Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2005 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Chem. 2005 Feb 11;280(18):17901–17909. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500510200

Analysis of Glycosylation in CDG-Ia Fibroblasts by Fluorophore-assisted Carbohydrate Electrophoresis

IMPLICATIONS FOR EXTRACELLULAR GLUCOSE AND INTRACELLULAR MANNOSE 6-PHOSPHATE*,S

Ningguo Gao 1, Jie Shang 1, Mark A Lehrman 1,
PMCID: PMC1282451  NIHMSID: NIHMS2727  PMID: 15708848

Abstract

Phosphomannomutase (PMM) deficiency causes congenital disorder of glycosylation (CDG)-Ia, a broad spectrum disorder with developmental and neurological abnormalities. PMM converts mannose 6-phosphate (M6P) to mannose-1-phosphate, a precursor of GDP-mannose used to make Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol (lipid-linked oligosaccharide; LLO). LLO, in turn, is the donor substrate of oligosaccharyltransferase for protein N-linked glycosylation. Hepatically produced N-linked glycoproteins in CDG-Ia blood are hypoglycosylated. Upon labeling with [3H]mannose, CDG-Ia fibroblasts have been widely reported to accumulate [3H]LLO intermediates. Since these are thought to be poor oligosaccharyltransferase substrates, LLO intermediate accumulation has been the prevailing explanation for hypoglycosylation in patients. However, this is discordant with sporadic reports of specific glycoproteins (detected with antibodies) from CDG-Ia fibroblasts being fully glycosylated. Here, fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE, a nonradioactive technique) was used to analyze steady-state LLO compositions in CDG-Ia fibroblasts. FACE revealed that low glucose conditions accounted for previous observations of accumulated [3H]LLO intermediates. Additional FACE experiments demonstrated abundant Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol, without hypoglycosylation, in CDG-Ia fibroblasts grown with physiological glucose. This suggested a “missing link” to explain hypoglycosylation in CDG-Ia patients. Because of the possibility of its accumulation, the effects of M6P on glycosylation were explored in vitro. Surprisingly, M6P was a specific activator for cleavage of Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol. This led to futile cycling of the LLO pathway, exacerbated by GDP-mannose/PMM deficiency. The possibilities that M6P may accumulate in hepatocytes and that M6P-stimulated LLO cleavage may account for both hypoglycosylation and the clinical failure of dietary mannose therapy with CDG-Ia patients are discussed.


Most newly synthesized endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1 proteins are modified with Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 (G3M9Gn2) by luminal transfer from the mature lipid-linked oligosaccharide(LLO) G3M9Gn2-P-P-dolichol (G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol) to asparaginyl residues in the context Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr. The N-linked oligosaccharide is processed by ER glycosidases, resulting in high mannose-type intermediates that participate in folding of the glycoprotein (1, 2). Subsequent export to the Golgi apparatus allows additional modifications, forming complex-type structures, that can participate in the function of the glycoprotein.

The congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are inherited disorders in which the synthesis of LLO (Type I) or the processing of the N-linked oligosaccharide (Type II) is defective. Twelve Type I subtypes (Ia–Il) are known (3). In all cases of CDG-I, serum glycoproteins of hepatic origin (transferrin is typically used for clinical evaluation) are underglycosylated. Depending upon the CDG-I subtype, this hypoglycosylation can be due to either inadequate production of mature LLO (limiting the amount of donor substrate for the oligosaccharyltransferase (OT), which transfers oligosaccharide to protein) or production of structurally immature LLOs that are poor donor substrates for OT (4, 5) and can be caused by defects in mannose metabolism or the LLO assembly pathway.

CDG-Ia patients typically show symptoms by six months of age, including developmental and neurological abnormalities. The root cause of CDG-Ia (which accounts for most Type I cases) is a genetic deficiency of phosphomannomutase (PMM), encoded by the PMM2 gene, resulting in a diminished capacity to convert mannose 6-phosphate (M6P) to mannose 1-phosphate (M1P) (4, 5). PMM deficiency would thus be expected to hinder formation of M1P and its metabolite, GDP-mannose (GDP-M), as reported (6, 7). Reduced concentrations of GDP-M, which contributes mannosyl residues (directly or via dolichol-P-mannose) to LLOs, would be predicted to inhibit maturation of the oligosaccharide. Since 1994 (6, 812), studies on [3H]mannose-labeled LLOs in CDG-Ia dermal fibroblasts have reported reduced quantities of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, and. all but one (12) reported accumulation of immature LLOs (typically M3–6Gn2-P-P-Dol). Deficient conversion of dehydrodolichol (polyprenol) to dolichol has also been reported in CDG-Ia fibroblasts and may contribute to LLO biosynthetic defects (12). Thus, the CDG-Ia phenotype has been explained by an inadequate supply of mature LLO coupled with over-abundance of immature LLOs that are poor OT substrates.

The second CDG-I subtype reported, Ib, is caused by a genetic deficiency of phosphomannose isomerase (PMI), with hindered formation of M6P from fructose 6-phosphate (F6P). Differing from CDG-Ia, CDG-Ib cells have mainly mature LLOs, although apparently in limited amounts (7, 13). The third form of CDG-I identified, Type Ic, is due to a defect in the specific glycosyltransferase that adds glucose to M9Gn2-P-P-Dol. In CDG-Ic, hypoglycosylation presumably occurs because the accumulated M9Gn2-P-P-Dol is a poor substrate for OT (14, 15).

Supporting the idea that PMM2 defects in CDG-Ia cause defective LLO synthesis, analyses of total [3H]mannose-labeled glycoprotein pools from cultured CDG-Ia fibroblasts have indicated hypoglycosylation (6, 811). However, paradoxically, the few studies examining specific N-linked glycoproteins from cultured CDG-Ia fibroblasts found no quantitative or qualitative glycosylation defects (1618). Most notably, comparison of α1-antitrypsin from a CDG-Ia patient’s blood and fibroblasts found that only the blood form was hypoglycosylated (18). It is also a paradox that dietary mannose therapy has failed to improve protein glycosylation or symptoms in CDG-Ia patients (4), although LLO defects in cultured CDG-Ia fibroblasts were corrected by supplemental mannose (10), and dietary mannose therapy is highly effective for CDG-Ib (13).

We noticed that reports of LLO abnormalities and hypoglycosylation in CDG-Ia fibroblasts were always associated with [3H]mannose pulse labeling of LLOs and glycoproteins (6, 812). These studies were done with culture media containing low glucose concentrations, typically 0–0.5 mm, below the physiological minimum of 4–5 mm. Such media are frequently used to increase labeling of cellular glycoconjugates with sugar precursors such as [3H]mannose and [3H]glucosamine and have long been considered suitable for labeling LLOs, since they can be used to detect synthesis of mature LLOs in normal human fibroblasts and cell lines such as CHO-K1. Analyses of CDG-Ia LLOs in physiological glucose have not been reported, because the efficiency of [3H]mannose labeling is so low. In contrast, experiments that reported normal glycosylation of specific glycoproteins used antibody-based methods and CDG-Ia fibroblasts cultured in media with physiological glucose (1618).

This discrepancy might be explained if LLO synthesis in CDG-Ia fibroblasts was not seriously defective in physiological glucose. If so, the basis for the glycosylation deficiency in patients would require reevaluation. To address these points, we used a nonradioactive method, fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis (FACE), to quantitatively analyze steady-state CDG-Ia LLO pools with media containing subphysiological and physiological concentrations of glucose (19, 20). Our FACE results demonstrated abundant Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-P-P-dolichol, without hypoglycosylation, in CDG-Ia fibroblasts grown with physiological glucose and led us to identify a novel effect of M6P in vitro that might explain hypoglycosylation of proteins synthesized by CDG-Ia patients’ hepatocytes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Cultures and Media

All cells were grown in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. When needed, low glucose media were prepared either by mixing complete and glucose-free formulations (see Fig. 2 and Table III) or by adding glucose to glucose-free media (Fig. 4). Normal and CDG-I dermal fibroblasts were obtained from the sources listed in Table I and were grown with 10% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals) in either RPMI 1640 medium (11 mm glucose) or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (5 mm glucose) (Invitrogen) as described (21). CHO-K1 cells and related mutant lines were grown in Ham’s F-12 medium with 2% fetal bovine serum and 8% calf serum. Freshly isolated rat hepatocytes (kindly provided by Dr. Guoxun Chen, Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas-Southwestern) were cultured in medium 199 with 10% fetal bovine serum on collagen-coated plates.

Fig. 2. Effects of glucose concentration on LLO compositions.

Fig. 2

FACE was performed as for Fig. 1, using either 2 mg (A) or 0.2 mg (B–E) of cellular material. Fibroblasts were grown in conventional RPMI 1640 plus 10% FBS. Prior to LLO analysis, fibroblasts were incubated for 30 min with RPMI 1640 or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing the indicated concentration of glucose and 10% (v/v) dialyzed FBS. A, LLO glycans from N-2 and CDG Ia-1 fibroblasts after incubation in RPMI 1640 with either 2.5 or 10 mm glucose. B–E, LLOs were analyzed for N-2 and CDG Ia-1 as above in media with glucose concentrations from 0.5 to 10 mm. The amounts of M5Gn2 (diamonds) and G3M9Gn2 (triangles) recovered, individually or together (circles), were calculated as a function of cellular protein. B and C, RPMI 1640. D and E, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium. B and D, N-2. C and E, CDG Ia-1. In B and C, results for 10 mm glucose with undialyzed FBS are also presented.

TABLE III. G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol and M5Gn2-P-P-Dol contents as functions of glucose concentration.

FACE measurements of LLO compositions are expressed as nmol/mg cellular protein. Glucose concentrations were adjusted as indicated. All of the data were acquired in a single experiment involving two measurements for each of four normal and three CDG-Ia cultures, grown continuously in conventional RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS and then in RPMI 1640 with dialyzed FBS at the indicated glucose concentration for 30 min. Averages ± S.E. are listed.

2.5 mm glucose
10 mm glucose
Cell type M5Gn2 G3M9Gn2 M5Gn2/G3M9Gn2 M5Gn2 G3M9Gn2 M5Gn2/G3M9Gn2 n
nmol/mg cellular protein nmol/mg cellular protein
Normal 3.0 ± 0.1 2.8 ± 0.3 1.1 1.1 ±0.2 6.9 ± 0.6 0.16 8
CDG-Ia 2.2 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.1 3.1 1.5 ± 0.2 7.3 ± 0.5 0.21 6

Fig. 4. Assessment of selectivity for mature LLO by oligosaccharyltransferases in intact normal and CDG-Ia fibroblasts.

Fig. 4

Fibroblasts were labeled with RPMI 1640 medium containing 0.5 mm glucose, 2.5 μm [3H]mannose, varying concentrations of unlabeled mannose (labels show total mannose concentrations), and 10% dialyzed FBS. A, C, E, and G, LLO glycans; B, D, F, and H, protein-linked glycans released by N-glycanase. For each mannose concentration, the LLOs and N-glycans were from the same dish of cells, and the graphs are aligned to allow selectivity of transfer of G3M9Gn2 to be discerned. A–D, are N-1 fibroblasts; E–H, CDG Ia-1 fibroblasts. The identities of the various peaks (marked by arrowheads) were determined as described earlier (22). For simplicity, only A and B are labeled, but all panels are marked. M3, M3Gn2; M5,M5Gn2; M9, M9Gn2; G1M9, G1M9Gn2; G3M9, G3M9Gn2.

TABLE I. Dermal fibroblasts analyzed.

Genotype Designation Source/Donor identifier/Reference
Normal N-1 ATCC/CRL1904
N-2 ATCC/CRL1987
N-3 ATCC/CRL1892
N-4 ATCC/CRL7514
CDG Ia Ia-1 C. Körner/KK/Ref. 6
Ia-2 H. Freeze/RB-44
Ia-3 H. Freeze/ZM-35/Ref. 21
Ia-4 H. Freeze/ML-50
Ia-5 H. Freeze/WO-46/Ref. 21
CDG Ib Ib H. Freeze/BJ/Ref. 36
CDG Ic Ic C. Körner/–/Ref. 25

FACE Analyses of Nonradioactive LLOs and N-Glycans from Intact Fibroblasts

Fibroblasts were cultured until 90% confluent, harvested in methanol, and dried under N2(g). LLOs were recovered in chloroform/methanol/water (10:10:3), hydrolyzed, modified with ANDS fluorophore, and analyzed by FACE exactly as described (19). For N-glycans, the residue remaining after organic extraction was dissolved by boiling with 20 μl of 2% SDS and then diluted 10-fold with 20 mm sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.6. 10 μl was reserved for protein assay, and the remainder was mixed gently with 20 μl of 7.5% Nonidet P-40. 1 unit of N-glycanase (Calbiochem) was added, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 18 h. 660 μl of absolute ethanol was added, and the tube was placed on ice for 15 min. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 15 min, the supernatant was dried under vacuum. The residue was processed for labeling with ANDS as described (19, 20), either directly for total N-glycans or after sequential deionization with AG50-X8 and AG1-X8 (Bio-Rad) for neutral N-glycans. FACE profiling gels were prepared and run as for LLO glycans (19).

HPLC Analyses of [3H]Mannose-labeled LLO Glycans and N-Linked Glycans from Intact Cells

Cells were cultured and labeled as described previously (21) with RPMI 1640 medium containing 0.5 mm D-glucose, 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals, GA), and 40 μCi/ml D-[2-3H]mannose (10–20 mCi/mmol, Amersham Biosciences). In some cases, 10, 30, 100, 300, or 1000 μM unlabeled mannose were added. [3H]LLO glycans released from LLOs with mild acid, and 3H-labeled N-glycans released from protein with N-glycosidase F (Calbio-chem), were analyzed by HPLC (22). The peak height of each [3H]glycan was normalized to mannose content prior to calculation of percentage abundance (21).

FACE and HPLC Analyses of 3H-Labeled LLO Glycans from Perme-abilized Fibroblasts

Fibroblasts were cultured until 90% confluent, refed with fresh medium for 1 h, permeabilized with SLO essentially as described for CHO-K1 cells (23), and incubated with 2 ml of reaction buffer (50 mm K-HEPES, pH 7.4, 78 mm KCl, 4 mm MgCl2, 100 μ m UDP-GlcNAc, 500 μm UDP-glucose, 2 mm 5′-AMP, 100 μg/ml castanospermine, 20 nm GDP-[3H]mannose, and different concentrations of unlabeled GDP-M as indicated). Cells were then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The buffer was removed, and cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and then harvested into methanol. The suspension was transferred to a 10-ml glass tube and dried under N2(g). LLO [3H]glycans were recovered, detected by HPLC (23), or labeled with ANDS, mixed with ANDS-labeled mouse liver LLO glycan standards, and resolved with a FACE gel (19). Glycans were extracted from bands cut from the gel with 1 ml of water overnight and mixed with scintillation fluid, and tritium was detected by scintillation spectroscopy.

FACE Analyses of Unlabeled LLO Glycans and Free Glycans from Permeabilized Cells

Cells were cultured to 90% confluence, permeabilized with SLO (23), and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h with 2 ml of reaction buffer (see above, but without GDP-[3H]mannose and containing 20 μm unlabeled GDP-M). After removal of reaction buffer, the cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and harvested into methanol. After drying under N2(g), sequential extractions were performed with chloroform/methanol (2:1) (discarded), with water (free glycans), and with chloroform/methanol/water (10:10:3) (LLOs). Free glycans were deionized with AG50-X8 and AG1-X8 resins. LLOs were cleaved with weak acid, and LLO glycans were recovered (19). All glycans were labeled with ANDS and resolved with a FACE gel.

In Vitro OT Assay

Fibroblasts were permeabilized with SLO and labeled with GDP-[3H]mannose as described above, except 40 μm OT acceptor peptide or OT control peptide (24) was included. Cells were harvested and extracted as described above. The water extract was deionized with AG50-X8 and AG1-X8 to remove residual salt and GDP-[3H]mannose. Molecules with exposed reducing termini were modified with ANTS (19) and removed with a second AG1-X8 treatment. After drying, the glycopeptides were dissolved with 0.1 m sodium citrate buffer, pH 5.5, containing 0.1 units of endoglycosidase H and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. Deionization with AG50-X8 and AG1-X8 was repeated. Endoglycosidase H-released glycans were modified with ANDS and analyzed in one of three ways: (i) a portion was counted directly to assess total [3H]glycan transferred from LLO to glycopeptide; (ii) a portion was treated with AG1-X8, and the bound (ANDS-modified) and unbound materials were counted to measure endoglycosidase H-sensitive and -resistant glycopeptide, respectively; or (iii) a portion was mixed with standards (endoglycosidase H-digested liver LLO glycans labeled with ANDS) and resolved by FACE (19), in which case bands containing individual glycans were cut from the gel, eluted with 1 ml of water, and counted. [3H]LLO glycans in the chloroform/methanol/water (10:10:3) fraction were analyzed with FACE gels in the manner described above for glycopeptides.

RESULTS

CDG-Ia Fibroblasts in Conventional Media Synthesize G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol Efficiently

LLOs in four normal, five CDG-Ia, a CDG-Ib, and a CDG-Ic culture (Table I) were analyzed quantitatively by FACE after growth in conventional media. In Fig. 1, cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 11 mm glucose and 10% undialyzed FBS. CDG-Ic cells accumulate M9Gn2-P-P-Dol by the [3H]mannose labeling technique (25). They gave a similar result with FACE (Fig. 1A) with mainly M9Gn2-P-P-Dol and smaller quantities of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol due to leakiness of the mutation. Also, as expected from [3H]mannose labeling, CDG-Ib (PMI-deficient) fibroblast LLOs were mainly G3M9Gn2P-P-Dol (Fig. 1A). Prior studies suggested that CDG-Ib fibroblasts contain abnormally low amounts of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol (7, 13). By FACE, the amounts of G3M9Gn2- P-P-Dol detected in CDG-Ib fibroblasts were highly variable, from 100% (in Fig. 1A) to 20% of normal (data not shown). The basis for this variability was not determined, although the PMI activity was also quite variable (Supplemental Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. CDG-Ia fibroblasts synthesize G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol efficiently in conventional RPMI 1640 medium: Analysis by FACE.

Fig. 1

Designations of normal (N) and CDG Type I (Ia, Ib, and Ic) fibroblasts are defined in Table I. Cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium plus 10% (v/v) FBS. LLOs were analyzed by FACE. The amounts of cellular material (as total cell protein) for each lane or scan were 4 mg (A) and 2 mg (B). S, ANDS-labeled glucose oligomers (n = 5, 6, or 7). The positions of glycan standards are indicated. A, LLO glycans from N-1, CDG Ia-1, CDG Ib, and CDG Ic. B, LLO glycans from N-2, N-3, CDG Ia-2, and CDG Ia-3.

Thus, it was anticipated that CDG-Ia (PMM-deficient) LLO glycans analyzed by FACE would be mainly immature structures such as M2–5Gn2. However, with multiple independent cultures, LLO glycans from CDG-Ia fibroblast cultures grown with conventional RPMI 1640 were mainly G3M9Gn2 and were indistinguishable from normal (Fig. 1A and B). This was verified by quantitative FACE analysis for duplicate cultures of three normal and four CDG-Ia fibroblasts (Table II). Due to this unanticipated result, we verified that our CDG-Ia fibroblasts were authentic, having expected decreases of PMM activity (26), with both a conventional enzyme-linked PMM assay and a novel FACE-based PMM assay (Supplemental Fig. 1).

TABLE II. FACE analyses of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol in normal and CDG-Ia dermal fibroblast.

G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol in normal and CDG-Ia fibroblasts, grown continuously with RPMI 1640 medium and 10% FBS, was measured by FACE (expressed as nmol/mg cellular protein) as in Fig. 2. The table is a composite of three sets of experiments.

Normal cultures
CDG-Ia cultures
N-1 N-2 N-3 Ia-1 Ia-2 Ia-3 Ia-5
nmol/mg cellular protein nmol/mg cellular protein
Measurement 1 6.7 9.0 7.8 8.8 7.8 7.0 4.6
Measurement 2 7.0 9.4 7.8 6.7 7.4 6.9 5.5

In Subphysiological Glucose Both Normal and CDG-Ia Fibroblasts Synthesize LLOs Abnormally, but CDG-Ia Fibroblasts Are More Sensitive

To determine whether differences between the results of Fig. 1 and previous reports (6, 811) were due to the method of detection (FACE versus [3H]mannose labeling) or to the use of conventional media in place of low glucose media, LLOs were examined by FACE after culturing fibroblasts for 30 min. in different concentrations of glucose. Dialyzed FBS was used to eliminate the serum as a source of hexose. An example is shown in Fig. 2A, and quantitative analyses are shown in Fig. 2BE. LLOs from normal and CDG-Ia fibroblasts grown with RPMI 1640 (Fig. 2AC) containing 10 mm glucose are mainly G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, although a small amount of M5Gn2-P-P-Dol is apparent in CDG-Ia. Nearly equal representation of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol and M5Gn2-P-P-Dol occurs with 2.5 mm glucose for normal fibroblasts (Fig. 2B) and with 5 mm glucose for CDG-Ia (Fig. 2C). Similar results were obtained by comparing duplicate cultures of four normal and three CDG-Ia fibroblasts in a single experiment (Table III) and with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Fig. 2D and E). These data reflect earlier [3H]mannose labeling/low glucose experiments in which [3H]M2–5Gn2-P-P-Dol accounted for most of the LLO in CDG-Ia cells, whereas [3H] G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol was the major LLO in normal cells, similar to the result shown for 2.5 mm glucose in Fig. 2A. However, [3H]mannose labeling and FACE are not expected to give precisely comparable results, in part because (i) the former detects newly made LLO, whereas the latter detects all LLO, and (ii) detection sensitivity by the former is directly related to the mannose content of the glycan, whereas detection by the latter is independent of mannose content.

FACE also showed that total amounts of LLOs in fibroblasts are greatly depressed by use of media with 0.5 mm glucose, with CDG-Ia cells being somewhat more sensitive. With 10 mm glucose, more M5Gn2-P-P-Dol can be detected in CDG-Ia fibroblasts than for normal fibroblasts (Fig. 2, A–C), but this difference is suppressed by the use of undialyzed serum (B and C). This explains why the CDG-Ia FACE samples in Fig. 1, with undialyzed serum, were indistinguishable from normal.

Related experiments were done by [3H]mannose labeling. For [3H]mannose labeling efficient enough to detect glycans by HPLC, glucose was kept at 0.5 mm. The mannose concentration was then varied. Consistent with results presented above and reported earlier (7, 10), [3H] G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol increased when fibroblasts were supplemented with mannose, but CDG-Ia fibroblasts required at least 10-fold higher [mannose] than did normal cells to produce a similar amount of [3H] G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol (data not shown).

The minimal glucose concentration in blood is typically 4–5 mm. Glucose levels in CDG-Ia patients are usually in the normal range, although a rare case of hypoglycemia has been reported (27). CDG-Ia fibroblasts in physiological glucose make normal amounts of total M5Gn2-P-P-Dol plus G3M9Gn2P-P-Dol (Fig. 2, B–E) and have G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol readily available for transfer by OT (see below). However, in 5 mm glucose, they accumulate M5Gn2-P-P-Dol in amounts equal to G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol (Fig. 2). If OT in CDG-Ia cells failed to use M5Gn2-P-P-, Dol efficiently, due to selectivity for G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, this could cause hypoglycosylation. On the other hand, if OT recognizes both M5Gn2-P-P-Dol and G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, hypoglycosylation should not occur (although there may be other consequences of transferring M5Gn2). The net activity of OT in CDG-Ia cells with Gn2-P-P-Dol is normal (28), but selectivity of OT has not been examined. Below, the consequences of partial accumulation of M5Gn2-P-P-Dol in CDG-Ia cells in 5 mm glucose are examined in detail.

OT in CDG-Ia Fibroblasts Is Selective for G0–3M6–9Gn2-Dol over M1–5Gn2-Dol in Vitro

Streptolysin-O (SLO) permeabilizes the plasma membrane, but not internal membrane systems (29), and was used to develop an in vitro system programmed with GDP-[3H]mannose in which the selectivity of OT for [3H]G0–3M6–9Gn2-P-P-Dol over [3H]M1–5 Gn2-P-P-Dol could be tested. The use of SLO eliminates LLO synthesis artifacts of microsomal membrane preparations (23, 24). Permeabilized cells were incubated with either 10 nm (Fig. 3, upper graph) or 200 nm (lower graph) GDP-[3H]mannose, resulting in different proportions of [3H]G0 –3M6 –9Gn2-P-P-Dol and[3H]M1–5Gn2-P-P-Dol. Reactions were done in the presence of a control OT nonacceptor peptide (Ac-Gln-Tyr-Thr-CONH2) to assess LLO synthesis or with an acceptor peptide (Ac-Asn-Tyr-Thr-CONH2) to test the transfer selectivity of OT. The compositions of the [3H]LLOs were determined by HPLC and expressed as percentages of either G0–3M6–9Gn2-Dol or M1–5Gn2-Dol in the total pool after normalizing to mannose content. The compositions of peptide-associated glycans were assessed by digestion with endoglycosidase H, which distinguished G0–3M6–9Gn2-peptides (sensitive) from M1–5Gn2-peptides (resistant).

Fig. 3. Oligosaccharyltransferases in SLO-permeabilized normal and CDG-Ia fibroblasts exhibit selectivity for mature LLO.

Fig. 3

Approximately 1 × 106 N-2 (left-hand bars) or CDG Ia-1 (right-hand bars) fibroblasts were grown until ~90% confluent, permeabilized with SLO, and incubated with 10 nm (upper graph) or 200 nm (lower graph) GDP-[3H]mannose in the presence of 40 μm OT control peptide to measure LLO synthesis (black bars) or 40 μm OT acceptor peptide to detect the N-glycans transferred by OT (white bars). For both, the M1–5Gn2 and G0–3M6–9Gn2 pools were assessed. [3H]LLO glycans were determined by FACE. [3H]glycopeptides were treated with endoglycosidase H to differentiate peptides with M1–5Gn2 or G0–3M6–9Gn2, and the associated tritium was expressed as a percentage of the total.

With control peptide, no differences were detectable between normal and CDG-Ia cells regarding the synthesis of [3H]LLOs (Fig. 3). Transfer of glycan to the control peptide was negligible (data not shown). Importantly, the selectivity of OT in normal and CDG-Ia fibroblasts was highly similar. In all cases, there was greater representation of G0–3M6–9Gn2, and lower representation of M1–5Gn2, in the N-glycan (acceptor peptide) pool compared with the LLO pool. Thus, N-linked glycoproteins produced by CDG-Ia fibroblasts in 5 mm glucose might be expected to be glycosylated mainly with G3M9Gn2, even with a sizeable amount of M5Gn2-P-P-Dol.

Failure of OT to Selectively Recognize G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol in Intact Normal and CDG-Ia Fibroblasts

OT selectivity was then tested in intact cells, by pulse-labeling with 2.5 μm [3H]mannose in the presence of 0.5 mm glucose and different concentrations of unlabeled mannose. This resulted in [3H]LLO pools with various amounts of LLO intermediates and G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol. As mentioned above, G3M9Gn2P-P-Dol in-creased with [mannose], but CDG-Ia fibroblasts required relatively higher [mannose]. LLOs and N-glycans from the same dish were compared by HPLC. Typical results are shown in Fig. 4. The identities of the N-glycans as discussed previously (22, 30) made it possible to determine whether they were derived from intermediates, such as M5Gn2-P-P-Dol, or from G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol. With 2.5 μm mannose, G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol was barely detectable in normal fibroblasts (Fig. 4A), but it accounted for much of the N-glycan pool (Fig. 4B), consistent with selectivity by OT. With 12.5 μm mannose, there was more G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol (Fig. 4C), but unexpectedly, the proportions of G3M9Gn2 in the LLO and N-glycan pools appeared similar(Fig. 4D), indicating a lack of selectivity by OT. Mannose concentrations in the 0.1–0.3 mm range were needed to produce enough G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol to evaluate OT selectivity in CDG-Iafibroblasts. As shown in Fig. 4, E–H, regardless of the proportion of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, there did not appear to be selective transfer from this substrate to protein by OT.

To summarize, OT was selective for G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol in vitro (Fig. 3) but not in intact fibroblasts (Fig. 4) unless very low concentrations of hexose (such as 2.5 μm mannose/0.5 mm glucose) were used. Throughout our experiments (Fig. 4 and data not shown) with intact CDG-Ia cells, selectivity of OT for G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol was never observed. The effects of higher extracellular hexose concentrations are not understood but suggest that in media with 5 mm glucose, immature LLOs such as M5Gn2-P-P-Dol will be substrates for OT. Thus, in conventional media, CDG-Ia fibroblast glycoproteins would not be expected to be hypoglycosylated, as found in studies of specific glycoproteins (1618). However, a significant fraction may be modified with truncated glycans that are not competent for protein folding (2), consistent with chronic ER stress in CDG-Ia fibroblasts grown in conventional media (21).

Availability of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol for Glycosylation in CDG-Ia Fibroblasts

Because N-linked glycans derived from either G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol or LLO intermediates such as M5Gn2-P-P-Dol can be processed by Golgi apparatus enzymes, there should be little difference between N-glycan pools from normal and CDG-Ia fibroblasts in conventional media. As shown in Supplemental Fig. 2, very similar FACE profiles for N-glycans were detected for three normal and four CDG-Ia fibroblast cultures grown in RPMI 1640. When cells were incubated for 24 h with castanospermine plus deoxymannojirimycin to inhibit processing by glucosidases and mannosidases, G3M9Gn2 appeared in the normal and CDG Ia N-glycan pools, verifying the availability of appreciable G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol (Fig. 5A and B). 1 mm mannose, reported to correct CDG-Ia LLO synthesis and glycosylation (10), had no appreciable effect (Fig. 5C). Together, these data support the conclusion that there is little or no protein hypoglycosylation in CDG-Ia fibroblasts grown with physiological glucose.

Fig. 5. Availability of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol for N-linked glycosy-lation in CDG-Ia fibroblasts.

Fig. 5

Neutral N-glycans were obtained from N-1 (A) and CDG Ia-1 (B and C) cells grown in RPMI 1640 with 10% FBS for 24 h in the absence (−) or presence (+) of 0.2 mg/ml castanospermine plus 0.1 mg/ml deoxymannojirimycin to inhibit processing. Ia-1 cells were grown without (B) or with (C) 1 mm mannose for 24 h. FACE results are shown graphically to facilitate direct comparisons of glycans, and the position of G3M9Gn2-ANDS is indicated.

Mannose 6-Phosphate Stimulates Selective Cleavage of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, with Futile Cycling of the LLO Pathway

In the absence of a clear explanation for hypoglycosylation of serum proteins in CDG-Ia patients, we considered that M6P could be a “missing link,” because it might accumulate in PMM-deficient hepatocytes. Thus, the possibility that M6P might interfere with LLO synthesis or stability was tested. This was done initially by GDP-[3H]mannose labeling with permeabilized fibroblasts (Fig. 6) and then by FACE analysis of permeabilized CHO-K1 cells and primary hepatocytes (Fig. 7).

Fig. 6. M6P is a specific activator of G3M9Gn2 release from the LLO pools of permeabilized fibroblasts labeled with GDP-[3H]mannose.

Fig. 6

Experiments involved fibroblast N-1 (A–D) or CDG-Ia-1 (E and F) permeabilized with SLO and incubated with mixtures containing GDP-[3H]mannose. A, tritium associated with the total LLO (black bars) and free glycan (white bars) pools after incubation for 30 min with 200 nm GDP-M, without hexose-P (CON.), or with 50 μm hexose-P as indicated (averages of duplicates). B, HPLC of samples incubated as in A, for 30 min. Full scales for LLO and free glycan chromatograms are 50,000 and 300,000 cpm, respectively. C, as for B, except 400 nm GDP-M was used. Full scales for LLO and free glycan chromatograms are 50,000 and 70,000 cpm, respectively. D, as for A, except that 400 nm GDP-M was used, and the incubation time was varied. LLO and free glycans are plotted in the upper and lower graphs, respectively. Black symbols, control. White symbols, 50 μm M6P. E, incubations as for A, with 50 μm hexose phosphates. Shown are cpm incorporated into the LLO glycans G3M9Gn2 (blackbars) and M5Gn2 (white bars) resolved and isolated with FACE gels (averages of duplicates). F, as for E, but detecting free G3M9Gn2 by HPLC(average of duplicates).

Fig. 7. FACE analyses of release of G3M9Gn2 from the LLO pools of permeabilized CHO-K1 cells and primary hepatocytes.

Fig. 7

CHO-K1-derived cultures (A–C and E) and primary rat hepatocytes (D) were permeabilized with SLO. Water-soluble glycans were quantified by FACE. A, time-dependent release of G3M9Gn2 (pmol/107 cells) from parental CHO-K1 cells incubated with 20 μm GDP-M in the absence of hexose-P, (control, black circles) or with 50 μm M6P (white circles) or M1P (white squares). B, as for A, incubation for 60 min with varying concentrations of M6P. C, as for A (control (black bars) and 50 μm M6P (white bars)), with 60-min incubations for parental CHO-K1; the mutant line Lec35.1, which accumulates M5Gn2-P-P-Dol instead of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol; or the 10A line, created by transfecting the Lec35.1 mutant with intact Lec35 cDNA, with restored production of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol. The release of the predominant LLO glycan of each line was measured by FACE (average of duplicates). D, release of G3M9Gn2 from primary hepatocytes incubated with 20 μm GDP-M for 60 min in the absence or presence of 100 μm hexose, phosphate as indicated. Note that in A–D, the 20 μm GDP-M was 50 times that required to prevent M6P-dependent changes in the LLO pool (see Fig. 6B and C). As a result, M6P treatment did not affect the LLO compositions in these experiments (data not shown). E, assays measured release of G3M9Gn2 from permeabilized CHO-K1, as for B, in the absence or presence of 100 μM M6P and the indicated concentrations of OT acceptor peptide.

Incubation with M6P, but no other sugar phosphates, increased the amount of water-soluble [3H]mannose-labeled material in a normal fibroblast system with 200 nm GDP-M (Fig. 6A) while having negligible effect on total radioactivity incorporated into LLO. Examinations of similarly prepared fractions by HPLC revealed that, in the absence of M6P, 200 nm GDP-M does not support efficient LLO extension, resulting in a modest amount of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol mixed with LLO intermediates. M6P caused selective loss of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol from the LLO pool, with insignificant effects on LLO intermediates (Fig. 6B left). Loss of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol coincided with appearance of free G3M9Gn2 in the water-soluble pool (Fig. 6B, right). Other hexose phosphates that are intermediates in mannose metabolism (M1P, G6P, glucose 1-phosphate, and F6P) had no effect(Fig. 6B). Thus, the cleavage was highly specific for G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol as the LLO and for M6P as the activating hexose-P. This suggests degradation by enzyme action rather than non specific cleavage.

With 400 nm GDP-M, extension of LLOs was efficient, and G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol was predominant (Fig. 6C). In this case, M6P did not affect the amount of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, but it still increased free G3M9Gn2. Along with G3M9Gn2, cleavage of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol would be expected to yield Dol-P, which can be used for additional rounds of LLO synthesis, or either Dol-OH or Dol-P-P, which can be recycled to Dol-P (31). Thus, the increased [GDP-M] was able to compensate for futile cy-cling by driving additional complete rounds of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol synthesis, without affecting G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol cleavage. Some G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol is cleaved even in the absence of M6P, a phenomenon often attributed to “transfer of the glycan to water” by OT. M6P (with 400 nm GDP-M) increased free G3M9Gn2 at all time points tested but did not affect LLO formation (Fig. 6D). It is highly unlikely that M6P itself was an acceptor, because “Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-M6P” should not label with ANDS and should not comigrate with a G3M9Gn2-ANDS standard. By a similar argument, it is unlikely that G3M9Gn2-P was released instead of G3M9Gn2.

Experiments in Fig. 6, A–D, used normal fibroblasts. Similar results were obtained with permeabilized CDG-Ia fibroblasts. With 200 nm GDP-M, M6P decreased G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol (Fig. 6E) and increased free G3M9Gn2 (Fig. 6F). Curiously, we consistently noticed that M6P caused appreciable accumulation of M5Gn2-P-P-Dol in CDG-Ia cells (Fig. 6E), but not in normal cells (Fig. 6B). Since SLO treatment removes diffusable cytoplasmic components, this difference is most likely due to a membrane-associated property of CDG-Ia fibroblasts, possibly diminished conversion of polyprenol to dolichol (12). The limited availability of dolichol may in some way impede mannosylation of M5Gn2-P-P-Dol in CDG-Ia cells, and its resistance to cleavage by the action of M6P (Fig. 6B) would cause it to accumulate.

M6P Accelerates Cleavage of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol Synthesized by CHO-K1 Lines and Primary Hepatocytes

The ability of M6P to specifically promote cleavage of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol was not limited to fibroblasts or GDP-[3H]mannose labeling techniques. FACE analysis of SLO-permeabilized CHO-K1 cells demonstrated that M6P, but not M1P, increased the rate of release of G3M9Gn2 (Fig. 7A), with maximal release by 10–100μm M6P (Fig. 7B). Comparison of parental CHO-K1 cells with a mutant line (Lec35.1), which synthesizes M5Gn2-P-P-Dol instead of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, and the same mutant line transfected (10A) to correct the mutant phenotype (23) showed that M6P caused cleavage of G3M9Gn2P-P-Dol but not M5Gn2-P-P-Dol (Fig. 7C), similar to its effects on fibroblast LLOs (Fig. 6B). M6P also stimulated release of G3M9Gn2 in permeabilized hepatocytes. Other hexose phosphates were not effective (Fig. 7D). As for CHO-K1, maximal release was achieved with 10–100 μm M6P (data not shown).

The preference for G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol as a substrate overM5Gn2-P-P-Dol in vitro is characteristic of both enhanced cleavage with M6P and glycan transfer to peptide, suggesting that OT catalyzes both activities. Although M6P caused cleavage of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol in SLO-permeabilized CHO cells, it did not with enriched CHO-K1 microsomal preparations in the absence or presence of 0.1% Nonidet P-40 (data not shown). Thus, like the Lec35 mutant phenotype (23) and LLO synthesis inhibition by translation blockers (24), which are preserved in SLO-treated cells but not microsomes, the effect of M6P on G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol cleavage may be highly sensitive to physical perturbation. Unfortunately, this precluded testing M6P with solubilized or purified preparations of OT. A specific yeast OT inhibitor was evaluated, but this reagent was ineffective with OT in SLO-permeabilized CHO-K1 (data not shown). If M6P acted by enhancing the hydrolytic action of OT, OT acceptor peptide substrate should compete. As shown in Fig. 7E, OT acceptor peptide suppressed the M6P-stimulated cleavage of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, under conditions where G3M9Gn2-peptide was formed (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

Choice of Analytical Method for LLO Analysis in Fibroblasts

In contrast to previous analyses of [3H]mannose-labeled CDG-Ia fibroblasts, which involved culture in low glucose and indicated robust LLO abnormalities and hypoglycosylation of protein, FACE analyses of CDG-Ia fibroblasts showed only moderate LLO abnormalities in 5 mm glucose (~50% accumulation of M5Gn2-P-P-Dol), which did not lead to obvious hypoglycosylation. Our results agree with previous studies of N-glycosylation in CDG-Ia fibroblasts with physiological glucose, which also failed to identify protein glycosylation abnormalities (1618), and indicate that CDG-Ia dermal fibroblasts are not adequate models for clinical hypoglycosylation. Glucose concentrations (such as 2.5 mm in Fig. 2A) can be identified with which normal fibroblasts are relatively rich in G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol. This may explain why investigators using the [3H]mannose labeling technique were able to report the relative accumulation of truncated LLOs in CDG-Ia fibroblasts.

Synergism between Elevated [M6P] and Diminished [GDP-M] in CDG-Ia

Our results suggest a model involving both diminished M1P and increased M6P (Fig. 8). Due to PMM deficiency, M6P may be expected to accumulate in hepatocytes due to the absence of a functional ER-associated M6Pase system and then cause selective depletion of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol with release of G3M9Gn2. In intact cells and in cells permeabilized with SLO, new rounds of LLO synthesis do not occur unless existing LLO is discharged (such as with an OT acceptor substrate (24)), because the pool of Dol-P available for glycosylation is limited. Since a secondary effect of cleavage of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol would be release of Dol-P/Dol-P-P, M6P would also cause futile cycling of the dolichol pathway, exacerbated further by low [GDP-M] (Fig. 6). Greatly reduced [GDP-M], about one-tenth of normal, was reported for CDG-Ia fibroblasts (7). Further, in the CDG-Ia background, M5Gn2-P-P-Dol is more likely to accumulate (Fig. 6E), possibly due to diminished polyprenol reductase (12). In combination, these factors could deplete the LLO pool and may account for hypoglycosylation of serum proteins in CDG-Ia.

Fig. 8. Proposed metabolic consequences of PMM deficiency on the dolichol pathway in CDG-Ia hepatocytes.

Fig. 8

A, the normal pathway; B, the CDG-Ia pathway proposed around 1994 (8); C, the revised CDG-Ia pathway model based upon diminished GDP-M synthesis, M6P accumulation, and stimulation of OT by M6P to cleave G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol. Molecules expected to increase in concentration in CDG-Ia are indicatedby larger red lettering, whereas those expected to decrease are indicated by smaller blue lettering. The thickness of the arrows emphasizes relative metabolic flux.

Although highly selective for G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol in vitro (Fig.3), OT in intact CDG-Ia fibroblasts utilized both G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol and M5Gn2-P-P-Dol as donors (Fig. 4) unless extracellular hexose was extremely low. Transfer of endoglycosidase H-resistant glycans, most likely from LLO intermediates, in CDG-Ia fibroblasts was observed earlier (10). OT selectivity depends upon the specific isoform (15) and requires occupancy of the regulatory site (14). In fibroblasts incubated with higher hexose concentrations, perhaps the regulatory site is inaccessible, or a less selective OT isoform may dominate.

Basis of M6P Action

Since the hexose—P transporter of the hepatic ER excludes M6P, M6P should operate in the cytoplasmic compartment, perhaps by direct interaction with cytoplasmic domains of OT. This is feasible, because cytoplasmic domains of OT have regulatory properties (32). However, it is not clear by what catalytic mechanism M6P might specifically increase the hydrolytic action of OT toward G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol. One possibility is that it might cause displacement of acceptor polypeptide from the catalytic site, allowing only nonproductive LLO hydrolysis to occur. The remarkable specificity for M6P and for G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol (Fig. 6) suggests a biological role for this interaction. Since a rapid increase of [M6P] would be expected to cause a correspondingly rapid discharge of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol, N-linked glycosylation should cease immediately. Many viral coat proteins are glycosylated, and the glycans are essential for folding. The activity of M6P reported here therefore has the potential to mediate protection from harmful pathogens that require N-glycosylation of coat proteins. It is not yet known whether [M6P] responds to viral infection.

Plausibility of M6P Toxicity In CDG-Ia Disease

The actual effects of PMM deficiency on hepatic [M6P] and [M1P] are unknown. Under normal conditions, it can be inferred that hepatic [M6P] does not interfere significantly with glycosylation. Since PMM deficiencies in CDG-Ia only partially eliminate enzyme activity (26), any increases of hepatic [M6P] should be only severalfold above normal. This suggests that the normal hepatic [M6P] should be close to the threshold for LLO cleavage. The [M6P] in snap-frozen livers from rats given free access to food was ~100 μm (33) and was 6–7 times greater than [M1P], suggesting that conversion of M6P to M1P is rate-limiting. Thus, with less PMM, [M6P] would be expected to exceed 100 μm. In the absence of a productive OT acceptor substrate, 10–100 μm M6P was sufficient to cause loss of G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol (Fig. 7B). However, hepatocytes produce substantial amounts of acceptor protein in the ER, and acceptor peptide was competitive with M6P in vitro for G3M9Gn2-P-P-Dol (Fig. 7E). Thus, in intact hepatocytes that actively synthesize glycoproteins, M6P in the 100 μm range may be just below the toxic threshold. An [M6P] increase due to PMM deficiency, coupled with less GDP-M and less dolichol (12), could then trigger the defects observed in CDG-Ia.

Incorporation of [3H]mannose into M6P occurs at a normal rate, whereas incorporation into M1P is 25% of normal, in CDG-Ia fibroblasts after a 30-min pulse in 0.5 mm glucose (6). If the use of low glucose did not invalidate these measurements, they would argue against M6P accumulation in CDG-Ia fibroblasts. By FACE monosaccharide analysis (data not shown), [M1P] in CDG-Ia fibroblasts was 44% of normal; [M6P] in normal and CDG-Ia was below the level of detection. However, extrapolation to hepatocytes may not be justified. In addition to having a more complex regulatory system for hexose metabolism, the endoplasmic reticulum in hepatocytes contains a highly selective G6P transporter that excludes M6P from the lumen, so that M6P is not hydrolyzed by luminal hexose 6-phosphatase. In contrast, the fibroblast endoplasmic reticulum contains less restrictive hexose phosphatase and hexose-P transporter activities that accommodate both G6P and glucose 1-phosphate and probably M6P (34).

CDG-Ia disease fails to respond to dietary mannose therapy, with no improvement of either clinical symptoms or protein glycosylation, whereas similar therapy is highly effective for CDG-Ib patients (35). If hypoglycosylation in CDG-Ia involves an inhibitory effect of M6P, approaches to lower intracellular concentrations of M6P and its precursors (such as F6P and G6P) should be considered.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

CDG-I cells were generously provided by Hudson Freeze and Christian Körner. Primary rat hepatocytes were kindly provided by Guoxun Chen. We thank Hudson Freeze and Harry Schachter for highly useful comments on the manuscript.

Footnotes

*

This work was funded by National Institutes of Health Grant GM38545 and Welch Foundation Grant I-1168 (to M. A. L.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

S

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains two additional figures.

1

The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ANDS, 7-amino-1,3-napthalenedisulfonic acid; CDG, congenital disorder(s) of glycosylation; Dol, dolichol; FACE, fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; GDP-M, GDP-mannose;G3M9Gn2, Glc3Man9GlcNAc2; G6P, glucose 6-phosphate; LLO, lipid-linked oligosaccharide; M6P, mannose 6-phosphate; M1P, mannose 1-phosphate; SLO, streptolysin-O; PMM, phosphomannomutase; PMI, phosphomannose isomerase; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; OT, oligosaccharyltransferase; FBS, fetal bovine serum.

References

  • 1.Kornfeld R, Kornfeld S. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:631–664. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.003215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lehrman MA. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:8623–8626. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R100002200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frank CG, Grubenmann CE, Eyaid W, Berger EG, Aebi M, Hennet T. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:146–150. doi: 10.1086/422367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marquardt T, Freeze H. Biol Chem. 2001;382:161–177. doi: 10.1515/BC.2001.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jaeken J, Matthijs G. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2001;2:129–151. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Körner C, Lehle L, von Figura K. Glycobiology. 1998;8:165–171. doi: 10.1093/glycob/8.2.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rush JS, Panneerselvam K, Waechter CJ, Freeze HH. Glycobiology. 2000;10:829–835. doi: 10.1093/glycob/10.8.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Powell LD, Paneerselvam K, Vij R, Diaz S, Manzi A, Buist N, Freeze H, Varki A. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1901–1909. doi: 10.1172/JCI117540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Krasnewich DM, Holt GD, Brantly M, Skovby F, Redwine J, Gahl WA. Glycobiology. 1995;5:503–510. doi: 10.1093/glycob/5.5.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Panneerselvam K, Freeze HH. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1478–1487. doi: 10.1172/JCI118570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Körner C, Lehle L, von Figura K. Glycoconj J. 1998;15:499–505. doi: 10.1023/a:1006939104442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ohkura T, Fukushima K, Kurisaki A, Sagami H, Ogura K, Ohno K, Hara-Kuge S, Yamashita K. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:6868–6875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.11.6868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Niehues R, Hasilik M, Alton G, Körner C, Schiebe-Sukumar M, Koch HG, Zimmer KP, Wu R, Harms E, Reiter K, von Figura K, Freeze HH, Harms HK, Marquardt T. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1414–1420. doi: 10.1172/JCI2350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karaoglu D, Kelleher DJ, Gilmore R. Biochemistry. 2001;40:12193–12206. doi: 10.1021/bi0111911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kelleher DJ, Karaoglu D, Mandon EC, Gilmore R. Mol Cell. 2003;12:101–111. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00243-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marquardt T, Ullrich K, Zimmer P, Hasilik A, Deufel T, Harms E. Eur J Cell Biol. 1995;66:268–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Marquardt T, Ullrich K, Niehues R, Koch H-G, Harms E. J Inherited Metabolic Disorders. 1996;19:246–250. doi: 10.1007/BF01799441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dupre T, Barnier A, de Lonlay P, Cormier-Daire V, Durand G, Codogno P, Seta N. Glycobiology. 2000;10:1277–1281. doi: 10.1093/glycob/10.12.1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gao N, Lehrman MA. Glycobiology. 2002;12:353–360. doi: 10.1093/glycob/12.5.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gao N, Lehrman MA. Glycobiology. 2003;13:1G–3G. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwg009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shang J, Körner C, Freeze H, Lehrman MA. Glycobiology. 2002;12:307–317. doi: 10.1093/glycob/12.5.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shang J, Lehrman MA. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:9703–9712. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310837200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Anand M, Rush JS, Ray S, Doucey MA, Weik J, Ware FE, Hofs-teenge J, Waechter CJ, Lehrman MA. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:487–501. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.2.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gao N, Lehrman MA. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:39425–39435. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M205195200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Körner C, Knauer R, Holzbach U, Hanefeld F, Lehle L, von Figura K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:13200–13205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grünewald S, Schollen E, Van Schaftingen E, Jaeken J, Matthijs G. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68:347–354. doi: 10.1086/318199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Böhles H, Sewell AC, Gebhardt B, Reinecke-Lüthge A, Klöppel G, Marquardt T. J Inherited Metabolic Disorders. 2001;24:858–862. doi: 10.1023/a:1013944308881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Knauer R, Lehle L, Hanefeld F, von Figura K. J Inherited Metabolic Disorders. 1994;17:541–544. doi: 10.1007/BF00711588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martys JL, Shevell T, McGraw TE. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:25976–25984. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shang J, Lehrman MA. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:12076–12080. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400431200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schenk B, Fernandez F, Waechter CJ. Glycobiology. 2001;11:61R–70R. doi: 10.1093/glycob/11.5.61r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chavan M, Rekowicz M, Lennarz W. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:51441–51447. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M310456200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Asikin N, Koeppe RE. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1979;89:279–285. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(79)90975-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Leuzzi R, Fulceri R, Marcolongo P, Bánhegy G, Zammarchi E, Stafford K, Burchell A, Benedetti A. Biochem J. 2001;357:557–562. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3570557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Harms HK, Zimmer KP, Kurnik K, Bertele-Harms RM, Weidinger S, Reiter K. Acta Paediatr. 2002;91:1065–1072. doi: 10.1080/080352502760311566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Patterson MC, Schwenk WF, O’Brien JF, Vockley J, Freeze HH, Mehta DP, Michels VV. J Pediatr. 1999;135:775–781. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

RESOURCES