Skip to main content
Microbial Genomics logoLink to Microbial Genomics
. 2026 Jan 21;12(1):001611. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001611

Evolved populations of Listeria monocytogenes related to biofilm formation and biocide stress in the context of food production environment niches

Oleksii Omelchenko 1,2,3,4, Ana Victoria Gutiérrez 1,4, Maria Diaz 1,4, Erin Lewis 3, Maria Solsona Gaya 1,2,4, Mark A Webber 1,2,4, Matthew Gilmour 1,2,4,*
PMCID: PMC12824596  PMID: 41563913

Abstract

Cleaning and disinfection of food production environments (FPE) are fundamental components of food safety programmes designed to control microbial pathogens and prevent food contamination. Yet, FPE can still harbour foodborne pathogens, including Listeria monocytogenes, a significant concern to food manufacturers and health authorities due to the high mortality rate associated with invasive listeriosis. Mechanisms contributing to L. monocytogenes persistence in FPE include biofilm formation and reduced susceptibility to biocides, such as benzalkonium chloride (BC), for which several mechanisms are known. We hypothesized that prolonged exposure to disinfectants and other FPE-associated stressors would drive L. monocytogenes adaptation, resulting in the accumulation of genetic mutations linked to biofilm formation and reduced biocide susceptibility. To test this, we developed a biofilm persistence model, which studied 30 consecutive passages of biofilm-associated cells grown on stainless steel under sub-inhibitory BC concentrations. Whole-genome sequencing of evolved populations identified mutations that were associated with biofilm lineages and/or BC exposure. Non-synonymous mutations were identified in genes and pathways involved in metal homeostasis, stress response and pyrimidine biosynthesis. In addition, reduced susceptibility to BC arose through multiple independent mutations within the fepRA operon, encoding FepR transcriptional repressor and FepA MATE efflux pump. These mutations were observed across both planktonic and biofilm lifestyles, resulting in a comparable level of reduced susceptibility to BC in both states. Several loci with fixed mutations associated with biofilm lineages were identified, including the ykoK riboswitch leader, the pyrimidine synthesis operon and the stress response-related gene rsbU. Collectively, these findings provide new insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying L. monocytogenes biofilm persistence and reduced biocide susceptibility in the context of FPE and reveal novel targets potentially exploited by L. monocytogenes to establish and maintain niches in unfavourable environments.

Keywords: adaptive evolution, benzalkonium chloride, biofilm, disinfectant, food processing environment, Listeria monocytogenes, reduced susceptibility


Impact Statement.

This study advances the understanding of Listeria monocytogenes adaptation to food processing environments, with a focus on sequence type 121, a prevalent lineage commonly associated with contamination in food and food processing facilities. Key findings include the identification of novel pathways linked to reduced disinfectant susceptibility and biofilm persistence, which may be exploited by L. monocytogenes to establish and maintain niches in otherwise unfavourable conditions. These pathways encompass mechanisms related to metal ion homeostasis, de novo pyrimidine synthesis and general stress response. Additionally, putative compensatory mechanisms were detected for some of the described pathways at later evolutionary stages, insights that would not be captured through single-time-point studies, highlighting the necessity of a longitudinal approach. We also expanded current knowledge of L. monocytogenes reduced susceptibility to benzalkonium chloride through the fepRA operon. This included the discovery of previously unreported mutations in the untranslated region of fepR, its coding sequence and in the fepA efflux pump. These findings provide molecular targets for surveillance of disinfectant-adapted strains in food processing environments and highlight the need for biocide management strategies that limit the selection of efflux-based tolerance mechanisms. Ultimately, understanding how L. monocytogenes adapts to food processing environments enables the development of improved food safety measures. These insights can support more effective strategies to prevent contamination of food production facilities and reduce the risk of in-factory foodborne pathogen transmission.

Data Summary

Data are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information under BioProject: PRJNA1276474 (Quadram Institute Bioscience). SRA and BioSample accession numbers are provided in Table S3. The authors confirm that all supporting data and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files.

Introduction

Food production environments (FPE) are complex ecosystems that can harbour diverse microbial communities capable of surviving despite intensive microbiological control procedures. These communities are shaped by multiple factors that promote the establishment of microbial niches and select for specific microbial members [1,2]. While most of FPE-associated communities are non-pathogenic, a smaller proportion may contain pathogenic bacteria, posing significant risks to food safety [3,4]. One pathogen of significant concern to both food manufacturers and public health authorities is Listeria monocytogenes, the causative agent of invasive listeriosis. Although the incidence of listeriosis remains relatively low, ranging from 0.13 to 0.38 cases per 100,000 people in England and Wales in 2023, the consequences can be severe. Mortality was 21.6% in England and Wales in 2023, with fatal obstetrical outcomes occurring in 20–30% of affected pregnancies [5,9].

A defining trait of L. monocytogenes is its ability to persist on FPE surfaces within biofilms, self-organized microbial communities encased in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances [10]. Once established, these biofilms are notoriously difficult to eradicate and can persist in food factories for decades, leading to recurrent contamination of food products [11]. L. monocytogenes biofilms commonly develop on surfaces, such as conveyor belts, drains, surface cracks and crevices [12], where they protect against multiple environmental stressors, including physical (shear-force, reduced temperatures), chemical (bactericidal compounds) and biological (nutrient/niche competition) stressors [13,15].

Certain subtypes of L. monocytogenes are more commonly associated with FPEs, particularly lineage II strains [16,18] Among lineage II strains, sequence type 121 (ST121) is notable for its frequent isolation from FPE and food products, including dairy, fish, turkey and sandwiches, although it is rarely associated with clinical cases [11]. Despite a lower virulence potential [19], the persistence of ST121 in FPEs poses a critical food safety challenge. Notable incidents have occurred in the UK [20] and Norway [21], where contaminated ready-to-eat foods were consumed by immunocompromised individuals.

This persistence is facilitated by intrinsic and acquired genetic traits that enhance L. monocytogenes survival and niche establishment within larger microbial communities [22,24], under refrigeration temperatures, high salt concentrations, low pH and exposure to biocides [12,22, 25, 26]. Among the most widely used disinfectants in FPE is benzalkonium chloride (BC) [27], a broad-spectrum disinfectant with a multi-factorial mode of action, including the inactivation of metabolic enzymes, denaturation of proteins and disruption of membrane bilayers [28,29]. However, L. monocytogenes can develop reduced susceptibility to BC following prolonged exposure, which may also reduce susceptibility to antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin and gentamicin [30]. Known reduced susceptibility mechanisms to BC include several efflux pump systems, such as QacH encoded on the transposon Tn6188 [31], EmrE on the genomic island LGI1 [32], two small multidrug resistance efflux pumps BcrB and BcrC located on a bcrABC cassette and the fepRA operon consisting of multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) efflux pump (FepA) and its local repressor (FepR) [27,33,36].

Complementing these reduced susceptibility mechanisms, L. monocytogenes also harbours a repertoire of biofilm-associated traits that support its persistence across varied environmental conditions [37]. These include surface structures such as flagellin A [encoded by flaA (lmo0690)], which facilitates initial attachment, and ActA, which promotes bacterial aggregation and biofilm development. Internalins A and B (InlA and InlB) also contribute to biofilm maturation by enhancing surface adhesion and cell-to-cell interactions [38]. Biofilm regulation is further influenced by quorum sensing systems, including the LuxS/AI-2 system, which has been associated with repression of biofilm-related genes, and the AgrBDCA operon, which promotes biofilm formation through peptide-based signalling [38,39].

We hypothesized that L. monocytogenes adapts to FPE-associated stressors through acquisition of genetic mutations that enhance biofilm formation and confer reduced biocide susceptibility. However, the specific genetic changes driving this adaptation, especially in the context of biofilm-associated cells, remain unknown. To address this, we developed a continuous in vitro biofilm model that resembles key conditions in FPE and allows us to study the long-term evolution of L. monocytogenes under sub-inhibitory BC exposure. We selected a biocide-susceptible, 1980s-era, chicken-derived L. monocytogenes ST121 isolate as a naive baseline strain. Being an older susceptible isolate, it is less likely to have undergone contemporary FPE bottlenecks, thus providing an opportunity to observe adaptation under experimentally imposed stresses. After 30 consecutive passages of evolution, followed by whole-genome sequencing of the evolved populations, we identified adaptive mutations that became fixed over time and described the genetic mechanisms driving L. monocytogenes persistence in food processing environments.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

L. monocytogenes isolate BL87-028 was selected as the wild-type, naive strain for the biofilm persistence model (BPM) experiment. This strain was isolated in 1987 from a chicken in the UK. Based on the analysis of the complete hybrid genome assembly (BioSample: SAMN28229363), previously performed by our group using short- and long-read sequencing, we identified it as belonging to ST121 and as a non-carrier of qacH and bcrABC cassettes. This strain was selected primarily due to its susceptibility to BC, exhibiting a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 3.12 µg ml−1 – significantly lower than that of closely related strains [40].

In vitro bead-based biofilm persistence model

An in vitro bead-based biofilm persistence model [41,42] was adapted to investigate the effects of exposure of L. monocytogenes to steady and ascending BC concentrations as well as to biofilm persistence (Fig.e S1, available in the online Supplementary Material; Supplementary Material 1). In the context of this study, we defined biofilm persistence as the ability of a microbial population to maintain long-term colonization of a surface through successive cycles of biofilm attachment and dispersal, under recurrent antimicrobial and/or environmental stress.

Four experimental conditions (biofilm steady-exposed, biofilm ladder-exposed, planktonic steady-exposed and planktonic ladder-exposed lineages) and two control conditions (biofilm non-exposed and planktonic non-exposed lineages) (Fig. S1) were performed, with four biologically independent lineages each.

For all conditions, the inoculum was prepared by growing L. monocytogenes in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth (NutriSelect®, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) for 18 h at 37 °C, followed by dilution to an optical density of 0.05 AU (OD600nm) in 1/10 BHI broth. Independent lineages were established from different colonies.

For biofilm lineages, one bead per well was placed in a 12-well microtiter Costar plate (Corning, Corning, NY, USA), containing 2 ml of the diluted culture [0.05 AU (OD600nm) in 1/10 BHI broth] and incubated for 48 h at 20 °C under mild agitation (60 r.p.m.). After incubation, beads were individually collected and washed by submerging twice into sterile PBS to remove loosely attached cells before being transferred into a subsequent 12-well microtiter plate containing sterile 1/10 BHI broth and a sterile bead. At each subsequent passage, only the bead most recently exposed to Listeria was collected for transfer to the next culture. This process was repeated continuously for a total of 30 passages, equivalent to 562 generations, as calculated following the method described by Poltak and Cooper [41]. Stainless-steel (grade 316) beads with a diameter of 6 mm (surface area=113.1 mm2) (Simply Bearings Ltd, Leigh, Lancashire, UK) were used as the substrate for biofilm formation. To distinguish between the beads during passaging (i.e. to reliably collect only the bead most recently exposed to Listeria), alternating beads were marked with lacquer in a small area of the bead (≈5% of the total area), leaving the majority of the bead unmarked for the availability of the stainless-steel surface. Prior to use, the beads were rinsed with water, autoclaved and then submerged in 70% ethanol. Prior to use, the beads were air-dried for 5 min to allow complete evaporation of residual ethanol. All beads were used only once.

Planktonic lineages (without the bead) were established in parallel as controls for the biofilm condition. For planktonic lineages, 2 ml of the diluted culture (0.05 AU (OD600nm) in 1/10 BHI broth) was incubated without beads in a 12-well microtiter plate for 48 h at 20 °C under mild agitation (60 r.p.m.). After incubation, 30 serial passages at 48 h were performed by preparing a 1/100 dilution of the bacterial culture in sterile 1/10 BHI broth and incubating as described before.

For lineages exposed to the stressor BC (C8H17-C18H37 alkyl distribution, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), two experimental models were tested. In the steady model, cultures were continuously passaged in 1/10 BHI broth supplemented with 0.625 µg ml−1 BC. In the ladder model, passage 11 of the steady model was split from the steady lineages and subjected to increasing BC concentrations: 1.3 µg ml−1 from passage 11 to 30 (1-step ladder) or, at passage 22, a further increase to 1.75 µg ml−1 until passage 30 (2-step ladder). Glycerol stocks were prepared at three selected time points – ‘early’ (passage 11), ‘mid’ (passage 22) and ‘late’ (passage 30), for both steady and ladder models. Biofilm beads were preserved in 1.5 ml of 20% glycerol prepared in 1/10 BHI broth, while 750 µl of planktonic cultures were mixed 1:1 with 50% glycerol. All samples were stored at −70 °C in 96-well deep-well plates (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). For biofilm lineages, the stored beads were later processed by detaching bead-attached cells (see the ‘Cell attachment capacity’ section), which were then mixed with 50% glycerol (1: 1 ratio) and stored again at −70 °C.

At each time point, the entire culture obtained from a biofilm or planktonic lineage was considered a population, representing the collective population-level phenotype. Both detached biofilm and planktonic cultures were plated on BHI agar and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. From each population lineage, three random colonies, hereafter referred to as individual colonies, representing clonal subpopulations, were isolated and preserved in 20% glycerol at −70 °C. These stocks were used for phenotypic characterization of both population-level and individual-colony traits, as well as for WGS of populations and individual colonies.

Cell attachment capacity

The cell attachment capacity assay was used to quantify the population of the parental strain on beads during BPM optimization, as well as to measure the surface attachment capacity of late evolved lineages.

Following biofilm formation (see the ‘In vitro bead-based biofilm persistence model (BPM)’ section), beads were submerged twice in 1 ml of sterile PBS contained in a 24-deep well plate (Axygen, Corning, NY, USA) to remove loosely attached cells. Washed beads were transferred into 1 ml PBS and then sonicated at 50 Hz for 5 min to detach cells from the surface of the beads. Plate counts of the bead-detached cell suspensions were performed on BHI agar, incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and the CFUs per bead were then calculated using the following formula: [(Number of colonies × dilution factor) / volume of culture plated] / volume used to sonicate one bead. Three biological and three technical replicates were included for each tested isolate.

Biocide sensitivity testing

The MIC of BC was determined using a modification of the agar dilution antimicrobial susceptibility method [43]. A 96-well pin replicator (Boekel Scientific, Feasterville-Trevose, PA, USA) was used to inoculate 104 c.f.u. ml−1 on lysed horse blood-Mueller–Hinton agar containing increasing BC concentrations (0 µg ml−1, 2.5 µg ml−1, 5 µg ml−1, 7.5 µg ml−1, 10 µg ml−1, 12.5 µg ml−1, 15 µg ml−1 and 20 µg ml−1). The growth-control plates (0 µg ml−1 BC concentration) were inoculated first and last to detect contamination or significant biocide carryover. MICs were recorded as the lowest BC concentration that entirely inhibited the growth of the strains. The mean MIC value was then calculated by averaging the values of three biological replicates. Data were presented for populations (whole culture) and individual colonies derived from respective populations.

Biomass quantification

Production of biofilm biomass was quantified by the crystal violet assay (modified from [44]). Overnight cultures of the parental strain, evolved populations and individual colonies derived from these populations from the steady model were grown in BHI broth and diluted in 1/10 BHI broth to an absorbance of 0.05 AU (OD600nm). A 200 µl inoculum was transferred into a microtiter plate (Greiner, Kremsmünster, Austria). Microtiter plates were sealed with an adhesive gas-permeable membrane (Starlab, Hamburg, Germany) and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h, statically. Following the incubation period, the culture was removed, and the plates were washed with deionised water three times, air-dried, stained with 1% crystal violet solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Next, 70% ethanol was added to the wells, and absorbance was determined for each well at OD590nm using FLUOstar OMEGA plate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) in spiral averaging mode. Three biological and three technical replicates were included for each isolate. A sterile control well containing only the growth media was included in all experiments.

Microscopy

Imaging was conducted exclusively on the L. monocytogenes parental strain as part of the optimization and validation of the bead-based biofilm persistence model. The purpose of this analysis was to confirm that reproducible biofilms could be established under the selected experimental conditions and to visualize their spatial organization on stainless-steel surfaces.

For both fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy, overnight cultures of the parental strain grown in BHI broth were diluted to an absorbance of 0.05 AU (OD600nm) in 1/10 BHI broth. Two millilitres of the diluted culture was added to each well of a 12-well polystyrene plate (Corning, NY, USA), each containing three stainless steel grade 316 coupons (10 mm diameter, 3 mm thick; LaserMaster, Redruth, Cornwall, UK). Coupons were incubated at 20 °C under mild agitation (60 r.p.m.) for 48 h to allow biofilm formation.

Fluorescence microscopy

Following incubation, coupons were gently washed with PBS to remove loosely attached cells and subsequently fixed for 30 min in 4% paraformaldehyde prepared in PBS. For staining, 100µl of a 5µM SYTO9 Green Fluorescent Nucleic Acid Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) solution in PBS was applied to each coupon, followed by a 15-min incubation in the dark. Excess stain was removed by washing once with PBS. Coupons were then transferred into a µ-Dish (35 mm, high, glass-bottom dish; ibidi, Gräfelfing, Germany) equipped with an adhesive gene frame (25 µl, 1.0×1.0 cm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Imaging was performed using a DeltaVision Elite Deconvolution Microscope (General Electric, Boston, MA, USA) equipped with a UPlanFLN Semi Apochromat 10× objective (Olympus, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan), with a numerical aperture of 0.3. Fluorescence images were acquired using the FITC channel (excitation, 470/24 nm; emission, 525/36 nm) at a resolution of 512×512 pixels. Z-stack images were captured at 0.2-µm intervals. Four biological replicates were examined, with ten fields of view captured per replicate.

Scanning electron microscopy

Following incubation, coupons were gently washed with PBS to remove loosely attached cells and subsequently fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde diluted in 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer for 1 h. A sterile coupon, prepared using the same procedure, served as a control to distinguish the coupon surface from biofilm biomass. After fixation, the fixative was removed, and coupons underwent three washes with 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer. The coupons were then post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h.

After three washes with distilled water, coupons were dehydrated through an ethanol dilution series (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90% and 3 changes of 100% ethanol), each step lasting at least 15 min, with a final rinse and dry in 100% ethanol. Coupons were dried in an EM CPD300 Critical Point Dryer (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) using liquid carbon dioxide as the transition fluid. Dried coupons were attached to aluminium SEM stubs using silver paint, coated with an 8.5 nm layer of gold in an ACE 600 sputter coater (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), and immediately imaged in a Nova NanoSEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) scanning electron microscope at 3 kV.

DNA extraction

DNA was obtained from 1 ml of overnight cultures grown in BHI broth from populations (whole culture) and individual colonies. Prior to extraction, the cells were lysed in a custom lysis solution [20 mg ml−1 lysozyme (Roche, Basel, Switzerland)] and 1.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in H2O) and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by addition of 20 mg ml−1 RNase A solution (Promega, Madison, USA). DNA was extracted using the Maxwell® RSC Cultured Cells DNA Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) on the Maxwell® RSC 48 automated extraction system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentrations were measured using Qubit™ dsDNA Quantification Assay Kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

DNA sequencing

Sequencing was performed at the Quadram Institute (Norwich, UK). DNA was normalized to a concentration of 5 ng µl−1 and used to generate 150 bp paired-end sequencing libraries with the Illumina DNA Prep Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina NextSeq 500 instrument using Mid Output Flowcell and NSQ® 500 Mid Output KT v2 (300 cycles). The short-read files are publicly available (BioProject: PRJNA1276474).

Bioinformatic analysis

Paired-end short reads were filtered with trimmomatic (v0.38.0) (GitHub - usadellab/Trimmomatic) using default parameters with a sliding window of 4 bp and quality of 20 and inspected for contamination using kraken2 (v2.1.1) [45]. SNPs between the evolved lineages (entire population and individual colonies) and the parental strain were identified by comparing the trimmed paired-end reads and the annotated genome of BL87-028 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14906828) in GenBank format using Snippy (v4.4.3) [46] using default parameters. Outputs were manually analysed in Microsoft Excel, and synonymous variants were excluded from further analysis. To identify SNPs unique to the biocide or biofilm conditions, we used an online Venn diagram tool [47] and selected only those SNPs that appeared exclusively in the conditions of interest. The genes carrying SNPs, their frequency and the number of SNPs per experimental condition were plotted using the RAWGraphs web tool [48]. SNP positions were labelled on the BL87-028 genome and visualized with SnapGene Viewer (v6.2.2).

Conservation of nucleic acid residues

Conservation of the mutated residues within the ykoK leader was evaluated by comparison with homologous sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database using blast [49]. Homologous sequences were retrieved (Table S1; Supplementary Material 2), excluding L. monocytogenes (taxid: 1639), to assess conservation within the Listeria genus. To assess conservation outside of the Listeria genus, sequences of related non-Listeria species were retrieved (Table S2). Multiple sequence alignment was performed in clustalw (v2.1) [50] on 50 sequences. Graphical representation of nucleic acid sequence alignment was generated with WebLogo (v.2.8.2) [51,52].

The alignment of the ykoK leader sequence against the ykoK leader from Bacillus subtilis IA40 (PDB: 2QBZ) was conducted using the Sequence Alignment Tool available on VectorBuilder (vectorbuilder.com). InterPro was used with default parameters to predict functional domains in analysed proteins against signatures from member databases [53]. Predicted protein structures were obtained from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database [54,56], while experimentally determined structures were retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) [57]. Accession numbers were provided for all structures used in the analysis.

Statistical analysis

All data were analysed using GraphPad Prism 5.4, and results are expressed as mean±sd, unless stated otherwise.

Statistical comparisons between multiple groups were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for pairwise comparisons, when data passed the normality test with the Shapiro–Wilk test and had a variance ratio below 4. In cases where data did not pass suitability for ANOVA, it was tested with the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05, with significance levels indicated as follows: P<0.05 (*), P<0.01 (**), P<0.001 (***) and P<0.0001 (****).

Results

Establishment of a biofilm persistence model for L. monocytogenes

The model involves biofilm formation on a solid substrate (bead) suspended in liquid culture media, followed by biofilm detachment and re-establishment through sequential bead passaging. This process is repeated under selective pressure (i.e. exposure to sub-inhibitory concentration of biocide) with the opportunity to characterize evolving populations of L. monocytogenes using whole-genome sequencing. To establish a robust and reproducible BPM, we optimized several parameters, including (1) incubation time for consistent biofilm formation, (2) sub-inhibitory concentration of BC, (3) long-term stability of bacterial populations in the presence of BC and (4) differentiation between the beads from alternating passages.

To determine the optimal incubation period for biofilm formation, we quantified the total population of L. monocytogenes parental strain supported on a 6-mm bead in 1/10 BHI broth. We selected a 48-h incubation period, which yielded 105–106 c.f.u. bead−1, a range previously described to be sufficient for stable biofilm carry-over between passages [42].

We then identified a BC concentration that could support a population density on the beads comparable to non-exposed control. The mean MIC value for planktonic cells was determined to be 3.12 µg ml−1 of BC. We tested the effect of sub-inhibitory BC concentrations below the MIC level (2, 1.25 and 0.625 µg ml−1) on biofilm-forming capacity on beads. A concentration of 0.625 µg ml−1 BC was selected, as it did not significantly reduce the number of viable cells attaching to the bead surface compared to the non-exposed control (Fig. 1a). Bacterial populations were also maintained over the course of five passages with a 48-h incubation period between the passages, at 0.625 µg ml−1 BC, further validating that this is a sub-inhibitory concentration (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1. Optimization and validation of the biofilm persistence model. (a) Selection of sub-inhibitory BC concentration. Biofilm formation on stainless steel beads was assessed following 48-h incubation with 0, 0.625, 1.25 and 2 µg ml−1 BC. The sub-inhibitory concentration of 0.625 µg ml−1 maintained the population size of the parental strain within the desired range of 10⁵−10⁶ c.f.u. bead−1. (b) Model stability across passages. Using 0.625 µg ml−1 BC, the stability of the biofilm model was confirmed over five consecutive 48 h passages [passage 1 (P1) to passage 5 (P5)] by measuring c.f.u. bead−1 on stainless steel beads. The population remained stable in the presence of BC throughout all passages. (c) Validation of bead marking method. Beads were marked with nail polish to distinguish between the beads from alternating time points, and their potential impact on bacterial attachment was evaluated. The marking had no detectable effect on the ability of the parental strain to attach to the bead surface. (d) Fluorescence microscopy of the parental strain biofilm. Representative two-dimensional top-view fluorescence image of a 48-h biofilm formed by the parental strain in 1/10 BHI broth at 20 °C, stained with SYTO9, and visualized on stainless-steel (SS316) coupons at 10× magnification. Scale bar is 50 µm. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Dots represent mean values of three technical replicates. Horizontal bars indicate the mean of three biological replicates±sd. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (**P<0.01, ***P<0.001); ns, not significant.

Fig. 1.

We also confirmed that the marking for differentiation between alternating beads from subsequent passages did not significantly impact bacterial attachment to the surface of stainless-steel beads (Fig. 1c).

To validate biofilm formation and spatial distribution under BPM conditions, we used fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) during model optimization. Biofilms formed on stainless-steel coupons were stained with the nucleic acid dye SYTO9 and examined by fluorescence microscopy. The biofilms appeared thin and lacked pronounced three-dimensional structures. Notably, the biofilm displayed a distinctive honeycomb-like hexagonal arrangement (Fig. 1d), likely resulting from cells aligning along microcracks and crevices in the coupon surface. This interpretation was corroborated by SEM, which confirmed the topographical features of the coupon surface (Fig. S2).

Exposure of L. monocytogenes to BC leads to the emergence of planktonic and biofilm lineages with reduced susceptibility

To investigate the adaptive response of L. monocytogenes to BC, we first examined how the steady model supported bacterial adaptation over time. The parental strain was exposed to a constant concentration of 0.625 µg ml−1 BC across eight independent lineages, with four biologically independent lineages evolving under either planktonic or biofilm conditions. Additionally, four non-exposed control lineages were included under both conditions. The steady model was run for 30 passages, with 3 key time points selected for BC susceptibility characterization: early (passage 11, P11), mid (passage 22, P22) and late (passage 30, P30). At each time point, BC tolerance was assessed in both populations (whole evolved cultures) and in individual colonies (randomly isolated colonies per lineage). Fold changes in mean MIC values were calculated relative to the parental strain (Fig. S1).

Following repeated exposure to BC in the steady model, evolved lineages exhibited reduced susceptibility to BC (Fig. 2a–d). In all BC-exposed populations derived from both populations and individual colonies, mean MIC values were significantly higher than those of the non-exposed controls and the parental strain, except early biofilm populations (Fig. 2a). When analysing dynamics in reduced susceptibility across evolutionary time points, no significant change in MIC values was observed among populations (Fig. 2a–b). MIC values for non-exposed control lineages remained consistent across all time points and were comparable to the parental strain (Fig. 2a–d).

Fig. 2. Exposure of L. monocytogenes to BC results in the emergence of tolerant planktonic and biofilm lineages. Fold change in average MICs of BC-exposed and non-exposed lineages, relative to the average MIC of the parental strain, across early (P11), mid (P22) and late (P30) evolutionary passages, under the steady (a–d) and ladder (e–h) models. Data are presented for both populations (a–b, e–f) and individual colonies (c–d, g–h). MIC values were measured in triplicate for each lineage. For populations, results from four independent lineages were averaged. For individual colony populations, the mean MIC from individual representative colonies is shown. Error bars represent standard error. n/a, not applicable.

Fig. 2.

To further evaluate the resilience of evolved lineages under escalating BC stress, we employed the ladder model. Lineages initially exposed to 0.625 µg ml−1 BC during the first 11 passages were subjected to an increase to 1.3 µg ml−1 BC and further evolved until the late passages (P30) (1-step ladder model). All BC-exposed populations showed higher MIC values than non-exposed controls. However, no additional MIC increase was detected in either biofilm (Fig. 2e, g) or planktonic (Fig. 2f, h) populations at mid (P22) or late (P30) passages compared to those exposed to 0.625 µg ml−1 BC.

Lineages exposed to 1.3 µg ml−1 BC between early (P11) and mid (P22) passages underwent a second concentration increase to 1.75 µg ml−1 BC from mid (P22) to late (P30) passages (2-step ladder model). Under these conditions, only biofilm lineages were recovered, while planktonic lineages could not be maintained. Biofilm lineages exposed to 1.75 µg ml−1 BC maintained MIC values comparable to those previously exposed to 1.3 µg ml−1 (Fig. 2e, g), but higher than the average MIC of the non-exposed control.

Genomic adaptations in fepR and 5′ UTR associated with reduced BC susceptibility across planktonic and biofilm conditions

To investigate the genetic changes associated with the emergence of reduced susceptibility to BC, three evolved lineages from each time point (Table S3) under both planktonic and biofilm conditions underwent whole-genome sequencing (for each lineage, entire populations and three individual colonies were sequenced). This was performed for both BC-exposed and non-exposed control lineages. Non-synonymous mutations were identified by comparing short reads from evolved lineages to the annotated parental strain (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14906828). Mutations occurring in BC-exposed lineages from both biofilm and planktonic conditions across three time points are illustrated in Fig. S3. The Venn diagram highlights the overlap and condition-specific distribution of genes carrying SNPs, distinguishing shared adaptive targets from those unique to either biofilm or planktonic lifestyles. Additionally, to visualize the frequency of SNPs, mutations were merged, encompassing six independent lineages, which were compared to mutations in non-exposed control lineages (Fig. 3a) (to view non-synonymous mutations that exclusively were detected in non-exposed lineages, see Fig. S5). Regarding non-synonymous mutations detected in non-exposed lineages, these mutations did not appear in any of the BC exposed conditions and, therefore, did not interfere with the interpretation of the results on adaptation to BC exposure. Notably, mutations in the intergenic region of celB, involved in metabolism of complex carbohydrates [58], were detected in both biofilm and planktonic non-exposed lineages and were not observed in any other condition, which may indicate adaptation specifically to a disinfectant-free environment.

Fig. 3. Mutations in the fepRA operon promote reduced susceptibility to BC in L. monocytogenes under steady and escalating exposure. (a) Mutation frequency scheme for SNPs acquired under steady exposure to BC (0.625 µg ml−1) (conditions ‘BC’) compared to non-exposed control (condition ‘No BC’) at different evolutionary time points: early (passage 11), mid (passage 22) and late (passage 30). Data encompasses six biologically independent lineages for BC-exposed and six for BC-non-exposed conditions at each time point. (b) Distribution and predicted domain location of non-synonymous mutations within fepR under steady and ladder BC exposure models. Gained residues are indicated above the sequence (amino acid map). Amino acids are colour-coded according to the phase in which the mutations were first detected: green, early phase; blue, mid phase; red, late phase. * indicates gain of an early stop codon. A yellow triangle represents mutations that occurred in planktonic lineages. Black triangle, in biofilm lineage; yellow and black circles, in the ladder model. N-terminal DNA binding domain (DBD) is indicated by a rectangle (amino acid residues 1–42). C-terminal effector binding domain spanning α-helices 4 to 9. Structural elements are highlighted below the sequence. (c) Map of base pair substitutions within 5′ UTR of fepR occurring in steady and ladder BC exposure models. Several functional elements were colour coded: blue arrow indicates the transcription start site (TSS), promoter regions −35 and −10 are indicated by a rectangle, the putative FepR operator motif is underscored in light blue, and the ribosome-binding site (RBS) is underscored in black. (d) Mutation frequency scheme for SNPs acquired under increasing exposure to BC (ladder model, 0.625–1.3to 1.75 µg ml−1) at late evolutionary time point. Biologically independent lineages=6 (0.625–1.3 µg ml−1) and 3 (1.75 µg ml−1).

Fig. 3.

In the steady model, all six BC-exposed lineages (biofilm and planktonic) independently acquired mutations in fepR (lmo2088), a local repressor of the MATE fluoroquinolone efflux pump FepA, whereas no mutations in fepR were detected in non-exposed lineages. These mutations rapidly reached fixation in all exposed populations and remained stable across subsequent passages (Fig. 3a). When analysed separately (Fig. S4), fepR mutations were found to occur with similar frequency in both biofilm- and planktonic-derived populations.

Overall, we detected 12 non-synonymous mutations (at 11 positions) within fepR in response to a steady concentration of BC (14 non-synonymous mutations at 13 positions in total for steady and ladder models) (Fig. 3b). We did not identify more than one mutation within fepR in the same isolate. Planktonic lineages exhibited a greater diversity of mutations (11 mutations) compared to biofilm lineages (5 mutations). Seven mutations appeared during early passages (K7E, A10T, V30F, S37T, A96V, F105V and P107L), three emerged at mid passages (L76P, G157R and A181V), with G157R also detectable until the final time point (Fig. 3b). Four mutations were shared between biofilm and planktonic lineages, three in early passages (A10T, A96V and P107L) and one in mid passages (G157V). Notably, a single mutation (E89*), introducing a premature stop codon, was exclusively detected in one biofilm lineage. Among the 12 identified mutations, five (K7E, A10T, L24F, V30F and S37T) were located within the N-terminal DNA-binding domain (DBD) (residues 1–42) [59], including two (V30F, S37T) within the HTH motif (residues 23–42). In particular, the A10T substitution from a non-hydrogen-forming methyl to a hydrogen-forming hydroxyl group leads to a gain of a hydrogen bond-forming ability by the side chain (Table S4).

The remaining seven mutations occurred in the C-terminal effector-binding domain, spanning α-helices 4 to 9 (Fig. 3b). Mutations at position 157 (G157R/V) resulted in two independent amino acid substitutions.

Beyond coding regions, seven mutations were identified in the fepR 5′ UTR (Fig. 3c). A single mutation arose in a planktonic lineage during early passages within the intra-operator spacer, while another was detected in a biofilm lineage at mid passages within the operator. Five mutations (four in planktonic lineages and one in a biofilm lineage) appeared in late passages, distributed across the putative ribosome-binding site, the intra-operator spacer and the operator (Fig. 3c). Two mutations located in the left side of the putative operator motif were predicted to overlap the transcription start site (TSS) occurring at the third and 14th base pairs downstream of the TSS.

Mutations affecting metal homeostasis (corA) and metabolic pathways (bglG; mtnN) were detected in BC-exposed and biofilm-associated populations

The corA gene (lmo1064), encoding a metal cation transporter [60], emerged as another candidate for reduced susceptibility to BC exclusively in biofilm lineages. A total of four distinct non-synonymous mutations were detected in two independent BC-exposed biofilm lineages, with one mutation (S166P) arising in early passages, two (T127K and L292F) in mid passages and one (P268Q) in late passages. Notably, mutation L292F was predicted to reside within a membrane-embedded region (InterPro) (Figs 3a, S6A).

A mutation within the mtnN gene (lmo1494), encoding 5′-methylthioadenosine nucleosidase (UniProt: Q9R4A1), was observed at position 180 (A180T) in a single biofilm lineage during mid and late evolutionary passages (Figs 3a, S6B). Similarly, mutations in the bglG gene (lmo0630), encoding a transcriptional regulator of the bgl operon (phosphotransferase system) [61], were detected in a single biofilm lineage at mid and late passages at position 29 (E29V) (Figs 3a, S6C).

Additional mutations were identified exclusively in BC-exposed lineages, though these only appeared at a single time point. In early passages, such mutations were found in pyrF (lmo1832), lmo1040 and lmo1183. In mid passages, mutations occurred in sufD (lmo2414), srmB (lmo1722), lmo1289 and the intergenic region upstream of crp. In late passages, mutations were detected in lmo2805, lmo0689, rpiB (lmo2662), cyoE (lmo2057), ndk (lmo1929), lipA (lmo1800) and fliG (lmo0714), as well as in the intergenic regions upstream of lmo2410, soxR (lmo2722) and focA (lmo0593) (Fig. 3a).

Stepwise BC escalation does not affect the level of reduced susceptibility to BC but selects for fepA mutations, potentially counteracting fepR effects

We further examined genetic traits associated with adaptation under progressively increasing BC concentration in the ladder model. As with the steady model, mutations occurring in BC-exposed lineages from both biofilm and planktonic conditions were grouped for these analyses, encompassing six independent lineages. Mutations identified in early and late passages from the steady model served as a reference for comparison with the ladder model. Overall, mutations were detected in six genes in lineages exposed to escalating BC concentrations, including fepA, fliG and menH, which were not affected in the steady model.

Mutations in lineages exposed to the 1-step ladder model (0.625 μg ml−1 to 1.3 μg ml−1) were described only for the late passages. All six lineages continued to exhibit mutations in fepR (Fig. 3b, d), including two additional SNPs (L24F and H41Q), which were not identified in the steady model (Fig. 3b). Notably, both mutations were located within the HTH motif of the DBD (spanning amino acid residues 23 to 42). In contrast, three SNPs found in fepR in lineages evolving at 0.625 µg ml−1 (A96V, P107L and G157R/V) were not detected in lineages exposed to 1.3 µg ml−1. Similarly, a mutation in the fepR 5′UTR intra-operator spacer, observed in one lineage exposed to 0.625 µg ml−1 BC, was lost following exposure to 1.3 µg ml−1 BC (Fig. 3c).

Such BC escalation was selected for two new SNPs (H439FS and W70L) in one biofilm lineage within fepA (lmo2087), a MATE efflux pump gene downstream of fepR (Fig. 3d). The H439FS substitution resulted in a frameshift, while the W70L mutation was located on an α-helix within a membrane-embedded region of FepA (spanning amino acid residues 49 to 73) (InterPro) (Fig. S6D). In both cases, mutations in fepA co-occurred with a gain of an early stop codon in fepR (E89*), suggesting a potential compensatory relationship between the two genes.

Additional mutations in several genes were exclusive to the ladder model. In corA, a S166P mutation observed in a biofilm lineage prior to BC escalation was no longer present after the increase in BC concentration. However, a new W290C substitution emerged in a biofilm lineage when the concentration increased to 1.3 µg ml−1 BC. Notably, mutation W290C was predicted to reside within a membrane-embedded region (InterPro) (Figs 3d, S6A).

For lineages exposed to a second BC concentration escalation (1.3 to 1.75 μg ml−1), mutations were described at late passages in three biofilm lineages, as growth was inhibited in planktonic lineages exposed to 1.75 µg ml−1 BC.

In menH (lmo2109), encoding 2-succinyl-6-hydroxy-2,4-cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylate (SHCHC) synthase [62] acquired a T44I substitution (Fig. S6E). While in fliG (lmo0714), a gene involved in flagellar motor function (UniProt: P0ABZ1), a frameshift was acquired (M188FS) (Figs 3d, S6F).

The corA W290C and menH T44I substitutions, previously observed in late passages at 1.3 µg ml−1 of BC, were also observed in populations exposed to 1.75 µg ml−1 of BC (Fig. S6A, E), suggesting they emerged prior to the second escalation.

Mutations in genes related to metal homeostasis, pyrimidine synthesis and stress response underline biofilm persistence

To investigate genetic traits associated with biofilm persistence, the steady model dataset was reanalysed by grouping mutations based on lifestyle rather than BC exposure. Mutations identified in six independent biofilm lineages (three BC-exposed and three non-exposed) were compared to those detected in six independent planktonic lineages (three BC-exposed and three non-exposed) across every evolutionary time point (Table S5).

Among the genetic elements associated with biofilm persistence, dispersion, growth and related to metal ion homeostasis were ykoK leader, mgtA (lmo0818), pitA (lmo0405) and corA. ykoK, which encodes the M-Box riboswitch RNA, exhibited five mutations at nucleotide residues 20, 33, 39, 63 and 97 exclusively in biofilm lineages (Fig. 4a–b). These mutations accumulated over time. Three mutations were observed during early passages in three lineages, one additional mutation emerged in a fourth lineage during mid passages and a further mutation was detected in a fifth lineage during the late passages. Analysis based on the complete structure of the ykoK leader from B. subtilis IA40 (PDB: 2QBZ) revealed that all five mutations mapped to regions conserved between B. subtilis IA40 and the L. monocytogenes parental strain (Fig. 4b). Notably, nucleotide residues 20, 63 and 97 are positioned near Mg2+-interacting sites that are critical for maintaining the RNA’s structural conformation [63], while residues 33, 63 and 97 are also located near long-range base pairs that stabilize the termination loop. Comparative analysis of ykoK sequences across related species (Table S1 and S2, Fig. S7) showed that in Gram-positive species outside the Listeria genus, residues 20 and 63 are fully conserved, while residues 33, 39 and 97 are more variable (Fig. S7B). Within the Listeria genus, residues 20 and 97 are highly conserved, while substitutions are tolerated at positions 33, 39 and 63 (Fig. S7A). The high conservation of residue 20 across both Listeria and other Gram-positive species suggests that mutations at this position are likely to have significant functional impacts.

Fig. 4. Mutations associated with metal homeostasis, pyrimidine synthesis and stress response in biofilm lineages. (a) Mutation frequency heatmap for SNPs acquired exclusively in biofilm lineages. The number of independent lineages carrying mutations linked to biofilm persistence is compared to planktonic controls. Six biologically independent biofilm and planktonic lineages were analysed. Evolutionary time points are categorized as early, mid and late phases. Colour intensity and square size indicate the number of independent lineages containing a SNP at each locus, with darker/larger squares representing higher frequency. Absence of squares indicates no detected mutations. (b) Structural mapping of the YkoK riboswitch leader and mutated residues. Conserved nucleotides between the parental strain and B. subtilis are shown in grey. Structurally important domains and putative magnesium-binding sites, inferred from B. subtilis, are indicated. YkoK predicted structure was obtained from NCBI: 2QBZ and previous studies [63]. (c) Overview of amino acid substitutions detected in MgtA in biofilm-associated lineages across early, mid and late time points. Substitutions are indicated by triangles, with predicted structural and functional domains annotated based on InterPro predictions.

Fig. 4.

Two non-synonymous mutations (A286G and L687I) were detected in mgtA, in a single biofilm lineage (Fig. 4a). mgtA encodes a divalent metal transporter [64] located downstream of ykoK. Mutations in A286G (emerged during mid passage) and L687I (emerged during late passage) were both predicted to reside within transmembrane domains (residues 223–330 and 634–810, respectively) (Fig. 4c). L687I substitution co-occurred with mutations in ykoK at residue 37, while A286G substitution was detected independently. Notably, the L687I substitution from a hydrophilic, positively charged amino group to a hydrophobic, neutral isopropyl group leads to a loss of a hydrogen bond-forming ability by the side chain (Table S6). Non-synonymous mutations were also detected in pitA, encoding a low-affinity inorganic phosphate transporter [65,66]. The I58M substitution was detected in a single biofilm lineage during mid and late passages (Fig.re S8A) and notably co-occurred with a mutation in ykoK at residue 33.

Non-synonymous mutations were also identified in five genes of the pyrimidine biosynthesis operon: pyrB (lmo1838), carB (lmo1835), pyrF (lmo1832), pyrD (lmo1833) and pyrE (lmo1831) (Fig. 4a and Fig. 5)

Fig. 5. Amino acid substitutions in pyrimidine synthesis operon genes detected exclusively in biofilm lineages of the biofilm persistence model experiment. Graphical overview of substitutions detected in early, mid and late time points during biofilm adaptation. Structural and positional mapping of mutations is shown for (a) PyrB, (b) CarB, (c) PyrF, (d) PyrD and (e) PyrE. Mutations are indicated by triangles, with orange boxes highlighting affected regions. * indicates an early stop codon, and FS denotes a frameshift mutation. Predicted structural and functional domains were annotated using InterPro.

Fig. 5.

Mutations also accumulated in the SigB regulatory operon (rsbU, rsbV and rsbW) (Figs 4a, S9). rsbU (lmo0892) exhibited six unique non-synonymous mutations: one early (E94FS), three mid (E22G, T204M and L60FS) and two late (Y9H and S41*). Frameshifts (L60FS and E94FS) and the stop codon S41* likely cause loss of function. T204M, within the PPM domain, may disrupt metal coordination, while Y9H and E22G near the active site may destabilize substrate binding. In rsbV (lmo0893), a single S58R substitution occurs at the regulatory phosphorylation site, potentially affecting sigma-B activation [67]. In rsbW, a stop codon (Q22*) was detected in the same lineage as the rsbU mutation S41*, suggesting coordinated disruption of SigB regulation.

Eight mutations were identified in the non-coding region upstream of a gene homologous to lmo0331 (39% identity with InlJ; PDB: 3BZ5) during late passages (Fig. 4a), potentially affecting gene expression. Additional mutations were found in rnfC (lmo1142), which encodes an oxidoreductase complex subunit involved in ion transport (UniProt: Q7VNT4) and ndh (lmo2638), encoding NADH dehydrogenase. A frameshift mutation in rnfC (V410FS) appeared in a single biofilm lineage during mid and late passages (Fig. S8B). Similarly, ndh mutations (A274T; A259P) were observed in the same lineage over the same time points.

Finally, additional mutations exclusive to biofilm-associated lineages were detected at single time points (Fig. 4a). Regions affected during the early passages included iap, yloV (lmo1814), araJ (lmo2377), pgpH (lmo1466), locus_9565 and the intergenic region upstream of guA1. In mid passages, mutations occurred in bdS1 (sepA), walk (lmo1061), marR (lmo1850), lolE (lmo1224), golR (lmo0352), yhcF (lmo0741), degU (lmo0352), yvaK (lmo0857), sufD and srmB. In late passages, mutations were detected in feoB (lmo2105), atpA1 (lmo0090), lysR (lmo0488), dtd (lmo1522), locus_12680 (l-alanoyl-d-glutamate peptidase), glpK (lmo1538), tlyC (lmo2232), yurZ (lmo0661), aceF (pdhC), fbp, catE (lmo0646), inlH and the intergenic regions upstream of lmo2743, peptidoglycan bound protein (locus_15625), DUF1310 and locus_00370.

Biofilm persistence did not elicit an increase in biomass

Evaluation of late passages of biofilm lineages revealed that neither cell attachment to the bead (Fig. S10A) nor overall biomass production (Fig. S10B) increased between lineages exposed to BC and those evolved in the absence of BC.

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to reveal mechanisms of FPE persistence by developing an adaptive biofilm model that resembles the conditions in FPE and allows for the in vitro evolution of genetic traits in L. monocytogenes. The model simulated the application of biocides typical of cleaning and disinfection programmes, along with FPE conditions such as low nutrient availability, reduced temperature and surface characteristics. The study specifically focused on selective outcomes associated with reduced BC susceptibility and biofilm persistence. The decision to summarize overall mutational trends rather than track individual lineages reflects the strength of the dataset, which captures population-level convergence under repeated selective pressures.

Through our steady model, we determined that adaptation to sub-inhibitory BC concentrations consistently targeted FepR, in both planktonic and biofilm lineages. Consistent with our findings, Guerin et al. [33] and Bolten et al. [68] reported that single non-synonymous mutations in fepR led to a twofold increase in BC MIC compared to the parental strain, in addition to other short-term evolution studies in L. monocytogenes, which also reported the emergence of BC-tolerant mutants [69,70]. These previous studies primarily focused on planktonic populations and did not assess biofilm-specific or long-term adaptive processes. In contrast, our model captured a more integrated spectrum of adaptation, from early mutational events associated with reduced susceptibility to BC, to longer-term compensatory mechanisms, particularly within biofilm-associated populations.

We also detected multiple mutations within the 5′ UTR of the fepRA operon, including five within the operator motif and two in the ribosome-binding site. These findings align with recent work by Schulz et al. [71], which implicated the 5′ UTR in fepA derepression.

Using both biofilm and planktonic models allowed for a direct comparison between the two systems, with the main mechanism involving fepR detected in both. Notably, a higher number of mutated loci under BC exposure was identified in the biofilm model (16 loci, including corA, mtnN and bglG) compared to the planktonic model (eight loci). This difference highlights distinct adaptive patterns between the two growth modes and suggests that the biofilm model may offer advantages for similar experimental evolution studies. In addition to being more representative of real-world conditions, the biofilm model also enabled the detection of adaptive pathways that were not observed in the planktonic counterpart. Notably, the extended design of the ladder model enabled us to capture not only the early adaptive responses in fepR, but also potential compensatory changes in fepA that emerged in the later passages. These previously unreported mutations in fepA co-occurred with a premature stop codon mutation in fepR (E89*), observed only in late passages. We hypothesize that such mutations may reduce or disrupt FepA function, thereby counteracting the constitutive overexpression driven by inactivation of fepR. Given that fepA expression can increase by 6- to 64-fold depending on the growth phase, sustained overexpression may impose a significant metabolic burden associated with continuous efflux activity. Thus, a partial loss of function in fepA may confer a fitness advantage by fine-tuning reduced susceptibility while mitigating the fitness cost of efflux hyperactivity.

Upregulation of phosphotransferase system genes, including bglG, has been observed by others in BC-tolerant mutants [72]. We also observed a bglG mutation in a BC-exposed condition, hinting at a broader metabolic adaptation, which may lead to a slower metabolic rate and, as a result, reduce active antimicrobial targets. Notably, as bglG mutations were also detected in biofilm conditions, they may impact the sessile lifestyle.

Recent studies suggest that CorA in Mycobacterium smegmatis and Escherichia coli may facilitate the extrusion of multiple structurally diverse drug classes, thereby reducing the susceptibility of host cells to these antimicrobials [73]. Fixation of corA mutations in BC-exposed lineages during our evolution experiment suggests that similar reduced susceptibility mechanisms may be at play in L. monocytogenes.

Beyond BC adaptation, our model revealed parallel mutations occurring in genes involved in metal ion homeostasis, pyrimidine biosynthesis and stress response, which may contribute to biofilm persistence. Among the most consistent findings were mutations impacting magnesium homeostasis, involving the ykoK leader, mgtA and pitA. The ykoK leader, which encodes the M-box riboswitch, was particularly enriched with mutations across all time points. Located upstream of mgtA, the ykoK leader functions as a magnesium-sensitive riboswitch that is suggested to regulate transcription of downstream mgtA depending on intracellular magnesium levels [74]. While the structure of M-Box in L. monocytogenes remains unresolved, a structural model from B. subtilis has identified magnesium-binding sites required for conformational control [63]. In our study, mutations were located near three predicted magnesium-interactive sites within conserved regions between L. monocytogenes and B. subtilis, as well as at predicted long-range base pair sites, suggesting potential disruption of riboswitch folding. Such disruption may affect M-box sensitivity to intracellular magnesium concentrations and, consequently, transcriptional regulation of mgtA.

Alongside ykoK mutations, we observed co-occurring mutations in mgtA and pitA, particularly in predicted transmembrane domains, suggesting functional fine-tuning of ion transport activity. mgtA encodes a magnesium-specific P-type ATPase capable of magnesium uptake [64], while pitA encodes a phosphate transporter which mediates the proton-driven uptake of soluble neutral metal phosphate (MeHP04) complexes [65]. Since magnesium forms metal phosphate salts, thereby reducing its bioavailability, altered uptake of phosphates via pitA may indirectly modulate intracellular magnesium concentrations [66]. Such coordinated changes likely reflect an adaptive strategy to balance magnesium acquisition with energy cost, a balance especially important in biofilms, where ionic gradients, nutrient limitations and metabolic stress differ significantly from planktonic conditions [75].

Our findings align with prior research highlighting the role of magnesium in biofilm development. Chalke et al. [76] reported that exposure to 50 mM magnesium enhanced L. monocytogenes biofilm formation and influenced later stages of biofilm development. Similarly, Nowak et al. [77] found that inactivation of mgtB, another magnesium transporter, led to the formation of a unique biofilm with a sandwich-like structure, likely due to the stabilization of the extracellular polymeric matrix. These observations suggest that magnesium availability may influence biofilm physiology through multiple mechanisms, including its role as a cofactor, a signalling element or a modulator of ionic balance, rather than through effects on growth alone [78]. Although the effects of magnesium on biofilms vary across bacterial species, either promoting or inhibiting biofilm formation depending on concentrations and environmental context [79,84], our results support a central role of magnesium homeostasis in L. monocytogenes biofilm persistence.

Another key adaptation pathway in biofilm lineages was de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis. Several genes in this pathway (carB, pyrD, pyrF, pyrB and pyrE) acquired mutations exclusively in biofilm lineages. Previous studies in other bacterial species have linked pyrimidine biosynthesis genes to biofilm formation. For example, pyrD inactivation in E. coli reduced flagellar motility and biofilm formation by downregulating the expression of both type 1 fimbriae and curli subunit genes [85]. Similarly, in Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri, carB was required for swimming motility and biofilm formation [86]. Likewise, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, de novo UMP biosynthesis was necessary for biofilm formation [87]. Although this link has not been previously demonstrated in L. monocytogenes, our findings suggest that disruption of pyrimidine biosynthesis may serve as a signal of severe nutrient stress, leading to the downregulation of biofilm-associated genes and potentially triggering biofilm dispersal or a transition to planktonic growth, paralleling mechanisms observed in P. aeruginosa [88].

We also identified recurrent mutations in rsbU, a positive regulator of the alternative sigma factor SigB, which controls ~300 genes involved in stress resistance and survival [89]. Mutations in rsbU occurred across all three evolutionary time points in several biofilm lineages, but were absent in BC-adapted lineages, contrary to the observations of Douarre et al. [90]. This result suggests that rsbU mutations may specifically benefit the sessile lifestyle. Supporting this hypothesis, the deletion of rsbU has been linked to increased extracellular matrix production and the number of cells in the biomass of L. monocytogenes [91]. Notably, in our study, a premature stop codon in rsbW co-occurred within the same lineage as the S41* premature stop codon in rsbU. This pattern may indicate a compensatory mechanism, where the rsbW loss-of-function mutation mitigates the altered stress response imposed by the loss of rsbU function.

Collectively, we demonstrated that L. monocytogenes biofilms sensitive to low concentrations of common FPE disinfectants can rapidly develop a tolerant phenotype. Our findings also provide new insights into biofilm persistence genetic mechanisms within FPEs and the potential targets exploited by L. monocytogenes to establish and maintain niches under otherwise unfavourable conditions. Importantly, the use of an evolutionary model enabled us to capture compensatory mechanisms that are not detectable through single time-point analyses or short-term stress exposures. Future investigations should focus on characterizing the mechanisms associated with these targets and their roles in biofilm formation and persistence.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Material 1.
mgen-12-01611-s001.pdf (18.3MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001611
Supplementary Material 2.
mgen-12-01611-s002.xlsx (47.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001611

Acknowledgements

We thank the Quadram Institute Bioscience Advanced Microscopy Facility, especially Dr James Lazenby and Kathryn Gotts. We also acknowledge the Quadram Institute Bioscience Sequencing Core Facility, particularly David Baker and Cara-Jane Moss. We are grateful to members of the Gilmour and Webber teams, including Elin Smith, for their support.

Abbreviations

BC

benzalkonium chloride

BHI

Brain Heart Infusion

BPM

biofilm persistence model

DBD

DNA-binding domain

FPE

food production environments

MATE

multidrug and toxic compound extrusion

MIC

minimum inhibitory concentration

NCBI

National Center for Biotechnology Information

PDB

Protein Data Bank

SEM

scanning electron microscopy

ST121

sequence type 121

TSS

transcription start site

Footnotes

Funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC). This research was funded by the FSA–UKRI Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Norwich Research Park Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership BB/T008717/1, the BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Microbes and Food Safety BB/X011011/1 and its constituent project BBS/E/QU/230002C (Theme 3, Flexible capabilities to reduce food safety threats and respond to national needs) and BBSRC Core Capability Grant BB/CCG2260/1. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author contributions: Conceptualization: M.G., E.L., A.V.G. and M.A.W. Data curation: O.O., A.V.G. and M.D. Formal analysis: O.O. and A.V.G. Investigation: O.O., A.V.G. and M.D. Methodology: O.O., A.V.G., M.D. and M.S.G. Visualization: O.O., A.V.G. and M.G. Writing: original draft: O.O. and A.V.G. Writing: review and editing: O.O., A.V.G., M.D., M.G., E.L., M.S.G. and M.A.W. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Oleksii Omelchenko, Email: oleksii.omelchenko@quadram.ac.uk.

Ana Victoria Gutiérrez, Email: ana-victoria.gutierrez@quadram.ac.uk.

Maria Diaz, Email: maria.diaz@quadram.ac.uk.

Erin Lewis, Email: erin.lewis@food.gov.uk.

Maria Solsona Gaya, Email: solsonam@stanford.edu.

Mark A Webber, Email: mark.webber@quadram.ac.uk.

Matthew Gilmour, Email: matthew.gilmour@quadram.ac.uk.

References

  • 1.Cobo-Díaz JF, Alvarez-Molina A, Alexa EA, Walsh CJ, Mencía-Ares O, et al. Microbial colonization and resistome dynamics in food processing environments of a newly opened pork cutting industry during 1.5 years of activity. Microbiome. 2021;9:204. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01131-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Diaz M, Aird H, Le Viet T, Gutiérrez AV, Larke-Mejia N, et al. Microbial composition and dynamics in environmental samples from a ready-to-eat food production facility with a long-term colonization of Listeria monocytogenes. Food Microbiol. 2025;125:104649. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2024.104649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fagerlund A, Langsrud S, Møretrø T. Microbial diversity and ecology of biofilms in food industry environments associated with Listeria monocytogenes persistence. Current Opinion in Food Science. 2021;37:171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.10.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Møretrø T, Langsrud S. Residential bacteria on surfaces in the food industry and their implications for food safety and quality. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2017;16:1022–1041. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McLauchlin J, Grant KA, Amar CFL. Human foodborne listeriosis in England and Wales, 1981 to 2015. Epidemiol Infect. 2020;148 doi: 10.1017/S0950268820000473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.UK Health Security Agency Listeriosis in England and Wales: Summary for 2023. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/listeria-monocytogenes-surveillance-reports/listeriosis-in-england-and-wales-summary-for-2023#acknowledgements n.d.
  • 7.Elinav H, Hershko-Klement A, Valinsky L, Jaffe J, Wiseman A, et al. Pregnancy-associated listeriosis: clinical characteristics and geospatial analysis of a 10-year period in Israel. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:953–961. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khalil A, Samara A, O’Brien P, Ladhani S. Listeria outbreaks cause maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity: we must do better. Lancet Microbe. 2023;4:e206–e207. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00388-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang Z, Tao X, Liu S, Zhao Y, Yang X. An update review on Listeria infection in pregnancy. IDR. 2021;Volume 14:1967–1978. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S313675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Donlan RM. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:881–890. doi: 10.3201/eid0809.020063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fagerlund A, Wagner E, Møretrø T, Heir E, Moen B, et al. Pervasive Listeria monocytogenes is common in the norwegian food system and is associated with increased prevalence of stress survival and resistance determinants. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022;88:e0086122. doi: 10.1128/aem.00861-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mazaheri T, Cervantes-Huamán BRH, Bermúdez-Capdevila M, Ripolles-Avila C, Rodríguez-Jerez JJ. Listeria monocytogenes biofilms in the food industry: is the current hygiene program sufficient to combat the persistence of the pathogen? Microorganisms. 2021;9:181. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Davey ME, O’Toole GA. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:847–867. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.64.4.847-867.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Coughlan LM, Cotter PD, Hill C, Alvarez-Ordóñez A. New weapons to fight old enemies: novel strategies for the (Bio)control of bacterial biofilms in the food industry. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1641. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ripolles-Avila C, Hascoët AS, Guerrero-Navarro AE, Rodríguez-Jerez JJ. Establishment of incubation conditions to optimize the in vitro formation of mature Listeria monocytogenes biofilms on food-contact surfaces. Food Control. 2018;92:240–248. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.04.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gilbreth SE, Call JE, Wallace FM, Scott VN, Chen Y, et al. Relatedness of Listeria monocytogenes isolates recovered from selected ready-to-eat foods and listeriosis patients in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:8115–8122. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8115-8122.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moura A, Criscuolo A, Pouseele H, Maury MM, Leclercq A, et al. Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2 doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pirone-Davies C, Chen Y, Pightling A, Ryan G, Wang Y, et al. Genes significantly associated with lineage II food isolates of Listeria monocytogenes. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:708. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5074-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rychli K, Wagner EM, Ciolacu L, Zaiser A, Tasara T, et al. Comparative genomics of human and non-human Listeria monocytogenes sequence type 121 strains. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McLauchlin J, Aird H, Amar C, Barker C, Dallman T, et al. An outbreak of human listeriosis associated with frozen sweet corn consumption: Investigations in the UK. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2021;338:108994. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Løvdal T, Brandal LT, Sundaram AYM, Naseer U, Roth B, et al. Small-scale comparative genomic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from environments of salmon processing plants and human cases in Norway. Hygiene . 2021;1:43–55. doi: 10.3390/hygiene1010005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ferreira V, Wiedmann M, Teixeira P, Stasiewicz MJ. Listeria monocytogenes persistence in food-associated environments: epidemiology, strain characteristics, and implications for public health. J Food Protect. 2014;77:150–170. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sibanda T, Buys EM. Listeria monocytogenes pathogenesis: the role of stress adaptation. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1522. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10081522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xayarath B, Freitag NE. Optimizing the balance between host and environmental survival skills: lessons learned from Listeria monocytogenes. Future Microbiol. 2012;7:839–852. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.NicAogáin K, O’Byrne CP. The role of stress and stress adaptations in determining the fate of the bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes in the food chain. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1865. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ribeiro MH, Manha S, Brito L. The effects of salt and pH stress on the growth rates of persistent strains of Listeria monocytogenes collected from specific ecological niches. Food Res Int. 2006;39:816–822. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2006.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jiang X, Jiang C, Yu T, Jiang X, Ren S, et al. Benzalkonium Chloride Adaptation Increases Expression of the Agr System, Biofilm Formation, and Virulence in Listeria monocytogenes. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:856274. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.856274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lambert PA, Hammond SM. Potassium fluxes, first indications of membrane damage in micro-organisms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1973;54:796–799. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(73)91494-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pereira BMP, Tagkopoulos I. Benzalkonium chlorides: uses, regulatory status, and microbial resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85 doi: 10.1128/AEM.00377-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guérin A, Bridier A, Le Grandois P, Sévellec Y, Palma F, et al. Exposure to quaternary ammonium compounds selects resistance to ciprofloxacin in Listeria monocytogenes. Pathogens. 2021;10:220. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Müller A, Rychli K, Muhterem-Uyar M, Zaiser A, Stessl B, et al. Tn6188 - a novel transposon in Listeria monocytogenes responsible for tolerance to benzalkonium chloride. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kovacevic J, Ziegler J, Wałecka-Zacharska E, Reimer A, Kitts DD, et al. Tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes to quaternary ammonium sanitizers is mediated by a novel Efflux pump encoded by emrE. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:939–953. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03741-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Guérin F, Galimand M, Tuambilangana F, Courvalin P, Cattoir V. Overexpression of the novel MATE fluoroquinolone efflux pump FepA in Listeria monocytogenes is driven by inactivation of its local repressor FepR. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Elhanafi D, Dutta V, Kathariou S. Genetic characterization of plasmid-associated benzalkonium chloride resistance determinants in a Listeria monocytogenes strain from the 1998-1999 outbreak. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:8231–8238. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02056-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Minarovičová J, Véghová A, Mikulášová M, Chovanová R, Šoltýs K, et al. Benzalkonium chloride tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from a meat processing facility is related to presence of plasmid-borne bcrABC cassette. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2018;111:1913–1923. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Romanova NA, Wolffs PFG, Brovko LY, Griffiths MW. Role of efflux pumps in adaptation and resistance of Listeria monocytogenes to benzalkonium chloride. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3498–3503. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3498-3503.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Janež N, Škrlj B, Sterniša M, Klančnik A, Sabotič J. The role of the Listeria monocytogenes surfactome in biofilm formation. Microb Biotechnol. 2021;14:1269–1281. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sela S, Frank S, Belausov E, Pinto R. A mutation in the luxS gene influences Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5653–5658. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00048-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Finn L, Onyeaka H, O’Neill SL. Listeria monocytogenes biofilms in food-associated environments: a persistent Enigma. Foods. 2023;12:3339. doi: 10.3390/foods12183339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gutiérrez AV, Matthews M, Diaz M, Le Viet T, de Oliveira Martins L, et al. Population structure and gene flux of Listeria monocytogenes ST121 reveal prophages as a candidate driver of adaptation and persistence in food production environments. Microb Genom. 2025;11:001397. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Poltak SR, Cooper VS. Ecological succession in long-term experimentally evolved biofilms produces synergistic communities. ISME J. 2011;5:369–378. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Trampari E, Holden ER, Wickham GJ, Ravi A, Martins L de O, et al. Exposure of Salmonella biofilms to antibiotic concentrations rapidly selects resistance with collateral tradeoffs. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021;7:3. doi: 10.1038/s41522-020-00178-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI). Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. CLSI standard M07. 2018;11th ed [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Di Bonaventura G, Piccolomini R, Paludi D, D’Orio V, Vergara A, et al. Influence of temperature on biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes on various food-contact surfaces: relationship with motility and cell surface hydrophobicity. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;104:1552–1561. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03688.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20 doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Seemann T. Snippy: fast bacterial variant calling from NGS reads. 2015. https://github.com/tseemann/snippy
  • 47.Heberle H, Meirelles GV, da Silva FR, Telles GP, Minghim R. InteractiVenn: a web-based tool for the analysis of sets through venn diagrams. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:169. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0611-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mauri M, Elli T, Caviglia G, Uboldi G, Azzi M. RAWGraphs: A Visualisation Platform to Create Open Outputs. In Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter; New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2017. p. 28. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schneider TD, Stephens RM. Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucl Acids Res. 1990;18:6097–6100. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.20.6097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004;14:1188–1190. doi: 10.1101/gr.849004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Blum M, Andreeva A, Florentino LC, Chuguransky SR, Grego T, et al. InterPro: the protein sequence classification resource in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025;53:D444–D456. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D439–D444. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Varadi M, Bertoni D, Magana P, Paramval U, Pidruchna I, et al. AlphaFold protein structure database in 2024: providing structure coverage for over 214 million protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:D368–D375. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235–242. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Voorhorst WG, Eggen RI, Luesink EJ, de Vos WM. Characterization of the celB gene coding for beta-glucosidase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus and its expression and site-directed mutation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:7105–7111. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.24.7105-7111.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Samad A, Li Y, Zhang C, Chen F, Zeng W, et al. X-ray crystal structure of putative transcription regulator lmo2088 from Listeria monocytogenes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;520:434–440. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kehres DG, Lawyer CH, Maguire ME. The CorA magnesium transporter gene family. Microb& Comparative Genom. 1998;3:151–169. doi: 10.1089/omi.1.1998.3.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Amster-Choder O, Wright A. Transcriptional regulation of the bgl operon of Escherichia coli involves phosphotransferase system-mediated phosphorylation of a transcriptional antiterminator. J Cell Biochem. 1993;51:83–90. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240510115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jiang M, Chen X, Guo Z-F, Cao Y, Chen M, et al. Identification and characterization of (1 R,6 R)-2-Succinyl-6-hydroxy-2,4-cyclohexadiene-1-carboxylate synthase in the menaquinone biosynthesis of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 2008;47:3426–3434. doi: 10.1021/bi7023755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ramesh A, Wakeman CA, Winkler WC. Insights into metalloregulation by M-box riboswitch RNAs via structural analysis of manganese-bound complexes. J Mol Biol. 2011;407:556–570. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.01.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Maguire ME. MgtA and MgtB: prokaryotic P-type ATPases that mediate Mg2+ influx. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1992;24:319–328. doi: 10.1007/BF00768852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Harris RM, Webb DC, Howitt SM, Cox GB. Characterization of PitA and PitB from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:5008–5014. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.17.5008-5014.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jackson RJ, Binet MRB, Lee LJ, Ma R, Graham AI, et al. Expression of the PitA phosphate/metal transporter of Escherichia coli is responsive to zinc and inorganic phosphate levels. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;289:219–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chaturongakul S, Boor KJ. RsbT and RsbV contribute to sigmaB-dependent survival under environmental, energy, and intracellular stress conditions in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:5349–5356. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5349-5356.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bolten S, Harrand AS, Skeens J, Wiedmann M. Nonsynonymous mutations in fepR are associated with adaptation of Listeria monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. to low concentrations of benzalkonium chloride but do not increase survival of L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. after exposure to benzalkonium chloride concentrations recommended for use in food processing environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022;88:e0048622. doi: 10.1128/aem.00486-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.To MS, Favrin S, Romanova N, Griffiths MW. Postadaptational resistance to benzalkonium chloride and subsequent physicochemical modifications of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:5258–5264. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5258-5264.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yu T, Jiang X, Zhang Y, Ji S, Gao W, et al. Effect of benzalkonium chloride adaptation on sensitivity to antimicrobial agents and tolerance to environmental stresses in Listeria monocytogenes. Front Microbiol. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Schulz LM, Dreier F, de Sousa Miranda LM, Rismondo J. Adaptation mechanisms of Listeria monocytogenes to quaternary ammonium compounds. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11:e0144123. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01441-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bechtel TD, Hershelman J, Ghoshal M, McLandsborough L, Gibbons JG. Chemical mutagenesis of Listeria monocytogenes for increased tolerance to benzalkonium chloride shows independent genetic underpinnings and off-target antibiotic resistance. PLoS One. 2024;19:e0305663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chatterjee D, Daya Manasi AR, Rastogi SK, Panda AP, Biju B, et al. Involvement of CorA of Mycobacterium smegmatis in exerting intrinsic resistance towards structurally unrelated antibiotics. J Appl Microbiol. 2024;135:lxae298. doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxae298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ramesh A, Winkler WC. Magnesium-sensing riboswitches in bacteria. RNA Biol. 2010;7:77–83. doi: 10.4161/rna.7.1.10490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Booth SC, Workentine ML, Wen J, Shaykhutdinov R, Vogel HJ, et al. Differences in metabolism between the biofilm and planktonic response to metal stress. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:3190–3199. doi: 10.1021/pr2002353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chalke S, Vidovic S, Fletcher GC, Palmer J, Flint S. Differential effects of magnesium, calcium, and sodium on Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation. Biofouling. 2022;38:786–795. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2022.2131398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nowak J, Visnovsky SB, Pitman AR, Cruz CD, Palmer J, et al. Biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes 15G01, a persistent isolate from a seafood-processing plant, is influenced by inactivation of multiple genes belonging to different functional groups. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87:e02349-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02349-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Groisman EA, Hollands K, Kriner MA, Lee E-J, Park S-Y, et al. Bacterial Mg2+ homeostasis, transport, and virulence. Annu Rev Genet. 2013;47:625–646. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-051313-051025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mulcahy H, Lewenza S. Magnesium limitation is an environmental trigger of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm lifestyle. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Li X, Zhang X, Zhang M, Luo X, Zhang T, et al. Environmental magnesium ion affects global gene expression, motility, biofilm formation and virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Biofilm. 2024;7:100194. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mangwani N, Shukla SK, Rao TS, Das S. Calcium-mediated modulation of Pseudomonas mendocina NR802 biofilm influences the phenanthrene degradation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;114:301–309. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Oknin H, Steinberg D, Shemesh M. Magnesium ions mitigate biofilm formation of Bacillus species via downregulation of matrix genes expression. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:907. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Song B, Leff LG. Influence of magnesium ions on biofilm formation by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Microbiological Research. 2006;161:355–361. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tang D, Gao Q, Zhao Y, Li Y, Chen P, et al. Mg2+ reduces biofilm quantity in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans through inhibiting Type IV pili formation. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2018;365 doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rossi E, Leccese G, Baldelli V, Bibi A, Scalone E, et al. Inactivation of the pyrimidine biosynthesis pyrD Gene negatively affects biofilm formation and virulence determinants in the crohn’s disease-associated adherent invasive Escherichia coli LF82 Strain. Microorganisms. 2022;10:537. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhuo T, Rou W, Song X, Guo J, Fan X, et al. Molecular study on the carAB operon reveals that carB gene is required for swimming and biofilm formation in Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:225. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0555-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ueda A, Attila C, Whiteley M, Wood TK. Uracil influences quorum sensing and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fluorouracil is an antagonist. Microb Biotechnol. 2009;2:62–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00060.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nair HAS, Subramoni S, Poh WH, Hasnuddin NTB, Tay M, et al. Carbon starvation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms selects for dispersal insensitive mutants. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21:255. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02318-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chaturongakul S, Raengpradub S, Palmer ME, Bergholz TM, Orsi RH, et al. Transcriptomic and phenotypic analyses identify coregulated, overlapping regulons among PrfA, CtsR, HrcA, and the alternative sigma factors sigmaB, sigmaC, sigmaH, and sigmaL in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:187–200. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00952-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Douarre P-E, Sévellec Y, Le Grandois P, Soumet C, Bridier A, et al. FepR as a central genetic target in the adaptation to quaternary ammonium compounds and cross-resistance to ciprofloxacin in Listeria monocytogenes. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:864576. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.864576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hsu C-Y, Cairns L, Hobley L, Abbott J, O’Byrne C, et al. Genomic differences between Listeria monocytogenes EGDe isolates reveal crucial roles for SigB and wall rhamnosylation in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol. 2020;202:e00692-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00692-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1.
mgen-12-01611-s001.pdf (18.3MB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001611
Supplementary Material 2.
mgen-12-01611-s002.xlsx (47.1KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.001611

Articles from Microbial Genomics are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES