Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1980 Jun;303:173–189. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013279

Acetylcholine sensitivity of developing ectopic nerve-muscle junctions in adult rat soleus muscles.

T Lømo, C R Slater
PMCID: PMC1282885  PMID: 6253618

Abstract

1. The development of junctional ACh sensitivity has been studied during the formation of ectopic nerve-muscle junctions (n.m.j.s) between the superficial fibular nerve and the denervated soleus muscle of adult rats. 2. When the soleus nerve was cut 2 weeks or more after implanting the fibular nerve, spontaneous m.e.p.p.s and evoked e.p.p.s were first detected in the vicinity of the fibular nerve sprouts 2.5-3 days later. At this time, peaks of local ACh sensitivity greater than the high level of extrajunctional sensitivity induced by denervation were found near the sprouts of the fibular nerve. 3. During the first week of foreign innervation, the extrajunctional sensitivity of the newly innervated muscle fibres fell, but the peaks of sensitivity in the region of the fibular nerve sprouts persisted. Many of these peaks occurred at sites of transmitter release from the fibular nerve terminals. Each innervated fibre had from 1-8 such peaks. 4. When the fibular nerve was cut 2 days or more after cutting the soleus nerve peaks of ACh sensitivity persisted in the region of the degenerated foreign nerve terminals even if the extrajunctional sensitivity was abolished by direct electrical stimulation of the muscle starting soon after cutting the fibular nerve. 5. When the fibular nerve was left intact, more than half of the peaks of sensitivity formed initially in the region of the foreign nerve sprouts had disappeared 2-3 weeks after cutting the soleus nerve. 6. We conclude that during the formation of ectopic n.m.j.s in adult rat muscle the foreign nerve terminals bring about two types of long-lasting change in the distribution and stability of the underlying ACh sensitivity in the muscle fibre membrane; an increase and stabilization of sensitivity at sites of transmitter release which occurs by the time functional transmission at the newly formed n.m.j.s can be detected, and a loss of sensitivity at some of the sites which takes place about 1-2 weeks later.

Full text

PDF
173

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W. Nerve-induced and spontaneous redistribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;268(3):757–773. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W., Zorychta E. Effects of innervation on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;268(3):731–756. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett M. R., Pettigrew A. G. The formation of neuromuscular synapses. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:409–424. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg D. K., Hall Z. W. Loss of alpha-bungarotoxin from junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors in rat diaphragm muscle in vivo and in organ culture. J Physiol. 1975 Nov;252(3):771–789. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bevan S., Steinbach J. H. The distribution of alpha-bungarotoxin binding sites of mammalian skeletal muscle developing in vivo. J Physiol. 1977 May;267(1):195–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brenner H. R., Sakmann B. Gating properties of acetycholine receptor in newly formed neuromuscular synapses. Nature. 1978 Jan 26;271(5643):366–368. doi: 10.1038/271366a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brockes J. P., Berg D. K., Hall Z. W. The biochemical properties and regulation of acetylcholine receptors in normal and denervated muscle. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:253–262. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown M. C., Jansen J. K., Van Essen D. Polyneuronal innervation of skeletal muscle in new-born rats and its elimination during maturation. J Physiol. 1976 Oct;261(2):387–422. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Buckley G. A., Heaton J. A quantitative study of cholinesterase in myoneural junctions from rat and guinea-pig extraocular muscles. J Physiol. 1968 Dec;199(3):743–749. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burden S. Development of the neuromuscular junction in the chick embryo: the number, distribution, and stability of acetylcholine receptors. Dev Biol. 1977 Jun;57(2):317–329. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90218-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chang C. C., Huang M. C. Turnover of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors of the rat diaphragm. Nature. 1975 Feb 20;253(5493):643–644. doi: 10.1038/253643a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. DIAMOND J., MILEDI R. A study of foetal and new-born rat muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;162:393–408. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):144–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fex S., Thesleff S. The time required for innervation of denervated muscles by nerve implants. Life Sci. 1967 Mar 15;6(6):635–639. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(67)90100-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Frank E., Gautvik K., Sommerschild H. Cholinergic receptors at denervated mammalian motor end-plates. Acta Physiol Scand. 1975 Sep;95(1):66–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1975.tb10026.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Frank E., Jansen J. K., Lomo T., Westgaard R. H. The interaction between foreign and original motor nerves innervating the soleus muscle of rats. J Physiol. 1975 Jun;247(3):725–743. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hartzell H. C., Fambrough D. M. Acetylcholine receptors. Distribution and extrajunctional density in rat diaphragm after denervation correlated with acetylcholine sensitivity. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Sep;60(3):248–262. doi: 10.1085/jgp.60.3.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ko P. K., Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W. Denervated skeletal muscle fibers develop discrete patches of high acetylcholine receptor density. Science. 1977 Apr 29;196(4289):540–542. doi: 10.1126/science.850796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Korneliussen H., Sommerschild H. Ultrastructure of the new neuromuscular junctions formed during reinnervation of rat soleus muscle by a "foreign" nerve. Cell Tissue Res. 1976 Apr 9;167(4):439–452. doi: 10.1007/BF00215176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuffler D., Thompson W., Jansen J. K. The elimination of synapses in multiply-innervated skeletal muscle fibres of the rat: dependence on distance between end-plates. Brain Res. 1977 Dec 16;138(2):353–358. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90752-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lomo T., Rosenthal J. Control of ACh sensitivity by muscle activity in the rat. J Physiol. 1972 Mar;221(2):493–513. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lomo T., Slater C. R. Proceedings: Induction of ACh sensitivity at new neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol. 1976 Jun;258(2):107P–108P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lomo T., Westgaard R. H. Further studies on the control of ACh sensitivity by muscle activity in the rat. J Physiol. 1975 Nov;252(3):603–626. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lømo T., Slater C. R. Control of acetylcholine sensitivity and synapse formation by muscle activity. J Physiol. 1978 Feb;275:391–402. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lømo T., Slater C. R. Control of junctional acetylcholinesterase by neural and muscular influences in the rat. J Physiol. 1980 Jun;303:191–202. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. MILEDI R. The acetylcholine sensitivity of frog muscle fibres after complete or partial devervation. J Physiol. 1960 Apr;151:1–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Matthews D. A., Cotman C., Lynch G. An electron microscopic study of lesion-induced synaptogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat. II. Reappearance of morphologically normal synaptic contacts. Brain Res. 1976 Oct 8;115(1):23–41. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90820-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schuetze S. M., Frank E. F., Fischbach G. D. Channel open time and metabolic stability of synaptic and extrasynaptic acetylcholine receptors on cultured chick myotubes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):520–523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Steinbach J. H., Merlie J., Heinemann S., Bloch R. Degradation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by developing rat skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jul;76(7):3547–3551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Waerhaug O., Korneliussen H. Morphological types of motor nerve terminals in rat hindlimb muscles, possibly innervating different muscle fiber types. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch. 1974;144(3):237–247. doi: 10.1007/BF00522809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES