Skip to main content
BMJ Paediatrics Open logoLink to BMJ Paediatrics Open
. 2026 Jan 21;10(1):e004087. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004087

Bone structure and body composition in adolescents with cow’s milk allergy in infancy: a clinical cohort study

Sonja Piippo 1,, Tero Varimo 1, Helena Hauta-alus 1,2,3, Mirva Viljanen 1, Erkki Savilahti 1, Outi Mäkitie 1,2, Mikael Kuitunen 1
PMCID: PMC12829375  PMID: 41565364

Abstract

Objective

We compared bone structure and body composition in adolescents with a challenge-confirmed cow’s milk allergy (CMA) during infancy to peers with refuted CMA and to controls.

Design

An observational clinical cohort study.

Setting

A tertiary allergy clinic at Helsinki University Hospital.

Patients

From a randomised controlled trial from 1999 to 2001 evaluating the effect of probiotics on atopic eczema, we followed up participants (n=81) at 15–18 years’ age and recruited age-matched controls (n=49). Original study participants all had atopic eczema, and CMA confirmed (n=43) or refuted (n=38) by double-blind placebo-controlled cow’s milk challenge in infancy.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was differences in volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measured with peripheral quantitative CT. Secondary outcomes were differences in body composition by a bioelectric impedance analysis.

Results

Participant’s median age was 17.3 years, 62% were females. After adjusting for sex, age-adjusted body mass index, past 5 years’ mean daily supervised physical activity, daily vitamin D intake from food and supplements and mean daily intake of dairy products, the CMA-confirmed group had, compared with the CMA-refuted group, lower median total vBMD at the distal radius (Z-scores −1.49 vs −0.78). The CMA-confirmed group had lower median total vBMD (Z-scores −0.05 vs +0.01) and lower median trabecular vBMD (Z-scores +0.20 vs +0.51) at the distal tibia compared with controls. No group differences in body composition were found.

Conclusion

An early childhood history of CMA may be associated with lower adolescent radial and tibial vBMD. Further studies are needed to assess this potential association.

Keywords: Adolescent Health, Endocrinology


WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

  • In children and female adolescents with persistent cow’s milk allergy (CMA), both dual X-ray absorptiometry and high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT have found reduced bone mineral density.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

  • In milk-tolerant adolescents, a history of CMA during infancy was associated with reduced volumetric bone mineral in the radius and the tibia, as measured by peripheral quantitative CT, compared with controls.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

  • Starting a milk-elimination diet in early childhood is warranted only when CMA is challenge confirmed with clinically relevant symptoms. Reassessment for milk tolerance is fundamentally important, and when tolerance has been achieved, milk should be actively introduced.

Introduction

In Europe, food challenge-verified cow’s milk allergy (CMA) affects 0.3%–4.9% of children.1 2 Spontaneous resolution of CMA is observed in up to 79%–95% by age 15–16 years.3 4 CMA is treated with a milk elimination diet, which most (85%) Finnish children follow with an extreme accuracy.5 Studies show, in children with CMA, a compromised intake of calcium,6 7 which is the strength-providing mineral of bones.

Cow’s milk contains more nutrients (eg, calcium, vitamin D and protein) valuable for bone health per unit of energy than many other food groups.8 Adequate intake of calcium is associated with greater bone mineral density (BMD) in childhood.9 10 Childhood and adolescence are crucial periods for bone mineral accrual, as peak bone mass is acquired at the end of the second decade of life.11 For the lifetime risk of osteoporosis, a condition characterised by a reduced BMD, peak bone mass is a major risk determinant.12

Studies on allergic children show detrimental influence of a milk elimination diet on bone health. In children with persistent CMA, a reduced dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived areal BMD (aBMD)13 and an increased risk for fractures14 have been found. In contrast to DXA, peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT) differentiates cortical and trabecular bone and provides a volumetric BMD (vBMD), which is not affected by the child’s size. A recent study on female adolescents with persistent CMA found in the distal tibia, with high-resolution pQCT, lower cortical thickness and lower total and trabecular vBMD.15

Previous studies have focused on participants with persistent CMA, a rare phenomenon.2 We have carried out a prospective study on children with the most common form of CMA, starting in infancy and achieving tolerance before adolescence.16 To the best of our knowledge, studies assessing the effect of an early childhood milk elimination diet on pQCT measured bone structure in adolescence are lacking. The effects of CMA on body composition have rarely been explored.

