Abstract
Mesocentrotus nudus is an important aquaculture species in East Asia, valued for its gonads as the only edible part. However, the molecular basis of gonadal differentiation in this species remains poorly understood. In this study, we determined that morphological gonadal differentiation occurs when individuals reach a test diameter of approximately 40 mm. Amino acid profiling revealed sex-specific differences between ovaries and testes, with higher levels of lysine, proline, alanine, and glutamic acid in testes, suggesting sexual dimorphism in metabolic demand. To investigate the regulatory mechanisms involved, we conducted integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses between differentiated and undifferentiated gonads. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) including retinoic acid, linoleic acid, and arachidonic acid, were significantly enriched in retinol metabolism, steroid biosynthesis, and amino acid metabolic pathways. Several key genes, such as GATA4, CYP17A1, and HSD17B, were identified as potential markers for gonadal differentiation. Furthermore, components of the TGF-β signaling pathway (Smads, Rbx1, SKP) and retinol metabolism genes (CYP26, CYP1A, CYP3A) exhibited sex-biased expression patterns. This study provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying sex differentiation in sea urchins and lays a molecular foundation for the development of sex-control breeding strategies.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-025-32582-x.
Keywords: Sea urchin, Gonadal differentiation, Sex-related genes, TGF-β signaling
Subject terms: Biochemistry, Developmental biology, Genetics, Molecular biology, Zoology
Introduction
Sea urchins have been widely used as model organisms in developmental biology and evolutionary research due to their unique embryology, transparent gametes, and phylogenetic position as invertebrate deuterostomes1–4. The sea urchin gonad is a highly prized delicacy in aquaculture, renowned for its exceptional commercial value. It is widely consumed in Japan, China, Korea, the United States, Canada, Chile, and several European countries5. Among the edible sea urchin species, M. nudus and Strongylocentrotus intermedius are the most widely farmed in various Asian countries, particularly in China6,7. Driven by rising market demand, sea urchin aquaculture in China has expanded steadily, with continuous innovation in cultivation techniques8–11. According to the China Fisheries Statistical Yearbook (2025), the aquaculture production of sea urchins reached approximately 7,375,843 tons12. Based on FAO data, global capture production of sea urchins in aquaculture was estimated to be just over 9,000 tons in 202013.
The gonadal quality of sea urchins, defined by attributes such as gonadal index, plumpness, color, and appearance, is not only a key determinant in market grading and pricing but also the primary target for selective breeding programs14. Studies have shown that sex is a major factor influencing sea urchin quality. Comparative analyses of gonadal nutritional composition and characteristics indicate that male gonads are generally more palatable and nutritious15–17. However, some studies suggest that females have a higher fatty acid content and better color, which can influence market value, and reflect sex-specific metabolic demands during gonadal development18–22. Moreover, sex-based differences in the expression of genes related to immune and stress responses have been observed in sea urchin coelomocytes23. Therefore, understanding the gonadal development process and its underlying molecular mechanisms is of great importance.
Numerous studies have shown that sex determination mechanisms are highly diverse and complex, yet those in echinoderms remain unclear. In contrast to vertebrates, which typically rely on well-defined sex-determining genes (SRY, DMRT1)24,25 and structured somatic support cells (Sertoli and granulosa cells) within the gonads26,27, invertebrates such as sea urchins lack heteromorphic sex chromosomes28,29 and possess different gonadal architectures, including nutritive phagocytes as the primary somatic component30,31. Furthermore, the timing of gonadal differentiation varies substantially across taxa32–34 and accurately identifying this timing is essential for implementing effective sex control breeding strategies. Advances in high-throughput sequencing technology have further enabled the decoding of gene regulatory networks involved in oogenesis and spermatogenesis. Many studies have utilized transcriptome sequencing to identify genes involved in sea urchin gonadal development. For example, S. intermedius and M. nudus have been investigated using RNA-Seq to identify differentially expressed genes in the testis and ovary35–37, as well as sex-biased microRNAs in gonadal tissues38. Recent studies have revealed that sex-specific gene expression occurs prior to metamorphosis in sea urchins, indicating that sex determination may begin at the larval stage. The early activation of meiotic and sex-related genes suggests the formation of a bipotential gonad primordium accompanied by sex-biased metabolic processes39. In addition, multiple sex-related genes have been identified in sea urchins, including members of the CYP family, Forkhead box L2 (foxl2), doublesex and mab-3 related transcription factor 1 (dmrt1), and nanos40. However, the genetic mechanisms underlying sex determination in sea urchins remain largely unclear.
M. nudus, a member of the Strongylocentrotidae family, is primarily found along the coasts of northern China, northern Japan, the Korean Peninsula, and the Russian Far East. To date, its genomic data remain unavailable. In the present study, we first determined the timing of morphological gonadal differentiation in M. nudus and analyzed the differences in amino acid composition between the testes and ovaries. Then, we applied a metabolomic approach using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight (LC-QTOF) along with transcriptomic analysis to identify differences in metabolites and gene expression between differentiated and undifferentiated ovaries and testes, and to explore potential molecular markers for detecting gonadal differentiation status. Furthermore, linkage networks were developed by analyzing the correlations between metabolites and regulatory genes involved in the differentiation of ovaries and testes. The findings of this study will offer new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying sex differentiation and development in sea urchins.
Results
Characteristics of the gonads of M. nudus
Given that sea urchins attain sexual maturity at 2–3 years of age, we examined gonadal development from 2 months after hatching (test diameter ~ 2.0 mm) to 2 years of age (test diameter ~ 40 mm). Firstly, the genetic sex of sea urchins was determined by PCR amplification, as described in our laboratory’s previous report41. As shown in Fig. 1, gonadal tissue becomes microscopically detectable within the coelom of sea urchins once the test diameter reaches ~ 5 mm (Fig. 1A, B). As individuals grow (test diameter ~ 8.0–13 mm), the gonadal tissue within the coelom progressively expands (Fig. 1 C, D). At this stage, the gonads of sea urchins remain undifferentiated, with sexually indistinguishable gonial cells lining the inner wall. By 2 years of age (test diameter ~ 40 mm), gonads begin to differentiate, with primary oocytes and basophilic spermatogonia or primary spermatocytes appearing in the germinal epithelium of ovaries and testes, respectively (Fig. 1 E–H). Moreover, differentiated testes exhibited higher proportions of lysine (an essential amino acid) and certain nonessential amino acids, including glutamic acid, glycine, alanine, and proline, compared to differentiated ovaries (Table 1). In contrast, no significant differences were observed in the fatty acid composition among the samples analyzed (Table S1).
Fig. 1.

Morphological and histological observations of juvenile gonads in sea urchins. Morphological observations based on anatomical dissection (top panels) and paraffin sections of gonads (bottom panels). Red triangles indicate the gonads. (A–D) represent M. nudus individuals with test diameters (TD) of 2, 5, 8, and 13 mm, respectively. (E, F) represent female and male sea urchins with a TD of 24 mm, and (G, H) represent female and male sea urchins with a TD of 40 mm. TD, test diameter; NP, nutritive phagocytes; Oo, oogonia; SPC, spermatocyte. Bar = 50 µm.
Table 1.
Amino acid composition analysis of gonadal tissues in adult sea urchins.
| Essential amino acids | Ovary (%) | Testis (%) | p-value | Nonessential amino acids | Ovary (%) | Testis (%) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leucine | 7.35 (0.08) | 8.00 (0.07) | 0.60 | Glutamic acid | 9.10 (0.10) | 13.70 (0.12) | 0.01 |
| Lysine | 6.77 (0.08) | 10.78 (0.09) | 0.03 | Glycine | 8.95 (0.10) | 11.48 (0.10) | 0.05 |
| Valine | 6.25 (0.07) | 6.14 (0.05) | 0.91 | Arginine | 7.37 (0.08) | 12.48 (0.11) | 0.15 |
| Threonine | 5.21 (0.06) | 5.68 (0.05) | 0.64 | Aspartic acid | 7.62 (0.09) | 10.99 (0.10) | 0.07 |
| Isoleucine | 4.88 (0.06) | 5.24 (0.05) | 0.67 | Serine | 5.00 (0.06) | 6.02 (0.05) | 0.21 |
| Phenylalanine | 4.32 (0.05) | 5.12 (0.04) | 0.31 | Tyrosine | 4.60 (0.05) | 4.54 (0.04) | 0.95 |
| Methionine | 2.01 (0.02) | 2.37 (0.02) | 0.57 | Alanine | 3.98 (0.04) | 5.60 (0.05) | 0.01 |
| Histidine | 2.18 (0.02) | 2.56 (0.02) | 0.38 | Proline | 2.97 (0.03) | 4.38 (0.04) | 0.04 |
Data are presented as mean values (g/kg), with percentages (%) indicating relative proportions of total amino acids. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Transcriptome analysis of undifferentiated and differentiated gonads
Overview of transcriptome sequencing
Total RNA was extracted from differentiated ovaries and testes (test diameter ~ 40 mm) and undifferentiated ovaries and testes (test diameter ~ 20 mm) for transcriptome sequencing. A total of 277,860,486 clean reads were generated, with a mean GC content of 43.2% and a mean Q30 of 95.25% (Table S2). Through de novo assembly, a total of 56,770 unigenes were obtained with an N50 value of 2,846 (Table S3). Subsequently, 25,652 unigenes were annotated by aligning them with various databases, including NR, SWISSPROT, COG, KOG, EGGNOG, KEGG, GO, PFAM and TREMBL database (Table S4). Principal component analysis (PCA) showed clear separation among the four groups: differentiated ovaries (DO), differentiated testes (DT), undifferentiated ovaries (UDO), and undifferentiated testes (UDT) (Figure S1). A total of 5,085 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between the DO and DT groups (fold change ≥ 2 and p < 0.01). Among these, 2,641 were up-regulated and 2,444 were down-regulated in the DT populations. Compared to the UDO sea urchins, the UDT group had 374 upregulated genes and 620 downregulated genes. In addition, compared with the differentiated ovaries and testes, the undifferentiated ovaries and testes showed 2,011 and 3,977 upregulated genes, and 2,718 and 4,185 downregulated genes, respectively (Figure S2).
DEGs enrichment results in GO and KEGG
To further determine the DEGs functions, we mapped all DEGs to GO and KEGG pathways. Compared to the DO group, the DT group displayed the most significantly enriched GO terms related to biological processes, including cellular component organization or biogenesis, reproductive process and reproduction. Enriched molecular function terms included structural molecule activity, translation regulator activity, and binding, while macromolecular complex, host cell part, and organelle part were the most enriched terms among cellular components (Fig. 2A). Similarly, compared to the UDO group, the UDT group exhibited highly enriched GO terms related to biological processes, such as metabolic process, cellular process, and response to stimulus, along with enriched molecular function terms catalytic activity, electron carrier activity, and binding, and cellular component terms membrane-enclosed lumen, nucleoid, and organelle part (Fig. 2B). In comparison to the DT group, the UDT group displayed enrichment in biological process terms cellular component organization or biogenesis, reproduction, and reproductive process, molecular function terms binding, molecular function regulator, and molecular transducer activity, and cellular component terms membrane-enclosed lumen, organelle part, and supramolecular complex (Fig. 3A). Lastly, the UDO group, when compared to the DO group, exhibited enriched GO terms for biological processes such as biological adhesion, metabolic process, and developmental process, molecular functions structural molecule activity, molecular transducer activity, and translation regulator activity, and cellular components extracellular region part, extracellular region, and membrane-enclosed lumen (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 2.

GO term enrichment analysis was performed for the DEGs between the compared gonadal groups. (A) GO term enrichment analysis of DEGs between differentiated ovaries and testes. (B) GO term enrichment analysis of DEGs between undifferentiated ovaries and testes.
Fig. 3.

GO term enrichment analysis was performed for the DEGs between the compared gonadal groups. (A) GO term enrichment analysis of DEGs between differentiated testes and undifferentiated testes. (B) GO term enrichment analysis of DEGs between differentiated ovaries and undifferentiated ovaries.
KEGG enrichment analysis identified significantly altered pathways (q < 0.05) in the transcriptome, with slight variations observed among the four groups. Specifically, in the DO vs. DT comparison, two metabolic pathways, ribosome (82 DEGs; upregulated: 3, downregulated: 79) and purine metabolism (40 DEGs; upregulated: 25, downregulated: 15) exhibited significant changes. In the DO vs. UDO comparison, 1,149 genes were mapped to 231 metabolic pathways, with only the ribosome pathway (81 DEGs; upregulated: 1, downregulated: 80) showing significant enrichment. In the DT vs. UDT comparison, seven pathways showed significant changes: extracellular matrix-receptor interaction (62 DEGs; upregulated: 55, downregulated: 7), TGF-β signaling pathway (36 DEGs; upregulated: 30, downregulated: 6), proteasome pathway (28 DEGs; upregulated: 1, downregulated: 27), homologous recombination (32 DEGs; upregulated: 1, downregulated: 31), purine metabolism (64 DEGs; upregulated: 23, downregulated: 41), DNA replication (37 DEGs; upregulated: 5, downregulated: 32), and mismatch repair (19 DEGs; upregulated: 2, downregulated: 17) (Fig. 4A). Finally, in the UDO vs. UDT comparison, 326 genes were mapped to 135 metabolic pathways, with 22 pathways exhibiting significant changes (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4.
KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs between the compared gonadal groups. (A) KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs between differentiated testes and undifferentiated testes. (B) KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs between undifferentiated ovaries and undifferentiated testes. The vertical axis shows KEGG pathways that are significantly enriched by DEGs, and the horizontal axis indicates the corresponding enrichment factors. Pathway maps are based on the KEGG database 42–44.
Identification of key sex-biased genes
Based on gene functions annotated by GO and KEGG, we identified several conserved sex-related genes that exhibited significant expression changes before and after gonadal differentiation, including hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase (HSD17B), GATA binding protein 4 (GATA4), SRY-box transcription factor 14 (SOX14), cytochrome P450 family 17 subfamily A member 1 (CYP17A1), CYCLIN A and CYCLIN B, DMRT1, FOXL2, SIX homeobox 4 (SIX4), ACTIVIN, Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF1). Based on the FPKM values from transcriptome data (Table S5), we found that GATA4, CYP17A1, FOXL2, ACTIVIN and WIF1 were predominantly expressed in undifferentiated gonads, suggesting their potential roles in the early stages of gonadal formation. In contrast, SOX14, HSD17B, CYCLIN A, and CYCLIN B showed higher expression in differentiated gonads, with SOX14 and DMRT1 exhibiting the highest expression levels in differentiated testes (Table 2).
Table 2.
Information on sex-biased gene expression between differentiated and undifferentiated gonads of M. nudus.
| Gene name | Function | Expression level | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DO | DT | UDO | UDT | ||
| SOX14 | Involved in sex determination and differentiation, gonadal development, neurogenesis, early embryonic development45 | 1.66a | 39.55a/c | 1.04d | 4.37c/d |
| HSD17B | Regulating transformation among androstenedione, testosterone, estrone and estradiol46 | 14.78a/b | 10.44a/c | 4.05b | 2.74c |
| GATA4 | Regulating the proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis of ovarian granulosa cells, promoting spermatogenesis and sex differentiation47 | 16.86b | 17.69c | 46.38b | 50.6c |
| CYP17A1 | Catalyzes steroid hormone synthesis, essential for androgen and estrogen production and gonadal development48 | 2.47b | 2.28c | 5.19b | 6.89c |
| CYCLIN A | Regulates DNA replication, mitosis, and meiosis49 | 73.34b | 46.86c | 1.89b | 2.45c |
| CYCLIN B | Regulates cell proliferation and promotes gonad development, mitosis, and meiosis50 | 113.06b | 97.94c | 3.62b | 3.58c |
| DMRT1 | Regulates sex determination and sex differentiation, testis development and male sex differentiation, important for spermatogenesis51 | 0a | 22.24a/c/d | 0 | 1.96c/d |
| FOXL2 | Regulates ovarian development and maintenance, involved in granulosa cell differentiation52 | 6.23b | 7.18c | 22.38b | 33.35c |
| SIX4 | Involved in gonad and muscle development; regulates cell differentiation and organogenesis53 | 1.29 | 2.65c | 0.77d | 0.52c/d |
| ACTIVIN | Regulates embryonic development, skeletal muscle, and reproductive development54 | 1.02b | 2.67 | 4.24b | 4.45 |
| WIF1 | Inhibits Wnt signaling; involved in cell differentiation and tissue development55 | 2.78 | 1.5c | 5.89 | 6.25c |
DO, differentiated ovaries; DT, differentiated testes; UDO, undifferentiated ovaries; UDT, undifferentiated testes. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05): a, DO vs. DT; b, DO vs. UDO; c, DT vs. UDT; d, UDT vs. UDO.
To validate the expression patterns of DEGs identified through Illumina sequencing, several key differential genes were further analyzed using qRT-PCR. The qRT-PCR results confirmed that their expression levels were consistent with the RNA-seq findings (Fig. 5). These results indicate that the observed changes in gene expression detected by RNA-seq accurately reflect the actual transcriptomic differences among the gonadal libraries.
Fig. 5.

Validation of six key differentially expressed genes in M. nudus by qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. DO, differentiated ovaries; DT, differentiated testes; UDO, undifferentiated ovaries; UDT, undifferentiated testes. Identical letters indicate no significant differences among individuals, whereas different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05).
Metabolomics analysis of undifferentiated and differentiated gonads
Metabolite differences between undifferentiated and differentiated gonads
To explore the metabolic differences among DO, UDO, DT, and UDO gonads in sea urchins, we generated comprehensive profiles of primary metabolites using UPLC-MS/MS. A total of 4,827 metabolites were identified across the four gonadal types. Among these, 975 metabolites showed significant changes between the DO and DT groups, with 481 upregulated and 494 downregulated (Figure S3). In the DO vs. UDO comparison, 2,520 differential metabolites were identified (1,164 upregulated and 1,356 downregulated), while in the DT vs. UDT comparison, 2,452 differential metabolites were observed (982 upregulated and 1,470 downregulated). Meanwhile, compared to the UDO group, 799 differential metabolites were identified in the UDT group, comprising 392 upregulated and 407 downregulated. A total of 56 differential metabolites were shared among the four comparison groups. The differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) primarily between the DO and DT groups mainly consisted of Pneumocandin B0, Luteolin 7-O-(2-apiosyl-4-glucosyl-6-malonyl)-glucoside, purine nucleosides, PA(LTE4/18:3(9Z,12Z,15Z)), Zotiraciclib and L-Tryptophan, N-(N(2)-(N-(N-(N-L-methionyl-L-alpha-glutamyl)-L-histidyl)-L-phenylalanyl)-L-arginyl). The DEMs predominantly consist of Thioridazine, Buprenorphine, Notoginsenoside I, PA(LTE4/18:3(9Z,12Z,15Z)), Zotiraciclib, and Cyclosquamosin D between the UDO and UDT groups. Meanwhile, Anabasine, Torulene, Protionamide sulfate, Methyl (Z)-5-(5-methyl-2-thienyl)-2-penten-4-ynoate, Furamidine, and 7-Mercaptoheptanoylthreonine are the main DEMs in the DO and UDO groups, and PIP(22:3(10Z,13Z,16Z)/20:4(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)-OH(20)), Elaterinide, CDP-DG(18:2(9Z,11Z)/PGE2), Pneumocandin B0, Methionyl-Arginine, and t Kaempferol 3-rhamnosyl-(1- > 3)(4'''-acetylrhamnosyl)(1- > 6)-glucoside are the main DEMs in the DT and UDT groups (Table 3).
Table 3.
Top three upregulated and downregulated metabolites.
| Group | DEMs ID | Name | Log2 FC | p-value | Regulated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DO vs DT | pos_7648 | Pneumocandin B0 | 37.64 | 0.03 | up |
| pos_3749 | Luteolin 7-O-(2-apiosyl-4-glucosyl-6-malonyl)-glucoside | 36.67 | 0.04 | up | |
| pos_2057 | methionine aspartate aspartate | 36.59 | 0.04 | up | |
| pos_4788 | PA(LTE4/18:3(9Z,12Z,15Z)) | -43.31 | 0.00 | down | |
| neg_2555 | Zotiraciclib | -42.06 | 0.00 | down | |
| neg_2342 | L-Tryptophan, N-(N(2)-(N-(N-(N-L-methionyl-L-alpha-glutamyl)-L-histidyl)-L-phenylalanyl)-L-arginyl)- | -40.97 | 0.01 | down | |
| DO vs UDO | neg_4104 | Thioridazine | 36.60 | 0.00 | up |
| neg_3564 | Buprenorphine | 35.73 | 0.02 | up | |
| pos_8367 | Notoginsenoside I | 35.65 | 0.01 | up | |
| pos_4788 | PA(LTE4/18:3(9Z,12Z,15Z)) | -43.31 | 0.00 | down | |
| neg_2555 | Zotiraciclib | -42.06 | 0.00 | down | |
| neg_2530 | Cyclosquamosin D | -41.67 | 0.01 | down | |
| DT vs UDT | pos_7729 | PIP(22:3(10Z,13Z,16Z)/20:4(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)-OH(20)) | 36.59 | 0.02 | up |
| neg_3678 | Elaterinide | 35.39 | 0.01 | up | |
| neg_3291 | CDP-DG(18:2(9Z,11Z)/PGE2) | 35.03 | 0.00 | up | |
| pos_7648 | Pneumocandin B0 | -37.64 | 0.04 | down | |
| pos_967 | Methionyl-Arginine | -36.14 | 0.02 | down | |
| pos_1925 | Kaempferol 3-rhamnosyl-(1- > 3)(4'''-acetylrhamnosyl)(1- > 6)-glucoside | -34.85 | 0.05 | down | |
| UDO vs UDT | pos_7367 | Anabasine | 4.97 | 0.04 | up |
| neg_1699 | Torulene | 4.83 | 0.03 | up | |
| pos_4721 | Protionamide sulfate | 4.39 | 0.05 | up | |
| pos_983 | Methyl (Z)-5-(5-methyl-2-thienyl)-2-penten-4-ynoate | -5.32 | 0.04 | down | |
| pos_10052 | Furamidine | -4.03 | 0.05 | down | |
| pos_1872 | 7-Mercaptoheptanoylthreonine | -3.92 | 0.04 | down |
KEGG analysis of differential metabolites
In the DO vs. DT group, 80 differential metabolites were enriched in KO pathways, with the most significant pathways including longevity regulating pathway—worm, the chloroalkane and chloroalkene degradation, the biosynthesis of various antibiotics, and the biosynthesis of siderophore group nonribosomal peptides (Fig. 6A). In the DO vs. UDO group, 229 differential metabolites were enriched in KO pathways, primarily associated with methane metabolism, inositol phosphate metabolism, eicosanoids, and histamine H2/H3 receptor agonists/antagonists (Fig. 6B). In the DT vs. UDT group, 236 differential metabolites were enriched in KO pathways, with key pathways including the biosynthesis of alkaloids derived from the shikimate pathway, the biosynthesis of various other secondary metabolites, serotonergic synapse, methane metabolism, isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis, phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis, butanoate metabolism, terpenoid backbone biosynthesis, and biosynthesis of plant hormones. (Fig. 6C) In the UDO vs. UDT group, 75 differential metabolites were enriched in KO pathways, mainly related to penicillins and the biosynthesis of siderophore group nonribosomal peptides.
Fig. 6.
KEGG pathway analysis of DEMs between the compared gonadal groups. The vertical axis represents the number of DEMs associated with each pathway, while the horizontal axis indicates the KEGG significantly pathways enriched by DEMs. Pathway maps are based on the KEGG database 42–44.
Integrative analysis of metabolomics and transcriptomics
Spearman correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between DEGs and DEMs (Table S6). In the DO vs. DT comparison, purine metabolite, pyrimidine metabolite, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, and biosynthesis of amino acids were identified as significantly co-enriched pathways. Within the DT group, the metabolites abundances of UDP, dUMP, xanthine, L-citrulline, and L-histidine were lower, whereas the levels of dGDP, pseudouridine 5’-phosphate, 3-dehydroquinate, and chorismate were higher. Additionally, NDK gene expression was upregulated (Fig. 7A). In the DO vs. UDO comparison, five metabolic pathways were significantly co-enriched: retinol metabolism, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, drug metabolism (cytochrome P450), linoleic acid metabolism, and arginine and proline metabolism. In the UDO group, the metabolites abundance of all-trans-4-oxoretinoic acid was lower, whereas 9-cis-retinal was higher, and the expression of CYP26, CYP1A, CYP3A, DHRS4, and RHD genes was upregulated (Fig. 7B). Compared to the DT group, the UDT group exhibited metabolites with lower abundances of ADP, UMP, uracil, dTMP, UDP, dTTP, and L-tyrosine, with NDK, AK9, TMK, and GART gene expression downregulated. This suggests that NDK, TMK, and GART are associated with testis differentiation (Fig. 7C). Additionally, the steroid biosynthesis pathway was significantly co-enriched in both the UDO and UDT groups. Notably, the UDT group exhibited higher levels of calcitetrol, while the expression of CYP51 and DHCR24 was downregulated, suggesting a potential role for steroid biosynthesis in early gonadal differentiation processes (Fig. 7D).
Fig. 7.

An integrative metabolic network map constructed from differentially expressed genes and metabolites between the compared gonadal groups. (A) DO vs DT group. (B) DO vs UDO group. (C) DT vs UDT group. (D) UDO vs UDT group. DO, differentiated ovaries; DT, differentiated testes; UDO, undifferentiated ovaries; UDT, undifferentiated testes. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are represented by boxes, and differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) are represented by circles. Red indicates upregulation, while green indicates downregulation.
Discussion
In this study, we revealed that the gonads of sea urchins with a test diameter of less than 20 mm remain undifferentiated, and morphological gonadal differentiation appears to occur when the test diameter reaches between 20 and 40 mm. Following this differentiation, sea urchins enter the reproductive cycle, progressing through four distinct stages: (1) inter-gametogenesis and nutritive phagocytes (NP) phagocytosis (Stage 1), (2) pre-gametogenesis and NP renewal (Stage 2), (3) gametogenesis and NP utilization (Stage 3), and (4) the culmination of gametogenesis (Stage 4), marked by NP exhaustion and spawning37,56. Previous studies have reported transcriptomic differences across these stages and identified candidate genes related to growth and fatty acid biosynthesis and metabolism, particularly between Stage 1 and Stage 257. In addition, integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses of gonads from Stages 1 to 3 revealed six differentially accumulated metabolites associated with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), along with multiple DEGs involved in PUFA synthesis and regulation58. Here, we compared the amino acid composition results with the metabolomic data to identify consistent patterns of amino acid metabolism between differentiated ovaries and testes. Most amino acids detected in the biochemical composition analysis, including L-phenylalanine, L-arginine, L-isoleucine, L-methionine, and L-threonine, were also identified in the metabolomic dataset, and their levels showed no significant differences between differentiated ovaries and testes, supporting the reliability of the metabolic profiling. However, several highly polar or easily oxidized amino acids were not detected, likely due to their low ionization efficiency or instability during LC–MS analysis.
Unlike vertebrates, which possess specialized somatic support cells such as Sertoli cells (testis) and granulosa cells (ovary) that play active roles in directing germ cell fate59, sea urchin gonads contain nutritive phagocytes that perform both nutritional and regulatory functions60. Moreover, the timing and regulation of the germ cell cycle differ substantially between vertebrates and sea urchins. In sea urchins, germ cells typically enter meiosis at later developmental stages, and gametogenesis is tightly synchronized with seasonal and environmental cues60,61. However, due to the asynchronous nature of gonadal development in sea urchins and the fact that germ cell meiosis occurs entirely within the body62, some differentiated male samples contained a small number of spermatids, as shown in histological sections (Figure S4-I). Consequently, several meiosis-related genes, including cntd1, sycp1, ccnb3, and cdk1, were also identified in this study.
It has been reported that molecular sex differentiation occurs earlier than morphological sex differentiation63, therefore, identifying molecular markers for gonadal differentiation is crucial. The expression of GATA4, and CYP17A1 was significantly higher in undifferentiated ovaries and testes, while HSD17B exhibited higher expression in differentiated ovaries and testes (Fig. 5). These genes may serve as potential molecular markers for identifying gonadal differentiation status in sea urchins and are known to play roles in gonadal development across vertebrate species. In mammals, GATA4 plays a key role in reproductive and gonadal differentiation during embryonic development; its conditional knockout in mice reduces sperm quantity and motility, causes Sertoli cell vacuolation, impairs spermatogenesis, and results in testicular atrophy and infertility64,65. In invertebrates, GATA4 has been identified in Argopecten scallops, where its expression is higher in testes than in ovaries; however, its precise function in gonadal development remains unclear66. Cyp17a1 is essential for the biosynthesis of sex steroid hormones and plays a crucial role in female sex determination in vertebrates48. Although homologs of CYP17A have been identified in various invertebrate species and exhibit sexually dimorphic expression patterns, their functional roles in gonadal development remain largely uncharacterized67. HSD17B enzymes play key roles in lipid and steroid metabolism and have been extensively studied in vertebrates68. In invertebrates, such as Patinopecten yessoensis, high expression levels of hsd17b8 and hsd17b11 were observed in ovaries, and their expression was associated with gonadal maturation, showing a progressive increase from early differentiation to mature stages69. Doublesex orthologs, including Dmrt1, exhibit male-biased expression in sea urchins, being highly expressed in the testis but absent in the ovaries51. Notably, Dmrt1 is also expressed at early stages of embryonic development, suggesting a potential role in early gonadal determination39. FoxL2, a highly conserved regulator of ovarian differentiation in chordates, even shows female-biased expression in mollusks70,71. In echinoderms, however, FoxL2 is relatively abundantly expressed in both male and female gonads72, and single-cell RNA-seq analyses have revealed its presence in follicle cell–like clusters across three echinoderm species73. Interestingly, in sea urchins, FoxL2 exhibits higher expression in undifferentiated gonads than in differentiated gonads, suggesting a potential role during early gonadal development in echinoderms. Further studies are needed to elucidate the functional roles of these genes in the process of gonadal differentiation in sea urchins.
To date, of the more than 20 identified master sex-determining genes in vertebrates, 13 are associated with the TGF-β signaling pathway, including Amh, Amhr2, Bmpr1b, Gsdf, and Gdf674. A total of 36 genes in the TGF-β signaling pathway were differentially expressed between differentiated and undifferentiated testes in sea urchin. Among them, thirty genes, such as mothers against decapentaplegic homologs (Smad4 and Smad1), fibrillin, bone morphogenetic protein and its receptor, multiple epidermal growth factor-like (EGF-like) domains protein, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) were highly expressed in undifferentiated testes, whereas six genes, such as mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 6-like (Smad6-like), RING-box protein 1(Rbx1), and S-phase kinase-associated protein (SKP), exhibited higher expression levels in differentiated testes. Smad4 has been identified as a pivotal regulator of female germ cell viability, playing an indispensable role in oocyte differentiation and the progression of meiosis in murine models75. In contrast, the widespread expression of Smad1 in the immature testis facilitates sufficient BMP signaling through the Smad1 axis, thereby contributing to testicular development76. The high expression of Smad6 protein at the onset of spermatogenesis suggests its potential involvement in testis differentiation77. MAPK signaling plays an established role in sex determination by being essential for the proper expression of Sry and Sox9 during testis development78. Rbx1 is highly expressed in the testis, particularly during the spermatocyte stage in male Eriocheir sinensis79, and exhibits dynamic distribution throughout oocyte maturation in mice, has been shown to be essential for gametogenesis, as its knockdown leads to metaphase arrest in most oocytes80, thereby implicating its crucial role in both spermatogenesis and oocyte meiotic progression. The members of TGF-β superfamily may play a crucial regulatory role in spermatogenesis and male gonadal differentiation in sea urchins.
The integrated transcriptome–metabolome analysis revealed that DEGs and DEMs were enriched in several key pathways, including retinol metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and steroid biosynthesis (Fig. 7). In the metabolomic analysis, both estradiol and testosterone were detected in gonads. However, their abundances did not differ significantly between differentiated and undifferentiated ovaries or testes. Although vertebrate-like sex steroid hormones have been detected in echinoderms using various methodologies81,82, many of the enzymes and receptors required for steroidogenesis in vertebrates, such as CYP19a which encodes aromatase responsible for converting androgens to estrogens, are absent in invertebrate genomes, and consequently, invertebrates, including echinoderms, are generally considered unable to synthesize sex steroids endogenously83,84. Therefore, the role of sex steroid hormones in sea urchin sex differentiation remains to be further investigated. Among the metabolites, retinoic acid (RA), linoleic acid, and arachidonic acid showed sex-specific patterns of accumulation and were strongly correlated with the expression of genes such as CYP26, CYP1A, and CYP3A, suggesting that retinoic acid signaling plays a central role in sea urchin gonadal differentiation (Fig. 7B, C), as it does in germ cell meiotic initiation in vertebrates. Retinoic acid has been shown to induce Stra8 expression in embryonic ovaries, thereby influencing the initiation of meiosis in both female germ cells85. Meanwhile, the RA-degrading enzyme Cyp26b1 prevents premature Stra8 expression in embryonic testes, delaying meiosis until postnatal development86. Cyp26a1 functions as a meiosis-inhibiting factor and plays a pivotal role in directing gonadal sexual fate toward the female pathway in zebrafish87. Moreover, retinoic acid signaling can promote ovarian development by activating female-specific genes such as Foxl2, whereas DMRT1 restricts retinoic acid receptor (RARα) activity, thereby preventing Foxl2 induction and safeguarding testicular fate88. In addition, the significant upregulation of ribosome and purine metabolism pathways in ovaries suggests that oogenesis may require a higher energy investment than spermatogenesis, indicating a potential trade-off between reproductive activity and somatic growth in sea urchins, as has been observed in other organisms89,90.
Conclusions
In summary, we investigated gonadal development in M. nudus from 2 months post-fertilization (test diameter ~ 2.0 mm) to 2 years of age (test diameter ~ 40 mm), and found that gonadal differentiation begins around 2 years of age. Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses revealed that differentiated ovaries exhibited elevated amino acid and nucleic acid synthesis activity, sexual dimorphism in growth may exist among sea urchins. By combining multi-omics approaches, key genes such as GATA4, HSD17B, and CYP17A1, along with metabolites including retinoic acid, linoleic acid, and arachidonic acid, were identified as potential markers involved in sex differentiation and germ cell development. Among them, the retinol metabolism pathway appears to play a crucial role in regulating gonadal differentiation in sea urchins. Overall, this work enhances our understanding of the molecular regulation of gonadal differentiation in echinoderms and offers a valuable foundation for the development of sex control breeding strategies in M. nudus aquaculture.
Materials and methods
Experimental animals
Sea urchins used in the present study were laboratory-maintained individuals obtained from the Key Laboratory of Mariculture & Stock Enhancement in North China′s Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Dalian Ocean University. They were maintained in 0.5 m3 seawater tanks under controlled conditions (17 ± 1 °C, salinity 30‰, pH 8.02 ± 0.04) and fed kelp once daily. Gonadal differentiation in juvenile sea urchins was first observed when individuals reached a test diameter of approximately 2 ± 0.2 mm. A total of 24 sea urchins were used for integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses, as well as qRT-PCR validation, including 12 adults (test diameter ~ 40 mm) and 12 juveniles (test diameter ~ 20 mm). First, the genetic sex of sea urchins was determined by PCR amplification, as described in our laboratory’s previous study41. Subsequently, a subset of gonadal tissue was subjected to histological analysis to confirm the gonadal developmental stage. All adults were confirmed to be at the same reproductive stage (Figure S4).
Histology, amino acid and fatty acid composition analysis in gonadal tissues
Gonadal tissues were collected by dissection from female and male sea urchins, respectively. A portion of each gonadal tissue was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for histological analysis, while the remaining tissue was immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C for subsequent RNA extraction, enzyme activity and amino acid composition analyses. Following fixation, the tissues were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove excess PFA, then embedded in Optimal Cutting Temperature (O.C.T.) compound. Sections of 5 μm thickness were prepared using a Leica CM 1900 microtome, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Servicebio, Wuhan, China), and examined for gonadal phases under a Leica DM4B microscope.
After genetic sex identification and histological examination of the gonads, three stage II ovaries and three stage II testes were selected for amino acid and fatty acid composition analysis. Amino acid profiles were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and fatty acid composition was determined using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Both analyses were performed by Qingdao Kechuang Quality Testing Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China) following standard protocols.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis
Total RNA was separately extracted from three differentiated and three undifferentiated ovaries, as well as from three differentiated and three undifferentiated testes, for qRT-PCR analysis using the SV Total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Z3100), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentration and purity were measured with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer, and its integrity was evaluated via 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Subsequently, 1 μg of high-quality RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript® First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, RR047A).
The qRT-PCR reaction was carried out on a LightCycler® 96 System (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) using the Hieff® qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Yeasen, Shanghai, China). Each 20 μL reaction mixture contained 10 μL of SYBR Green Mix, 6.4 μL of DEPC-treated water, 0.8 μL each of forward and reverse primers, and 2 μL of cDNA (1 μg/μL). The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s. Primer sequences are listed in Table S7, all primers were confirmed to produce a single, specific amplification band (Figure S5). All analyses were performed with three biological replicates, and each reaction was conducted in triplicate. The Ubiquitin gene of M. nudus was used as the internal control to normalize the expression levels of target genes37. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent samples t-test in SPSS 22.0. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Transcriptomics analysis
Based on histological analysis of gonadal tissues, three samples each of differentiated ovaries (DO), differentiated testes (DT), undifferentiated ovaries (UDO), and undifferentiated testes (UDT) were used for RNA extraction and subsequent RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Total RNA was extracted from the collected gonadal tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Following quality assessment, 1 μg of total RNA per sample was used to construct sequencing libraries using the NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The libraries were subsequently sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform to generate high-quality transcriptome data, provided by Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). To ensure data quality, raw reads in FASTQ format were initially processed using in-house Perl scripts. Clean reads were obtained by removing adapter sequences, reads containing poly-N, and low-quality sequences. Quality metrics, including Q20, Q30, GC content, and sequence duplication levels, were calculated for the clean data. De novo transcriptome assembly was conducted using Trinity (version: trinity-v2.5.1)91. Gene function annotation was performed via BLAST searches (E-value < 1e−5) against major public databases, including NR (NCBI non-redundant protein sequences), Pfam, KOG, COG, eggNOG, Swiss-Prot, KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes)43, and GO (Gene Ontology). Differential expression analysis was carried out using the DESeq R package (v1.10.1). P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method to control the false discovery rate (FDR). Genes with adjusted p-values < 0.05 and |log₂ (fold change) |> 1 were considered significantly differentially expressed.
Metabolite extraction and detection
A total of 24 gonadal tissue samples were collected, including six biological replicates each of DO, DT, UDO, and UDT, for non-targeted metabolomic profiling. Metabolomics analysis was conducted by Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China) using an LC–MS/MS platform. The analytical system consisted of a Waters ACQUITY UPLC I-Class PLUS system coupled to a Waters Xevo G2-XS QTof high-resolution mass spectrometer92. Chromatographic separation was performed using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (1.8 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm)92. Mass spectrometry was conducted in MSE mode with data acquisition controlled by MassLynx v4.2 software. Raw spectral data were processed using Progenesis QI software for peak detection, alignment, and normalization92. Metabolite identification was achieved through interrogation of the METLIN database and Biomarker’s in-house spectral library. Metabolites with missing values in more than 50% of samples per group were excluded, and internal standard normalization was applied to ensure comparability across samples92. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Spearman correlation analysis (SCA) were performed to assess sample reproducibility and data quality. Differential metabolites were identified using orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) and univariate statistical tests (t-test)93, with significance thresholds set at fold change (FC) > p value < 0.05 and variable importance in projection (VIP) > 1. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of differential metabolites was conducted using a hypergeometric distribution test94.
Integrative analysis of metabolomics and transcriptomics
To explore coordinated molecular changes, DEGs and DEMs identified among the gonadal groups were subjected to integrative analysis. Prior to correlation analysis, gene expression and metabolite abundance data were standardized using Z-score transformation. Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) were then calculated for each gene–metabolite pair. Pairs exhibiting strong correlations (|PCC|> 0.80, p < 0.05) were considered significantly associated. To further interpret these associations, shared KEGG metabolic pathways enriched by both DEGs and DEMs were identified. Correlation patterns within these common pathways were examined to uncover potential regulatory interactions and functional convergence between gene expression and metabolite accumulation.
Ethics approval
The study was conducted in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Dalian Ocean University (Approval No. DLOU20250006).
Human and animal rights
All personnel involved in the study underwent comprehensive training in animal care, handling techniques, and specific experimental procedures to ensure the minimization of animal discomfort and adherence to ethical standards.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, Z.S., data curation, A.A. and W.S., investigation, W.S., methodology, A.A., W.S., X.H., and H.X., writing—original draft, A.A. and Z.S., writing-review & editing, Z.S., funding acquisition, Z.S. and Y.C. All authors contributed to and critically reviewed the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Plan Project of Liaoning Province [grant number: 2023-MSLH-006], and the Liaoning Province Xingliao Talents Plan Project [grant number: XLYC2002107].
Data availability
The datasets presented in this research are available from online repositories. Repository names and accession numbers are given below: NCBI’s BioProject data base: accession PRJNA1266096.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Zhihui Sun, Email: sunzhihui@dlou.edu.cn.
Yaqing Chang, Email: yqchang@dlou.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Stimpson, W. The Crustacea and Echinodermata of the pacific shores of North America. Houghton and Company. (1857).
- 2.Adonin, L., Drozdov, A. & Barlev, N. A. Sea urchin as a universal model for studies of gene networks. Front. Genet.11, 627259 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marlétaz, F. et al. Analysis of the P. lividus sea urchin genome highlights contrasting trends of genomic and regulatory evolution in deuterostomes. Cell Genomics.3, 100295 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.Drozdov, A., Lebedev, E. & Adonin, L. Comparative analysis of bivalve and sea urchin genetics and development: Investigating the dichotomy in bilateria. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 17163 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lawrence, J. M. Developments in aquaculture and fisheries science. Edible Sea Urchin Biol Ecol.37, 1–529 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takagi, S., Hasegawa, N., Watanabe, T., Sakai, Y. & Unuma, T. Dietary protein requirement for somatic growth and gonad production in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius at different life stages. Aquaculture575, 739748 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu, H., Chang, Y. Q. Sea urchin aquaculture in China. Echinoderm aquaculture. 127–146 (2015).
- 8.Yu, J., Yan, T., Kong, H. J. O. & Management, C. Exploring the management mode for breeding new species suitable for deep sea mariculture in China: Best practices, challenges, and prospects. Ocean Coast. Manag.261, 107508 (2025). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cen, Y. et al. The culture of the tropical sea urchin Salmacis sphaeroides: A new candidate for aquaculture in South China. Aquac Rep.39, 102371 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xu, W., Liu, Y., Li, M., Lu, S. & Chen, S. Advances in biotechnology and breeding innovations in China’s marine aquaculture. Adv Biotechnol.2, 38 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rubilar, T. & Cardozo, D. Blue growth: Sea urchin sustainable aquaculture, innovative approaches. Rev. Biol. Trop.69, 474–486 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fisheries Bureau of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. China Agricultural Press, Beijing. (2025).
- 13.Zilia, F., Orsi, L., Costantini, M., Tedesco, D. E. A. & Sugni, M. Case study of life cycle assessment and sustainable business model for sea urchin waste. Clean Environ Syst.8, 100108 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu, L. et al. Relationships among morphological traits, body weight, and gonadal development in juvenile Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Aquaculture537, 736516 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Archana, A. A. A. & Babu, K. Nutrient composition and antioxidant activity of gonads of sea urchin Stomopneustesvariolaris. Food Chem.197, 597–602 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Phillips, K. et al. Effect of gender, diet and storage time on the physical properties and sensory quality of sea urchin (Evechinus chloroticus) gonads. Aquaculture288, 205–215 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Murata, Y., Yoshimura, H. & Unuma, T. Compositions of extractive components in the testes and ovaries of various sea urchins: Comparisons among species, sexes, and maturational status. Fish. Sci.86, 203–213 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhao, C., Zhang, W., Chang, Y. & Liu, P. Test and gonad characteristics in different genders of cultivated sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus intermedius, Agassiz): First insight into sexual identification. Afr. J. Biotech.9, 7560–7563 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Somjee, U., Shankar, A. & Falk, J. J. Can sex-specific metabolic rates provide insight into patterns of metabolic scaling?. Integr. Comp. Biol.62, 1460–1470 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chen, H. et al. Comparative physiological and transcriptomic profiling offers insight into the sexual dimorphism of hepatic metabolism in size-dimorphic spotted scat (Scatophagus argus). Life.11, 589 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sun, J. L. et al. Sexual size dimorphism in golden pompano (Trachinotus blochii): Potential roles of changes in energy allocation and differences in muscle metabolism. Front. Mar. Sci.9, 1009896 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Costa, D. N., Santosa, S. & Jensen, M. D. Sex differences in the metabolism of glucose and fatty acids by adipose tissue and skeletal muscle in humans. Physiol. Rev.105, 897–934 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pérez-Portela, R. & Leiva, C. Sex-specific transcriptomic differences in the immune cells of a key Atlantic-Mediterranean sea urchin. Front. Mar. Sci.9, 908387 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nagahama, Y., Chakraborty, T., Paul-Prasanth, B., Ohta, K., Nakamura, M. Sex determination, gonadal sex differentiation, and plasticity in vertebrate species. Physiological reviews. 101, 1237–1308 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Curzon, A. Y., Shirak, A., Ron, M. & Seroussi, E. Master-key regulators of sex determination in fish and other vertebrates: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24, 2468 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Song, H., Park, H. J., Lee, W. Y. & Lee, K. H. Models and molecular markers of spermatogonial stem cells in vertebrates: to find models in nonmammals. Stem Cells Int.2022(1), 4755514 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Song, Y., Hu, W., Ge, W. J. G. & Endocrinology, C. Establishment of transgenic zebrafish (Danio rerio) models expressing fluorescence proteins in the oocytes and somatic supporting cells. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.314, 113907 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eno, C. C., Bottger, S. A. & Walker, C. W. Methods for karyotyping and for localization of developmentally relevant genes on the chromosomes of the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotuspurpuratus. Biol Bull.217, 306–312 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Saotome, K., Kamimura, R., Kurokura, H. & Hirano, R. Male chromosomes of sea urchin hybrid andromerogones created with cryopreserved sperm. Zoolog. Sci.19, 185–189 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Eckelbarger, K. J. & Hodgson, A. N. Development, invertebrate oogenesis: A review and synthesis: comparative ovarian morphology, accessory cell function and the origins of yolk precursors. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev.65, 71–140 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hernandez, E., Vázquez, O. A., Torruco, A. & Rahman, M. S. Reproductive cycle and gonadal development of the Atlantic sea urchin Arbacia punctulata in the Gulf of Mexico: Changes in nutritive phagocytes in relation to gametogenesis. Mar. Biol. Res.16, 177–194 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 32.James, P., Siikavuopio, S., Johansson, G. S. A guide to the sea urchin reproductive cycle and staging sea urchin gonad samples. Tromsø: Nofima. (2011).
- 33.Díaz-Martínez, J. P., Mejía-Gutiérrez, L. M., Islas-Villanueva, V. & Benítez-Villalobos, F. Trioecy is maintained as a time-stable mating system in the pink sea urchin Toxopneustes roseus from the Mexican Pacific. Sci. Rep.12, 21408 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang, J. et al. Molecular cloning and sexually dimorphic expression analysis of nanos2 in the sea urchin, Mesocentrotus nudus. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, 2705 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jia, Z. et al. De novo transcriptome sequencing and comparative analysis to discover genes involved in ovarian maturity in Strongylocentrotus nudus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D: Genomics Proteomics23, 27–38 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gou, P., Wang, Z., Yang, J., Wang, X. & Qiu, X. Comparative transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes in the testis and ovary of sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus intermedius). Fishes.7, 152 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sun, Z. H., Zhang, J., Zhang, W. J. & Chang, Y. Q. Gonadal transcriptomic analysis and identification of candidate sex-related genes in Mesocentrotus nudus. Gene698, 72–81 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mi, X. et al. Identification and profiling of sex-biased microRNAs from sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus gonad by Solexa deep sequencing. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D: Genomics Proteomics10, 1–8 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pieplow, C., Furze, A., Gregory, P., Oulhen, N. & Wessel, G. M. Sex specific gene expression is present prior to metamorphosis in the sea urchin. Dev. Biol.517, 217–233 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Su, W.-Y. et al. Characterization and sexual dimorphic expression of Cytochrome P450 genes in gonads of the sea urchin (Mesocentrotus nudus). Aquac Rep.36, 102137 (2024). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cui, Z. et al. Identification of sex-specific markers through 2b-RAD sequencing in the sea urchin (Mesocentrotus nudus). Front. Genet.12, 717538 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci.28(11), 1947–1951 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.28(1), 27–30 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Matsuura, Y. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG: Biological systems database as a model of the real world. Nucleic Acids Res.53(D1), D672–D677 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hu, Y., Wang, B. & Du, H. A review on sox genes in fish. Rev. Aquac.13, 1986–2003 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chen, R. et al. Characterization and Functional analysis of the 17-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 (hsd17b2) gene during sex reversal in the ricefield Eel (Monopterus albus). Int. J. Mol. Sci.25, 9063 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang, Z. et al. Polymorphism within the GATA binding protein 4 gene is significantly associated with goat litter size. Anim. Biotechnol.34, 4291–4300 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yang, L. et al. Cyp17a1 is required for female sex determination and male fertility by regulating sex steroid biosynthesis in fish. Endocrinology162, bqa205 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhou, Z. et al. Function analysis and molecular characterization of cyclin A in ovary development of oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense. Gene788, 145583 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhang, W. et al. RNA interference analysis of the functions of cyclin B in male reproductive development of the oriental river prawn (Macrobrachium nipponense). Genes13, 2079 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Cui, Z. et al. Testis-specific expression pattern of dmrt1 and its putative regulatory region in the sea urchin (Mesocentrotus nudus). Comp Biochem Physiol Part B: Biochem Mol Biol.257, 110668 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sun, J.-J. et al. Identification and functional analysis of foxl2 and nodal in sea cucumber Apostichopusjaponicus. Gene Expr Patterns.44, 119245 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Heiat, M. et al. Knockdown of SIX4 inhibits pancreatic cancer cells via apoptosis induction. Med. Oncol.40, 287 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Richman, J. & Phelps, M. Activin signaling pathway specialization during embryonic and skeletal muscle development in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Mar. Biotechnol.26, 766–775 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Alshareef, A., Peters, A. C., Gélébart, P., Chen, W. & Lai, R. Gene methylation and silencing of WIF1 is a frequent genetic abnormality in mantle cell lymphoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 893 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Walker, C. W., Unuma, T., Lesser, M. P. Gametogenesis and reproduction of sea urchins. In Developments in aquaculture and fisheries science. 37, 11–33. (2007).
- 57.Wang, H. et al. Metabolomic changes and polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis during gonadal growth and development in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D: Genom Proteom32, 100611 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang, H., Ding, J., Ding, S. & Chang, Y. Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses identify critical genes in eicosapentaenoic acid biosynthesis and metabolism in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus intermedius. Sci. Rep.10, 1697 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Carré, G. A., Greenfield, A. The gonadal supporting cell lineage and mammalian sex determination: the differentiation of sertoli and granulosa cells. Molecular Mechanisms of Cell Differentiation in Gonad Development. 58, 47–66 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 60.Walker, C. W., Lesser, M. & Unuma, T. Sea urchin gametogenesis: Structural, functional and molecular/genomic biology. Dev Aquac fish Sci.38, 25–43 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li, Z. & Yang, Y. Development, reproductive physiology and molecular mechanisms underlying testicular development and spermatogenesis in echinoderms: A marine invertebrate deuterostomes. Mol. Reprod. Dev.92, e70011 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Walker, C. W., Harrington, L. M., Lesser, M. P. & Fagerberg, W. R. Nutritive phagocyte incubation chambers provide a structural and nutritive microenvironment for germ cells of Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, the green sea urchin. Biol. Bull.209, 31–48 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wei, H. et al. Sexual development of the hermaphroditic scallop Argopecten irradians revealed by morphological, endocrine and molecular analysis. Front Cell Dev Biol.9, 646754 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.LaVoie, H. A. The role of GATA in mammalian reproduction. Exp. Biol. Med.228, 1282–1290 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kyrönlahti, A. et al. GATA4 regulates Sertoli cell function and fertility in adult male mice. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.333, 85–95 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chen, M. et al. Transcriptomic analyses of hermaphroditic gonads at different stages revealing candidate genes for sex differentiation and gonad growth/maturation in QN Orange scallops. Aquac. Res.53, 3696–3705 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 67.Shangguan, X. et al. Cyp17a effected by endocrine disruptors and its function in gonadal development of Hyriopsis cumingii. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.323, 114028 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kemiläinen, H. et al. The hydroxysteroid (17β) dehydrogenase family gene HSD17B12 is involved in the prostaglandin synthesis pathway, the ovarian function, and regulation of fertility. Endocrinology157, 3719–3730 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Thitiphuree, T. Elucidation of biosynthetic pathway for sex steroids during gametogenesis in bivalve (Doctoral dissertation, Tohoku University). (2018).
- 70.Biason-Lauber, A. WNT4, RSPO1, and FOXL2 in sex development. In seminars in reproductive medicine. In Seminars in reproductive medicine. Thieme medical publishers. 30, 387–395 (2012) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 71.Ning, J. et al. Identification and functional analysis of a sex-biased transcriptional factor Foxl2 in the bay scallop Argopecten irradians irradians. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B: Biochem Mol Biol.256, 110638 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhang, J., Sun, Z.-H., Liu, B.-Z., Su, W.-Y. & Chang, Y.-Q. Sexually dimorphic expression of foxl2 in the sea urchin (Mesocentrotus nudus). Gene Expr. Patterns46, 119280 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Oulhen, N. et al. Conservation and contrast in cell states of echinoderm ovaries. Mol. Reprod. Dev.91, e23721 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Pan, Q. et al. Evolution of master sex determiners: TGF-β signalling pathways at regulatory crossroads. Philos Trans R Soc B.376, 20200091 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wu, Q. et al. Sexual fate change of XX germ cells caused by the deletion of SMAD4 and STRA8 independent of somatic sex reprogramming. PLoS Biol.14, e1002553 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Itman, C. & Loveland, K. L. Smads and cell fate: Distinct roles in specification, development, and tumorigenesis in the testis. IUBMB Life65, 85–97 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Itman, C. & Loveland, K. L. SMAD expression in the testis: An insight into BMP regulation of spermatogenesis. Dev Dyn: Off Publ Am Assoc Anatomists.237, 97–111 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bogani, D. et al. Loss of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 4 (MAP3K4) reveals a requirement for MAPK signalling in mouse sex determination. PLoS Biol.7, e1000196 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhang, J.-S., Li, X.-J., Yang, L., Li, W.-W. & Wang, Q. Expression pattern and functional analysis of the two RING box protein RBX in spermatogenesis of Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis. Gene668, 237–245 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Zhou, L. et al. The role of RING box protein 1 in mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. PLoS ONE8, e68964 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dewi, K. H., Masturah, M. & Wan Daud, W. R. Parameter optimization in the extraction of sea cucumber (Holothuria scabra J) as a source of testosterone. Adv Mater Res.233, 1358–1365 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 82.Thongbuakaew, T., Suwansa-Ard, S., Chaiyamoon, A., Cummins, S. F. & Sobhon, P. Sex steroids and steroidogenesis-related genes in the sea cucumber, Holothuriascabra and their potential role in gonad maturation. Sci. Rep.11, 2194 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lafont, R. & Mathieu, M. Steroids in aquatic invertebrates. Ecotoxicology16, 109–130 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Scott, A. P. Do mollusks use vertebrate sex steroids as reproductive hormones? II. Critical review of the evidence that steroids have biological effects. Steroids78, 268–281 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Koubova, J. et al. Retinoic acid regulates sex-specific timing of meiotic initiation in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.103, 2474–2479 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kumar, S. et al. Sex-specific timing of meiotic initiation is regulated by Cyp26b1 independent of retinoic acid signalling. Nat. Commun.2, 151 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rodriguez-Mari, A. et al. Retinoic acid metabolic genes, meiosis, and gonadal sex differentiation in zebrafish. PLoS ONE8, e73951 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Minkina, A. et al. DMRT1 protects male gonadal cells from retinoid-dependent sexual transdifferentiation. Dev. Cell29, 511–520 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Powell, M. L., Marsh, A. G. & Watts, S. A. Biochemical and energy requirements of gonad development in regular sea urchins. Dev Aquac Fish Sci.43, 51–64 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 90.Marsh, A. G., Powell, M. L. & Watts, S. A. Biochemical and energy requirements of gonad development. Dev Aquac Fish Sci.38, 45–57 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 91.Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol.29, 644–652 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Wang, J. et al. Serum metabolomics for early diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by UHPLC-QTOF/MS. Metabolomics12, 116 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 93.Thévenot, E. A., Roux, A., Xu, Y., Ezan, E. & Junot, C. J. Analysis of the human adult urinary metabolome variations with age, body mass index, and gender by implementing a comprehensive workflow for univariate and OPLS statistical analyses. J. Proteome Res.14, 3322–3335 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics: J Integr Biol.16, 284–287 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets presented in this research are available from online repositories. Repository names and accession numbers are given below: NCBI’s BioProject data base: accession PRJNA1266096.


