Abstract
Regulatory factor X6 (RFX6) is defined as the sixth member of the RFX family based on its highly conserved and specific wing-helix DNA-binding domain. Its expression in adults is predominantly localized to pancreatic islets, small intestine, and colon. Extensive research has demonstrated that RFX6 regulates cellular processes, such as pancreatic development, differentiation of islet progenitor cells, and insulin secretion, through the modulation of specific miRNAs (such as miR145 and miR195) and mRNAs (such as Pdx1, Neurod1, GCK, and Abcc8). Hence, mutations and deletions in RFX6 have been linked to the onset of various types of diabetes, including type 2 diabetes, Maturity-onset diabetes of the young, neonatal diabetes mellitus, especially Mitchell-Riley Syndrome (MRS). Specifically, homozygous mutations in RFX6 impede the proper differentiation of pancreatic progenitor cells, leading to inhibition of pancreatic head-tail development and endocrine cell formation, thereby contributing to the pathogenesis of MRS. Furthermore, examination of RFX6 target genes reveals a potential association with tumor development, indicating that RFX6 may play a role in cancer progression. Dysregulated expression or mutations of the RFX6 gene in prostate cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, melanoma, and other tumors have garnered significant interest, with studies showing that such alterations affect tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, and are correlated with an unfavorable clinical prognosis in patients carrying RFX6 mutations. This review delves into the various functions of RFX6, emphasizing its crucial regulatory roles in pancreatic development, tumorigenesis, and progression. In addition, recent advancements in MRS therapy are outlined, underscoring the importance of RFX6-targeted therapy in MRS and cancer.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-025-04073-6.
Keywords: RFX6, Pancreatic development, Insulin secretion, Diabetes, Mitchell-Riley syndrome, Cancer
Background
Regulatory factor X6 (RFX6) transcription factor belongs to the Regulatory factor X (RFX) family, which is widely distributed in eukaryotes, except in plants and algae [1, 2]. The DNA-binding domain (DBD) of RFX family members exhibits a high degree of conservation and specificity, playing a crucial role in facilitating the interaction of RFX transcription factors with the conserved cis-regulatory element known as the X-box motif [3]. Currently, there are eight documented members of the RFX family (RFX1-8) [4]. The RFX6 gene is situated on chromosome 6q22.1 and consists of 928 amino acids distributed across 19 exons [3]. Alongside the highly conserved DBD, the human RFX6 gene also features other conserved structural domains, such as the B, C, and dimerization domains [5]. The B and C domains, commonly known as the extended dimerization domains, facilitate the dimerization process [3]. In addition, RFX6 can interact with other members of the RFX family, mainly RFX2 and RFX3, to bind DNA as a dimer and play a regulatory role in the organism [3, 6]. However, RFX6 lacks a defined activation domain [4].
RFX transcription factors are widely expressed across a diverse array of tissues [4], with notable high expression in the immune system, gastrointestinal tract, reproductive system, and nervous system, where they play key roles in maintaining ciliary development and function [7–10]. In contrast, RFX6 exhibits a more restricted expression profile, being predominantly localized to the pancreas [6]. In murine models, RFX6 expression is initially observed in the terminal endoderm during embryonic development, then broadly expressed in the intestinal endoderm and becomes progressively restricted to the pancreatic buds and cells dispersed within the intestines during mid-gestation. Upon Neurog3 activation, RFX6 gene expression is observed in pancreatic progenitor cells, its expression is confined to the mature pancreas and islets of the intestinal tract and in later stages restricted to the islets of Langerhans in the mature pancreatic organ and the intestinal tract in mammals [6, 11]. In zebrafish, as in mice, RFX6 is present in pancreatic endocrine progenitor cells and mature islet cells, but it is not detected in the intestine [11]. In adult humans, RFX6 is primarily expressed in the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract, with lower levels of expression observed in the liver and heart [3, 6, 12]. These findings suggest that RFX6 plays a distinct role in pancreatic development.
In this paper, we have compiled and summarized the existing RFX6-related literature, and elaborated on RFX6 function with respect to pancreatic development, insulin secretion, Mitchell-Riley syndrome (MRS) treatment and tumor progression. These findings suggest the potential of RFX6 as a novel therapeutic target for diabetes and MRS, while also serving as a valuable reference for future research on the mechanisms of RFX6 action in tumors.
Key factor influencing pancreatic development and insulin secretion
The pancreas consists of distinct cell types with specialized functions. Endocrine cells—α-, β-, δ-, PP-, and ε-cells—regulate glucose through hormone secretion, while exocrine acinar and ductal cells produce digestive enzymes. Proper development of these populations is crucial for the pancreas to fulfill its essential roles in metabolism and digestion. In RFX6-deficient mice, notable observations included swollen bowel sounds attributed to small bowel obstruction, reduced pancreatic size, gastric heterotopia [13], impaired normal feeding, and early postnatal mortality [6]. Similarly, in RFX6-deficient zebrafish, pancreatic development was substantially disrupted, the differentiation of pancreatic endocrine progenitors was inhibited, and there was a significant decrease in the expression of genes related to endocrine function [12]. Notably, a significant suppression of Arx expression was observed in both RFX6-deficient mice and zebrafish [11, 12, 14]. The pancreatic islets comprise several endocrine cell types, with α-cells secreting glucagon to counterbalance insulin from β cells. Arx functions as a key determinant of α-cell fate by promoting glucagon gene expression and suppressing alternative endocrine lineages. Therefore, these findings indicate that RFX6 is positioned upstream of Arx and plays a crucial role in regulating α-cell differentiation and function within the pancreatic islets.
Studies have demonstrated that RFX6 does not bind to the Ins1 promoter, and in adult mice with RFX6 deficiency, the expression of key transcription factors involved in insulin production, including Mafa, Pdx1, and Nkx6.1, remains largely unchanged. Consequently, overall insulin production is not significantly altered, indicating that RFX6 is not essential for insulin production in adult mice [15]. In contrast, RFX6 deficiency during early developmental stages leads to defective pancreatic development and impaired insulin secretion, which are highly lethal. Thus, the functional requirement for RFX6 is stage-dependent, with a critical role in pancreatic development and β-cell differentiation, but only a minor role in maintaining insulin production in mature animals. Furthermore, a marked suppression of exocrine pancreatic gene expression was noted in Xenopus deficient in RFX6 [12]. In contrast, mice deficient in RFX6 exhibited no abnormalities in exocrine function [6], and zebrafish with RFX6 mutations showed no effect on the differentiation of exocrine cells [11]. Among patients with MRS, some exhibit severe exocrine dysfunction [16], whereas others remain unaffected [17]. Consequently, the impact of RFX6 deficiency and mutation on the exocrine pancreas remains unclear, warranting further investigation.
Importance of RFX6 in pancreatic development
In islet progenitor cells, RFX6 is activated by Neurog3 and is uniquely expressed in pancreatic islets, directing islet formation [6]. Neurog3 serves as a crucial transcription factor in facilitating the differentiation of β-cells and various other pancreatic islet cell types during embryogenesis [18, 19]. Inhibition of CDK-dependent phosphorylation of Neurog3 significantly increases the expression of downstream targets such as Neurod1, Insm1, Atoh8, and Rfx6, thereby promoting cellular differentiation [20]. RFX6 is co-expressed with Neurog3 in pancreatic islets [6, 21].However, RFX6 is not detectable in the pancreas of Neurog3-deficient mouse embryos [6, 22], whereas the absence of RFX6 does not affect Neurog3 expression [6], indicating that RFX6 acts downstream of Neurog3. Interestingly, RFX6 has been observed to partially restore islet development in the pancreas of Neurog3-deficient mice [23]. Nakamura et al. posited that Neurog3 deficiency may lead to more pronounced morphological abnormalities compared to RFX6 deficiency [24]. Neurog3 deficiency does not result in significant disruptions in the pancreas and intestines to the same extent as RFX6 deficiency, a finding that has been corroborated by studies conducted in both human and murine models [6, 25]. This indicates that the regulatory mechanism of RFX6 in the early endoderm is different from the mode dependent on Neurog3 activation in pancreatic endocrine cells.
Notably, a significant decrease in PDX1 expression was observed in RFX6-deficient mice and Xenopus [6, 12, 26]. PDX1 regulates pancreatic growth and development while acting in the transcriptional hierarchy controlling gastroduodenal functions [27, 28]. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis (ChIP-seq) confirmed that RFX6 is a direct target of PDX1 [29](Fig. 1). Furthermore, the analysis identified other pancreatic differentiation-related genes, including Neurod1, Hnf1a, Nkx6-1, St18, Shox2, and insulin translation-related genes Eif2ak1, Upf1, and Eif5, as targets of RFX6 [29]. The knockdown of RFX6 in postnatal zebrafish leads to a failure in insulin translation [30]. Additionally, miR-145 and miR-195 were identified by ChIP-seq as having RFX6 binding sites, which further modulate the process of pancreatic differentiation [29]. Collectively, these findings suggest that RFX6, functioning as a transcriptional regulator, persistently impacts pancreatic development by regulating target genes that govern both pancreatic differentiation and the insulin translation process.
Fig. 1.
RFX6 promotes pancreatic development and insulin secretion processes
In addition, an in vitro model of pancreatic differentiation utilizing human pluripotent stem cells identified two upstream microRNAs, miR-30d and let-7e, that target the expression of RFX6 [31]. However, during pancreatic development, the expression patterns of these microRNAs and RFX6 exhibit both correlation and anti-correlation, suggesting the involvement of multiple regulatory factors influencing this process [31].
Regulation of insulin secretion by RFX6
There was a marked reduction in the expression of transcription factors responsible for encoding insulin after RFX6 deletion [6]. In addition to pancreatic polypeptide cells, mice lacking RFX6 fail to form any other normal type of pancreatic islet cells, including β-cells [6]. β-cells are rare specialized cells that produce large amounts of insulin, and active insulin is stored in dense core secretory granules and is released via exocytosis thus regulating blood glucose levels [32]. RFX6 contributes to the maintenance of β-cell identity and function and normal islet morphology [33]. Piccand et al. suggested that RFX6 deficiency in adult β-cells causes glucose intolerance, impaired β-cell glucose sensing, and defective insulin secretion [15]. These conditions arise in association with reduced expression of core components of the insulin secretion pathway due to RFX6 deficiency, including glucokinase, the Abcc8/SUR1 subunit of the ATP-sensitive K+ channel (KATP channel), and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VDCCs) [15, 34]. GCK plays an important role in insulin secretion as well as glucose homeostasis [35]. GCK functions as a glucose sensor [36], linking blood glucose levels to metabolic signals within the β-cells [37], thereby modulating the ATP/ADP ratio, which in turn activates KATP channels and induces membrane depolarization. Abcc8/SUR1 encodes the regulatory sulfonylurea-binding subunit of the KATP channel, thereby connecting glucose metabolism to the electrical activity of the β-cells [38, 39]. Furthermore, genes responsible for the expression of VDCCs, such as Cacna1d and Cacna1c (L-type Ca2+ channels), Cacna1a (P/q-type Ca2+ channels), and Cacnb2 (β−2 subunit Ca2+ channels), influence Ca2+ influx and play a critical role in modulating β-cell insulin secretion [40, 41]. Studies have demonstrated that RFX6 directly regulates the transcription and expression of GCK and Abcc8, and also directly controls genes associated with VDCCs, specifically Cacna1c and Cacnb2 [34]. Consequently, these genes exhibit significant downregulation in pancreatic islets with deficient RFX6 expression [15, 34]. The absence of RFX6 expression results in reduced GCK levels, causing an imbalance in the ATP/ADP ratio. This imbalance, along with the downregulation of Abcc8/SUR1, modifies the excitability of β-cell membranes [37]. Concurrently, the inhibition of VDCCs results in impaired glucose-induced Ca2+ influx, ultimately causing defects in insulin secretion and thereby contributing to the development of diseases such as diabetes, etc [34].
In RFX6-inactivated adult β-cells, a group of so-called disallowed or forbidden genes (Ldha, Slc16a1, Pdgfra, Igfbp4, etc.) were found to be re-expressed [15]. The disallowed genes denote a group of genes that are typically expressed across various tissues but are selectively and profoundly repressed in adult β-cells [42]. Previous studies have indicated that certain disallowed genes, such as Ldha, influence insulin secretion upon expression [43]. Experimental evidence has demonstrated that RFX6 can directly bind to the conserved region of Ldha, thereby modulating its expression [15]. Consequently, we propose that RFX6 may regulate insulin secretion in conjunction with a diverse set of transcriptional regulators and contribute to this process through modulating the expression of ‘disallowed’ genes, such as Ldha. Furthermore, research utilizing the RFX6 defect model revealed a reduction in the expression of the zinc transporter Slc30a8, which is essential for normal insulin crystallization and secretion, thereby affecting the insulin secretion [6, 15]. The loss of RFX6 expression or the gain-of-function of disallowed genes can lead to impaired insulin secretion. Transcriptomic analyses have verified that RFX6 is an activated Nuclear factor 2 (NFATC2) dependent gene target, and NFATC2 is essential for maintaining RFX6 dependent β-cells differentiation and functional maturation [34]. Under conditions of metabolic and inflammatory stress, the Ca2+-dependent Calmodulin phosphatase (CN)/NFATC2 facilitates the recruitment of p300/HDAC1 to the promoters of the RFX6 and MCT1 genes [34]. This process induces the expression of RFX6 while inhibiting the transcription of the MCT1 (one of the disallowed genes) [44], thereby sustaining β-cell differentiation and modulating insulin secretion [34]. When there is excessive stimulation or depletion of Ca2+ signaling, CN/NFATC2 activity diminishes, leading to the suppression of RFX6 expression, induction of MCT1 expression, dedifferentiation of β-cells, and a marked reduction in insulin secretion [34].
Recent research indicates that RFX6 is highly expressed in intestinal endocrine K cells, with expression restricted exclusively to these cells [45, 46]. By constructing knockdown and overexpression models of RFX6, it has been demonstrated that RFX6 positively regulates the secretion of Gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) and enhance GIP mRNA expression by binding to the active region of the GIP promoter [45]. GIP, also known as glucose dependent insulin-like peptide, is an intestinal insulinotropic protein produced by intestinal endocrine K cells located in the duodenum and upper small intestine, and functions to suppress gastric acid secretion and promote insulin secretion under glucose stimulation [47]. In summary, RFX6 can affect insulin secretion in K cells by regulating the expression of GIP.
A key player of RFX6 in diabetes mellitus and tumorigenesis
RFX6 and diabetes mellitus
MRS
Neonatal diabetes mellitus (NDM), defined as diabetes mellitus diagnosed within the first 6 months of birth, is an autosomal recessive syndrome in which pancreatic hypoplasia is the typical manifestation [48]. NDM exhibits a high degree of genetic heterogeneity, with various patterns of inheritance including dominant, recessive, and X-linked [49]. NDM is primarily classified into two forms: permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus (PNDM) and transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TNDM) [50]. TNDM manifests as diabetes at birth, and enters a remission period several years later, usually progressing to T2D later in life [51]. PNDM lacks a remission phase and is typically divided into three types etiological types: abnormal pancreatic development, reduced β-cell mass, β-cell dysfunction [52]. Smith et al. were the first to identify a mutation in the RFX6 gene in patients with neonatal diabetes [6]. This particular case differs from the clinical manifestations of Martinez-Frias syndrome (MFS) and aligns with the symptoms documented by Mitchell et al. in 2004, leading to its initial designation as MRS [6]. The majority of MRS cases are classified under PNDM [53]. This study summarizes the currently identified RFX6 mutations associated with MRS (Fig. 2 and Table S1). Exons are labeled numerically, respectively, with all mutation sites in Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) at the top and all mutation sites in MRS at the bottom.
Fig. 2.
Mutation sites for RFX6 in MRS and MODY
MRS is caused by either homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in the RFX6 gene [17]. MRS is believed supposed to be a variant of MFS [54] and has also been associated with severe inflammatory cholangiopathy in conjunction with other infantile cholestatic syndromes [55]. MRS is primarily characterized by neonatal diabetes, duodenal and jejunal atresia, pancreatic hypoplasia, and gallbladder hypoplasia [6, 17, 56]. In addition, some patients may present with cholestasis, refractory ascites, anemia, hemochromatosis, severe diarrhea, or gastric heterotopia, among other symptoms [16, 57–63]. The severity of these symptoms varies among individuals with MRS; however, the condition is generally associated with a high mortality rate, particularly during infancy.
In embryogenesis, a study revealed that RFX6 expression was significantly higher in the primitive gut tube (PGT) compared to the terminal endodermal stage [24]. During the PGT phase, PDX1 and SOX2 exhibit a high degree of co-expression with RFX6, and it has been confirmed that RFX6 can bind to regions upstream of the transcription start sites of PDX1 and CDX2 [24]. Therefore, RFX6 deletion resulted in decreased expression of the anterior-posterior and mid-posterior intestinal master regulators PDX1 and CDX2, but not the foregut marker SOX2 [24]. CDX2 is an intestinal-specific transcription factor involved in the regeneration and differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells and in maintaining the morphology and function of intestinal epithelial cells [64, 65]. Therefore, the diminished levels of PDX1 and CDX2 caused by RFX6 deficit could lead to pancreatic hypoplasia, intestinal atresia, diarrhea and gastric tissue ectopia in MRS [66–68]. In an experiment, induced pluripotent stem cells derived from individuals with MRS were cultivated in vitro and demonstrated normal differentiation capabilities during early developmental stages [24]. Nevertheless, following the generation of pancreatic endoderm, a significant impairment in differentiation was observed, with RFX6 deficiency specifically impairing the formation of endocrine cells in the head and tail regions of the pancreas, and resulting in the absence of the pancreatic body and tail [19, 69]. Given its role in regulating pancreatic progenitor cells and pancreatic development, homozygous mutations in RFX6 lead to pancreatic hypoplasia, as exemplified by the homozygous c.1129 C >T mutation identified in individuals with MRS [26]. Connective tissue resembling pancreatic tissue has been identified in the submucosa of the intestine in patients with RFX6-mutated MRS.
Several more effective treatments have been proposed for MRS in existing reported cases. For example, one approach involves surgically excising a portion of the ectopic gastric mucosa [53]. Gastric heterotopia occurs multiple times in MRS patients, with gastric mucosal ectopia in the small intestine resulting in malabsorption, chronic anemia, intestinal bleeding, and intestinal perforation [67, 70]. The patient in this case showed significant improvement in clinical symptoms at a later stage [53], suggesting that surgery may be an effective treatment modality for gastric ectopia in MRS. Moreover, individuals with MRS who receive Multi visual transplantation (MVT) early in life exhibit a positive prognosis characterized by near-normal gastrointestinal and pancreatic function, leading to one of the lengthiest post-treatment survival rates on record [68]. Consequently, testing the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract as well as the structure and function of the pancreas in patients is now a more efficacious approach of treating as well as evaluating the condition of patients with MRS. Congenital glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) deficiency has been identified in certain cases of MRS. The GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide has demonstrated enhanced glycemic control and has significantly ameliorated abdominal pain, diarrhea, and other related symptoms [62]. These findings suggest that liraglutide may be a viable therapeutic strategy for managing neonatal diabetes resulting from RFX6 mutations.
MODY
MODY, which usually appears before the age of 25, is an autosomal dominant disorder [71], a form of monogenic diabetes caused by β-cell dysfunction [72]. Heterozygous mutations in transcription factors that play a role in the development and maturation of pancreatic β-cells are important in the development of MODY [73–75]. Fourteen MODYs have been identified, including GCK, HNF4A, HNF1A, HNF1B, PDX1, NEUROD1, KLF11, CEL, PAX4, INS, BLK, ABCC8, KCNJ11, and APPL1 [76–78]. In recent years, several truncating variants of the RFX6 protein have been identified within the MODY cohort [79]. This study summarized the existing RFX6 mutations in MODY, and the results are shown in Fig. 2. Heterozygous truncating variants of RFX6 have been linked to diminished penetrance and defects in GIP in MODY [79]. Most individuals with MODY associated with RFX6 mutations present with decreased pancreatic autoantibodies and reduced secretion of insulin, GIP, and GLP-1 [80, 81]. Consequently, GLP-1 agonists have demonstrated significant efficacy in enhancing glycemic control and are effective in the treatment of MODY. Furthermore, Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have also been reported to elicit favorable therapeutic responses [72].
T2D
Type 1 diabetes mellitus is characterized by a complete deficiency of insulin resulting from the destruction of β-cells [82]. In contrast, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is primarily attributed to a reduction in β-cell mass and dysfunction, leading to impaired insulin secretion [83, 84]. Nevertheless, the extent to which reduced β-cell mass and dysfunction contribute to the pathogenesis of T2D has been a subject of ongoing debate [85, 86]. Walker et al. employed a comprehensive, multimodal, and integrated methodology to assess pancreatic tissue and isolated islets from early T2D donors [87]. Their findings indicated that intrinsic defects in β-cell function are the predominant characteristic of this disease stage, while alterations in β-cell mass are not a significant factor. Further unbiased multimodal analyses identified a strong association between the RFX6 regulatory network and genetic risk for T2D, demonstrating that reduced expression of noncoding variants of RFX6 contributes to an elevated risk of developing T2D. RFX6 knockdown in β-cells induces transcriptional and chromatin changes. Genome-wide association studies have revealed that the regions of chromatin architectural changes caused by RFX6 overlap with common T2D variants. The changes are linked to the defective ion transport processes and dysregulated vesicle trafficking and exocytosis pathways mediated by changes in chromatin accessibility. Consequently, it is established that reduced expression of RFX6 in T2D contributes to compromised insulin secretion in β-cells. In mice exposed to a low-protein maternal diet leading to impaired development of fetal pancreatic islet β-cells, the body stimulates cell differentiation at the cost of proliferation through the upregulation of transcription factors such as RFX6 [88]. This ultimately results in a diminished reserve of β-cells and an elevated risk of developing T2D later in life.
Collectively, these findings underscore the critical role of RFX6 in preserving the functional and differentiated state of β-cells, suggesting that RFX6 may represent a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of T2D. Meanwhile, induction of the gene expression of RFX6 can be used to treat T2D with elevated blood glucose levels due to insufficient or resistant insulin secretion.
RFX6 and cancer
The RFX family has previously been demonstrated to be closely associated with cancer progression, with varying expression patterns observed across different types of cancer. Specifically, RFX1 functions as a transcriptional regulator that modulates the expression of proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressors [89]. In gastric [90], breast [91, 92], hepatocellular carcinoma [93–96], and esophageal cancers, among others, down-regulation of RFX1 expression has been observed. Overexpression of RFX1 has been shown to impede the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of cancer cells to reduce tumor invasion and metastasis [96]; additionally, increased RFX1 expression reduced the resistance to chemotherapy and cancer recurrence [92, 96]. Conversely, RFX1 exhibited a contrasting effect in metastatic ovarian cancer by facilitating metastasis upon overexpression [97]. Furthermore, heightened expressions of RFX3 [98] and RFX4 [99, 100] were observed in gliomas, contributing to glioma progression and impacting patient outcomes. Similarly, elevated levels of RFX5 [101] and RFX8 [102] were detected in cancerous tissues, promoting hepatocellular carcinoma advancement. Consequently, the involvement of RFX6 in cancer has garnered considerable attention in recent years.
Examination of pan-cancer data from the UCSC database revealed notable disparities in the expression profiles of RFX6 in cancerous tissues as opposed to normal counterparts (Fig. 3). A notable increase in RFX6 expression was observed in 7 tumor types, including Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), Esophageal carcinoma (ESCA), Prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD), Liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), while a significant decrease was noted in 13 tumor types, such as Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), Breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), Thyroid carcinoma (THCA), Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma (OV), and Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Through a review of existing literature, it was determined that RFX6 exhibits high expression levels in prostate cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and melanoma, while showing decreased expression in gastric cancer. These findings suggest that RFX6 may have varying roles as a transcription factor across different tumor types. Consequently, to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of RFX6 in cancer, the research advancements in each specific cancer type are outlined below.
Fig. 3.
RFX6 pan cancer expression analysis
Pan-cancer datasets standardized to TCGA, TARGET, and GTEx were obtained from the UCSC database by Sangerbox (Access Sangerbox free at http://www.sangerbox.com/tool.html). The expression levels of RFX6 in each sample were extracted and subjected to Log2 (X + 1) transformation. The expression differences between normal and tumor samples were calculated using R software (version 3.6.4) and analyzed for significance using unpaired Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Signed Rank Tests.
Prostate cancer
In a genome-wide association study of a Japanese male population, RFX6 was first identified as a susceptibility gene for prostate cancer [103], underscoring the significance of RFX6 in the context of cancer. Specifically, the study pinpointed a significantly associated susceptibility locus for prostate cancer, rs339331, situated on chromosome 6q22 within an evolutionarily conserved intronic region of the RFX6 gene [104]. Notably, the presence of the T risk allele at the SNP rs339331 locus exhibited a robust association with elevated RFX6 expression levels [105]. This finding was validated in both a Chinese male cohort and a black South African population [106–110], thereby confirming the link between genetic variation at the rs339331 locus and susceptibility to prostate cancer [101].
RFX6 is highly expressed in prostate cancer and is particularly upregulated when the tumor is in metastatic or advanced states [104]. Multiple sets of clinical data showed a positive correlation between the expression of HOXB13 and GATA2 with RFX6, suggesting that RFX6 may be a direct target of these transcription factors [111] (Fig. 4). HOXB13, a transcription factor with a homologous structural domain, is predominantly expressed in the adult prostate [112] and is significantly linked to androgen-dependent prostate cancer growth [113] and increased susceptibility to hereditary prostate cancer [114, 115]. The genetic variant rs339331 has been identified as being localized to prostate-specific enhancer elements upstream of the RFX6 gene, where it exhibits a preference for recruiting HOXB13 to the T risk allele [116]. This recruitment leads to increased binding of HOXB13 to transcriptional enhancers, followed by recruitment of AR and FOXA1 to the same region. This results in the formation of a transcriptional complex that promotes heightened expression of RFX6, ultimately increasing susceptibility to prostate cancer. The overexpression of GATA2 in prostate cancer is associated with increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasive capabilities, thereby facilitating tumorigenesis. In a similar manner, HOXB13 recruits GATA2 and SMAD4 to the RFX6 enhancers, forming a transcriptional complex that collectively influences the expression of the prostate cancer susceptibility gene RFX6. In summary, the rs339331 genetic variant promotes the recruitment of the transcription factor HOXB13 to RFX6 enhancers, leading to increased RFX6 expression, thereby facilitating the proliferation, migration, and invasion of prostate cancer cells and influencing various aspects of prostate cancer development, including onset, progression, metastasis, and biochemical recurrence [104].
Fig. 4.
Mechanisms by which RFX6 regulates tumor progression
Hepatocellular carcinoma
RFX6 is highly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma, promotes cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, and is associated with unfavorable patient prognosis [117]. Depletion of RFX6 triggers apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells and modulates tumor immune responses [118]. A study revealed a decrease in miRNA-542-3p expression in hepatocellular carcinoma, which was associated with the suppression of RFX6 expression [118]. RFX6 modulates hepatocarcinogenesis by targeting NOTCH1 and DTX2 proteins within the Notch signaling pathway as well as enhancing transcriptional stability. The Notch signaling pathway can facilitate tumor proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis [119]. This indicates that the miRNA-542-3p-RFX6-DTX2-NOTCH1 regulatory pathway is significant in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma [118]. Variations in the levels of glycerate mutase 1 (PGAM1) protein have the potential to impact the initiation of glycolysis [120]. Research has demonstrated that RFX6 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma growth and metastasis by transcriptionally regulating the expression level of PGAM1 and enhancing glycolysis [117]. Consequently, RFX6 is identified as a key regulator of glycolysis through the activation of its target genes, including PGAM1, ADH5, and GAPDH.
Melanoma
RFX6 is also a prognostic risk marker for melanoma, which contributes to 90% of skin cancer mortality. Six prognostically relevant genes, including RFX6, were screened by clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic data. Subsequent experiments confirmed that genes such as RFX6 were significantly overexpressed in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues, suggesting that RFX6 could be used as a new marker for the prognosis of melanoma patients [121].
Gastric cancer
Previous research has shown that homozygous mutations in RFX6 are associated with the development of MRS, a syndrome characterized by gastric heterotopia among other clinical symptoms. Valeria Calcaterra et al. concluded that patients with these mutations are at an increased risk of developing cancerous changes in the ectopic gastric mucosa and other tumor-related complications [67]. Analysis of transcriptomic data from databases indicated that alterations in RFX6 were the most notable among key transcription factors differentially expressed in gastric cancer [122]. Validation of these findings through clinical tissue analysis confirmed a significant downregulation of RFX6 expression in gastric cancer, suggesting that RFX6 could be a novel target for the treatment of gastric cancer.
Conclusion
Examination review on common scientific articles on the gene RFX6 suggests a main role in pancreatic development, MRS, and tumor progression. RFX6 is predominantly expressed in the pancreas and gastrointestinal tract, where it plays a crucial role in regulating pancreatic development, differentiation, and insulin translation by modulating the expression of downstream genes. Additionally, RFX6 is involved in the regulation of genes associated with β-cell maturation and function, ultimately impacting insulin secretion. Consequently, RFX6 abnormalities are likely to lead to diabetes, especially in MRS, which is typically characterized by pancreatic dysfunction and diabetes mellitus. Homozygous mutations in RFX6 are considered the main etiological factor. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms underlying the occurrence of RFX6 mutations remain unclear. In the current phase of treatment investigation, primary therapeutic modalities for managing MRS include surgical excision of ectopic gastric mucosa or multimucosal transplantation during infancy. While advancements have been made in these treatment strategies, further clinical studies are required to validate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions and medications for MRS. RFX6 is anticipated to emerge as a significant target for MRS treatment in the foreseeable future.
Given the aberrant expression of RFX6 in numerous cancer types, it is imperative to elucidate the regulatory pathways of RFX6 in tumorigenesis. RFX6 exhibits varying expression across different tumor types, and this, coupled with its aberrant expression as well as upstream and downstream regulation affect tumor cell proliferation and cancer prognosis. The identification of RFX6 as a potential biomarker for predicting the recurrence or metastasis of cancer, as well as a promising therapeutic target, highlights its significance in the field of oncology. Furthermore, the latest study has revealed the involvement of RFX6 in glycolysis and its ability to modulate the expression of the pivotal protein PGAM1, thereby facilitating tumor advancement. This research has significantly advanced our comprehension of the mechanism of RFX6 action, offering a novel approach for cancer therapy. Examination of the upstream and downstream effects of RFX6 in both diabetes and tumorigenesis revealed a complex network of interconnected genes. This indicates that there is potential for further investigation into the role of RFX6 in tumors, drawing upon its known mechanism of action in diabetes. RFX6 may have utility as a biomarker for anticipating recurrence or metastasis, as well as for designing therapeutic strategies targeting RFX6.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express our gratitude to both current and former members, as well as collaborators, for their contributions to the publications referenced in this review article. However, due to space constraints, we regret that we were unable to include all recent publications in our citations.
Abbreviations
- RFX6
Regulatory factor X6
- RFX
Regulatory factor X
- DBD
DNA-binding domain
- MRS
Mitchell-Riley syndrome
- ChIP-seq
Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis
- KATP channel
ATP-sensitive K+ channel
- VDCCs
Voltage-gated Ca2+ channels
- CN
Calmodulin phosphatase
- NFATC2
Nuclear factor of activated T-cells 2
- GIP
Gastric inhibitory peptide
- NDM
Neonatal diabetes mellitus
- PNDM
Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus
- TNDM
Transient neonatal diabetes mellitus
- MFS
Martinez Frias syndrome
- PGT
Primitive gut tube
- MVT
Multi visual transplantation
- GLP-1
Glucagon-like peptide-1
- MODY
Maturity-onset diabetes of the young
- DPP-4
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4
- T2D
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- LUAD
Lung adenocarcinoma
- ESCA
Esophageal carcinoma
- PRAD
Prostate adenocarcinoma
- LIHC
Liver hepatocellular carcinoma
- GBM
Glioblastoma multiforme
- BRCA
Breast invasive carcinoma
- COAD
Colon adenocarcinoma
- STAD
Stomach adenocarcinoma
- LUSC
Lung squamous cell carcinoma
- THCA
Thyroid carcinoma
- OV
Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma
- ACC
Adrenocortical carcinoma
- PGAM1
Glycerate mutase 1
Author contributions
X.N. and J.Q. researched data and wrote the manuscript. X.N., J.Q. and Z.F. established the scope of the review. All authors made substantial contributions to the discussion and revision of the manuscript before submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82174028), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LY22H280006) and Key Laboratory of Prevention, Diagnosis and Therapy of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer of Zhejiang Province (2022E10021).
Data availability
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Xixian Ni and Jiaqi Qiu contributed to the work equally and should be regarded as co-first authors.
References
- 1.Emery P, et al. RFX proteins, a novel family of DNA binding proteins conserved in the eukaryotic kingdom. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(5):803–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Piasecki BP, Burghoorn J, Swoboda P. Regulatory factor X (RFX)-mediated transcriptional rewiring of ciliary genes in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(29):12969–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aftab S, et al. Identification and characterization of novel human tissue-specific RFX transcription factors. BMC Evol Biol. 2008. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sugiaman-Trapman D, et al. Characterization of the human RFX transcription factor family by regulatory and target gene analysis. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Katan-Khaykovich Y. RFX1, a single DNA-binding protein with a split dimerization domain, generates alternative complexes. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(38):24504–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smith SB, et al. Rfx6 directs islet formation and insulin production in mice and humans. Nature. 2010;463(7282):775–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen N, et al. Identification of ciliary and ciliopathy genes in caenorhabditis elegans through comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2006;7(12):R126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.El Zein L, et al. RFX3 governs growth and beating efficiency of motile cilia in mouse and controls the expression of genes involved in human ciliopathies. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 17):3180–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lemeille S, et al. Interplay of RFX transcription factors 1, 2 and 3 in motile ciliogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(16):9019–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Choi W, et al. RFX4 is an intrinsic factor for neuronal differentiation through induction of proneural genes POU3F2 and NEUROD1. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024;81(1):99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Soyer J, et al. Rfx6 is an Ngn3-dependent winged helix transcription factor required for pancreatic islet cell development. Development. 2010;137(2):203–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pearl EJ, Jarikji Z, Horb ME. Functional analysis of Rfx6 and mutant variants associated with neonatal diabetes. Dev Biol. 2011;351(1):135–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Piccand J, et al. Rfx6 promotes the differentiation of peptide-secreting enteroendocrine cells while repressing genetic programs controlling serotonin production. Mol Metab. 2019;29:24–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Coykendall VMN, et al. RFX6 maintains gene expression and function of adult human islet α-cells. Diabetes. 2024;73(3):448–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Piccand J, et al. Rfx6 maintains the functional identity of adult pancreatic β cells. Cell Rep. 2014;9(6):2219–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Globa E, et al. Neonatal and early-onset diabetes in Ukraine: atypical features and mortality. Diabet Med. 2022. 10.1111/dme.15013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mitchell J, et al. Neonatal diabetes, with hypoplastic pancreas, intestinal atresia and gall bladder hypoplasia: search for the aetiology of a new autosomal recessive syndrome. Diabetologia. 2004;47(12):2160–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Scharfmann R, et al. Mass production of functional human pancreatic β-cells: why and how? Obes Metabolism. 2016;18(S1):128–36. Diabetes. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jennings RE, Scharfmann R, Staels W. Transcription factors that shape the mammalian pancreas. Diabetologia. 2020;63(10):1974–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Azzarelli R, et al. Multi-site Neurogenin3 phosphorylation controls pancreatic endocrine differentiation. Dev Cell. 2017;41(3):274–e2865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lizio M et al. Mapping mammalian cell-type-specific transcriptional regulatory networks using KD-CAGE and ChIP-seq data in the TC-YIK cell line. Front Genet. 2015;6 (331). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Taleb N, Polychronakos C. RFX6 is needed for the development and maintenance of the β-cell phenotype. Islets. 2014;3(5):291–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pauerstein PT, et al. Dissecting human gene functions regulating islet development with targeted gene transduction. Diabetes. 2015;64(8):3037–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nakamura T, et al. Human RFX6 regulates endoderm patterning at the primitive gut tube stage. PNAS Nexus. 2024. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gradwohl G, et al. Neurogenin3 is required for the development of the four endocrine cell lineages of the pancreas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(4):1607–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhu Z, et al. Genome editing of lineage determinants in human pluripotent stem cells reveals mechanisms of pancreatic development and diabetes. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18(6):755–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jonsson J, et al. Insulin-promoter-factor 1 is required for pancreas development in mice. Nature. 1994;371(6498):606–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Offield MF, et al. PDX-1 is required for pancreatic outgrowth and differentiation of the rostral duodenum. Development. 1996;122(3):983–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cheng C, et al. Identification of Rfx6 target genes involved in pancreas development and insulin translation by ChIP-seq. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;508(2):556–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wang X, et al. Genome-wide analysis of PDX1 target genes in human pancreatic progenitors. Mol Metab. 2018;9:57–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liao X et al. Matched MiRNA and mRNA signatures from a hESC-based in vitro model of pancreatic differentiation reveal novel regulatory interactions. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(Pt 17):3848–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Ohara-Imaizumi M, Aoyagi K, Ohtsuka T. Role of the active zone protein, ELKS, in insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells. Mol Metab. 2019;27s(Suppl):S81–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lu J, et al. The dual role of RFX6 in directing β cell development and insulin production. J Mol Endocrinol. 2021;66(2):129–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chandra V, et al. RFX6 regulates insulin secretion by modulating Ca2 + homeostasis in human β cells. Cell Rep. 2014;9(6):2206–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abu Aqel Y, et al. Glucokinase (GCK) in diabetes: from molecular mechanisms to disease pathogenesis. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2024;29(1):120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Calcaterra V, et al. Maternal or paternal diabetes and its crucial role in offspring birth weight and MODY diagnosis. Metabolites. 2020. 10.3390/metabo10100387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Koeck T, et al. A common variant in TFB1M is associated with reduced insulin secretion and increased future risk of type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 2011;13(1):80–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bowman P, et al. Long-term follow-up of glycemic and neurological outcomes in an international series of patients with sulfonylurea-treated ABCC8 permanent neonatal diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(1):35–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li M, et al. Genetic variants of ABCC8 and phenotypic features in Chinese early onset diabetes. J Diabetes. 2021;13(7):542–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rorsman P, Braun M. Regulation of insulin secretion in human pancreatic islets. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:155–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hastoy B, et al. Electrophysiological properties of human beta-cell lines EndoC-βH1 and -βH2 conform with human beta-cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.LaPierre MP, Stoffel M. Micrornas as stress regulators in pancreatic beta cells and diabetes. Mol Metab. 2017;6(9):1010–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ainscow EK, Zhao C, Rutter GA. Acute overexpression of lactate dehydrogenase-A perturbs beta-cell mitochondrial metabolism and insulin secretion. Diabetes. 2000;49(7):1149–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Plaisance V, et al. Role of MicroRNAs in islet beta-cell compensation and failure during diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2014;2014:618652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Suzuki K, et al. Transcriptional regulatory factor X6 (Rfx6) increases gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) expression in enteroendocrine K-cells and is involved in GIP hypersecretion in high fat diet-induced obesity. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(3):1929–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gehart H, et al. Identification of enteroendocrine regulators by Real-Time Single-Cell differentiation mapping. Cell. 2019;176(5):1158–e117316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yamane S, Harada N, Inagaki N. Mechanisms of fat-induced gastric inhibitory polypeptide/glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide secretion from K cells. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7(S1):20–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gower BA, et al. A higher-carbohydrate, lower-fat diet reduces fasting glucose concentration and improves β-cell function in individuals with impaired fasting glucose. Metabolism. 2012;61(3):358–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Haldorsen IS, et al. The role of pancreatic imaging in monogenic diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;8(3):148–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Laimon W, et al. Genetic and clinical heterogeneity of permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus: a single tertiary centre experience. Acta Diabetol. 2021;58(12):1689–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nyakudya TT, et al. Short-term neonatal oral administration of oleanolic acid protects against fructose-induced oxidative stress in the skeletal muscles of suckling rats. Molecules. 2019. 10.3390/molecules24040661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.O’Hara SE, Gembus KM, Nicholas LM. Understanding the long-lasting effects of fetal nutrient restriction versus exposure to an obesogenic diet on islet-cell mass and function. Metabolites. 2021. 10.3390/metabo11080514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Skopkova M, et al. Two novel RFX6 variants in siblings with Mitchell-Riley syndrome with later diabetes onset and heterotopic gastric mucosa. Eur J Med Genet. 2016;59(9):429–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Khan N. A Newly-Discovered Mutation in the RFX6 Gene of the Rare Mitchell-Riley Syndrome. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.Chiengkriwate P, et al. Variants associated with infantile cholestatic syndromes detected in extrahepatic biliary atresia by whole exome studies: a 20-case series from Thailand. J Pediatr Genet. 2018;07(02):067–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Chappell L, et al. A further example of a distinctive autosomal recessive syndrome comprising neonatal diabetes mellitus, intestinal atresias and gall bladder agenesis. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(13):1713–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Spiegel R, et al. Clinical characterization of a newly described neonatal diabetes syndrome caused by RFX6 mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155(11):2821–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Concepcion JP, et al. Neonatal diabetes, gallbladder agenesis, duodenal atresia, and intestinal malrotation caused by a novel homozygous mutation inRFX6. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014;15(1):67–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zegre Amorim M, et al. Mitchell-Riley syndrome: a novel mutation in RFX6 gene. Case Rep Genet. 2015;2015:1–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Huopio H, et al. Clinical, genetic, and biochemical characteristics of early-onset diabetes in the Finnish population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(8):3018–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kambal MA, et al. Mitchell-riley syndrome due to a novel mutation in RFX6. Front Pediatr. 2019. 10.3389/fped.2019.00243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Nóbrega S, et al. Congenital Glucagon-like Peptide-1 deficiency in the pathogenesis of protracted diarrhea in Mitchell–Riley syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metabolism. 2021;106(4):e1084–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Harsunen M, et al. Identification of monogenic variants in more than ten per cent of children without type 1 diabetes-related autoantibodies at diagnosis in the Finnish pediatric diabetes register. Diabetologia. 2022;66(3):438–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Satoh K, et al. Aberrant expression of CDX2 in the gastric mucosa with and without intestinal metaplasia: effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter. 2002;7(3):192–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Calon A, et al. Different effects of the Cdx1 and Cdx2 homeobox genes in a murine model of intestinal inflammation. Gut. 2007;56(12):1688–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sansbury FH, et al. Biallelic RFX6 mutations can cause childhood as well as neonatal onset diabetes mellitus. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23(12):1744–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Calcaterra V, et al. Determining oncogenic patterns and cancer predisposition through the transcriptomic profile in Mitchell–Riley syndrome with heterotopic gastric mucosa and duodenal atresia: a case report. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021. 10.1186/s13023-021-02093-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Estefanía-Fernández K, et al. First multivisceral transplantation in Mitchell‐Riley/Martinez‐Frias syndrome. Pediatr Transplant. 2022. 10.1111/petr.14270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Trott J et al. Mitchell-Riley syndrome iPSC exhibit reduced pancreatic endoderm differentiation due to an RFX6 mutation. Development. 2020;147(21):dev194878. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 70.Xu XQ. Active gastrointestinal diverticulum bleeding diagnosed by computed tomography angiography. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(37):13620–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Mohan V, et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis identifies pathogenic variants in maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) patients in South India. BMC Med Genet. 2018. 10.1186/s12881-018-0528-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Artuso R, et al. Therapeutic implications of novel mutations of the RFX6 gene associated with early-onset diabetes. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015;15(1):49–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Płoszaj T, et al. Screening for extremely rare pathogenic variants of monogenic diabetes using targeted panel sequencing. Endocrine. 2021;73(3):752–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tosur M, et al. Exome sequencing in children with clinically suspected maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021;22(7):960–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Şimşek E. Screening of Mutations in Maturity-onset Diabetes of the Young-related Genes and RFX6 in Children with Autoantibody-negative Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. 2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 76.Awa WL, et al. Genetic and clinical characteristics of patients with HNF1A gene variations from the German-Austrian DPV database. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(4):513–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Liu L, et al. Mutations in KCNJ11 are associated with the development of autosomal dominant, early-onset type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2013;56(12):2609–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Li M, Han X, Ji L. Clinical and genetic characteristics of ABCC8 nonneonatal diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. J Diabetes Res. 2021;2021:p9479268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Patel KA, et al. Heterozygous RFX6 protein truncating variants are associated with MODY with reduced penetrance. Nat Commun. 2017. 10.1038/s41467-017-00895-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Imaki S, et al. A novel RFX6 heterozygous mutation (p.R652X) in maturity-onset diabetes mellitus: a case report. J Diabetes Investig. 2021;12(10):1914–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kim GL, Kwak SH, Yu J. A case of monogenic diabetes mellitus caused by a novel heterozygous RFX6 nonsense mutation in a 14-year-old girl. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2021;34(12):1619–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rapini N, Schiaffini R, Fierabracci A. Immunotherapy strategies for the prevention and treatment of distinct stages of type 1 diabetes: an overview. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. 10.3390/ijms21062103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kargar C, Ktorza A. Anatomical versus functional beta-cell mass in experimental diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10(Suppl 4):43–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Matveyenko AV, Butler PC. Relationship between beta-cell mass and diabetes onset. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10(Suppl):23–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Nasykhova YA, et al. Pharmacogenetics of type 2 diabetes-progress and prospects. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. 10.3390/ijms21186842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Cohrs CM, et al. Dysfunction of persisting β cells is a key feature of early type 2 diabetes pathogenesis. Cell Rep. 2020;31(1):107469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Walker JT, et al. Genetic risk converges on regulatory networks mediating early type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2023;624(7992):621–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Rodríguez-Trejo A, et al. Developmental programming of neonatal pancreatic β-cells by a maternal low-protein diet in rats involves a switch from proliferation to differentiation. Am J Physiology-Endocrinology Metabolism. 2012;302(11):E1431–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Issac J, Raveendran PS, Das AV. RFX1: a promising therapeutic arsenal against cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2021. 10.1186/s12935-021-01952-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Guo L, Liu D. Identification of RFX5 as prognostic biomarker and associated with immune infiltration in stomach adenocarcinoma. Eur J Med Res. 2022;27(1):164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Amin S, et al. Breast cancer cells proliferation is regulated by tyrosine phosphatase SHP1 through c-jun N-terminal kinase and cooperative induction of RFX-1 and AP-4 transcription factors. Mol Cancer Res. 2011;9(8):1112–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Shibata M, et al. Expression of regulatory factor X1 can predict the prognosis of breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2017;13(6):4334–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Su JC, et al. RFX-1-dependent activation of SHP-1 inhibits STAT3 signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(12):2807–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Ma T, et al. Long Non-coding RNA SNHG17 upregulates RFX1 by sponging miR-3180-3p and promotes cellular function in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Genet. 2020;11:607636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jia W, et al. Hypoxia-induced exosomes facilitate lung pre-metastatic niche formation in hepatocellular carcinoma through the miR-4508-RFX1-IL17A-p38 MAPK-NF-κB pathway. Int J Biol Sci. 2023;19(15):4744–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Liu Y, et al. Downregulation of RFX1 predicts poor prognosis of patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(7):1087–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Liu G, et al. Genome-wide DNA copy number profiling and bioinformatics analysis of ovarian cancer reveals key genes and pathways associated with distinct invasive/migratory capabilities. Aging. 2020;12(1):178–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Qian Y, et al. CircRFX3 up-regulates its host gene RFX3 to facilitate tumorigenesis and progression of glioma. J Mol Neurosci. 2022;72(6):1195–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Jeong HY, et al. High expression of RFX4 is associated with tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with glioblastoma. Int J Neurosci. 2021;131(1):7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Matsushita H, et al. Identification of glioma-specific RFX4-E and -F isoforms and humoral immune response in patients. Cancer Sci. 2005;96(11):801–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wang M, et al. Replication and cumulative effects of GWAS-identified genetic variations for prostate cancer in asians: a case–control study in the ChinaPCa consortium. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(2):356–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Liu T, et al. RNA helicase DDX24 stabilizes LAMB1 to promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Cancer Res. 2022;82(17):3074–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Takata R, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five new susceptibility loci for prostate cancer in the Japanese population. Nat Genet. 2010;42(9):751–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Huang Q, et al. A prostate cancer susceptibility allele at 6q22 increases RFX6 expression by modulating HOXB13 chromatin binding. Nat Genet. 2014;46(2):126–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Spisák S, et al. Causel: an epigenome- and genome-editing pipeline for establishing function of noncoding GWAS variants. Nat Med. 2015;21(11):1357–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Li X-h, et al. Association of THADA, FOXP4, GPRC6A/RFX6 genes and 8q24 risk alleles with prostate cancer in Northern Chinese men. 2015;20(5):1223-8. [PubMed]
- 107.Wang N-N, et al. Susceptibility loci associations with prostate cancer risk in Northern Chinese men. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(5):3075–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Du M, et al. Chromatin interactions and candidate genes at ten prostate cancer risk loci. Sci Rep. 2016. 10.1038/srep23202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Long Q, et al . Replication and fine mapping for association of the C2orf43, FOXP4, GPRC6A and RFX6 genes with prostate cancer in the Chinese population. 2015;7(5):e37866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 110.Soh PXY, et al. Prostate cancer genetic risk and associated aggressive disease in men of African ancestry. Nat Commun. 2023. 10.1038/s41467-023-43726-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Yang X, et al. GATA2 co-opts TGFβ1/SMAD4 oncogenic signaling and inherited variants at 6q22 to modulate prostate cancer progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42(1):198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Nelson WG, et al. Health inequity drives disease biology to create disparities in prostate cancer outcomes. J Clin Invest. 2022. 10.1172/JCI155031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Lu X, et al. HOXB13 suppresses de novo lipogenesis through HDAC3-mediated epigenetic reprogramming in prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2022;54(5):670–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Ewing CM. Germline mutations in HOXB13 and prostate-cancer risk. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 115.Attard G, et al. Prostate cancer. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):70–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Mills IG. HOXB13, RFX6 and prostate cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2014;46(2):94–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Qiu Z, et al. Rfx6 facilitates aerobic glycolysis-mediated growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma through targeting PGAM1. Clin Transl Med. 2023. 10.1002/ctm2.1511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Song M, et al. Inhibition of RFX6 suppresses the invasive ability of tumor cells through the Notch pathway and affects tumor immunity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021. 10.3389/fonc.2021.801222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Villanueva A, et al. Notch signaling is activated in human hepatocellular carcinoma and induces tumor formation in mice. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(6):1660–9. .e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Liu J, et al. Tumor suppressor p53 and metabolism. J Mol Cell Biol. 2019;11(4):284–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Gao Y, et al. Identification and validation of prognostically relevant gene signature in melanoma. BioMed Res Int. 2020;2020:1–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Fu Z, et al. Construction of miRNA-mRNA-TF regulatory network for diagnosis of gastric cancer. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.




