Skip to main content
MycoKeys logoLink to MycoKeys
. 2026 Jan 15;127:89–105. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.127.173104

Morphological and molecular data reveal one new species of Coltricia and one new species of Sidera in Hymenochaetales from South China

Wan-Ying Li 1, Wen Jing 1, Qian-Xin Guan 1, Fang Wu 1,
PMCID: PMC12828331  PMID: 41586039

Abstract

Two new poroid species of Hymenochaetales, Coltricia subpusilla and Sidera pini, are described from Anhui Province and Jiangxi Province based on morphological characters and multimarker phylogenetic analyses using a combined ITS, nLSU, and partial tef1 dataset. Phylogenetic results revealed that C. subpusilla is closely related to C. pusilla and that S. pini is related to S. borealis. Coltricia subpusilla was found on the bark of dead Pinus and is recognized by its annual, laterally stipitate, small, flabelliform to subcircular pilei, angular pores (2–3 per mm), and smooth to verrucose basidiospores. Sidera pini was found on fallen trunks of Pinus massoniana and is characterized by annual, resupinate basidiomata with angular pores (8–12 per mm), a dimitic hyphal system, and allantoid basidiospores. Detailed descriptions and illustrations of the two new species are provided.

Key words: New taxa, phylogenetic analysis, polypore, taxonomy

Introduction

The order Hymenochaetales (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) was established by Oberwinkler in 1977, with Hymenochaetaceae Donk as the type family (Frey et al. 1977). It is a large order in Agaricomycetes and is globally distributed, comprising 15 families and 84 genera, of which 19 have an uncertain position at the family level (He et al. 2024; Wang and Zhou 2024). The majority of species within Hymenochaetales are poroid and corticioid, exhibiting high morphological diversity and various trophic strategies, including wood-inhabiting and ectomycorrhizal fungi (Tedersoo et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2023; Dai et al. 2025; Deng et al. 2025; Liu et al. 2025).

The cosmopolitan genus Coltricia Gray, typified by Coltricia perennis (L.) Murrill, was established in 1821 and is currently placed in the family Hymenochaetaceae (Wu et al. 2022a). The genus is characterized by predominantly poroid and stipitate basidiomata, a monomitic hyphal system lacking clamp connections, and slightly to distinctly thick-walled, brownish basidiospores (Wu et al. 2022a). Species of Coltricia are primarily terricolous and have a saprotrophic lifestyle (Wu et al. 2022a, b; Zhao et al. 2023). However, C. perennis was reported to form ectomycorrhizae (Tedersoo et al. 2007); therefore, further studies are needed to confirm the lifestyle of other Coltricia species. Coltriciella Murrill was established by Murrill (1904) and is similar to Coltricia in morphological characteristics, except for having verrucose basidiospores. Coltriciella formed a monophyletic clade within Coltricia based on phylogenetic analyses; thus, it was treated as a synonym of Coltricia and merged into Coltricia (Wu et al. 2022a). Recently, Coltricia has been widely studied worldwide, and more than 20 species have been described and reported in the last 10 years. Thirteen new Coltricia species were discovered in South China, primarily distributed in the Yunnan region (Bian and Dai 2015, 2017, 2020; Bian et al. 2016, 2022; Vasco-Palacios 2016; Susan et al. 2018; Valenzuela et al. 2020; Vlasák et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2022a; Patil et al. 2024; Zhang et al. 2024; Zhou et al. 2024). According to Index Fungorum (https://www.indexfungorum.org; accessed on 5 June 2025), the genus Coltricia (including former Coltriciella species) has 156 records, and 84 species are currently accepted worldwide (Wu et al. 2022a; Zhang et al. 2024; Zhou et al. 2024).

Sidera Miettinen & K.H. Larss. was originally proposed by Miettinen and Larsson (2011) based on molecular analyses and morphological characteristics and is currently placed in the family Sideraceae (He et al. 2024). It is distinguished by resupinate, white to cream or buff basidiomata when fresh, poroid or hydnoid hymenophores, a monomitic or dimitic hyphal system with clamp connections in generative hyphae, loosely arranged skeletal hyphae, the presence of rosette-like crystals, and allantoid to lunate, acyanophilous basidiospores that are negative in Melzer’s reagent (Miettinen and Larsson 2011; Liu et al. 2022, 2023). Species of Sidera mainly grow on rotting wood and cause white rot (Liu et al. 2021, 2023). In recent years, the species diversity of Sidera has been extensively studied in China, North America, and Europe. Five new species were discovered in South China, with the majority reported from Hainan Province and Tibet (Dai 2010; Du et al. 2019, 2020; Liu et al. 2021, 2022, 2023; Xu et al. 2023; Fryssouli et al. 2024). According to Index Fungorum (https://www.indexfungorum.org; accessed on 5 June 2025), 21 names of Sidera are recorded, and 19 species are currently accepted (Xu et al. 2023; Fryssouli et al. 2024).

During our investigations of wood-rotting fungi in South China, four poroid specimens were collected and identified as belonging to two new species of Hymenochaetales, Coltricia subpusilla sp. nov. and Sidera pini sp. nov., based on morphological characteristics and molecular data from ITS, nLSU, and tef1 sequences. This study enriches the species diversity of Hymenochaetales in South China.

Materials and methods

Morphological studies

Voucher specimens are deposited at the Fungarium of Beijing Forestry University (BJFC). Macro-morphological descriptions were based on field notes and laboratory observations. Microscopic measurements and drawings were made from slide preparations of dried tissues stained with Cotton Blue and Melzer’s reagent. The following abbreviations were used in the descriptions: IKI = Melzer’s reagent; IKI– = negative in Melzer’s reagent; KOH = 5% potassium hydroxide; CB = cotton blue; CB– = acyanophilous; CB+ = cyanophilous; L = mean spore length (arithmetic average of all spores); W = mean spore width (arithmetic average of all spores); Q = L/W ratio for each specimen studied; n (a/b) = number of spores (a) measured from a given number (b) of specimens. Special color terms followed Petersen (1996) and Anonymous (1969).

DNA extraction and sequencing

A CTAB rapid plant genome extraction kit-DNA (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd) was used to extract total genomic DNA from dried specimens of the new collections according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with some modifications (Wu et al. 2022a). The primer pair ITS4 and ITS5 was used for amplification of the ITS region, whereas the primer pair LR0R and LR7 (https://www.biology.duke.edu/fungi/mycolab/primers.htm) was used for amplification of the nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA (nLSU), and EF1-983F and EF1-1567R were used for tef1 (White et al. 1990; Rehner 2001). The PCR procedure for ITS and tef1 was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 54 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR procedure for nLSU was as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1.5 min, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified and sequenced at the Beijing Genomics Institute, China, using the same primers. All newly generated sequences were submitted to GenBank and are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Taxon information and sequences used in this study.

Species Specimen No. Country GenBank accession no.
ITS nLSU TEF1
Coltricia abieticola Cui 12276 China KU360673 KU360643 KY693912
C. abieticola Cui 12312 China KU360674 KU360644
C. australica TU 103694T Australia AM412243
C. austrosinensis Dai 13093T China KU360670 KU360640 KY693913
C. austrosinensis Dai 13098 China KU360671 KU360640
C. barbata AMV 1866 Colombia KT724137
C. barbata AMV 1925 Colombia KT724136 KT724149
C. baoshanensis Cui 8147 China KX364799 KX364819
C. baoshanensis Dai 13075T China KX364800 KX364820 KY693953
C. cinnamomea Cui 12549 China KY693728 KY693742 KY693916
C. cinnamomea Cui 12584 China KY693729 KY693743 KY693917
C. cinnamomea TN 8199 Finland MF318906
C. confluens TAA 181460 Estonia AM412241 AM412241
C. confluens TF 072287 USA MN121008 MN121008
C. crassa Cui 10255 China KU360678 KU360647 KY693921
C. crassa Dai 15163 China KU360679 KU360648 KY693922
C. dependens Dai 10944 China KY693737 KY693757
C. dependens Cui 9210 China KY693738 KY693758
C. fimbriata Dai 22300T China OL691607 OL691616
C. fragilissima Dai 16636 Thailand KY693733 KY693749
C. focicola Dai 16090 China KX364786 KX364805 KY693923
C. focicola Dai 26383 China OR964386 OR964380
C. globosa Cui 7545T China KJ540930 KJ000226 KY693954
C. globosa Dai 18420 Vietnam MT174245 MT174238
C. hamata AMV 1897 Colombia KT724146 KT724150
C. hamata AMV 2076 Colombia KT724142 KT724151
C. hirtipes Dai 16647 Thailand KY693734 KY693750
C. hirtipes Dai 16651 Thailand KY693751
C. kinabaluensis Dai 13957 Thailand KX364787 KX364806 KY693924
C. kinabaluensis Dai 13958 Thailand KX364788 KX364807 KY693925
C. lateralis Cui 12563T China KX364789 KX364808 KY693926
C. lateralis Dai 13564 China KX364790 KX364809 KY693927
C. lenis Dai 22367 China OL691608 OL691617
C. lenis Dai 22374T China OL691609 OL691619
C. macropora Cui 9019T China KU360680 KJ000220
C. macropora Cui 9039 China KU360681 KJ000221 KY693928
C. minima Dai 15206T China KU360682 KU360649 KY693929
C. minima Dai 15222 China KU360683 KU360650 KY693930
C. minor Dai 16088 China KU360684 KU360651 KY693931
C. minuscula BO22806T Indonesia KX086684
C. montagnei Cui 10169 China KU360685 KU360652 KY693932
C. montagnei Dai 12137 China KX364810 KY693933
C. montagnei MF 96-96 USA AY039683
C. navispora MCA 3921 Guyana KC155387 KC155386
C. navispora TH 9529 Guyana KT339262
C. oblectabilis AMV 2255 Colombia KT354690
C. oblectabilis TH 9187 Guyana KC155387 KC155387
C. perennis Cui 10318 China KU360686 KJ000224 KY693934
C. perennis Cui 10319 China KU360687 KU360653 KY693935
C. perennis JV 0809/66 USA KX364791 KX364811
C. pseudodependens Cui 8138T China KJ540931 KJ000227
C. pseudodependens Cui 12582 China KX364801 KX364821 KY693955
C. pusilla Dai 15168 China KU360701 KU360667 KY693956
C. pusilla Dai 26381 China OR964387 OR964381
C. pusilla MN 26.7.95 Japan AY059060
C. pyrophila Cui 10314 China KU360689 KU360655 KY693937
C. pyrophila Cui 10411 China KU360690 KU360656 KY693938
C. pyrophila Cui 12553 China KX364792 KX364812 KY693939
C. raigadensis AMH 10511T India OR072877
C. raigadensis MMH 1211 India OR072932 OR053821
C. rigida Dai 13622aT China KX364793 KX364813
C. rigida Dai 16322 China KX364794 KX364814 KY693941
C. sinoperenniss Dai 11625 China KY693735 KY693753
C. sinoperennis Dai 13095 China KY693736 KY693754
C. sonorensis RV 13144T Mexico HQ439179
C. strigosipes Dai 15145 China KX364795 KX364815 KY693942
C. strigosipes Dai 15586 China KU360692 KU360658 KY693943
C. subcinnamomea Dai 17016T China KY693740 KY693755
C. subcinnamomea Dai 17022 China KY693756
C. subglobosa Dai 25569 China OR964388 OR964382
C. subglobosa Yuan 6253 China KX364822
C. subpusilla Wu 2076T China PV919824* PV919828* PV928713*
C. subpusilla Wu 2077 China PV919825* PV919829* PV928714*
C. subverrucata Dai 12919 China MT174242 MT174235 MT133895
C. subverrucata Dai 15600T China MT174243 MT174236 MT133896
C. tenuihypha Dai 22684T China OL691610 OL691620
C. tenuihypha Dai 22690 China OL691611 OL691621
C. tibetica Cui 12208T China MZ484551 MZ437407
C. velutina Dai 16980 China KY693752
C. verrucata Dai 15120 China KU360694 KU360660 KY693945
C. verrucata Dai 15125 China KU360695 KU360661 KY693946
C. weii Cui 12624 China KX364796 KX364816 KY693950
C. weii Dai 13422 China KX364797 KX364817 KY693951
C. weii Dai 25824 China OR964389 OR964383
C. wenshanensis Dai 15585T China KX364798 KX364818 KY693952
C. wuyiensis Dai 25601 China OR964390 OR964384
C. wuyiensis Dai 26431T China OR964391 OR964385
C. yunnanensis CLZhao 4204T China OR668921 OR708662
C. zixishanensis CLZhao 7706T China OR668922 OR708662
Fomitiporella chinensis Cui 11230 China KX181309 KY693759 KY693958
Inonotus griseus Dai 13436 China KX364802 KX364823 KY693959
Sidera americana Dai 19173 Canada MW198477 MW192005
S. americana Dai 12730T USA MW198478
S. borealis Dai 22822 China OM974254 OM974246
S. borealis Cui 11216T China MW198485
S. borealis Dai 23962 China OQ134534
S. borealis Dai 23803 China OQ134535
S. borealis Dai 24120 China OQ134533
S. borealis Dai 24187 China OQ134536 OQ134528
S. borealis Dai 23960 China OQ134537
S. inflata Cui 13610T China MW198480
S. lenis Dai 22834 China OQ134538 OQ134529
S. lenis Dai 22854 China OQ134539 OQ134530
S. lenis Miettinen 11036 Finland FN907914 FN907914
S. lowei Miettinen X419 Venezuela FN907917 FN907917
S. lowei Dollinger 922 USA KY264044
S. lowei Miettinen X426 New Zealand FN907919 FN907919
S. lunata JS 15063 Norway DQ873593 DQ873593
S. malaysiana Dai 18570T Malaysia MW198481 MW192007
S. minutipora Gates FF257 Australia FN907922 FN907922
S. minutipora Cui 16720 Australia MN621349 MN621348
S. minutissima Dai 19529T Sri Lanka MN621352 MN621350
S. minutissima Dai 22495 China OM974248 OM974240
S. minutissima Dai 18471A China MW198482 MW192008
S. parallela Dai 22038 China MW477793 MW474964
S. parallela Cui 10346T China MK346145
S. parallela Cui 10361 China MK346144
S. parallela Dai 22635 China OQ134540 OQ134531
S. pini Wu 1847 China PV919826* PV919830*
S. pini Wu 1848T China PV919827* PV919831*
S. punctata Dai 22119T China MW418438 MW418437
S. roseobubalina Dai 11277T China MW198483
S. salmonea Dai 23343 China OM974249 OM974241
S. salmonea Dai 23354 China OM974250 OM974242
S. salmonea Dai 23428 China OM974251 OM974243
S. salmonea Dai 23612T China OM974247
S. srilankensis Dai 19581 Sri Lanka MN621345 MN621347
S. srilankensis Dai 19654T Sri Lanka MN621344 MN621346
S. tenuis Dai 18697T Singapore MK331865 MK331867
S. tenuis Dai 18698 Singapore MK331866 MK331868
S. tianshanensis Cui 19143T China OP920995 OP920987
S. tianshanensis Cui 19132 China OP920994 OP920986
S. tibetica Dai 23407 China OM974252 OM974244
S. tibetica Dai 23648T China OM974253 OM974245
S. tibetica Dai 21057 Belarus MW198484 MW192009
S. tibetica Dai 22151 China MW477794 MW474965
S. vesiculosa BJFC025367 Singapore MH636565 MH636567
S. vesiculosa Dai 17845T Singapore MH636564 MH636566
S. vulgaris HUBO 7745 Italy PP275217 PP275227
S. vulgaris HUBO 8296 Italy PP275218 PP275228
S. vulgaris SALA Fungi 3749 Spain PP275220
S. vulgaris SALA Fungi 4105 Spain PP275222
S. vulgaris Ryvarden 37198 New Zealand FN907918 FN907918
Skvortzovia furfuracea KHL 11738 Finland DQ873648 DQ873648
Sk. furfurella KHL 10180 Puerto Rico DQ873649 DQ873649

New species are shown in bold. * Newly generated sequences for this study. T represents type specimens.

Phylogenetic analysis

New sequences generated in this study and reference sequences retrieved from GenBank (Table 1) were partitioned into ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, nLSU, and tef1 and then aligned separately using MAFFT v.7.526 (Katoh et al. 2019; http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) with the G-INS-I iterative refinement algorithm and optimized manually in BioEdit v.7.0.5.3 (Hall 1999). The separate alignments were then concatenated using PhyloSuite v.1.2.2 (Zhang et al. 2020). Phylogenetic trees of Coltricia and Sidera were constructed using the concatenated ITS1+5.8S+ITS2+nLSU+tef1 dataset and the concatenated ITS1+5.8S+ITS2+nLSU dataset, respectively, and phylogenetic analyses were performed using maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI). The final alignments and the resulting topologies were deposited in TreeBASE (http://www.treebase.org) under accessions 32218 and 32242.

RAxML v.7.2.8 was used to infer ML trees under the GTR+I+G model of site substitution, including estimation of gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity and a proportion of invariant sites (Stamatakis 2006). Branch support was evaluated using a bootstrap method with 1,000 replicates (Hillis and Bull 1993). BI was performed using MrBayes 3.2.7 with the best-fit partitioning scheme and substitution model determined by ModelFinder v2.2.0 (Ronquist et al. 2012; Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). Four Markov chains were run for two independent runs from random starting trees for one million generations in the phylogenetic analyses of Coltricia and Sidera until the split deviation frequency value reached < 0.01, and trees were sampled every 1,000 generations. The first 25% of the sampled trees were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were used to reconstruct a majority-rule consensus tree and to calculate Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) for the clades. The phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree v.1.4.4 (Rambaut 2018). Branches receiving ML bootstrap support (BS) and BPP values ≥ 75% and ≥ 0.90, respectively, were considered to be significantly supported.

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

In the phylogenetic analysis of Coltricia, the combined ITS+nLSU+tef1 dataset included sequences from 91 fungal collections representing 49 taxa. The final alignment comprised a total of 3,318 nucleotide positions, including 747 bases of ITS1, 158 bases of 5.8S, 422 bases of ITS2, 1,411 bases of nLSU, and 580 bases of tef1. The nLSU region was relatively conserved, whereas ITS and tef1 showed higher variability, potentially providing more phylogenetic information. Fomitiporella chinensis (Pilát) Y.C. Dai, X.H. Ji & Vlasák and Inonotus griseus L.W. Zhou were used as outgroups following Bian et al. (2022). ModelFinder proposed the models HKY+F+G4 for ITS1, K2P+G4 for 5.8S, GTR+F+G4 for ITS2, GTR+F+I+G4 for nLSU, and SYM+I+G4 for tef1 for the Bayesian analysis. The Bayesian inference (BI) analysis resulted in an average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.009848. The maximum likelihood (ML) and BI trees were similar in topology; therefore, only the ML topology is presented, with branch support values from ML (≥75%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP ≥0.90) shown (Fig. 1). The phylogeny inferred from the ITS+nLSU+tef1 sequences (Fig. 1) showed that our two specimens – representing the new species Coltricia subpusilla – formed a well-supported sister lineage (99/0.99) to C. pusilla Imazeki & Kobayasi. There are approximately 2.2% differences in the ITS sequences between C. subpusilla and C. pusilla.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree illustrating the phylogeny of Coltricia based on the combined ITS+nLSU+tef1 dataset. Branches are labeled with ML bootstrap values (BS) greater than 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 0.90. The new species is shown in bold.

In the phylogenetic analysis of Sidera, the combined ITS+nLSU dataset included sequences from 54 fungal specimens representing 22 taxa. The final alignment comprised a total of 2,186 nucleotide positions, including 347 bases of ITS1, 129 bases of 5.8S, 350 bases of ITS2, and 1,360 bases of nLSU. The nLSU region was relatively conserved, whereas the ITS region was more variable. Skvortzovia furfuracea (Bres.) G. Gruhn & Hallenb. and Sk. furfurella (Bres.) Bononi & Hjortstam were used as outgroups following Fryssouli et al. (2024). ModelFinder proposed the models HKY+F+G4 for ITS1, GTR+F+I+G4 for 5.8S, HKY+F+G4 for ITS2, and GTR+F+I for nLSU for the Bayesian analysis. The BI analysis resulted in an average standard deviation of split frequencies of 0.009951. Because the ML and BI trees showed similar topologies, only the ML topology is presented, with statistical support values from ML (≥75%) and BPP (≥0.90) shown (Fig. 2). The phylogeny inferred from the combined ITS+nLSU sequences indicated that our two specimens – representing the new species Sidera pini – formed a distinct lineage with high support (100/1.00) and were closely related to S. borealis Z.B. Liu & Yuan Yuan and S. vulgaris (Fr.) Miettinen. There are more than 9% differences between the ITS sequences of S. pini and S. borealis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree illustrating the phylogeny of Sidera based on the combined ITS+nLSU dataset. Branches are labeled with ML bootstrap values (BS) greater than 75% and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 0.90. The new species is shown in bold.

Taxonomy

Coltricia subpusilla

F. Wu, W.Y. Li, W. Jing & Y.C. Dai, sp. nov.

C27B2385-B647-5EC7-9092-1B3887CBDBDA

860043

Figs 3, 4

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Basidiomata of Coltricia subpusilla (holotype, Wu 2076). A. Pore surface; B. Pileal surface.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Microscopic structures of Coltricia subpusilla (holotype, Wu 2076). A. Basidiospores; B. Basidia and basidioles; C. Hyphae from context; D. Hyphae from trama.

Diagnosis.

Coltricia subpusilla is distinguished by its annual, laterally stipitate, small, flabelliform to subcircular pilei, angular pores (2–3 per mm), and basidiospores that are smooth to verrucose, usually with one guttule and CB+.

Holotype.

China. • Anhui Province, Anqing, Yuexi County, Laibang Town, 30°54'32"N, 116°14'7"E, 725 m asl., 4 July 2024, on bark of dead Pinus, F. Wu leg., Wu 2076 (BJFC 046384, holotype).

Etymology.

Subpusilla (Lat.): Referring to its macro-morphological resemblance to Coltricia pusilla.

Description.

Basidiomata. Annual, laterally stipitate, solitary to gregarious, soft fibrous without odor or taste when fresh, becoming soft corky when dry. Pilei small, flabelliform to more or less circular, flat to slightly depressed towards the stipitate, up to 13 mm in diam and 1 mm thick at center. Pileal surface velutinate, radially aligned fine hair extending to the margin, reddish brown to honey yellow from center to margin, slightly shiny, margin thinning out and lobed. Pore surface fawn color to greyish brown when fresh, become greyish brown when dry; pores angular, 2–3 per mm; dissepiments thin, entire. Context greyish brown to clay-buff color when dry, soft corky, up to 0.5 mm thick. Tubes fawn color, distinctly deeper than context in color, soft corky, up to 0.5 mm long. Stipe reddish brown, corky and finely velutinate when fresh, up to 0.9 cm long and 1 mm in diam, with a more or less swollen tip.

Hyphal structure. Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae simple septate, tissue darkening but otherwise unchanged in KOH.

Context. Contextual hyphae buff color to cinnamon-buff color, thick-walled with a wide lumen, rarely branched, frequently simple septate, straight, more or less regularly arranged, 4.0–9.4 μm in diam; hyphae in stipe clay-buff color, thick-walled with a narrow lumen, rarely septate and branched, sometimes sclerified, distinctly narrower than those in context, loosely interwoven, 3.7–5.5 μm in diam.

Tubes. Tramal hyphae buff yellow color to cinnamon-buff color, slightly thick-walled with a wide lumen, rarely branched, frequently simple septate, more or less flexuous, loosely interwoven, 3–5 μm in diam. Cystidia and cystidioles absent. Basidia clavate, with four sterigmata and a simple septum at the base, 20–25 × 6–10 μm; basidioles similar in shape but slightly smaller.

Basidiospores. Navicular to ellipsoid, cinnamon-buff color, thick-walled, smooth to verrucose, usually with one guttule, IKI–, CB+, (4.8–)5.9–7.4(–9.0) × (2.9–)3.4–4.5(–5.1) μm, L = 6.70 μm, W = 3.95 μm, Q = 1.65–1.74 (n = 60/2).

Additional specimen examined (paratype).

China. • Anhui Province, Anqing, Yuexi County, Laibang Town, 30°54'32"N, 116°14'7"E, 722 m asl., 4 July 2024, on dead bark of Pinus, F. Wu leg., Wu 2077 (BJFC 046385).

Sidera pini

F. Wu, W.Y. Li, W. Jing & Y.C. Dai, sp. nov.

679E9258-B285-5465-B2E5-E6CA1E6A7419

860044

Figs 5, 6

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Basidiomata of Sidera pini (holotype, Wu 1848).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Microscopic structures of Sidera pini (holotype, Wu 1848). A. Basidiospores; B. Basidia and basidioles; C. Cystidioles; D. Hyphae from subiculum; E. Hyphae from trama; F. Hyphae at dissepiment edge.

Diagnosis.

Sidera pini can be diagnosed by annual, resupinate basidiomata with angular pores (8–12 per mm), dimitic hyphal system, presence of cystidioles (cystidia absent), and allantoid basidiospores that occasionally with one or two guttules.

Holotype.

China. • Jiangxi Province, Jian, Jinggangshan County, Jinggangshan, 26°32'22"N, 114°8'54"E, 985 m asl., 12 July 2024, on fallen trunk of Pinus massoniana, F. Wu leg., Wu 1848 (BJFC 046157, holotype).

Etymology.

Pini (Lat.): Referring to the species growth on Pinus sp.

Description.

Basidiomata. Annual, resupinate, soft and white when fresh, soft corky when dry, up to 12 cm long, 2.1 cm wide, and 2.5 mm thick at center. Pore surface white to cream color when fresh, becoming cream color to buff color when dry; pores angular, 8–12 per mm; dissepiments thin, lacerate. Margin fertile, not differentiate. Subiculum very thin to almost absent; tubes concolorous with pore surface, up to 2 mm long.

Hyphal structure. Hyphal system dimitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections; skeletal hyphae dominant; all hyphae IKI–, CB–; tissue unchanged in KOH.

Subiculum. Generative hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, unbranched, 1–2 μm in diam; skeletal hyphae dominant, thick-walled with a narrow to medium lumen, occasionally branched, flexuous, interwoven, 2–3 μm diam.

Tubes. Generative hyphae hyaline, thin-walled, unbranched, 1–2 μm in diam, dominating at dissepiment edges; skeletal hyphae dominant in trama except dissepiment edges, thick-walled with a narrow to medium lumen, occasionally branched, flexuous, interwoven, 2–3 μm in diam. Rosette-like crystals abundant, 3–11 μm in diam. Cystidia absent; cystidioles present, fusoid, hyaline, thin-walled, basally slightly swollen, with an obtuse or capitate tip and often hyphoid neck, 9.0–11.2 × 2.8–3.6 μm. Basidia barrel-shaped, hyaline, with four sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 6.2–7.0 × 3.2–4.2 μm; basidioles in shape similar to basidia, but slightly shorter.

Basidiospores. Allantoid, hyaline, thin-walled, smooth, occasionally with one or two guttules, IKI–, CB–, (1.7–)2.2–2.9(–3.8) × 1.1–1.5(–1.6) μm, L = 2.63 μm, W = 1.32 μm, Q = 1.98–1.99 (n = 60/2).

Additional specimen examined.

China. • Jiangxi Province, Jian, Jinggangshan County, Jinggangshan, 26°32'22"N, 114°8'54"E, 985 m asl., 12 July 2024, on fallen trunk of Pinus massoniana, F. Wu leg., Wu 1847 (BJFC 046156).

Discussion

In this study, two new species of HymenochaetalesColtricia subpusilla and Sidera pini – are described from South China based on morphological characters and phylogenetic analyses.

Coltricia subpusilla is characterized by its small (about 1 cm in diam), laterally stipitate basidiomata; a reddish brown to honey yellow pileal surface from the center to the margin; a fawn-colored to grayish brown pore surface when fresh; pores 2–3 per mm; and navicular to ellipsoid basidiospores. Phylogenetically, C. subpusilla forms a sister lineage to C. pusilla, and both are closely related to C. minuscula (Susan, Retn. & Sukarno) Y.C. Dai & F. Wu, C. sonorensis (R. Valenz., Esqueda & Decock) Y.C. Dai & F. Wu, and C. tibetica Y.C. Dai & F. Wu (Fig. 1). Morphologically, C. minuscula and C. subpusilla have similar pores (2–3 per mm) and basidiospore sizes (5.8–7.2 × 3.8–4.8 µm vs. 5.9–7.4 × 3.4–4.5 µm), but the former species has pendent and smaller basidiomata (up to 4 mm vs. up to 13 mm in diam), basidia with two sterigmata, and finely verruculose basidiospores (Susan et al. 2018). Coltricia pusilla differs from C. subpusilla by its coriaceous, glabrous, and smaller pilei (2–10 × 2–7 mm wide vs. up to 13 mm in diam), regular pores, entirely verrucose basidiospores, smaller basidia (6.5–7.5 × 4.5–5.0 µm vs. 20.0–25.0 × 6.0–10.0 µm), and larger basidiospores (8.2–9.8 × 5.0–5.5 µm vs. 5.9–7.4 × 3.4–4.5 µm; Núñez and Ryvarden 2000). Coltricia sonorensis differs from C. subpusilla by its entirely verrucose and larger basidiospores (8.0–10.5 × 4.0–5.0 µm vs. 5.9–7.4 × 3.4–4.5 µm), growth on soil, and distribution in Mexico (Valenzuela et al. 2011). Coltricia tibetica and C. subpusilla appear to prefer growth on dead wood and are distributed in China, but the former species has larger basidiomata (up to 3.0 cm vs. up to 1.3 cm in diam), a longer stipe (up to 2.0 cm vs. 0.9 cm long), and produces acyanophilous and significantly larger basidiospores (8.2–9.8 × 5.0–5.5 µm vs. 5.9–7.4 × 3.4–4.5 µm; Wu et al. 2022a).

Sidera pini is characterized by annual, resupinate basidiomata; a white to cream pore surface when fresh that becomes cream to buff when dry; pores 8–12 per mm; a dimitic hyphal system; and allantoid basidiospores. Morphologically, S. pini resembles S. malaysiana Z.B. Liu & Y.C. Dai by having similar pores (8–12 per mm vs. 9–11 per mm) and basidiospore widths (1.1–1.5 µm vs. 1.0–1.2 µm), but S. malaysiana has longer basidiospores (2.9–3.2 µm vs. 2.2–2.9 µm long), distinctly larger basidia (7.8–15 × 3.0–4.3 µm vs. 6.2–7.0 × 3.2–4.2 µm), and is distributed in Malaysia (Liu et al. 2021). Phylogenetically, S. pini is closely related to S. borealis and S. vulgaris (Fig. 2), but S. borealis differs from S. pini by its longer and narrower basidiospores (3.9–4.1 × 1.0–1.1 µm vs. 2.2–2.9 × 1.1–1.5 µm) and growth on fallen angiosperm trunks (Liu et al. 2023). Sidera vulgaris (Fr.) Miettinen differs by having larger pores (6–7 per mm vs. 8–12 per mm) and larger basidiospores (2.9–3.6 × 0.9–1.4 µm vs. 2.2–2.9 × 1.1–1.5 µm; Niemelä and Dai 1997).

Although one new species each is described from Coltricia and Sidera, the delimitation of some previously described species remains unresolved because classical morphological species were often not accurately identified during early sequencing efforts 20 years ago. As a result, GenBank contains multiple distinct and information-wise divergent sequences of, for example, C. cinnamomea (Jacq.) Murrill, C. perennis, C. montagnei (Fr.) Murrill, C. focicola (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Murrill, and S. lenis (P. Karst.) Miettinen. For instance, two highly divergent accessions of C. cinnamomea appear in the phylogeny in Fig. 1 – one from China and one from Finland – and the sequences of S. lenis from China and Finland also differ substantially, sharing only 97% similarity in the ITS region. Because reference sequences from type material are lacking, it remains unclear which, if any, of these sequences represent the species in a strict sense. However, these species were originally described from outside China and are distantly related to the two new species described here. We therefore consider intercontinental distributions to be highly improbable for these two genera, and the divergent sequences from different continents likely represent distinct species. To resolve these long-standing taxonomic issues, additional specimens from type localities will be required for comprehensive morphological and molecular re-examinations.

Wood-inhabiting fungi play key roles in material circulation and energy flow in forest ecosystems. Hymenochaetales is a large and extensively studied order of wood-inhabiting fungi that exhibits substantial morphological and genetic diversity (Susan et al. 2018; Xu et al. 2023; Fryssouli et al. 2024; Wu et al. 2022a; Liu et al. 2021, 2022, 2023, 2025). Numerous new species of Coltricia and Sidera have been discovered in China (Liu et al. 2021, 2022, 2023; Bian et al. 2022; Wu et al. 2022a). The description of C. subpusilla and S. pini further improves our understanding of the species diversity of Hymenochaetales in China.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Coltricia subpusilla
XML Treatment for Sidera pini

Citation

Li W-Y, Jing W, Guan Q-X, Wu F (2026) Morphological and molecular data reveal one new species of Coltricia and one new species of Sidera in Hymenochaetales from South China. MycoKeys 127: 89–105. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.127.173104

Funding Statement

the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 32570008 & 32270011), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. QNTD202509).

Footnotes

Wan-Ying Li and Wen Jing contributed equally to this work.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Use of AI

No use of AI was reported.

Funding

This study was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 32570008 and 32270011) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. QNTD202509).

Author contributions

Data curation: WYL, WJ. Investigation: QXG, FW, WYL, WJ. Methodology: WYL, WJ. Resources: FW. Supervision: FW. Validation: WJ, WYL. Writing – original draft: WYL, WJ. Writing – review and editing: FW, QXG.

Author ORCIDs

Wan-Ying Li https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7782-6670

Wen Jing https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8080-9910

Qian-Xin Guan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-080X

Fang Wu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1455-6486

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Tree of Coltricia

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Wan-Ying Li, Wen Jing, Qian-Xin Guan, Fang Wu

Data type

nxs

mycokeys-127-089-s001.nxs (312.4KB, nxs)
Supplementary material 2

Tree of Sidera

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Wan-Ying Li, Wen Jing, Qian-Xin Guan, Fang Wu

Data type

nxs

References

  1. Anonymous (1969) Flora of British Fungi. Colour Identification Chart. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 3 pp.
  2. Bian LS, Dai YC (2015) Coltriciella globosa and C. pseudodependens spp. nov. (Hymenochaetales) from southern China based on morphological and molecular characters. Mycoscience 56(2): 190–197. 10.1016/j.myc.2014.06.001 [DOI]
  3. Bian LS, Dai YC (2017) Morphological and molecular evidence for three new species of Coltricia (Hymenochaetaceae, Basidiomycota) from southern China. Mycologia 109(1): 64–74. 10.1080/00275514.2017.1286571 [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Bian LS, Dai YC (2020) Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal two new species of Coltricia (HymenochaetaceaeBasidiomycota) from China. Mycological Progress 19(7): 657–666. 10.1007/s11557-020-01583-7 [DOI]
  5. Bian LS, Wu F, Dai YC (2016) Two new species of Coltricia (Hymenochaetaceae, Basidiomycota) from southern China based on evidence from morphology and DNA sequence data. Mycological Progress 15: 1–27. 10.1007/s11557-016-1173-0 [DOI]
  6. Bian LS, Zhou M, Yu J (2022) Three new Coltricia (Hymenochaetaceae, Basidiomycota) species from China based on morphological characters and molecular evidence. Mycological Progress 21: 1–45. 10.1007/s11557-022-01792-2 [DOI]
  7. Dai YC (2010) Hymenochaetaceae (Basidiomycota) in China. Fungal Diversity 45: 131–343. 10.1007/s13225-010-0066-9 [DOI]
  8. Dai YF, Yuan Q, Yang X, Liu R, Liu DF, Yuan HS, Zhao CL (2025) Morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses reveal five new species of Hymenochaetales (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) from southwestern China. MycoKeys 114: 133–175. 10.3897/mycokeys.114.143851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Deng YL, Chen M, Liu LF, Li QZ, Zhang SC, Yuan HS, Zhao CL (2025) Morphological and molecular analyses revealed four new wood-inhabiting fungal species (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) from Yunnan. MycoKeys 117: 29–66. 10.3897/mycokeys.117.146236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Du R, Wang L, Zhou M, Chen JJ (2019) A new species of Sidera (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) from tropical Asia. Phytotaxa 387(2): 165–171. 10.11646/phytotaxa.387.2.9 [DOI]
  11. Du R, Wu F, Gate GM, Dai YC, Tian XM (2020) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Sidera (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota): Four new species and keys to species of the genus. MycoKeys 68: 115–135. 10.3897/mycokeys.68.53561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  12. Frey W, Hurka K, Oberwinkler F (1977) Beiträge zur Biologie der Niederen Pflanzen. Systematik, Stammesgeschichte, Ökologie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart/New York.
  13. Fryssouli V, Polemis E, Typas MA, Zervakis GI (2024) Revisiting the phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Sidera (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) with particular emphasis on S. vulgaris. MycoKeys 105: 119–137. 10.3897/mycokeys.105.121601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
  15. He MQ, Cao B, Liu F, Boekhout T, Denchev TT, Schoutteten N, Denchev CM, Kemler M, Gorjón SP, Begerow D, Valenzuela R, Davoodian N, Niskanen T, Vizzini A, Redhead SA, Ramírez CV, Papp V, Dudka VA, Dutta AK, García SR, Liu XZ, Kijpornyongpan T, Savchenko A, Tedersoo L, Theelen B, Trierveiler PL, Wu F, Zamora JC, Zeng XY, Zhou LW, Liu SL, Ghobad NM, Giachini AJ, Li GJ, Kakishima M, Olariaga I, Haelewaters D, Sulistyo B, Sugiyama J, Svantesson S, Yurkov A, Alvarado P, Antonín V, da Silva AF, Druzhinina I, Gibertoni TB, Guzmán DL, Justo A, Karunarathna SC, Galappaththi MCA, Toome HM, Hosoya T, Liimatainen K, Márquez R, Mešić A, Moncalvo JM, Nagy LG, Varga T, Orihara T, Raymundo T, Salcedo I, Silva FAGS, Tkalčec Z, Wartchow F, Zhao CL, Bau T, Cabarroi HM, Cortés PA, Decock C, Lange RD, Weiss M, Menolli JN, Nilsson RH, Fan YG, Verbeken A, Gaforov Y, Meiras OA, Mendes ARL, Zeng NK, Wu Q, Hyde KD, Kirk PM, Zhao RL (2024) Phylogenomics, divergence times and notes of orders in Basidiomycota. Fungal Diversity 126(3): 127–406. 10.1007/s13225-024-00535-w [DOI]
  16. Hillis DM, Bull JJ (1993) An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42(2): 182–192. 10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182 [DOI]
  17. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20(4): 1160–1166. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Liu ZB, Zhou M, Yuan Y, Dai YC (2021) Global diversity and taxonomy of Sidera (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota): Four new species and keys to species of the genus. Journal of Fungi 7(4): e251. 10.3390/jof7040251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Liu ZB, Zhou M, Wu F, Yu J (2022) Two New Species of Sidera (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) from Southwest China. Journal of Fungi 8(4): e385. 10.3390/jof8040385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Liu ZB, Zhou HM, Liu HG, Yuan Y (2023) Taxonomy and phylogeny of Sidera (Hymenochaetales, Rickenella clade) from China and North America revealing two new species. MycoKeys 96: 173–191. 10.3897/mycokeys.96.100743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Liu ZB, Yuan Y, Dai YC, Liu HG, Vlasák J, Zeng GY, He SH, Wu F (2025) Global diversity and systematics of Hymenochaetaceae with non-poroid hymenophore. Fungal Diversity 131: 1–97. 10.1007/s13225-025-00552-3 [DOI]
  23. Miettinen O, Larsson KH (2011) Sidera, a new genus in Hymenochaetales with poroid and hydnoid species. Mycological Progress 10: 131–141. 10.1007/s11557-010-0682-5 [DOI]
  24. Murrill WA (1904) The Polyporaceae of North America: VII. The genera Hexagona, Grifola, Romellia, Coltricia and Coltriciella. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 31(6): 325–348. 10.2307/2478798 [DOI]
  25. Niemelä T, Dai YC (1997) Polypore Skeletocutis lenis and its sib S. vulgaris. Annales Botanici Fennici 34(2): 133–140.
  26. Núñez M, Ryvarden L (2000) East Asian polypores. Synopsis Fungorum 13: 1–168.
  27. Patil PB, Vaidya S, Maurya S, Yadav LS (2024) Coltricia raigadensis (Hymenochaetaceae, Basidiomycota), a new species from India. Mycoscience 65: 105–110. 10.47371/mycosci.2024.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  28. Petersen JH (1996) The Danish Mycological Society’s Colour-Chart. Foreningen til Svam pekundskabens Fremme, Greve, 6 pp.
  29. Rambaut A (2018) Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology. FigTree ver.4.4 software.
  30. Rehner S (2001) Primers for Elongation Factor 1-a (EF1-a).
  31. Ronquist M, Teslenko M, Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  32. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum Likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22(21): 2688–2690. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 [DOI] [PubMed]
  33. Susan D, Retnowati A, Sukarno N (2018) Coltriciella minuscula sp. nov., a new species of poroid fungus on Pinus merkusii from an Indonesian tropical forest. Mycoscience 59: 49–53. 10.1016/j.myc.2017.08.005 [DOI]
  34. Tedersoo L, Suvi T, Beaver K, Saar I (2007) Ectomycorrhizas of Coltricia and Coltriciella (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) on Caesalpiniaceae, Dipterocarpaceae and Myrtaceae in Seychelles. Mycological Progress 6: 101–107. 10.1007/s11557-007-0530-4 [DOI]
  35. Valenzuela R, Raymundo T, Cifuentes J, Esqueda M, Amal M, Decock C (2011) Coltriciella sonorensis sp. nov. (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales) from Mexico: Evidence from morphology and DNA sequence data. Mycological Progress 11: 181–189. 10.1007/s11557-011-0740-7 [DOI]
  36. Valenzuela R, Raymundo T, Decock C, Lara-Díaz BN, Luna-Vega I, García-Sandoval R (2020) Coltriciella multipileata (Agaricomycetes, Hymenochaetaceae), a new species from Mexico, related to ectomycorrhizal lineages. Phytotaxa 475: 79–90. 10.11646/phytotaxa.475.2.2 [DOI]
  37. Vasco-Palacios AM (2016) Ectomycorrhizal fungi in Amazonian tropical forests in Colombia. Panamericana Formas e Impresos S.A, Colombia.
  38. Vlasák J, Vlasák Jr J, Ryvarden L (2020) Studies in Neotropical polypores 46 Some new and noteworthy polypores from Costa Rica. Synop Fungorum 42: 30–33.
  39. Wang XW, Zhou LW (2024) Umbellaceae fam. nov. (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) for Umbellus sinensis gen. et sp. nov. and three new combinations. Journal of Fungi 10(1): 1–22. 10.3390/jof10010022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  40. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, New York, 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
  41. Wu F, Zhou LW, Vlasák J, Dai YC (2022a) Global diversity and systematics of Hymenochaetaceae with poroid hymenophore. Fungal Diversity 113(1): 1–192. 10.1007/s13225-021-00496-4 [DOI]
  42. Wu F, Man XW, Tohtirjap A, Dai YC (2022b) A comparison of polypore funga and species composition in forest ecosystems of China, North America, and Europe. Forest Ecosystems 9: e100051. 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100051 [DOI]
  43. Xu TM, Sun YF, Liu S, Song CG, Gao N, Wu DM, Cui BK (2023) Ceriporiopsis tianshanensis (Polyporales, Agaricomycetes) and Sidera tianshanensis (Hymenochaetales, Agaricomycetes), two new species of wood-inhabiting fungi from Xinjiang, Northwest China. MycoKeys 98: 1–18. 10.3897/mycokeys.98.102552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 [DOI] [PubMed]
  45. Zhang JY, Luo KY, Yuan Y, Bian LS (2024) A new species of Coltricia (Hymenochaetaceae, Basidiomycota) and a key to species in China. Mycosystema 43(5): e230365.
  46. Zhao H, Dai YC, Wu F, Liu XY, Maurice S, Krutovsky KV, Pavlov IN, Lindner DL, Martin FM, Yuan Y (2023) Insights into the ecological diversification of the Hymenochaetales based on comparative genomics and phylogenomics with an emphasis on Coltricia. Genome Biology and Evolution 15(8): 1–15. 10.1093/gbe/evad136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  47. Zhou M, Dai YC, Vlasák J, Liu HG, Yuan Y (2023) Updated systematics of Trichaptum s.l. (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota). Mycosphere: Journal of Fungal Biology 14(1): 815–917. 10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/11 [DOI]
  48. Zhou Q, Jiang Q, Yang X, Yang J, Zhao C, Zhao J (2024) Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Analyses of Five New Wood-Inhabiting Fungi of Botryobasidium, Coltricia and Coltriciella (Basidiomycota) from China. Journal of Fungi 10(3): e205. 10.3390/jof10030205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Coltricia subpusilla
XML Treatment for Sidera pini
Supplementary material 1

Tree of Coltricia

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Wan-Ying Li, Wen Jing, Qian-Xin Guan, Fang Wu

Data type

nxs

mycokeys-127-089-s001.nxs (312.4KB, nxs)
Supplementary material 2

Tree of Sidera

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Wan-Ying Li, Wen Jing, Qian-Xin Guan, Fang Wu

Data type

nxs

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.


Articles from MycoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES