Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1978 Jan;274:511–537. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012164

The rate of recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens

Fred Giffin 1, Donald E Mitchell 1,*
PMCID: PMC1282507  PMID: 625006

Abstract

1. Fifteen kittens were monocularly deprived of vision by suturing the lids of the right eye together for various periods of time at different ages. A simple behavioural technique was used to assess the immediate effects of the period of monocular deprivation on the visual acuity of the deprived eye as well as the time course of any subsequent recovery.

2. The extent of the recovery of vision was measured under conditions where the animal was either forced to use its deprived eye by performing a reverse suture or where the animal had both eyes open after the initial period of monocular occlusion.

3. The initial effects of monocular deprivation were graded in severity according to the age at which the deprivation was imposed, ranging from apparent blindness in animals deprived at 6 weeks of age to only a small loss of acuity in kittens deprived at 12 weeks of age.

4. The effects of deprivation imposed from birth were particularly severe, leading to a temporary blindness. Nevertheless after a period of time that became progressively longer with increasing deprivation, all animals showed some recovery of pattern vision over the course of the next 2 or 3 months. The extent of this recovery became progressively less as the period of deprivation was prolonged. There was even some recovery of vision (an acuity of 2·5 cycles/deg) in animals that were deprived throughout the duration of the `critical period' to 4 months of age.

5. Direct comparison of the rate of behavioural recovery between animals that were reverse sutured with that of litter-mates that received binocular input after monocular occlusion to either 45 or 60 days of age proved to be remarkably similar, although the acuity that was eventually attained by the reverse sutured animals was always slightly higher.

6. The recoveries observed after reverse suturing were reasonably well correlated with changes observed in the ocular dominance of visual cortical cells under similar circumstances.

7. Although the recovery in these animals can be accounted for by the simple notion of a competitive interaction between the two eyes, the recovery observed in animals that had both eyes open after the initial period of deprivation cannot be so readily explained. Evidently there must be an additional non-competitive mechanism of recovery.

Full text

PDF
511

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blakemore C., Cummings R. M. Eye-opening in kittens. Vision Res. 1975 Dec;15(12):1417–1418. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(75)90202-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakemore C., Van Sluyters R. C. Reversal of the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in kittens: further evidence for a sensitive period. J Physiol. 1974 Feb;237(1):195–216. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chow K. L., Stewart D. L. Reversal of structural and functional effects of long-term visual deprivation in cats. Exp Neurol. 1972 Mar;34(3):409–433. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(72)90038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dews P. B., Wiesel T. N. Consequences of monocular deprivation on visual behaviour in kittens. J Physiol. 1970 Feb;206(2):437–455. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dürsteler M. R., Garey L. J., Movshon J. A. Reversal of the morphological effects of monocular deprivation in the kittens's lateral geniculate nucleus. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;261(1):189–210. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J. G. Proceedings: Direct measurement of image quality in the cat eyes. J Physiol. 1974 May;239(1):30P–31P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ganz L., Fitch M. The effect of visual deprivation on perceptual behavior. Exp Neurol. 1968 Dec;22(4):638–660. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(68)90154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ganz L., Haffner M. E. Permanent perceptual and neurophysiological effects of visual deprivation in the cat. Exp Brain Res. 1974 Apr 30;20(1):67–87. doi: 10.1007/BF00239018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ganz L., Hirsch H. V., Tieman S. B. The nature of perceptual deficits in visually deprived cats. Brain Res. 1972 Sep 29;44(2):547–568. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90318-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guillery R. W. Binocular competition in the control of geniculate cell growth. J Comp Neurol. 1972 Jan;144(1):117–129. doi: 10.1002/cne.901440106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF CELLS IN STRIATE CORTEX OF VERY YOUNG, VISUALLY INEXPERIENCED KITTENS. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:994–1002. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Nov;28(6):1041–1059. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol. 1970 Feb;206(2):419–436. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hughes A. A quantitative analysis of the cat retinal ganglion cell topography. J Comp Neurol. 1975 Sep;163(1):107–128. doi: 10.1002/cne.901630107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jacobson S. G., Franklin K. B., McDonald W. I. Visual acuity of the cat. Vision Res. 1976;16(10):1141–1143. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(76)90254-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. KUPFER C., PALMER P. LATERAL GENICULATE NUCLEUS: HISTOLOGICAL AND CYTOCHEMICAL CHANGES FOLLOWING AFFERENT DENERVATION AND VISUAL DEPRIVATION. Exp Neurol. 1964 May;9:400–409. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(64)90074-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Maffei L., Fiorentini A. Monocular deprivation in kittens impairs the spatial resolution of geniculate neurones. Nature. 1976 Dec 23;264(5588):754–755. doi: 10.1038/264754a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitchell D. E., Cynader M., Movshon J. A. Recovery from the effects of monocular deprivation in kittens. J Comp Neurol. 1977 Nov 1;176(1):53–63. doi: 10.1002/cne.901760104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mitchell D. E., Giffin F., Timney B. A behavioural technique for the rapid assessment of the visual capabilities of kittens. Perception. 1977;6(2):181–193. doi: 10.1068/p060181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mitchell D. E., Giffin F., Wilkinson F., Anderson P., Smith M. L. Visual resolution in young kittens. Vision Res. 1976;16(4):363–366. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(76)90197-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Movshon J. A. Reversal of the behavioural effects of monocular deprivation in the kitten. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;261(1):175–187. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Movshon J. A. Reversal of the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in the kitten's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;261(1):125–174. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rizzolatti G., Tradardi V. Pattern discrimination in monocularly reared cats. Exp Neurol. 1971 Oct;33(1):181–194. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(71)90112-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sherman S. M., Guillery R. W., Kaas J. H., Sanderson K. J. Behavioral, electrophysiological and morphological studies of binocular competition in the development of the geniculo-cortical pathways of cats. J Comp Neurol. 1974 Nov 1;158(1):1–18. doi: 10.1002/cne.901580102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sherman S. M., Stone J. Physiological normality of the retinal in visually deprived cats. Brain Res. 1973 Sep 28;60(1):224–230. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90861-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Steinberg R. H., Reid M., Lacy P. L. The distribution of rods and cones in the retina of the cat (Felis domesticus). J Comp Neurol. 1973 Mar 15;148(2):229–248. doi: 10.1002/cne.901480209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. WIESEL T. N., HUBEL D. H. EFFECTS OF VISUAL DEPRIVATION ON MORPHOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF CELLS IN THE CATS LATERAL GENICULATE BODY. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:978–993. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. WIESEL T. N., HUBEL D. H. SINGLE-CELL RESPONSES IN STRIATE CORTEX OF KITTENS DEPRIVED OF VISION IN ONE EYE. J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:1003–1017. doi: 10.1152/jn.1963.26.6.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wiesel T. N., Hubel D. H. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Nov;28(6):1029–1040. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wiesel T. N., Hubel D. H. Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Nov;28(6):1060–1072. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wiesel T. N., Raviola E. Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys. Nature. 1977 Mar 3;266(5597):66–68. doi: 10.1038/266066a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. von Noorden G. K. Experimental amblyopia in monkeys. Further behavioral observations and clinical correlations. Invest Ophthalmol. 1973 Oct;12(10):721–726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES