Abstract
1. Extracellular action potentials were recorded from supraoptic neurones in lactating, urethane-anaesthetized rats. A microtap was used to apply a very small volume (about 10-7 ml.) of hypertonic saline (1-4 M-NaCl) to the immediate neighbourhood of these units over about 1 min.
2. Twenty-five of twenty-seven supraoptic neurones were excited by this local osmotic stimulus. The response of individual units was reversible and repeatable. Microtap applications of isotonic saline to supraoptic neurones were without observed effect.
3. Continuously firing supraoptic neurones responded to hypertonic saline with a smooth acceleration in firing rate. Phasic neurones showed an increase in the over-all level of activity, and in particular, a prolongation of the active phases. Slow, irregularly firing cells responded either with a smooth acceleration in firing rate, or with phasic behaviour.
4. The response to local hypertonic saline appears to be reasonably specific to the supraoptic nucleus. Of thirty-five neurones recorded close to the supraoptic nucleus but which were not antidromically activated from stimulation of the neural stalk, only nine responded to the local application of hypertonic saline.
5. Similarities between the manner of response of supraoptic neurones to local application of hypertonic saline and the manner of their response to systemic increases in the osmotic pressure of blood plasma support the hypothesis that supraoptic neurones are osmosensitive.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arnauld E., Dufy B., Vincent J. D. Hypothalamic supraoptic neurones: rates and patterns of action potential firing during water deprivation in the unanaesthetized monkey. Brain Res. 1975 Dec 19;100(2):315–325. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90485-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bioulac B., Gaffori O., Harris M., Vincent J. D. Effects of acetylcholine, sodium glutamate and GABA on the discharge of supraoptic neurons in the rat. Brain Res. 1978 Oct 6;154(1):159–162. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)91064-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brimble M. J., Dyball R. E. Characterization of the responses of oxytocin- and vasopressin-secreting neurones in the supraoptic nucleus to osmotic stimulation. J Physiol. 1977 Sep;271(1):253–271. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brimble M. J., Dyball R. E., Forsling M. L. Oxytocin release following osmotic activation of oxytocin neurones in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei. J Physiol. 1978 May;278:69–78. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dyball R. E. Oxytocin and ADH secretion in relation to electrical activity in antidromically identified supraoptic and paraventricular units. J Physiol. 1971 Apr;214(2):245–256. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felten D. L., Cashner K. A. Cytoarchitecture of the supraoptic nucleus. A Golgi study. Neuroendocrinology. 1979;29(4):221–230. doi: 10.1159/000122926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hatton G. I., Armstrong W. E., Gregory W. A. Spontaneous and osmotically-stimulated activity in slices of rat hypothalamus. Brain Res Bull. 1978 Sep-Oct;3(5):497–508. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(78)90079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubbard J. I., Jones S. F., Landau E. M. An examination of the effects of osmotic pressure changes upon transmitter release from mammalian motor nerve terminals. J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):639–657. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wakerley J. B., Poulain D. A., Brown D. Comparison of firing patterns in oxytocin- and vasopressin-releasing neurones during progressive dehydration. Brain Res. 1978 Jun 16;148(2):425–440. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90730-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walters J. K., Hatton G. I. Supraoptic neuronal activity in rats during five days of water deprivation. Physiol Behav. 1974 Nov;13(5):661–667. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(74)90237-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]