Skip to main content
Clinical Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Case Reports
. 2026 Jan 27;14(2):e71893. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.71893

Endoscopic CO2 Laser Excision of Internal Pyolaryngocele: A Rare Airway Emergency Case Report With Review of the Literature

Luigi Falchetta 1,, Mario Carucci 2, Matteo Calvanese 2, Alfonso Scarpa 1, Giovanni Salzano 3, Francesco Antonio Salzano 1
PMCID: PMC12835889  PMID: 41607679

ABSTRACT

A pyolaryngocele is a rare, potentially life‐threatening complication of laryngocele, resulting from secondary infection and obstruction of the saccular neck. Clinical severity ranges from mild dysphonia to acute airway compromise. We report a 51‐year‐old man with a sore throat, dysphagia, and dyspnea. Flexible laryngoscopy and contrast‐enhanced CT revealed an internal pyolaryngocele. After emergency tracheostomy and intravenous antibiotics, the patient underwent CO2 laser microlaryngoscopic excision and marsupialization. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with complete healing and no recurrence at follow‐up. This case underscores the importance of early diagnosis and highlights CO2 laser surgery as an effective, minimally invasive option. Internal pyolaryngocele is a rare airway emergency that requires prompt management. CO2 laser excision appears to be a safe and effective first‐line approach in selected internal cases.

Keywords: airway emergency, case report, laryngocele, laryngopyocele, pyolaryngocele

Key Clinical Message

Early recognition of internal pyolaryngocele is crucial to prevent life‐threatening airway compromise. In internal pyolaryngocele, CO2 laser microlaryngoscopic excision offers a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment, ensuring rapid recovery, low morbidity, and excellent functional outcomes while minimizing recurrence risk. Prompt diagnosis and tailored surgical management are essential.


Graphical abstract illustrating a large internal pyolaryngocele causing airway narrowing, diagnosed on contrast‐enhanced CT scan.

graphic file with name CCR3-14-e71893-g002.jpg

1. Introduction

A laryngocele is a rare benign air‐ or fluid‐filled dilation of the laryngeal saccule, commonly resulting from chronically elevated intralaryngeal pressure or congenital susceptibility. Classified as internal, external, or mixed based on extension through the thyrohyoid membrane, laryngoceles may rarely become secondarily infected and form a pyolaryngocele (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

(a and b) Anatomical classification of laryngoceles [1].

This is clinically significant due to the risk of airway obstruction and sepsis, with an estimated incidence of 1 per 2.5 million per year [2, 3]. It can be present at any age, but is most common in the sixth decade of life [1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9].

We report a rare case of internal pyolaryngocele in a middle‐aged adult, managed successfully with CO2 laser microlaryngoscopic excision.

2. Case History

A 51‐year‐old male gardener, an active smoker (20 cigarettes/day), with only a prior epiglottic history of abscess drainage, presented with a 20‐day history of sore throat, progressive dysphagia, and inspiratory dyspnea. Laryngoscopy showed medial bulging of the right aryepiglottic fold, partially obliterating the piriform sinus (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Laryngoscopy showing medial bulging of the right aryepiglottic fold.

3. Differential Diagnosis, Investigations and Treatment

Contrast‐enhanced CT (Figure 3a–c) demonstrated a 3.2 × 2.5 cm hypodense cystic lesion extending caudally to 4 cm, displacing the airway to the right and abutting the thyroid cartilage, consistent with an internal pyolaryngocele [4].

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Coronal (a), axial (b), and sagittal (c) computer tomography scan revealed a hypodense cystic lesion consistent with an internal pyolaryngocele.

The patient received intravenous ceftriaxone (2 g/day) and metronidazole (1500 mg/day). Due to acute airway compromise and failed intubation, an emergency tracheostomy was performed. Microlaryngoscopy revealed purulent supraglottic collection, which was incised and drained. After recurrence at 48 h, CO2 laser microlaryngoscopic excision and marsupialization were performed.

4. Conclusion and Results

Postoperatively, recovery was uneventful. Tracheostomy was removed on day 2; discharge followed on day 4. Endoscopic follow‐up confirmed complete healing with no recurrence (Figure 4). Histopathology showed pseudostratified columnar epithelium over fibromuscular connective tissue, without malignancy, consistent with laryngocele [5].

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Follow‐up laryngoscopy showing complete healing with no recurrence.

After discharge on day 4, the patient underwent scheduled postoperative evaluations at 7 days, 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. Flexible laryngoscopy at each follow‐up confirmed complete resolution of the infection, adequate mucosal healing, and absence of recurrence. In addition, the patient reported no further symptoms throughout the follow‐up period.

5. Discussion and Literature Review

Laryngoceles arise from the pathological distension of the laryngeal saccule, typically lined with mucus‐secreting pseudostratified ciliated epithelium. Obstruction by inflammation or infection may result in pus accumulation, forming a pyolaryngocele—a rare but potentially life‐threatening entity due to supraglottic airway compromise [1, 2, 3]. It's estimated that 8%–10% of laryngoceles may become infected at some point during their natural history [3, 10]. Although most laryngoceles remain asymptomatic, infection can lead to rapid enlargement and onset of symptoms such as hoarseness, sore throat, dysphagia, cervical swelling, and stridor [11]. Pyolaryngocele should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any rapidly progressive supraglottic swelling, especially in patients with known risk factors such as smoking or prior upper airway infections [6]. However, cases without identifiable risk factors have also been described [12]. Maweni et al. [13] highlighted that misdiagnosis as a parapharyngeal abscess can delay treatment. Cassano et al. [9] highlighted a possible association between laryngopyocele and underlying laryngeal carcinoma, stressing the need for malignancy exclusion.

Diagnosis relies on flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy for direct visualization and contrast‐enhanced CT for anatomical mapping and surgical planning [6, 7, 14, 15]. Nazaroglu et al. [15] described typical CT features—such as wall thickening, rim enhancement, and air‐fluid level—that help distinguish pyolaryngocele from other deep neck masses. In selected emergency settings, point‐of‐care ultrasound has also been reported as a rapid diagnostic tool when CT is unavailable [16] and ultrasound may also guide percutaneous drainage in selected patients [17].

CT imaging is essential to distinguish between internal, external, and mixed forms [14, 15, 18] and to assess the degree of airway obstruction. Initial treatment includes broad‐spectrum antibiotics and airway management, often requiring tracheostomy when intubation fails [1, 19]. Fröhlich et al. [1], and Sabat et al. [7] both described episodes of acute airway obstruction and stridor, underscoring the emergency nature of this condition [1, 7, 20, 21, 22] and the importance of early intervention. Vasileiadis et al. [20] also described severe airway compromise requiring emergency intervention. Delayed diagnosis can be fatal, as demonstrated by Beautyman et al. [23] in one of the earliest lethal reports of untreated laryngopyocele.

Surgical drainage is necessary for purulent collections. Definitive management depends on lesion characteristics. For internal lesions, endoscopic CO2 laser excision offers high precision, minimal morbidity, and excellent functional preservation. Singh et al. [3] emphasized the utility of minimally invasive techniques in their review, while Fraser et al. [8] described the successful use of a microdebrider to manage an infected laryngocele without the need for tracheostomy. For extensive or recurrent pyolaryngoceles, complete excision via an external approach remains the gold standard, as confirmed by Marharay et al. [24]. Mahdoufi et al. [4, 5] and Touihmi et al. [2] also reported favorable outcomes with external approaches for mixed or large cases.

Although conservative management has been proposed in selected asymptomatic cases [25], surgery remains the standard.

Heuveling and Mahieu [26] further expanded the role of endoscopic management by demonstrating that even large combined laryngoceles can be excised transorally using the CO2‐laser “inversion technique,” in which the external component is gradually pulled inward and turned inside‐out through the thyrohyoid membrane.

Our case adds to the limited reports demonstrating that CO2 laser marsupialization is a safe and effective treatment for internal pyolaryngocele, with rapid recovery and no recurrence. However, this approach requires specialized equipment and expertise and may be less effective in large or mixed‐type lesions [6, 8]. Although open surgery, such as trans‐thyrohyoid or V‐shaped thyrotomy, remains an option in selected cases, the trend toward endoscopic management continues to grow due to reduced morbidity and favorable outcomes.

6. Conclusion

Internal pyolaryngocele is a rare ENT emergency requiring prompt multidisciplinary management. This case highlights successful CO2 laser microlaryngoscopic excision following airway stabilization and antibiotics, supporting its role as a first‐line, minimally invasive approach in selected patients.

Author Contributions

Luigi Falchetta: conceptualization, investigation, writing – original draft. Mario Carucci: validation. Matteo Calvanese: resources. Alfonso Scarpa: supervision, writing – review and editing. Giovanni Salzano: supervision. Francesco Antonio Salzano: project administration.

Funding

The authors have nothing to report.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the staff of the U.O.C. Clinica Otorinolaringoiatrica of San Giovanni di Dio and Ruggi d'Aragona Hospital (Salerno) for their support in the clinical management of the patient described in this report.

Declaration of generative AI and AI‐assisted technologies in the writing process: During the preparation of this work, the authors used Chat GPT in order to improve the language of the manuscript. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Falchetta L., Carucci M., Calvanese M., Scarpa A., Salzano G., and Salzano F. A., “Endoscopic CO2 Laser Excision of Internal Pyolaryngocele: A Rare Airway Emergency Case Report With Review of the Literature,” Clinical Case Reports 14, no. 2 (2026): e71893, 10.1002/ccr3.71893.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Fröhlich S. and O'Sullivan E., “Repeated Episodes of Pyolaryngocele,” European Journal of Emergency Medicine 18, no. 3 (2011): 179–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Touihmi S., Errabhi C., and Rkain I., “Pyolaryngocele: Case Report,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 111 (2023): 108820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Singh R., Karantanis W., Fadhil M., Kumar S. A., Crawford J., and Jacobson I., “Systematic Review of Laryngocele and Pyolaryngocele Management,” Journal of International Medical Research 48, no. 10 (2020): 300060520940441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mahdoufi R., Barhmi I., Tazi N., Abada R., Roubal M., and Mahtar M., “Mixed Pyolaryngocele: A Rare Case,” Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 29, no. 93 (2017): 225–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mahdoufi R., Barhmi I., Khallouq A., Abada R., Roubal M., and Mahtar M., “Mixed Pyolaryngocele: Deep Spaces Infection,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery (London) 10 (2016): 49–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Khan N. A., Watson G., Sivayoham E., and Willatt D. J., “Pyolaryngocoele: An Unusual Cause,” Clinical Medicine Insights: Ear, Nose and Throat 1 (2008): 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Sabat S., Gonzalez L., and Agarwal A., “Pyolaryngocele With Stridor,” Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine 7, no. 4 (2023): 266–267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fraser L., Pittore B., Frampton S., Brennan P., and Puxeddu R., “Laryngeal Debridement: An Alternative Treatment for a Laryngopyocele Presenting With Severe Airway Obstruction,” Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 31, no. 2 (2011): 113–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Cassano L., Lombardo P., Marchese‐Ragona R., and Pastore A., “Laryngopyocele: Three New Clinical Cases and Review of the Literature,” European Archives of Oto‐Rhino‐Laryngology 257, no. 9 (2000): 507–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Al‐Yahya S. N., Baki M. M., Saad S. M., Azman M., and Mohamad A. S., “Laryngopyocele: Report of a Rare Case and Systematic Review,” Annals of Saudi Medicine 36, no. 4 (2016): 292–297, 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Swain S. K., Mallik K. C., Mishra S., et al., “Laryngocele: Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital of Eastern India,” Journal of Voice 29 (2015): 512–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bisogno A., Cavaliere M., Scarpa A., Cuofano R., Troisi D., and Iemma M., “Mixed Laryngocele Without Risk Factors,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery 60 (2020): 356–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Maweni R. M., Shirazi S., Chatzoudis D., and Das S., “Laryngopyocoele With Contralateral Laryngocoele: A Rare Cause of Respiratory Distress,” BMJ Case Reports 2018 (2018): bcr‐2018‐225444, 10.1136/bcr-2018-225444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lam S. Y. and Lau H. Y., “A Rare Case of Laryngopyocele With Airway Obstruction,” Journal of Clinical Imaging Science 8 (2018): 42, 10.4103/jcis.JCIS_50_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Nazaroglu H., Ozates M., Uyar A., Deger E., and Simsek M., “Laryngopyocele: Signs on Computed Tomography,” European Journal of Radiology 33, no. 1 (2000): 63–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Aslaner M. A., “Laryngopyocele: A Deep Neck Infection Diagnosed by Emergency Ultrasound,” American Journal of Emergency Medicine 36, no. 11 (2018): 2132.e5–2132.e7, 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Raine J. I., Allin D., and Golding‐Wood D., “Laryngopyocoele Presenting With Acute Airway Obstruction,” BMJ Case Reports 2014 (2014): bcr2014204102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ozcan C., Vayisoglu Y., Güner N., Türkili S., and Görür K., “External Laryngopyocele: A Rare Cause of Upper Airway Obstruction,” Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 21, no. 6 (2010): 2022–2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Fredrickson K. L. and A. J. D'Angelo, Jr. , “Internal Laryngopyocele Presenting as Acute Airway Obstruction,” Ear, Nose, & Throat Journal 86 (2007): 104–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Vasileiadis I., Kapetanakis S., Petousis A., Stavrianaki A., Fiska A., and Karakostas E., “Internal Laryngopyocele as a Cause of Acute Airway Obstruction: An Extremely Rare Case and Review of the Literature,” Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 32, no. 1 (2012): 58–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Luis‐Hern´ andez J., Tacoronte‐P´ erez L., and de Serdio‐Arias J. L., “Pyolaryngocele: A Rare Cause of Acute Dyspnea,” Acta Otorrinolaringologica (English Edition) 65, no. 6 (2014): 385–386, 10.1016/j.otoeng.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Weissler M., Fried M., and Kelly J., “Laryngopyocele as a Cause of Airway Obstruction,” Laryngoscope 95 (1985): 1348–1351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Beautyman W., Haidak G. L., and Taylor M., “Laryngopyocele: Report of a Fatal Case,” New England Journal of Medicine 260 (1959): 1025–1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Marharay D., Fernandes C. M. C., and Pinto A. P., “Laryngopy‐Ocele (A Report of Two Cases),” Journal of Laryngology and Otology 101 (1987): 838–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Ling F. and Lamothe A., “Is There a Role for Conservative Management for Symptomatic Laryngopyocele? Case Report and Literature Review,” Journal of Otolaryngology 33, no. 4 (2004): 264–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Heuveling D. A. and Mahieu H. F., “Endoscopic CO2 Laser Resection Using the Inversion Technique in 22 Combined Laryngoceles,” Laryngoscope 133, no. 10 (2023): 2742–2746, 10.1002/lary.30687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Clinical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES