Abstract
1. Extension of a frog muscle spindle evoked a discharge of impulses in its sensory axon. The adaptation of the discharge after the dynamic phase of stretching occurred in two phases. At first the impulse train was almost regular and adapted quickly, but later this gave place to a phase of slower adaptation in which the variability of discharge was much increased. 2. The discharge of action potentials by the muscle spindle depressed the response of the receptor to a subsequent extension. This was true whether they were elicited antidromically by afferent stimulation or orthodromically by longitudinal vibration. This depression had its most marked effect on the first phase of adaptation where it greatly increased the rate of adaptation. The second, slower, phase of adaptation was little influenced. 3. The depression increased with the duration and with the frequency of afferent stimulation. It persisted for about 300 msec. 4. The results show that the properties of the spike generating mechanisms in the muscle spindle are modified by previous discharge and that this modification may influence the overall properties of the receptor. 5. The fact that afferent stimulation has different effects on the two phases of adaptation is consistent with the suggestion that the impulse train evoked by extension is derived from more than one spike generator within the muscle spindle.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ADRIAN R. H. The effect of internal and external potassium concentration on the membrane potential of frog muscle. J Physiol. 1956 Sep 27;133(3):631–658. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brokensha G., Westbury D. R. Adaptation of the discharge of frog muscle spindles following a stretch. J Physiol. 1974 Oct;242(2):383–403. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brokensha G., Westbury D. R. Proceedings: The influence of repetitive antidromic stimulation on the adaptation of muscle spindles following a stretch. J Physiol. 1976 Jul;259(1):38P–39P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eagles J. P., Purple R. L. Afferent fibers with multiple encoding sites. Brain Res. 1974 Sep 6;77(2):187–193. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90783-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ito F. Effects of polarizing currents on long lasting discharges in the frog muscle spindle. Jpn J Physiol. 1970 Dec 15;20(6):697–710. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.20.697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ito F., Kanamori N., Kuroda H. Structural and functional asymmetries of myelinated branches in the frog muscle spindle. J Physiol. 1974 Sep;241(2):389–405. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ito F. Recovery curves of thresholds of muscle spindle, leaf-like and tendon receptors in the frog sartorius muscle after an antidromic discharge. Jpn J Physiol. 1968 Dec 15;18(6):731–745. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.18.731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KATZ B. The efferent regulation of the muscle spindle in the frog. J Exp Biol. 1949 Aug;26(2):201–217. doi: 10.1242/jeb.26.2.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MATTHEWS P. B., WESTBURY D. R. SOME EFFECTS OF FAST AND SLOW MOTOR FIBRES ON MUSCLE SPINDLES OF THE FROG. J Physiol. 1965 May;178:178–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthews B. H. The response of a muscle spindle during active contraction of a muscle. J Physiol. 1931 Jun 26;72(2):153–174. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1931.sp002768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ottoson D., McReynolds J. S., Shepherd G. M. Sensitivity of isolated frog muscle spondle during and after stretching. J Neurophysiol. 1969 Jan;32(1):24–34. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.1.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]