To assess bone structure and body composition in adolescents with a history of a milk elimination diet in infancy, we conducted a pQCT scan and a bioelectrical impedance analysis. Additionally, participant fracture rate was recorded. We compared this CMA-confirmed group to adolescents with refuted CMA and age-matched controls.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

In 1999–2001, a randomised, controlled trial assessed the treatment effect of 4 weeks of probiotics on atopic eczema (AE) in infants. We followed up the participants (n=230) at age 15–18 years. As three were unreachable, we contacted 227 participants. Among these, 46% (n=104) consented to our follow-up study (figure 1). Original study participants with AE and suspected CMA had been referred to a tertiary allergy clinic at Helsinki University Hospital to confirm or rule out CMA before the age of 12 months. CMA, IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated, was diagnosed in 120 (52%) of study participants by a double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge. A detailed protocol of the original study has been published.17 We recruited age-matched controls (n=57) by collaboration with school healthcare nurses in Helsinki, and social media advertising. One subject (control) declined the pQCT scan. We performed scans on altogether 130 participants who attended a study visit: 43 on those with confirmed CMA during infancy, 38 on those with a negative CMA challenge (CMA-refuted) and 49 controls. Due to lower extremity size, one tibial scan was unfeasible, and for three participants only distal (6%) and diaphyseal (38%) scans were obtained.

Figure 1. Flowchart of the study. Inclusion criteria for the original study were: 1. age<12 months at the beginning of the study; 2. symptoms indicating CMA, AE being the required symptom; 3. no routine use of probiotic preparations (daily for longer than 1 week within 6 weeks prior to the beginning of the study). AE, atopic eczema; CMA-confirmed, cow’s milk allergy confirmed—positive, double-blind, placebo-controlled, oral cow’s milk challenge during the original study; CMA-refuted, negative, double-blind, placebo-controlled, oral cow’s milk challenge during the original study; Q1, questionnaire one; Q2, questionnaire two.

Figure 1

Patient and public involvement

Patients or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this study.

Questionnaire data

Information on physical activity (PA), bone fractures, family history of osteoporosis and the year in which cow’s milk allergic participants reintroduced milk into their diet came from a study questionnaire. PA was recorded separately for the past 12 months and 5 years, including daily activities (eg, walking or cycling to school), and both supervised and unsupervised PA. An average exercise duration in minutes per day was calculated based on reported type, frequency and duration of exercise. For each fracture, we recorded the affected bone, trauma mechanism and year. Two food frequency questionnaires collected data on dairy consumption and intake of vitamin D from food and supplements, as well as adherence to special diets.16

Register data

The National Pension Institute (Kela) registers all pharmacy purchases of doctor-prescribed medicines. It grants special reimbursements for asthma medication, which patients apply for after 6 months of regular inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use. We acquired data on purchase of ICS and asthma special reimbursement status for years 1999–2017.

Anthropometric variables and biochemical analyses

Participants were evaluated at a study visit by a research physician (SP) and a research nurse (RP). A wall-mounted stadiometer measured height to the nearest 1 mm. A hand-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis with InBody 770 (InBodyUSA, Cerritos, California) measured weight, body fat percentage, fat mass and fat-free mass. Length and weight were converted into SD scores and age-adjusted body mass index (BMI-for-age), respectively, based on Finnish paediatric growth references,18 as previously published.16 The research physician clinically assessed pubertal status by Tanner staging.19 20

A blood sample was drawn after overnight fasting. With the standard technique, the accredited Central Laboratory of Helsinki University Hospital analysed plasma alkaline phosphatase, inorganic phosphate and calcium. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D was analysed with an immunoassay (fully automated) (IDS-iSYS; Immunodiagnostic System).16

pQCT bone assessment

At the study visit, the non-dominant radius and the left tibia were assessed by pQCT to determine vBMD and bone geometry (Stratec XCT 2000 L Research, Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH; software V.6.20). Bone length was measured with a ruler at 0.5 cm accuracy: the radius from the ulnar styloid process to the olecranon, and the tibia from the medial malleolus to the medial condyle. A scout view established the measurement site. With a 0.5 mm voxel size, scans were obtained at 4% and 66% sites for the radius and 4%, 38% and 66% sites for the tibia. The manufacturer’s macro-based automated data interpretation software analysed the pQCT images. At the distal (4%) sites, the analysed bone parameters comprised bone mineral content (BMC), total cross-sectional area (CSA), total vBMD and trabecular vBMD. At the diaphyseal (38%) and proximal (66%) sites, these parameters were BMC, total CSA, total vBMD, cortical CSA, cortical vBMD, cortical thickness, periosteal and endocortical circumference, and polar stress–strain index. Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted Z-scores were calculated based on previously reported equations (Z-score=(Ln (X/M))/S where X is the acquired raw value, Ln is the natural logarithm and M is the mean (radius) or median (tibia) and S is the coefficient of variation).21,23 As such equations were not available for the 66% tibial measurement site, we analysed raw values. A trained and experienced research nurse performed the pQCT scans.

Statistical analyses

Differences in categorical background characteristics between the CMA-confirmed group, the CMA-refuted group and controls were analysed by χ2, except for family history of osteoporosis, which was analysed by Fisher’s exact test. Normality of variable distributions was estimated by visual inspection of histograms and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Bone parameter Z-scores were non-normally distributed, and non-transformable and thus analysed by Kruskal-Wallis. Bone parameters from pQCT are presented as medians and IQR. Missing data were handled using pairwise deletion, allowing all available data to be used in each analysis.

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to assess the association between a history of CMA during infancy on vBMD in adolescence while controlling for covariates. The final model included the covariates sex, BMI-for-age, supervised PA during the past 5 years, daily dairy product consumption and daily intake of vitamin D from food and supplements. Pairwise comparisons were Bonferroni-corrected. No interaction was observed between study group and sex. Homogeneity of regression slopes, equality of error variances, multicollinearity and normality of residual distribution were analysed. These assumptions were mostly met, and the test was considered robust for minor violations.

To assess the congruence of the adjusted model for pQCT Z-scores, we also examined raw values of all parameters by ANCOVA. The differences between groups remained roughly similar (online supplemental tables 1 and 2). Spearman’s rank correlation explored associations between height and vBMD.

Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS for Windows, V.25 and 29 (IBM, Armonk, New York). Significance was set at p<0.05. We applied a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Results

Participant characteristics

Baseline characteristics are shown in table 1. The CMA-confirmed group included 43, the CMA-refuted group 38 and the control group 49 participants. The CMA-confirmed group included 24 participants (56%) with IgE-mediated CMA and 19 participants (44%) with non-IgE-mediated CMA. The median age in all study groups was 17.3 years. A higher proportion of the control group was female (82%) compared with the CMA-confirmed group (47%) and the CMA-refuted group (53%). As previously reported,24 from the original study cohort, male participants (p=0.004) and participants who during the original study had a mother who smoked (p=0.024) were more likely to be lost to follow-up. Based on the food frequency questionnaires, one participant in the CMA-confirmed group adhered to a milk elimination diet at the time of the present study. There was no difference in total dairy product consumption between the groups (table 1).16 A subanalysis within the CMA-confirmed group revealed that participants with a history of IgE-mediated CMA had a lower median total daily dairy product consumption compared with those with a history of non-IgE-mediated CMA (317 g/day vs 661 g/day, respectively) (p=0.04). In the CMA-confirmed group, 60% (n=26) of participants reported the year in which milk was reintroduced in their diet. The median duration of the elimination diet was 2 years in this group, the range being 0–11 years. Family history of osteoporosis in a second degree relative, and fracture history were similar across groups. In girls and boys, 80 (96%) and 45 (98%), respectively, had reached Tanner stage 5 of pubertal development. There was no significant difference in Tanner stage between the study groups. The CMA-refuted group had a significantly higher daily total PA over the past 5 years, compared with controls (p=0.024), and alkaline phosphatase was significantly higher in the CMA-confirmed group, compared with the control group (p=0.005). These differences were not significant after adjustment for sex. There was no significant difference in the frequency of special reimbursements for asthma medication. The CMA-confirmed group had, however, significantly more often purchased ICS during their lifetime (54%) compared with the CMA-refuted group (21%) and controls (20%).

Table 1. Participant characteristics.

CMA-confirmed
(n=43)
CMA-refuted
(n=38)
Controls
(n=49)
P P*
Age, years, median (q1, q3) 17.3 (16.9, 17.5) 17.3 (16.9, 17.5) 17.3 (16.5, 17.9) 0.95 0.83
Sex, female, median (q1, q3) 20 (47) 20 (53) 40 (82) 0.001
Height, cm, mean (SD) 173.4 (10.3) 172.0 (9.4) 170.6 (8.2) 0.33 0.38
Height, SD score, mean (SD) 0.04 (1.2) −0.05 (1.3) 0.33 (1.2) 0.30 0.41
Weight, kg, median (q1, q3) 65.7 (57.7, 73.8) 64.0 (58.1, 78.0) 62.8 (53.1, 69.0) 0.18 0.87
Age-adjusted body mass index (kg/m2), median (q1, q3) 22.2 (20.1, 24.3) 22.0 (19.9, 25.2) 21.0 (19.8, 22.9) 0.26 0.48
Tanner stage of puberty 0.10
 M or G 4, n (%) 0 (0) 3 (8) 1 (2)
 M or G 5, n (%) 42 (100) 34 (92) 48 (98)
Special diet, any, yes, n (%) 11 (29) 7 (23) 20 (44) 0.13
Body fat (%), median (q1, q3) 17.9 (10.8, 28.1) 18.8 (12.7, 26.0) 20.7 (16.2, 25.6) 0.34
Body fat mass (kg), median (q1, q3) 10.3 (6.5, 17.3) 11.2 (7.6, 18.8) 12.3 (9.2, 15.3) 0.66
Fat free mass (kg), mean (SD) 54.3 (11.8) 52.5 (11.1) 48.8 (8.9) 0.04 0.874
Osteoporosis in a second-degree relative, yes, n (%) 5 (12) 4 (11) 5 (10) 1.00
Fractures§, ever—yes, n (%) 14 (27) 13 (25) 18 (32) 0.74
Reimbursement for asthma medication, yes, n (%) 10 (23) 4 (11) 6 (12) 0.23
Prescription of inhaled corticosteroids, ever, yes, n (%) 23 (54) 8 (21) 10 (20) 0.001
Total dairy consumption (g/d), median (q1, q3) 452 (172, 1229) 566 (277, 1023) 230 (78, 800) 0.07 0.95
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration (nmol/l), median (q1, q3) 76.0 (58.9, 97.9) 79.3 (65.1, 89.6) 81.1 (65.9, 93.6) 0.83 0.35
Plasma alkaline phosphatase**, median (q1, q3) 95 (73, 139) 94 (66, 119) 76 (61, 96) 0.005 0.12
Physical activity†† (min/days), median (q1, q3)
 Past 12 months, supervised 19 (0, 61) 16 (1, 44) 11 (0, 42) 0.73 0.84
 Past 12 months, total 62 (28, 138) 66 (40, 103) 57 (41, 83) 0.60 0.83
 Past 5 years, supervised 29 (13, 63) 28 (8, 49) 28 (12, 61) 0.33 0.42
 Past 5 years, total 67 (40, 118) 80 (47, 125) 65 (46, 84) 0.02 0.07

P values were calculated with ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate.

Categorical P values were calculated with the χ2 test.

Age-adjusted BMI, body fat mass and physical activity during past 12 months and 5 years; both supervised and total were transformed with natural log to achieve a normal distribution.

Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Significant P-values are bolded.

*

Analaysis of covariance adjusted for sex.

Missing cases: CMA-confirmed n=1, CMA-refuted n=1.

Missing cases: CMA-confirmed n=5, CMA-refuted n=7, control n=3.

§

n= 159.

Missing cases: CMA-confirmed n=8, CMA-refuted n=6, control n=3.

**

Missing cases: CMA-refuted n=1, control n=2.

††

Missing cases: CMA-confirmed n=5, CMA-refuted n=6, control n=3.

BMI, body mass index; CMA, cow’s milk allergy.

Comparison of pQCT parameters

Bone structure findings from the radius are presented in table 2, and from the tibia in table 3. Total vBMD was the lowest in the CMA-confirmed group at all measurement sites in both the radius and the tibia, though this difference was not significant at the proximal radius and tibia. In the adjusted model in the CMA-confirmed group, total vBMD was significantly lower at the distal radius compared with the CMA-refuted group, and in the distal tibia compared with the control group (figure 2). In the distal radius, but not at other measurement sites, the proportion of vBMD Z-scores below −2.0 was higher in the CMA-confirmed group (37.2%) compared with the CMA-refuted (5.3%) and control groups (14.6%) (p=0.001). Trabecular vBMD in the distal tibia was lower in the CMA-confirmed group compared with the control group (figure 2). Cortical vBMD in the diaphyseal tibia was lower in the CMA-confirmed group compared with the CMA-refuted group (table 3).

Table 2. Bone structure in the radius among adolescents with atopic eczema and confirmed cow’s milk allergy during infancy, adolescents with atopic eczema and refuted cow’s milk allergy during infancy, and controls.

CMA-confirmed
(n=43)
CMA-refuted
(n=38)
Controls
(n=49)
P P*
Distal radius (4% site)
 Total BMC 0.12 (-0.39, 0.93) 0.37 (0.05, 0.95) 0.27 (-0.54, 1.49) 0.42 0.005
 Total CSA 1.38 (0.76, 2.10) 1.27 (0.71, 1.70) 1.64 (0.72, 2.16) 0.17 0.09
 Total vBMD −1.49 (−2.36, –0.61) −0.78 (−1.39, –0.27) −0.88 (−1.86, –0.53) 0.01 0.009 §
 Trabecular vBMD −0.37 (−1.18, 0.75) 0.53 (−0.52, 1.01) 0.07 (−0.77, 0.99) 0.13 0.06
Proximal radius (66% site)
 Total BMC 0.41 (−0.41, 1.04) 0.23 (−0.41, 0.69) 0.20 (−0.49, 0.93) 0.90 0.08
 Total CSA 0.70 (−0.23, 1.37) 0.39 (−0.40, 0.93) 0.49 (−0.16, 1.29) 0.49 0.02
 Total vBMD 0.61 (0.11, 1.19) 0.85 (0.30, 1.39) 0.85 (−0.07, 1.14) 0.32 0.09
 Cortical CSA 0.31 (−0.59, 0.91) 0.12 (−0.52, 0.62) 0.21 (−0.52, 0.96) 0.83 0.31
 Cortical vBMD 0.95 (0.67, 1.29) 1.23 (0.77, 1.62) 0.83 (0.18, 1.61) 0.18 0.12
 Polar SSI 0.53 (−0.81, 1.14) 0.04 (−0.53, 0.64) 0.22 (−0.62, 0.94) 0.63 0.03

Presented as Z-score medians (q1, q3).

Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Significant P-values are bolded.

*

Analysis of covariance adjusted for sex, supervised exercise during the past 5 year, age-adjusted body mass index, mean daily intake of dairy products and mean daily intake of vitamin D from food and supplements. Missing cases: CMA-confirmed n=8, CMA-refuted n=6, control n=3.

Pairwise comparison CMA-confirmed vs control, Bonferroni corrected p<0.05.

Violates assumption of homogeneity of regression slopes.

§

Pairwise comparison CMA-confirmed vs CMA-refuted, Bonferroni corrected p<0.05.

Pairwise comparison CMA-refuted vs control, Bonferroni corrected p<0.05.

BMC, bone mineral content; CMA, cow’s milk allergy; CSA, cross-sectional area; SSI, stress-strain index; vBMD, volumetric bone mineral density.

Table 3. Bone structure in the radius among adolescents with atopic eczema and confirmed cow’s milk allergy during infancy, adolescents with atopic eczema and refuted cow’s milk allergy during infancy, and controls.

CMA-confirmed (n=43) CMA-refuted
(n=38)
Controls
(n=48)
P P*
Distal tibia (4% site) - Z-scores
 Total BMC −0.06 (−0.40, 0.34) 0.08 (−0.22, 0.43) 0.28 (−0.34, 0.93) 0.11 <0.001
 Total CSA 0.56 (−0.13, 1.11) 0.27 (−0.47, 0.95) 0.31 (−0.45, 1.07) 0.34 0.017
 Total vBMD −0.05 (−0.10, 0.01) 0.00 (−0.06, 0.05) 0.01 (−0.04, 0.07) 0.01 0.008
 Trabecular vBMD 0.20 (−0.54, 0.64) 0.43 (−0.25, 0.93) 0.51 (0.08, 1.09) 0.07 0.008
Diaphyseal tibia (38% site)—Z-scores
 Total BMC −0.58 (−1.32, 1.01) −0.18 (−0.95, 0.38) 0.22 (−0.89, 0.86) 0.16 <0.001
 Total CSA −1.25 (−2.37, –0.30) −1.32 (−2.26, –0.37) −0.71 (−1.69, 0.21) 0.04 0.008
 Cortical thickness 0.87 (−0.37, 2.29) 1.09 (0.04, 2.13) 1.33 (0.73, 1.85) 0.39 0.03§
 Cortical vBMD 0.51 (0.14, 0.94) 1.02 (0.48, 1.40) 0.86 (0.41, 1.26) 0.02 0.04
 Endosteal circumference −1.67 (−2.09, –0.91) −1.96 (−2.48, –1.17) −1.30 (−2.25, –0.72) 0.09 0.07
 Periosteal circumference −1.22 (−2.63, –0.29) −1.42 (−2.43, –0.36) −0.70 (−1.62, 0.22) 0.03 0.014
Proximal tibia (66% site)—raw values
 Total BMC, mg/mm 381 (367–396) 388 (372–404) 420 (403–437) 0.99 <0.001
 Total CSA, mm2 601 (575–627) 585 (556–613) 654 (624–685) 0.66 0.001
 Total vBMD, mg/cm3 644 (624–664) 671 (648–693) 647 (623–670) 0.08 0.13§
 Cortical CSA, mm2 292 (281–304) 298 (285–310) 325 (311–338) 0.96 0.001
 Cortical vBMD, mg/cm3 1109 (1103–1116) 1121 (1114–1128) 1113 (1105–1121) 0.02 0.047**
 Cortical thickness, mm 3.95 (3.81–4.09) 4.11 (3.95–4.27) 4.20 (4.03–4.37) 0.60 0.016
 Endosteal circumference, mm 61.5 (59.4–63.6) 59.5 (57.1–61.8) 63.9 (61.4–66.4) 0.27 0.009
 Periosteal circumference, mm 86.3 (84.4–88.2) 85.3 (83.2–87.3) 90.3 (88.1–92.5) 0.66 <0.001
 Polar SSI, mm3 2377 (2234–2520) 2374 (2216–2531) 2714 (2546–2883) 0.90 0.003

Presented as Z-score medians (q1, q3) for distal and diaphyseal measurement sites. Presented as means of raw values (95% CI) for the proximal measurement site.

Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Significant P-values are bolded.

*

Analysis of covariance adjusted for sex, supervised exercise during the past 5 year, age-adjusted body mass index, mean daily intake of dairy products, and mean daily intake of vitamin D from food and supplements. Missing cases: CMA-confirmed n=8, CMA refuted n=8, control n=3.

Pairwise comparison CMA-confirmed vs control, Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05.

Pairwise comparison CMA-refuted vs control, Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05.

§

Violates assumption of homogeneity of regression slopes.

Pairwise comparison CMA-confirmed vs CMA-refuted, Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05.

**

Pairwise comparisons non-significant.

BMC, bone mineral content; CMA, cow’s milk allergy; CSA, cross-sectional area; SSI, stress-strain index; vBMD, volumetric bone mineral density.

Figure 2. Volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) Z-scores in the three study groups; CMA-confirmed (n=43), CMA-refuted (n=38) and control (n=49, for tibial measurements n=48): (A) the distal radius; (B) the proximal radius (C) total vBMD at the distal tibia and (D) trabecular vBMD at the distal tibia. Bonferroni-corrected significant group differences from the analysis of covariance which adjusted for sex, BMI-for-age, supervised physical activity during the past 5 years, daily dairy product consumption and daily intake of vitamin D combined from food and supplements are denoted with the appropriate P value. BMI, body mass index; CMA, cow’s milk allergy.

Figure 2

In the adjusted model, BMC was significantly lower in the CMA-confirmed group compared with controls at the distal radius, and in both the CMA-confirmed group and the CMA-refuted group compared with the control group at all three tibial measurement sites (table 3). At the diaphyseal tibial site, BMC Z-score was more frequently below −2.0 both in the CMA-confirmed group (11.6%) and the CMA-refuted group (13.2%), compared with the control group (0%) (p=0.038). A subanalysis within the CMA-confirmed group found that participants with IgE-mediated CMA had a lower median Z-score compared with those with non-IgE-mediated CMA for distal radial trabecular vBMD (−0.59 vs 0.32, p=0.03), the distal tibial total vBMD (−0.08 vs −0.01, p=0.01) and trabecular vBMD (−0.18 vs 0.46, p=0.01).

In the adjusted model, the total CSA was smaller in the CMA-refuted group compared with controls in the proximal radius as well as all three tibial measurement sites. The CMA-confirmed group exhibited a smaller CSA compared with controls in the proximal tibia (table 3).

In the adjusted model, the endocortical circumference at the proximal tibial measurement site was significantly smaller in the CMA-refuted group compared with the control group. In the diaphyseal tibia, the periosteal circumference was significantly smaller in the CMA-refuted group compared with the control group, in the proximal tibia, the periosteal circumference was significantly smaller in both the CMA-confirmed group and the CMA-refuted group as compared with the control group (table 3). The Z-score for the periosteal circumference in the diaphyseal tibia was more frequently below −2.0 in the CMA-refuted group (39.5%) compared with the control group (14.6%) (p=0.037).

Group comparisons of raw bone characteristics values by ANCOVA were roughly similar (online supplemental tables 1 and 2). Associations between height and pQCT-derived vBMD parameters are presented in online supplemental table 3. The use of ICSs did not affect the results, data not shown.

Body composition

The CMA-confirmed group had a significantly higher fat-free mass compared with the control group by bioelectrical impedance analysis. This difference was not significant in a stratified sex-specific analysis. Height SD scores or BMI-for-age did not differ between groups (table 1).

Discussion

Our longitudinal study found reduced pQCT-measured vBMD in both the radius and the tibia and lower tibial BMC among adolescents with a history of AE and CMA (CMA-confirmed group) during early childhood compared with control groups. Body composition was similar across groups. These findings suggest a long-term effect of early childhood CMA and milk elimination diet on bone health in adolescents.

Our pQCT findings agree with a recent study on bone structure by high-resolution pQCT in participants with persistent IgE-mediated CMA, which found in the distal tibia, in postmenarchal females compared with controls, a reduced total and trabecular vBMD. No difference was observed in vBMD among premenarchal females. Noteworthy, approximately half of both participants and controls were vitamin D deficient (serum concentration <50 nmol/L),15 whereas most of our study participants were vitamin D sufficient16 (table 1). A distally reduced total vBMD could be explained by a reduced trabecular vBMD, as distal bone is primarily composed of trabecular bone. Trabecular vBMD was lowest in the CMA-confirmed group.

Our findings are important as reduced vBMD in childhood is associated with an increased fracture risk. In male adolescents (n=991, mean age 18.9 years), a decreased trabecular and cortical vBMD in both radius and tibia have been associated with a history of X-ray confirmed fractures.24 Children (n=224, mean age girls 10.1 years, boys 11.6 years) with radial and/or ulnar fractures have shown a reduced vBMD at the distal radius.25 We observed no increase in fracture rate. However, the observed differences in vBMD were modest at most measurement sites, except for the distal radius, where a clinically significant proportion of participants in the CMA-confirmed group had a Z-score below −2.0. Fractures associated with low childhood milk intake may not yet have manifested in the age group we studied. Further follow-up is necessary to determine the long-term clinical implications of our findings. In addition, our study cohort was rather small, and significantly larger cohorts would be needed to detect such differences. A study on the association between milk consumption in childhood (age 5–12 years) and adolescence (age 13–17 years) found in women aged ≥50 years (n=1880) an increased risk for osteoporotic fractures among women with a low childhood milk intake, but no association with fracture incidence in women aged 20–49 years.26

While we used pQCT, other studies have evaluated BMD in children with CMA by DXA. Postpubertal adolescents with persistent IgE-mediated CMA (n=33, mean age 19.7 years) have shown, compared with controls, a reduced aBMD Z-score at the hip, the femoral neck and lumbar spine. However, a successfully completed oral milk immunotherapy (n=12, mean age 20.2 years) increased aBMD compared with participants with persistent allergy.27 Our study found that vBMD was reduced in the CMA-confirmed group although all but one had achieved milk tolerance. A study that compared children with persistent CMA (n=52) to children with other food allergies (n=29) found a lower spinal aBMD by DXA associated with CMA, but not other food allergies.13 Our study found that participants with a history of IgE-mediated CMA had lower dairy consumption and lower vBMD compared with those with a history of non-IgE-mediated allergy. Furthermore, since most participants in the CMA-confirmed group had had an IgE-mediated allergy, our findings support the idea that differences in dairy product consumption may explain the observed differences in BMD. A positive relationship between calcium intake and bone mass accrual has been established in prepubertal children, and calcium supplementation enhances the positive effect of PA at skeletal sites that are weight bearing in young children,11 highlighting the importance of dietary calcium acquisition before the onset of pubertal maturation. This could explain why a milk elimination diet in early childhood may affect bone structure beyond the duration of the diet, as our current study shows.

We found a higher frequency of any purchase of ICS in the CMA-confirmed group, which is in line with our previous finding of a higher reported lifetime prevalence of wheezing in the CMA-confirmed group.28 Among children with CMA, low weight Z-score and diagnosis of asthma have been identified as independent risk factors for decreased aBMD.29 However, it is mainly high daily doses of ICS that affect bone loss, and adequate intake of vitamin D and calcium seem to mitigate these effects.30 In our study, a history of any ICS purchase was not associated with adolescent bone structure. The current national guidelines for asthma recommend treatment at low doses of ICS.

The strength of our study is the rigorous diagnosis of CMA by the gold standard method, as other studies often define CMA based on parental reports, IgE-mediated sensitisation or open oral food challenges. Another strength is the choice of bone structure analysis method, as it has been suggested that vBMD by pQCT, as opposed to aBMD by DXA, may provide more information about bone strength and fracture risk.31 Our study also has some limitations. Due to the cross-sectional design, we establish associations between CMA and reduced vBMD, but causality cannot be inferred. Another limitation is the lack of prospective data regarding the use of calcium substitutes during the span of the milk elimination diet, as well as on sunlight exposure, which may result in residual confounding that the adjusted model could not account for. The analysis on endocortical circumference Z-scores in the diaphyseal tibia should be interpreted with caution, as the median Z-score was low across groups. The calculation for Z-scores, which was inferred from a Belgian population, may be unsuitable for our Finnish population.

Conclusion

In this cohort study, we found reduced vBMD in adolescents diagnosed with CMA during infancy. Most of the participants had an IgE-mediated allergy and these participants demonstrated lower total dairy consumption in adolescence. Our findings further support the interpretation that variations in long-term dietary habits, influenced by early-life CMA type and subsequent tolerance development, may have lasting effects on bone health trajectories. Reduced vBMD may influence fracture rate in older age, when the risk for osteoporotic fractures is at its highest. Our finding highlights the importance of starting a milk-elimination diet in early childhood only when CMA is challenge confirmed with clinically relevant symptoms. It is also fundamentally important to regularly reassess milk tolerance and actively introduce milk when tolerance has been achieved. For children with mild symptoms, desensitisation using the food ladder principle should be endorsed.32

Supplementary material

online supplemental table 1
bmjpo-10-1-s001.docx (31KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004087

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the study participants and express our gratitude for the dedicated work of study nurse Rhea Paajanen. Parts of this work have previously been presented at the 62nd annual meeting of the European Society of Paediatric Endocrinology. The conference abstract has been published.

Footnotes

Funding: All phases of this study were supported by grants from: the Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, the Finnish Medical Foundation, Finska Läkaresällskapet, the Foundation for Pediatric Research in Finland, the Foundation for the Memory of Dorothea Olivia, Karl Walter and Jarl Walter Perklén, Academy of Finland, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Juho Vainio Foundation, and via a salaried PhD position at the University of Helsinki. Open access funded by Helsinki University Library. Funders did not provide grant numbers.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.

Patient consent for publication: Not applicable.

Ethics approval: Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District Ethics Committee approved this study (HUS/2027/2016). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Data availability free text: The data generated for and analysed in this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Spolidoro GCI, Ali MM, Amera YT, et al. Prevalence estimates of eight big food allergies in Europe: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2023;78:2361–417. doi: 10.1111/all.15801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fiocchi A, Bognanni A, Brożek J, et al. World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow’s Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines update - I - Plan and definitions. World Allergy Organ J. 2022;15:100609. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hansen MM, Nissen SP, Halken S, et al. The natural course of cow’s milk allergy and the development of atopic diseases into adulthood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2021;32:727–33. doi: 10.1111/pai.13440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Skripak JM, Matsui EC, Mudd K, et al. The natural history of IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120:1172–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tuokkola J, Kaila M, Kronberg-Kippilä C, et al. Cow’s milk allergy in children: adherence to a therapeutic elimination diet and reintroduction of milk into the diet. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64:1080–5. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tuokkola J, Luukkainen P, Nevalainen J, et al. Eliminating cows’ milk, but not wheat, barley or rye, increases the risk of growth deceleration and nutritional inadequacies. Acta Paediatr. 2017;106:1142–9. doi: 10.1111/apa.13846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Boaventura RM, Mendonça RB, Fonseca FA, et al. Nutritional status and food intake of children with cow’s milk allergy. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2019;47:544–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2019.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wallace TC, Bailey RL, Lappe J, et al. Dairy intake and bone health across the lifespan: a systematic review and expert narrative. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61:3661–707. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1810624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cadogan J, Eastell R, Jones N, et al. Milk intake and bone mineral acquisition in adolescent girls: randomised, controlled intervention trial. BMJ. 1997;315:1255–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7118.1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eastell R, Lambert H. Diet and Healthy Bones. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;70:400–4. doi: 10.1007/s00223-001-0047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chevalley T, Rizzoli R. Acquisition of peak bone mass. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;36:101616. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2022.101616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bachrach LK. Acquisition of optimal bone mass in childhood and adolescence. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2001;12:22–8. doi: 10.1016/s1043-2760(00)00336-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mailhot G, Perrone V, Alos N, et al. Cow’s Milk Allergy and Bone Mineral Density in Prepubertal Children. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20151742. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Konstantynowicz J, Nguyen TV, Kaczmarski M, et al. Fractures during growth: potential role of a milk-free diet. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18:1601–7. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0397-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yonamine GH, Domiciano DS, Takayama L, et al. Impaired bone mineral density and microarchitecture in female adolescents with IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy. Arch Osteoporos. 2024;19:40. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01396-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Piippo S, Hauta-Alus H, Viljanen M, et al. Dairy consumption and vitamin D concentration in adolescents with challenge-confirmed cow’s milk allergy during infancy. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024;78:897–904. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01477-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Viljanen M, Savilahti E, Haahtela T, et al. Probiotics in the treatment of atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome in infants: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Allergy. 2005;60:494–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saari A, Sankilampi U, Hannila ML, et al. New Finnish growth references for children and adolescents aged 0 to 20 years: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-length/height, and body mass index-for-age. Ann Med. 2011;43:235–48. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.515603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child. 1969;44:291–303. doi: 10.1136/adc.44.235.291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch Dis Child. 1970;45:13–23. doi: 10.1136/adc.45.239.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rauch F, Schöenau E. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the distal radius in young subjects - new reference data and interpretation of results. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2005;5:119–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rauch F, Schoenau E. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the proximal radius in young subjects--new reference data and interpretation of results. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2008;8:217–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Roggen I, Roelants M, Sioen I, et al. Pediatric reference values for tibial trabecular bone mineral density and bone geometry parameters using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;96:527–33. doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-9988-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Darelid A, Ohlsson C, Rudäng R, et al. Trabecular volumetric bone mineral density is associated with previous fracture during childhood and adolescence in males: the GOOD study. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:537–44. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kalkwarf HJ, Laor T, Bean JA. Fracture risk in children with a forearm injury is associated with volumetric bone density and cortical area (by peripheral QCT) and areal bone density (by DXA) Osteoporos Int. 2011;22:607–16. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1333-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kalkwarf HJ, Khoury JC, Lanphear BP. Milk intake during childhood and adolescence, adult bone density, and osteoporotic fractures in US women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:257–65. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.1.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nachshon L, Goldberg MR, Schwartz N, et al. Decreased bone mineral density in young adult IgE-mediated cow’s milk-allergic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:1108–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Piippo S, Viljanen M, Savilahti E, et al. Allergic symptoms and sensitisation in adolescents with cows’ milk allergy and atopic eczema in infancy. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2020;8:423–33. doi: 10.1002/iid3.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Goldberg MR, Nachshon L, Sinai T, et al. Risk factors for reduced bone mineral density measurements in milk-allergic patients. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018;29:850–6. doi: 10.1111/pai.12972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fuhlbrigge AL, Kelly HW. Inhaled corticosteroids in children: effects on bone mineral density and growth. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:487–96. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70024-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bachrach LK, Gordon CM, Endocrinology SO, et al. Bone Densitometry in Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20162398. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Luyt D, Ball H, Makwana N, et al. BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of cow’s milk allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44:642–72. doi: 10.1111/cea.12302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    online supplemental table 1
    bmjpo-10-1-s001.docx (31KB, docx)
    DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004087

    Data Availability Statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request.


    Articles from BMJ Paediatrics Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

    RESOURCES