Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences logoLink to Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences
. 2025;28(12):1736–1742. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2025.85494.18494

Toxicological evaluation and preliminary phytochemical characterisation of a Nigerian Cannabis sativa chemovar

Ebele Joan Ajagun 1,2, Babatunde Adebola Alabi 3,4, Abdul-musawwir Alli-oluwafuyi 2, Mary Olufunmilayo Ologe 2,*
PMCID: PMC12829708  PMID: 41586191

Abstract

Objective(s):

Different Cannabis sativa chemovars produce diverse pharmacological and behavioral effects. With the widespread use of cannabis in Nigeria, detailed toxicological effects of Nigerian chemovars are lacking. This study aimed to identify phytocannabinoids and investigate the toxic effects of an indigenous C. sativa.

Materials and Methods:

The plant samples were air-dried, powdered, extracted with ethanol, and characterized (phytochemical screening, Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)). Acute and subacute toxicity tests were done following Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) protocols.

Results:

Screening showed appreciable levels of alkaloids, tannins, saponins, cardiac glycosides, and phenol. FTIR analysis indicated functional groups and chemical linkages like alcohols, fatty acids, alkynes, ketones, and esters, and 11 phytocannabinoids with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in abundance (35.78%) reported by GC-MS. Acute toxicity test indicated an oral lethal dose (LD50) value of ˃5000 mg/kg, a no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) dose of ≤300 mg/kg, and a significant (P<0.05) decrease in the weight of animals in the 2000 mg/kg treatment group. The sub-acute toxicity test showed significantly (P<0.05) decreased ALP and ALT levels at 25 mg/kg body weight, and significantly lower triglyceride (P<0.01) and LDL (P<0.05) levels. Urea and some haematological parameters were significantly (P<0.05) higher in the 250 mg/kg group. Also, we observed mild to moderate necrosis in the excised pancreas and liver, and mild tubular changes in the kidney.

Conclusion:

This suggests that our indigenous variety of C. sativa may be considered safe following oral consumption.

Key Words: Acute toxicity, Cannabinoids, Cannabis sativa, Profile, Sub-acute toxicity

Introduction

Cannabis sativa L., an annual dioecious herb of the family Cannabaceae, is known globally as marijuana or Indian hemp and locally in Nigeria as “Igbo,” “wiwi,” and “ebo”. Native to Central Asia, it is now cultivated worldwide (1, 2) and used recreationally and medicinally for its phytoconstituents and cannabinoids, with applications ranging from analgesic to anti-inflammatory effects (2-4). Commonly smoked, it is also brewed as tea, infused in alcohol, added to food, or eaten fresh (5, 6). Nigeria ranks among the largest producers, suppliers, and consumers in West Africa (7-9). Despite its illegal status, documented use persists (10, 11). Globally, 147 million people (2.5% of the population) use cannabis, with an estimated 50,000-100,000 diabetic patients consuming it, rising from 1.7% in 2005 to 5.8% in 2018, with an unknown number self-medicating (12, 13). While bioactive plants are well represented in orthodox medicine, data on the safety and phytochemical profile of locally cultivated cannabis remain scarce. Most toxicity studies have focused on isolated cannabinoids, synthetic derivatives, or certified extracts (14), leaving a gap in knowledge regarding repeated oral administration of the crude extract. This study fills that gap by identifying the phytoconstituents and cannabinoids of an indigenous Nigerian variety and assessing its toxic effects in Wistar rats to guide dosing for future efficacy studies and evaluate potential histopathological changes in vital organs.

Methods

Collection, identification, and extraction of plant materials

Permission to handle C. sativa was granted by the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), Abuja, Nigeria. Seized samples were collected from the Oyo State Command Office in Ibadan in April 2022. Authenticity was confirmed at the Department of Plant Biology, University of Ilorin, and a voucher specimen was deposited (UILH/001/1467/2023). Hand-picked leaves were air-dried, ground with a mortar and pestle, and 1000 g was extracted in 70% ethanol by cold maceration for 72 hr (15). The extract was filtered, concentrated, and the percentage yield was calculated.

% yield=weight of plant extract/weight of powdered plant material)×100

Preliminary phytochemical tests

Fresh 70% ethanol crude extract was qualitatively analysed for secondary metabolites using standard procedures (16, 17).

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR)

FTIR analysis was performed on the ethanol extract using a SHIMADZU FTIR8400S with ATR sampling (18). One mg extract was mixed with 50 mg FTIR grade KBr, compressed into a pellet, and scanned at 400-4000 cm⁻¹, resolution 4 cm⁻¹.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)

GC-MS analysis (SHIMADZU GC-MSTQ8050NX) on the ethanolic crude extract of C. sativa used an Elite5MS capillary column (30 m×250 µm×0.25 µm)(19). Helium carrier gas flowed at 1.61 ml/min. Oven temperature: 50 °C (3 min), raised 10 °C/min to 280 °C, final 300 °C. Electron ionisation: 70 eV, scan 0.3 sec, m/z 40-600. Injection volume: 0.5 µl, split ratio 20:1, injector at 280 °C. Compounds were identified by retention time, peak area, and spectra compared with the NIST library (NIST11.1L).

Experimental animals

Adult female Wistar rats (180-250 g) were used, cared for per international guidelines. Ethical approval: University of Ilorin (UERC/ASN/2023/2573).

Acute toxicity test

Following OECD guideline 420 (17), 18 overnight fasted rats were assigned to six groups (n=3). Controls received virgin coconut oil (5 ml/kg); treatment groups received 50, 300, 2000, 3000, or 5000 mg/kg extract. Animals were monitored continuously for four hours, then twice daily for 14 days. Body weights were recorded weekly.

Sub-acute toxicity test

Following OECD 407 (17), 24 female rats (200-250 g) were allocated to four groups (n=6):

Virgin coconut oil (5 ml/kg), C. sativa (25 mg/kg), C. sativa (125 mg/kg), and C. sativa (250 mg/kg) groups. Doses were given daily by oral gavage for 28 days. Animals were monitored twice daily, and body weights were taken on day 0 and weekly thereafter. After an overnight fast, rats were weighed and euthanised on day 29. Blood was collected via cardiac puncture for biochemical and haematological analysis. Heart, brain, liver, kidneys, and pancreas were excised, rinsed, weighed, trimmed, and fixed in formalin for histology.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (GraphPad Prism 9.02) with Dunnett’s post hoc test; significance set at P<0.05 and P<0.01. Results are expressed as mean±SEM.

Results

Extraction yield

Ethanolic extraction of C. sativa leaves produced a 6.3% yield (63 g of dried extract).

Preliminary phytochemical screening

The extract contained high levels (+++) of alkaloids, tannins, saponins, phenol, and cardiac glycosides; moderate amounts (++) of phlobatannin, flavonoids, anthraquinones, and steroids; minute amounts (+) of terpenoids, while cardenolides and chalcones were absent (Table 1).

Table 1.

Preliminary phytochemical profile of ethanol crude leaf extract of Cannabis sativa

Constituent Relative abundance
Alkaloids +++
Tannins +++
Saponins +++
Phenol +++
Cardiac glycosides +++
Phlobatannins ++
Flavonoids ++
Anthraquinones ++
Steroids ++
Terpenoids +
Cardenolides
Chalcones

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis

The FTIR spectrum (Figure 1) revealed prominent peaks for O-H (3394.83 cm⁻¹), aliphatic C-H stretching (2928.04 cm⁻¹, 2858.60 cm⁻¹), alkene C=C-C (1708.99 cm⁻¹), ester C=O (1620.26 cm⁻¹), and CH₃ of methylene (1053.17 cm⁻¹), reflecting a diversity of functional groups.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of ethanol extract of Cannabis sativa leaves showing major functional group assignments

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) profiling

Thirty-nine compounds were identified, including 15 phytocannabinoids (74.64 % total peak area). Major cannabinoids were Δ⁹tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, 35.78 %), cannabigerol (9.70 %), cannabinol (5.71 %), cannabichromene (4.77 %), and cannabidiol (3.92 %). Trace components included methoxyTHC (0.20 %) and cannabicyclol (0.95 %)(Table 2). The complete list of all compounds is contained in the supplementary Table (T1).

Table 2.

Major phytocannabinoids of Cannabis sativa identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)

Compound Retention time (min) Peak area (%)
Δ⁹Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) 23.063 35.78
Cannabigerol (CBG) 23.450 9.70
Cannabinol (CBN) 23.572 5.71
Cannabichromene (CBC) 22.169 4.77
Cannabidiol (CBD) 22.125 3.92
Others (trace cannabinoids) 20.166-25.240 ≤ 2.0 each

Acute toxicity

Acute toxicity testing revealed no mortality in any treatment groups, even at the highest dose of 5000 mg/kg, indicating an LD₅₀ greater than 5000 mg/kg. However, behavioral changes were observed at doses as low as 300 mg/kg, including decreased motor activity and weight loss. The 2000 mg/kg group showed a statistically significant reduction in body weight on days 7 and 14 (P<0.05)(Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Body weight changes in rats over 14 days following acute oral administration of Cannabis sativa extract (mean±SD, n=3; P<0.05 vs day 0)

Sub-acute toxicity

Sub-acute toxicity screening over 28 days revealed dose-dependent effects. Rats in the 250 mg/kg group showed significant weight loss (P<0.05), as relative and absolute pancreas weights were significantly reduced in the 125 mg/kg group (P<0.01) relative to control. Biochemical analysis showed reduced ALP and ALT levels at 25 and 250 mg/kg, while AST levels increased at 25 and 125 mg/kg. Urea and glucose levels were elevated at higher doses, and LDH increased across all treatment groups. CK levels decreased significantly at 125 and 250 mg/kg. Lipid profile analysis showed reduced triglycerides and LDL at 250 mg/kg. Haematological analysis showed increased packed cell volume (PCV) at 250 mg/kg and elevated hemoglobin and platelet counts at 125 mg/kg. Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) decreased across all doses. White blood cell (WBC) and lymphocyte counts were significantly reduced at 125 and 250 mg/kg, while neutrophil and monocyte counts increased in all treated groups (Table 3). Histopathological examination revealed dose-dependent necrosis in the pancreas, ranging from mild (25 mg/kg) to moderate-severe (250 mg/kg). Mild necrosis was also observed in liver tissues, and mild tubular changes were noted in the kidneys across all treatment groups. No histological changes were observed in the brain or heart (Figure 3).

Table 3.

Summary of significant sub-acute effects of Cannabis sativa extract

Category Parameter Direction of change Dose(s) affected Significance level
Body/Organ weight Body weight 250 mg/kg P<0.05
Pancreas wt ↓ vs control 250 mg/kg P<0.01
Liver function ALP 25 mg/kg P<0.05
ALT 25 & 250 mg/kg P<0.05
AST 25 & 125 mg/kg P<0.05–0.01
Renal/metabolic Urea 250 mg/kg P<0.05
Glucose 125 & 250 mg/kg P<0.01
LDH all doses P<0.01
CK 125 & 250 mg/kg P<0.01
Lipids TAG 250 mg/kg P<0.01
LDL 250 mg/kg P<0.05
Haematology PCV 250 mg/kg P<0.05
Hb 125 mg/kg P<0.05
PLT 125 mg/kg P<0.01
MCHC all doses P<0.05–0.01
WBC 125 & 250 mg/kg P<0.05–0.01
Lymphocytes 125 & 250 mg/kg P<0.01
Neutrophils all doses P<0.05–0.01
Monocytes all doses P<0.01

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative histological sections of pancreas, liver, and kidney from rats treated with Cannabis sativa extract for 28 days, showing dose-dependent necrosis and tubular alterations (H&E stain)

Discussion

The global rise in cannabis use is especially notable in Nigeria, where our unique local variety is gaining popularity (9, 20). This rise in traditional oral consumption–whether as tea, infusions in alcoholic drinks, or as condiments and vegetables in soups– along with the use of crude plant extracts instead of pharmaceutical-grade products, influenced the decision to use crude ethanol extract and the oral route for this study (6, 9). However, there is limited data on its phytocannabinoids and the toxic effects of repeated oral intake.

The preliminary and FTIR analysis of the ethanol extract from C. sativa leaves confirmed the presence of several secondary metabolites, consistent with similar studies highlighting the complex nature and therapeutic effects (1, 6). The high THC levels detected by GC-MS analysis, with a (THC+CBN/CBD) ratio of >1 and a CBD/THC ratio of <0.5 (0.11), classify this local cannabis as chemotype 1 and drug-type (narcotic) according to chemotaxonomic classification (6, 21-23), suggesting a potential for toxicity. Therefore, classifying cannabis chemotypes can help predict both therapeutic and adverse effects. The observed THC levels are consistent with other studies that reported elevated levels in cannabis products, which might be due to the degradation of tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA) and influenced by regional climate.

The acute toxicity profile showed effects varied with dose, with high doses causing excitatory effects, while inhibitory effects occurred at lower doses. These findings align with the literature, which emphasizes the plant’s complexity, making classification as a stimulant or depressant difficult (24, 25), with effects varying by dose, strain, and genetic factors. The lethal dose 50 (LD50) of C. sativa, which exceeds 5000 mg/kg after oral consumption, is regarded as safe according to established standards for chemical substances (17).

Subacute toxicity studies are crucial for predicting the safety of agents administered repeatedly, as they evaluate the structural integrity and function of organs through biochemical analysis (17). The observed dose-dependent weight loss agrees with other studies that report reduced body mass index (BMI) and lower rates of obesity in cannabis users (26, 27), thereby increasing interest in its potential for weight management. However, further research is necessary to explore the long-term effects on appetite-regulating hormones.

Repeated administration of C. sativa extract did not significantly alter liver function markers, as the observed reductions in ALP and ALT levels and increase in AST values remained within accepted ranges (28, 29). However, the mild necrosis observed in liver tissue samples across treatment groups may suggest limited safety after repeated exposure.

The elevated plasma urea levels in animals receiving 250 mg/kg could result from dehydration, as histological examination showed mild tubular changes. The significant increase in glucose levels in the 125 and 250 mg/kg groups remained within normal ranges (30, 31).

The toxic effects of xenobiotics and chemicals on cardiac and skeletal muscle membranes can be assessed by plasma levels of creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which act as biomarkers of muscle damage because they cannot cross the sarcoplasmic membrane (32). The observed increase in LDH levels and decreased CK levels suggests toxic effects on muscles and tissues, indicating potential damage to the organs.  

The impact of crude plant extracts on the lipid profile after oral administration is essential for predicting cardiovascular risk, with the subacute use of C. sativa crude extract resulting in decreased LDL and triglyceride levels in the 250 mg/kg treatment group, with LDL levels within the optimised range for female Wistar rats (31, 33).

Blood parameters, including hemoglobin, haematocrit, red blood cells (RBC), and white blood cells (WBC), reflect health status with deviations indicating toxicity or disease conditions (28, 34). Repeated administration of C. sativa crude extract led to increases in PCV, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, and neutrophil levels, suggesting erythrocytosis (30, 31, 34).

Changes in organ weight indicate toxicity, which may result from damage, enzyme disruption, or physiological disturbances, and are confirmed through gross examinations, clinical evaluations, and histopathological analyses (17). Mild to moderate changes in the structure of the pancreas, kidney, and liver confirm the non-lethal toxicity profile of the C. sativa crude extract. However, the elevated levels of some observed parameters highlight the importance of regular monitoring of individuals using C. sativa over an extended period.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrated the relative safety of the crude ethanol extract of C. sativa after consumption, with an oral LD50 of >5000 mg/kg body weight (GHS-Category 5, LD50 cut-off at 5000 mg/kg body weight) and a NOAEL dose of ≤300 mg/kg body weight. These results suggest that our indigenous variety of C. sativa may be considered safe for oral intake, despite the behavioral changes and significant weight loss observed in the animals.

Acknowledgment

We express our deepest gratitude to the Deputy Director of Planning, Research and Statistics, NDLEA, Abdul Momodu CN, the then State Commander Alhaji Abdullahi Saeed CN, and the entire staff of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, Oyo State Command, Ibadan, Oyo State, for providing the plant material used in this research and their help and support throughout this work. 

Authors’ Contributions

EJ A contributed to the conception and design of the research, conducted the experiment, analyzed the data, drafted, and finalized the manuscript. BA A contributed to the conception and design of the research, supervised the bench work, interpreted the results, and revised the manuscript. AA O contributed to the conception and design of the research, interpreted the results, and revised the manuscript. MO O contributed to the conception and design of the research, supervised the bench work, interpreted the results, and critically revised the draft to produce the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Declaration

We have not used any AI tools or technologies to prepare this manuscript.

Funding

This research was personally funded; therefore, the authors did not receive any financial support for the bench work, authorship, or publication of the final manuscript.

Limitations of the Study

A notable limitation of this study was the poor solubility of the crude extract in common aqueous and organic solvents. This creates difficulties in maintaining consistent concentrations for in vitro and potential in vivo assays. As a result, cold-pressed coconut oil was used as the vehicle for reconstituting the crude extract.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical approval was sought and given before the commencement of this research work from the University Ethical Review Committee of the University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria (UERC/ASN/2023/2573).

The National Headquarters of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, Abuja, Nigeria, granted permission to handle the plant material. Seized plant samples of C. sativa were collected from the Oyo State Command office of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, in Ibadan, Oyo State, in April 2022.

The authenticity of the collected plant samples was confirmed at the Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin (UNILORIN), Ilorin, Kwara State, and a voucher for the plant was deposited in the University’s herbarium under the reference number UILH/001/1467/2023.

Consent for Publication

All authors have gone through the final draft of the manuscript and have given their consent for its publication.

Availability of Data and Materials

Data will be made available upon reasonable request.

Future Work

This research did not examine the toxicological effects of long-term use. However, it is crucial to investigate the toxic effects over extended periods (>90 days), compare toxicity profiles across different routes of exposure, and assess the impact of pharmacogenomics on toxicity, as both route and genetics are known to influence the toxicity of any substance.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary Table 1. (193.4KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Pattnaik F, Nanda S, Mohanty S, Dalai AK, Kumar V, Ponnusamy SK, Naik S. Cannabis: Chemistry, extraction and therapeutic applications. Chemosphere. 2022;289:133012. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Visković J, Zheljazkov VD, Sikora V, Noller J, Latković D, Ocamb C M, Koren A. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L ) agronomy and utilisation: A review. Agronomy. 2023;13:931–954. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hall W, Budney AJ, Hoch E, Conner JP, Stjepanovic D, Le Foll B. Cannabis and cannabinoid use disorders. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2021;7:16. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00247-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Karki P, Rangaswamy M. A review of historical context and current research on cannabis use in India. Indian J Psychol Med. 2022;45:105–116. doi: 10.1177/02537176221109272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Response to Drugs and Related Organised Crime in Nigeria, Fact Sheet 05, 2017 (Get the facts about cannabis) [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ajagun EJ, Abdulsalam TA, Oni AC, Afolabi F, Jayeoba LA. Cannabis sativa L : A review of the medicinal properties of this ‘wonder plant’ and an update on the Nigerian situation. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2024;15:1000–1011. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Olanrewaju JA, Hamzat EO, Enya JI, Udekwu MO, Osuoya Q, Bamidele R, Johnson OF, et al. An assessment of drug and substance abuse prevalence: A cross-sectional study among undergraduates in selected southwestern universities in Nigeria. J Int Med Res. 2022;50:1–11. doi: 10.1177/03000605221130039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.United Nations World Drug Report. Opiates, cocaine, cannabis, synthetic drugs. (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.18.XI.9); 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Nigeria Cannabis Survey. 2019 Baseline Assessment in Six States (unodc-pdmu@un.org) Published 2022. (Accessed 20th February 2023) [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chaachouaya N, Azerouala A, Bencharkia B, Douirab A, Zidaneb L. Cannabis sativa L : A review on traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, and pharmacological aspects. Trad Integr Med. 2022;8:97–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ediru M. Is unlawful possession of Indian hemp (Simpliciter) an Offence in Nigeria? Int J Hum Soc Studies. 2019;5:168–176. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Montoya-Alatriste CA, Alarcon-Aguilar FJ. Cannabis and cannabinoids as an alternative remedy in metabolic syndrome. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2022;58:e20161–20184. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sexton TR, Alshaarawy O. Cannabis use prevalence among individuals with diabetes The National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2005-2018 Short Communications. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;212:108035. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Filipiuc L-E, Stef˘anescu R, Solcan C, Ciorpac M, Szilagyi A, Cojocaru D, et al. Acute toxicity and pharmacokinetic profile of an EU-GMP-certified Cannabis sativa in rodents. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16:694–715. doi: 10.3390/ph16050694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rožanc J, Kotnik P, Milojevi´c M, Gradišnik L, Knez Hrnčič M, Knez Ž, et al. Different Cannabis sativa extraction methods result in different biological activities against a colon cancer cell line and healthy colon cells. Plants. 2021;10:566–582. doi: 10.3390/plants10030566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chandrika P, Prasad KRS, Phani RS. Phytochemical screening and evaluation of anti-bacterial activity and various antioxidant studies of root extracts of the mangrove plant Dalbergia spinosa. Research J Pharm and Tech. 2020;13:2551. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ugwah-Oguejiofor CJ, Okoli CO, Ugwah MO, Umaru ML, Ogbulie CS, Mshelia HE, et al. Acute and sub-acute toxicity of aqueous extract of aerial parts of Caralluma dalzielii N. E. Brown in mice and rats. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01179. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pharmawati M, Wrasiati LP. Phytochemical Screening and FTIR spectroscopy on crude extract from Enhalus acoroides leaves. Malaysian J Analytic Sci. 2020;24:70–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bhalla N, Ingle N, Patri SV, Haranath D. Phytochemical analysis of Moringa oleifera leaves extract by GC-MS and free radical scavenging potency for industrial applications. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28:6915. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.World Health Organisation (WHO) Cannabis. 2024. [(Assessed 28th January 2024)]. ( https://www.who.int/teams/mental-health-and-substance-use/alcohol-drugs-and-addictive-behaviours/drugs-psychoactive/cannabis )
  • 21.United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNDOC)(2024) [ (assessed online on 10th April 2024)];Recommended methods for the identification and analysis of cannabis and cannabis products. UN Publication, Sales No. E09.XL.15. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Elzinga S, Fischedick J, Podkolinski R, Raber JC. Cannabinoids and terpenes as chemotaxonomic markers in cannabis. Nat Prod Chem Res. 2015;3:181. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Salamone S, Waltl L, Pompignan A, Grassi G, Chianese G, Koeberle A, Pollastro F. Phytochemical characterisation of Cannabis sativa L chemotype V reveals three new dihydrophenanthrenoids that favorably reprogram lipid mediator biosynthesis in macrophages. Plants. 2021;11:2130–2144. doi: 10.3390/plants11162130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Katsidoni V, Kastellakis A, Panagis G. Bisphasic effects of Δ9 tetrahydrocannabinoid on brain stimulation, reward, and motor activity. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;16:2273–2284. doi: 10.1017/S1461145713000709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kitdumrongthum S, Trachootham D. An individuality of response to cannabinoids: Challenges in safety and efficacy of cannabis products. Molecules. 2023;28:2791–2816. doi: 10.3390/molecules28062791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Clark TM, Jones JM, Hall AG, Tabner SA, Kmiec RL. Theoretical explanation for reduced body mass index and obesity rates in Cannabis Users. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res.  2018;3:259–271. doi: 10.1089/can.2018.0045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cavalheiro EKFF, Costa AB, Salla DH, Silva MR, Mendes TF, Silva LE, et al. Cannabis sativa as a treatment for obesity: from anti-inflammatory indirect support to a promising metabolic re-establishment target. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022;7:135–151. doi: 10.1089/can.2021.0016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sharp P, Villano JS. The laboratory rat. A volume in the laboratory animal pocket reference series. Ed: Second edition. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hasan KMM, Tamanna N, Haque MA. Biochemical and histopathological profiling of Wistar rats treated with Brassica napus as a supplementary feed. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2018;7:77–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Leob WF, Quimby FW. The clinical chemistry of laboratory animals, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis USA: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vigneshwar R, Arivuchelvan A, Mekala P, Imayarasi K. Sex-specific reference intervals for Wistar albino rats: Haematology and clinical biochemistry. Indian J Anim Health. 2021;60:58–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Klein R, Nagy O, Tóthová C, Chovanová F. Clinical and diagnostic significance of lactate dehydrogenase and its isoenzymes in animals. Vet Med Int. 2020;2020:5346483–534694. doi: 10.1155/2020/5346483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Andreadou I, Schulz R, Badimon L, Adameová A, Kleinbongard P, Lecour S, et al. Hyperlipidaemia and cardioprotection: Animal models for translational studies. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177:5287–5311. doi: 10.1111/bph.14931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stokol T. eClinPath.com, 2024. 2024. https://eclinpath.com/hematology/tests/hematocrit/#Test_interpretation )

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1. (193.4KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Data will be made available upon reasonable request.


Articles from Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES