Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1978 Feb;275:403–417. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012197

The effect of external pH on osmotic permeability, ion and fluid transport across isolated frog skin.

J Fischbarg, G Whittembury
PMCID: PMC1282552  PMID: 24737

Abstract

1. The rate of volume flow across frog skin induced by an osmotic gradient was measured when normal (7.4) and low pH (2.28) solutions bathed the outside. The osmotic permeabilities (Pos) were 2.4 +/- 0.4 and 4.8 +/- 1.0 micrometer/sec, respectively. The change in Pos induced by low pH was reversible. 2. Volume flow in the absence of an osmotic gradient was measured at normal and low pH. Values were 0.69 +/- 0.13 and 1.1 +/- 0.2 microliter/hr. cm2, respectively; the paired differences were significant (P less than 0.0025). This change in rate was partially reversible upon return to normal pH. 3. The potential difference (V) and short-circuit current (Is) across skins were measured under several conditions and the following equivalent parameters in a simplified electrical model were computed: total resistance (Rt); shunt resistance (Rs); electromotive force of the pump (ENa); and salt transport at open circuit (JNaCl). Representative figures were (a), at pH 7.4: Is = 14 +/- 1.6 microampere/cm2; Rt = 3.3 +/- 0.4 komega.cm2; Rs = 7.2 +/- 1.0 komega.cm2; ENA = 103 +/- 38 mV; JNaCl = 7.2 +/- 1.2 microampere/cm2; (b) at pH 2.28: Is = 8.3 +/- 2.1 microampere/cm2; Rt = 0.46 +/- 0.12 komega. cm2; Rs = 0.65 +/- 0.06 komega.cm2; ENa = 59 +/- 25 mV; JNaCl = 9.4 +/- 3.3 microampere/cm2. 4. From the electrical parameters measured concomitantly with the rate of fluid transport in given experiments, the expected salt concentration of the transported fluid was 0.30 +/- 0.08 and 0.38 +/- 0.08 mole/l. at normal and low pH, respectively, or some 3-4 times hyperosmotic with respect to the medium. 5. Treatment with low pH on the outside has been found to open the intercellular junctions in previous studies. The present results suggest that, if such an effect occurs, it is localized only to a small fraction of the cell perimeter. Making certain assumptions that fraction could be as low as 0.003. 6. Low pH on the outside reversibly changes the electrical parameters of a 'tight' epithelium like the frog skin into values more typical of 'intermediate' epithelia; both the total and shunt resistances decrease to about 0.1 of their normal values. These changes do not apparently affect the osmolarity of the transported fluid.

Full text

PDF
403

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bentzel C. J., Parsa B., Hare D. K. Osmotic flow across proximal tubule of Necturus: correlation of physiologic and anatomic studies. Am J Physiol. 1969 Aug;217(2):570–580. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1969.217.2.570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boulpaep E. L. Electrical phenomena in the nephron. Kidney Int. 1976 Feb;9(2):88–102. doi: 10.1038/ki.1976.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Civan M. M. Effects of active sodium transport on current-voltage relationship of toad bladder. Am J Physiol. 1970 Jul;219(1):234–245. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1970.219.1.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diamond J. M., Bossert W. H. Standing-gradient osmotic flow. A mechanism for coupling of water and solute transport in epithelia. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Sep;50(8):2061–2083. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.8.2061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Erlij D. Solute transport across isolated epithelia. Kidney Int. 1976 Feb;9(2):76–87. doi: 10.1038/ki.1976.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischbarg J., Lim J. J., Bourguet J. Adenosine stimulation of fluid transport across rabbit corneal endothelium. J Membr Biol. 1977 Jun 30;35(2):95–112. doi: 10.1007/BF01869942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frömter E. The route of passive ion movement through the epithelium of Necturus gallbladder. J Membr Biol. 1972;8(3):259–301. doi: 10.1007/BF01868106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HOUSE C. R. THE NATURE OF WATER TRANSPORT ACROSS FROG SKIN. Biophys J. 1964 Sep;4:401–416. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(64)86791-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUF E. G., WILLS J. The relationship of sodium uptake, potassium rejection, and skin potential in isolated frog skin. J Gen Physiol. 1953 Mar;36(4):473–487. doi: 10.1085/jgp.36.4.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Helman S. I., O'Neil R. G., Fisher R. S. Determination of the ENa of from skin from studies of its current-voltage relationship. Am J Physiol. 1975 Oct;229(4):947–951. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1975.229.4.947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hill A. E. Solute-solvent coupling in epithelia: a critical examination of the standing-gradient osmotic flow theory. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1975 Jun 20;190(1098):99–114. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1975.0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hill A. E. Solute-solvent coupling in epithelia: contribution of the junctional pathway to fluid production. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1975 Dec 16;191(1105):537–547. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1975.0143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. JOHNSEN V. K., LEVI H., USSING H. H. The mode of passage of chloride ions through the isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1952 Jun 6;25(2-3):150–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1952.tb00866.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. KIRSCHNER L. B., MAXWELL R., FLEMING D. Non-osmotic water movement across the isolated frog skin. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1960 Jun;55:267–273. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030550309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MACROBBIE E. A., USSING H. H. Osmotic behaviour of the epithelial cells of frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1961 Nov-Dec;53:348–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1961.tb02293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Segel L. A. Standing-gradient flows driven by active solute transport. J Theor Biol. 1970 Nov;29(2):233–250. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. USSING H. H., WINDHAGER E. E. NATURE OF SHUNT PATH AND ACTIVE SODIUM TRANSPORT PATH THROUGH FROG SKIN EPITHELIUM. Acta Physiol Scand. 1964 Aug;61:484–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. USSING H. H., ZERAHN K. Active transport of sodium as the source of electric current in the short-circuited isolated frog skin. Acta Physiol Scand. 1951 Aug 25;23(2-3):110–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1951.tb00800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ussing H. H., Erlij D., Lassen U. Transport pathways in biological membranes. Annu Rev Physiol. 1974;36:17–49. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.36.030174.000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES