Simple Summary
The post-weaning period is a critical transition phase in pig production, during which piglets exhibit increased susceptibility to enteric pathogens and associated intestinal disorders. To investigate the underlying mechanisms, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a component of bacterial cell walls, is frequently used to induce immune stress in experimental models. However, LPS administration alone fails to recapitulate the full spectrum of pathological changes caused by live bacterial infections. In this study, we established an oral infection model using Salmonella enterica (SE), a major enteric pathogen, and systematically compared its effects with those of LPS in weaned piglets. Our results demonstrated that while both challenges in duced immune activation and intestinal injury, SE infection provoked more severe and sustained systemic inflammation, along with distinctive gut structural damage, such as villus perforations and mitochondrial damage, that were not observed in the LPS group. Notably, an oral dose of 2 × 109 CFU SE for 24 h established a reproducible and physiologically relevant model that closely mimics natural Salmonella infection. This optimized model provides a valuable experimental platform for further research on intestinal diseases and for evaluating nutritional or therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing gut health in swine, with potential benefits for animal welfare and sustainable pork production.
Keywords: Salmonella, immune stress, weaned piglets, lipopolysaccharide, intestine, cytokines, T lymphocytes
Abstract
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is widely used to model immune stress in weaned piglets, but it does not fully replicate the pathophysiological alterations induced by live bacterial infection. This study therefore established an oral Salmonella enterica (SE) challenge model and systematically compared its effects with those of LPS to evaluate its potential as a complementary immune stress paradigm. Forty piglets were assigned to five groups: control (saline), LPS (intraperitoneal, 100 μg/kg BW), and three SE groups receiving low-, middle-, or high-dose oral SE (1 × 108 CFU/mL, 2 × 108 CFU/mL, or 3 × 108 CFU/mL in a 10 mL saline volume, respectively). Both LPS and SE significantly reduced average daily gain, while only SE challenge decreased colon length. A transient rectal temperature elevation occurred at 8 h in all challenged groups, persisting at 12 h in the LPS and high-dose SE groups. Serum cytokine analysis revealed that LPS induced early but transient interleukin-12 and tumor necrosis factor-α elevation at 8 h, followed by sustained suppression of interferon-γ, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8. In contrast, the middle-dose SE triggered robust increases in multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines at 24 h. Both challenges significantly reduced the CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratios in blood and lymphoid organs and decreased intestinal interleukin-10 levels. SE infection produced more severe intestinal pathology, including dose-dependent villus perforations, microvillus disorganization, and mitochondrial cristae vacuolization, beyond the villus shortening and goblet cell reduction observed in both groups. While both LPS and SE induced immune stress and intestinal injury, SE infection caused more severe and comprehensive pathophysiological alterations. Oral administration of 2 × 109 CFU SE for 24 h established a physiologically relevant immune stress model that effectively mimics natural Salmonella infection in weaned piglets, providing a valuable tool for studying enteric diseases and evaluating interventions.
1. Introduction
Post-weaning stress represents a critical period in swine production, significantly increasing piglet susceptibility to enteric pathogens and associated immune dysregulation [1]. To study the ensuing pathophysiology, immune stress modeling in weaned piglets has primarily relied on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge or live Escherichia coli infection. LPS, a key component of Gram-negative bacterial cell walls, is extensively utilized to induce acute systemic inflammation [2,3]. However, its model fidelity is limited, as it typically elicits transient systemic inflammation without reproducing the characteristic intestinal pathology of a live bacterial infection [4]. Conversely, while E. coli is also a common enteric pathogen, it often fails to provoke a robust and consistent immune activation in challenge models, limiting its utility for immune stress studies [5]. These constraints highlight a need for complementary models that better recapitulate the complex host responses to enteric pathogens, particularly in the intestinal compartment.
Salmonella enterica (SE) presents a promising complementary model, being a primary enteric pathogen capable of causing severe gastroenteritis in both animals and humans [6]. Its potential for modeling is underpinned by findings that SE challenge can induce significant pyrexia and marked alterations in serum immune markers [7,8]. Furthermore, the specific SE strain 50336 used in this study has demonstrated a pronounced ability to infect porcine jejunal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) in vitro, indicating a high affinity for the porcine intestinal tract [9]. These findings suggest that oral SE challenge could effectively mimic key aspects of natural infection. More importantly, SE possesses virulence mechanisms, such as type III secretion systems (T3SS), that are absent in purified LPS and are known to drive more profound gut morphological damage, including villus perforations and disruption of tight junctions [10]. Consequently, an SE-based model may induce more severe and comprehensive intestinal pathophysiological alterations, providing a complementary approach to the classic LPS model, especially for studies focused on gut-specific immune responses and structural damage.
Therefore, this study aimed to directly address the limitations of existing models by systematically comparing the pathophysiological differences between the standard LPS challenge and an optimized oral SE infection in weaned piglets. We focused on a multidimensional assessment of systemic inflammation, intestinal immunity, and gut morphology to evaluate SE as a complementary model for immune stress in weaned piglets.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Strain
The Salmonella enterica strain 50336 was provided by Professor Guoqiang Zhu (College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University).
2.2. Animals and Experimental Design
Forty piglets weaned at 21 days of age (28 days old at study initiation) were randomly allocated to five groups (n = 8/group): CTR (control), orally administered 10 mL of 0.9% saline; LPS, intraperitoneally injected with 100 μg/kg body weight LPS (E. coli O55:B5; Sigma L6529, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); LSE, orally administered 1 × 108 CFU/mL SE in 10 mL saline; MSE, orally administered 2 × 108 CFU/mL SE in 10 mL saline; HSE, orally administered 3 × 108 CFU/mL SE in 10 mL saline. The commercially available E. coli O55:B5 LPS was selected as it represents a standardized and widely referenced agent for inducing endotoxemia in swine, facilitating direct comparison with established models [4,11]. The LPS dose followed established protocols [4,11]. Piglets received a basal diet (Supplementary Materials Table S1; Yangzhou University Feed Factory) free of antibiotics, formulated according to the National Research Council (2012). The piglets were obtained from a commercial farm with a standard health management protocol but were not subjected to any vaccination program against Salmonella or other enteric pathogens prior to or during the trial. At 8, 12, 24, and 36 h post-challenge, rectal temperature was recorded and venous blood was collected. Six piglets per group were euthanized at 36 h for tissue sampling. The selected time points (8, 12, 24, and 36 h post-challenge) were based on the established kinetics of immune and pathophysiological responses in weaned piglet models [12,13,14].
2.3. Sample Collection
Blood samples were collected from the anterior vena cava using a sterile 21-gauge needle attached to a 5 mL syringe. The venipuncture site was disinfected with 70% ethanol prior to collection. Samples were collected at for cytokine analysis (IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, TNF-α) and immune cell profiling. At 36 h, the abdominal cavity was opened, the intestine was separated, and the length of the duodenum, jejunum and ileum were measured. A 2-cm segment from the mid-section of the small intestine was rinsed with PBS, longitudinally incised, treated with 0.25% trypsin to remove mucus, and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Segments (2 cm) from the mid-jejunum and mid-ileum were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for histological study. The intestinal contents of jejunum and ileum were flushed with pre-cooled PBS, the moisture was dried with filter paper, and the mucosa was gently scraped with a slide. The samples were then flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for cytokine analysis. Fresh samples of the thymus, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes were collected immediately for T Lymphocyte subset analysis.
2.4. Cytokine Quantification
Serum and intestinal cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ) were measured using commercial ELISA kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China; Cat# H002, H008, H009, H010, H025, H052) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
2.5. T Lymphocyte Subset Analysis
Heparinized whole blood (100 μL) was incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 (Solarbio K009445M; Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and PE-conjugated anti-CD8α (Solarbio K009446M; Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China; 10 μL each) for 30 min at 4 °C in dark. Erythrocytes were lysed with 3 mL of lysis buffer, samples were centrifuged (500× g, 5 min), and pellets were resuspended in 1% paraformaldehyde for flow cytometry [15]. Homogenates of thymus, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes were filtered through a 300-μm nylon mesh), centrifuged (100× g, 8 min, 4 °C), washed twice with PBS, and stained identically to blood samples.
2.6. Electron Microscopy
For scanning electron microscope (SEM): Fixed tissues were washed with 0.1 M PBS, post-fixed in 1% OsO4, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30–100%), critical-point dried, sputter-coated with gold, and imaged (ZEISS GeminiSEM 300; Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) [16]. For transmission electron microscopy (TEM): Samples were fixed in 1% OsO4 (2 h, dark), dehydrated in ethanol/acetone, embedded in resin, polymerized (37 °C overnight; 60 °C, 48 h), ultrathin-sectioned, stained, and imaged (Hitachi HT7800; Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) [17].
2.7. Histological Analysis
Formaldehyde-fixed tissues were paraffin-embedded, sectioned (5 μm), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Solarbio G1120; Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Villus height, crypt depth, and villus height-to-crypt depth ratio (V/C) were quantified using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA) under an Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) [18].
2.8. Goblet Cell Staining
Goblet cells were stained with Alcian Blue (Solarbio G1560; Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Five intact villi per section were imaged (Nikon Eclipse E100, Nikon Instruments Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and goblet cells were quantified using Image J software 17.0.
2.9. Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Group differences were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. Figures were generated using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Body Weight, Colon Length and Rectal Temperature
Compared to the CTR group, the average daily weight gain (ADG) was significantly reduced in all challenged groups (LPS, LSE, MSE, HSE; p = 0.002; Figure 1A). Colon length tended to be shorter in SE-challenged groups compared to the CTR group (p = 0.054; Figure 1B). Rectal temperature increased significantly at 8 h post-challenge in the LPS and all SE groups compared to CTR (p < 0.001). By 12 h, significantly elevated temperatures persisted in the LPS and HSE groups (p = 0.012; Figure 1C).
Figure 1.
Body Weight, Colon Length and Rectal Temperature. Average daily gain (ADG) of piglets in the control (CTR), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and low-, medium-, and high-dose Salmonella enterica (LSE, MSE, HSE)-challenged groups (A). Colon length of piglets from each treatment group (B). Rectal temperature measured at 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36 h post-challenge (C). Different letters (a, b, c) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
3.2. Levels of Cytokines in Serum and Small Intestine
At 12 h post-stimulation, serum IFN-γ levels were significantly elevated in the HSE group (p < 0.05), while MSE-induced significant increases in serum IL-6 at 8, 12, 24, and 36 h (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A,B). Serum IL-8 levels were significantly higher in the LSE and MSE groups at 8 h, with sustained elevations in the MSE group at 12 and 24 h (p < 0.05) (Figure 2C). At 8 h, both LPS and SE groups showed significantly increased serum IL-12, and the LPS and LSE groups exhibited significantly higher serum TNF-α (p < 0.05) (Figure 2D,E). Conversely, the LPS group had significantly reduced serum IFN-γ and IL-6 at all time points, along with significantly lower IL-8 at 36 h (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A–C).
Figure 2.
Cytokine profiles in serum and intestinal tissues. Serum levels of IFN-γ (A), IL-6 (B), IL-8 (C), IL-12 (D), and TNF-α (E) of piglets in the control (CTR), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and low-, medium-, and high-dose Salmonella enterica (LSE, MSE, HSE)-challenged groups were measured at 8, 12, 24, and 36 h post-challenge. At 36 h post-challenge, the levels of IL-10 (F), IL-1β (G), IL-8 (H), TNF-α (I), and IL-6 (J) were quantified in the jejunum and ileum. Different letters (a, b, c, d) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
At 36 h post-challenge, jejunal and ileal IL-10 levels were significantly reduced in both LPS and SE groups relative to the CTR group (p < 0.05) (Figure 2F). In contrast, jejunal IL-1β was elevated in the LPS group, and both jejunal and ileal IL-1β were significantly increased in SE groups (p < 0.05) (Figure 2G). Jejunal IL-8 levels were significantly higher in the LPS, MSE, and HSE groups compared to CTR (p < 0.05) (Figure 2H). Additionally, the HSE group showed significantly increased ileal TNF-α and jejunal IL-6, while the LSE group had elevated ileal IL-6 (p < 0.05 vs. CTR) (Figure 2I,J).
3.3. T-Lymphocyte Subsets in Blood and Immune Organs
In blood, the CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocyte ratio was significantly decreased in the LPS and SE groups at 4, 8, 12, 24, and 36 h post-challenge (p < 0.05) (Figure 3A–O). At 36 h, this ratio was also significantly lower in the thymus, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes of LPS- and SE-challenged piglets compared to the control group (p < 0.05) (Figure 3P–X).
Figure 3.
CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocyte ratio in peripheral blood and immune organs. The ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ T lymphocytes was analyzed in blood samples collected at (A–C) 4 h, (D–F) 8 h, (G–I) 12 h, (J–L) 24 h, and (M–O) 36 h post-challenge from piglets in the control (CTR), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and low-, medium-, and high-dose Salmonella enterica (LSE, MSE, HSE)-challenged groups. CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocyte ratio in the thymus (P–R), spleen (S–U) and mesenteric lymph nodes (V–X) at 36 h. Different letters (a, b, c, d) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
3.4. Intestinal Morphology
Scanning electron microscopy revealed villus tip damage in the small intestine of LPS and SE groups (Figure 4A), with surface perforations specific to SE-challenged piglets (Figure 4B). Microvilli were shorter in LPS and SE groups than in CTR, and SE groups exhibited disorganized microvilli in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4C). Mitochondrial swelling was observed in both LPS and SE groups, with more severe damage in SE groups, including vacuolated cristae (Figure 4C,D). Hematoxylin–eosin (HE) staining showed significantly reduced villus height/crypt depth (V/C) ratios in the jejunum and ileum of LPS and SE groups compared to CTR (p < 0.05) (Figure 5).
Figure 4.
Ultrastructural alterations in the small intestinal epithelium revealed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). SEM images showing damage to villus tips in the small intestine of challenged piglets (representative images shown) (A). SEM images depicting surface holes (arrows) specific to the enterocytes of SE-challenged piglets (B). TEM micrographs showing shortened and disorganized microvilli (MV) and mitochondrial swelling (arrows) in challenged groups (C). High-magnification TEM images revealing severe mitochondrial damage, including vacuolated cristae (arrowheads), in the SE-challenged groups (D). Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
Figure 5.
Histological analysis of jejunal and ileal morphology. Representative hematoxylin-and-eosin (H&E)-stained sections of the jejunum and ileum of piglets in the control (CTR), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and low-, medium-, and high-dose Salmonella enterica (LSE, MSE, HSE)-challenged groups (A). The villus height, crypt depth and villus height to crypt depth (V/C) ratio of the jejunum (B–D) and ileum (E–G). Different letters (a, b, c, d) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
3.5. Number of Goblet Cells
In the jejunum and ileum, the number of goblet cells in villi and crypts was significantly lower in LPS and SE groups than in CTR (p < 0.05) (Figure 6).
Figure 6.
Goblet cell count in the jejunum. Representative histochemical images (Alcian Blue staining) of jejunal sections showing goblet cells in villi and crypts of jejunum and ileum of piglets in the control (CTR), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and low-, medium-, and high-dose Salmonella enterica (LSE, MSE, HSE)-challenged groups (A). Quantification of goblet cells in the villi and crypts of jejunum (B–D) and ileum (E–G). Different letters (a, b, c, d) above bars indicate statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
4. Discussion
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) remains a cornerstone for modeling intestinal inflammatory injury, particularly in simulating Gram-negative bacterial infections such as Salmonella enterica (SE) [2,3]. However, our findings demonstrate that the immunological and pathophysiological distinctions between purified endotoxin exposure and live bacterial invasion are substantial, especially in the intestinal compartment. We systematically evaluated these responses in weaned piglets and demonstrated that oral SE infection (optimally at 2 × 109 CFU) offers a complementary model. This model captures essential features of natural gut infection that LPS alone does not fully represent. The results of this study supported the utility of the SE model as a valuable adjunct to existing paradigms, particularly for studies focusing on intestinal pathology and sustained local immune activation.
The observed suppression of average daily gain (ADG) in both LPS- and SE-challenged piglets reflects the metabolic burden of systemic inflammation. This growth impairment likely stems from impaired nutrient absorption due to villus shortening and mitochondrial dysfunction [19], combined with pro-inflammatory cytokine-mediated anorexia [20]. Notably, SE infection induced more severe growth retardation and a unique reduction in colon length, aligning more closely with clinical reports of Salmonella-associated enteropathy characterized by persistent diarrhea and malabsorption [21]. The rectal temperature profiles further distinguished these stressors. LPS triggered a rapid, sharp hyperthermia (>40.5 °C at 8 h), characteristic of acute endotoxin shock mediated primarily via TLR4/MyD88-dependent signaling [22]. In contrast, SE elicited a more dose-dependent and sustained pyrexia, underscoring its engagement of multiple pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including NLRs and cytosolic sensors, a hallmark of live bacterial invasion [23].
The cytokine responses unveiled a fundamental divergence in immune activation kinetics. The response to LPS was biphasic: an early surge in TNF-α and IL-12 was followed by the sustained suppression of IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-8. This pattern is a classic manifestation of endotoxin tolerance, a compensatory mechanism that prevents uncontrolled inflammation [24]. This pattern starkly contrasts with the sustained, robust elevation of multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6 and IL-8, observed at 24 h post-SE infection, especially in the MSE group. This sustained response indicates persistent bacterial antigen presentation and inflammasome activation [25], more accurately mimicking the ongoing immune battle during a natural infection. Critically, the 2 × 109 CFU SE dose generated optimal and reproducible cytokine kinetics for modeling. The spatial heterogeneity in intestinal cytokines, with ileal IL-6 dominating in low-dose SE and jejunal IL-8 prevailing at higher doses, may reflect differential microbial density or epithelial Toll-like receptor expression along the intestinal tract [26]. The concurrent suppression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in both jejunum and ileum across challenged groups underscores a critical disruption of the anti-inflammatory feedback loop, likely permitting uncontrolled neutrophil infiltration via IL-8-mediated chemotaxis [27].
A key finding was the significantly reduced CD4+/CD8+ T cell ratios across peripheral blood and all examined lymphoid organs (thymus, spleen, mesenteric lymph nodes). This signifies a profound, systemic immunosuppression induced by both challenges. Mechanistically, TNF-α overexpression can promote CD4+ T cell apoptosis [28], while chemokine gradients may sequester CD8+ T cells at inflamed intestinal sites [29]. The observed thymic involvement suggests a potential disruption in T cell ontogeny [30]. Moreover, dysfunction in the mesenteric lymph nodes, which are critical for intestinal immune surveillance, would severely compromise local immune responses [31]. This multi-organ immune impairment heightens susceptibility to secondary infections, a finding with critical implications for swine health management.
While both LPS and SE induced common morphological injuries like villus blunting, reduced V/C ratio, and microvillus atrophy, SE infection uniquely caused severe ultrastructural lesions. The dose-dependent villus perforations and mitochondrial cristae vacuolization observed specifically in SE-challenged piglets indicated direct epithelial cytotoxicity that extends beyond the effects of purified endotoxin. These distinctive pathological features are consistent with the action of Salmonella’s type III secretion systems (T3SS), which are known to disrupt tight junctions by redistributing claudin-1 and occludin [32]. The observed depletion of goblet cells across challenged groups further compromises the mucus barrier, but this effect was amplified in a dose-dependent manner by SE infection, facilitating potential pathogen translocation.
Collectively, our data robustly establish that oral challenge with 2 × 109 CFU SE at 24 h post-infection constitutes a physiologically superior model for immune stress in weaned piglets. This model elicits severe and sustained systemic and intestinal immune activation, induces characteristic morphological damage in the gut, and leads to measurable growth suppression, thereby closely mimicking key features of natural infection. The resulting growth impairment and intestinal pathology translate directly into economic losses in swine production through reduced feed efficiency and increased morbidity. The optimized SE challenge model presented here offers a valuable platform for screening nutritional and therapeutic interventions aimed at mitigating such losses, ultimately supporting strategies to enhance gut health and improve productivity. It should be noted that while the sample size (n = 6 per group) followed established standards in porcine challenge models and was sufficient to detect significant differences in primary outcomes [33,34], a formal a priori power calculation was not conducted. Future studies applying this model, especially when evaluating interventions with subtler effects, would benefit from such calculations to strengthen experimental design. Finally, this study focused on acute responses within 36 h; longer-term observations would help clarify recovery dynamics and adaptive immunity. The model also remains to be tested with different Salmonella strains. Moving forward, this platform is well-suited for assessing feed additives, vaccines, and probiotics aimed at improving gut health. Deeper mechanistic insights could be gained by integrating transcriptomic or metabolomic approaches, and by evaluating specific interventions such as those targeting IL-10 pathway restoration [35] or mitochondrial integrity protection [36], with the goal of reducing post-weaning gastrointestinal morbidity in commercial swine production.
5. Conclusions
In summary, this study demonstrates that while both LPS challenge and Salmonella enterica (SE) infection induced immune stress in weaned piglets, oral SE infection provoked a more severe and comprehensive pathophysiological response. SE infection resulted in more pronounced growth impairment, sustained systemic inflammation, and profound intestinal damage, including distinctive lesions such as villus perforations and mitochondrial vacuolization not observed in the LPS model. Crucially, an oral dose of 2 × 109 CFU SE for 24 h was optimized to establish a robust and physiologically relevant immune stress model. This validated protocol provides a potential tool for future research on intestinal immunology and for evaluating nutritional and therapeutic interventions in weaned piglets.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Guoqiang Zhu from the College of Veterinary Medicine at Yangzhou University for generously providing the Salmonella enterica strain 50336.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani16020311/s1, Table S1: Composition and nutrient levels of basal diets (air-dry basis).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, L.D. and L.Y.; formal analysis, Z.L. and W.L.; investigation, L.D., Z.L., C.Z., W.L., H.Y. and J.L.; resources, L.Y.; data curation, L.D., Z.L., C.Z., J.L. and W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, L.D. and C.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.D. and H.W.; supervision, H.W. and L.Y.; funding acquisition, L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the journal and was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yangzhou University (Certification number: 202202086).
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent has been obtained from the owner of the animals.
Data Availability Statement
The data of the study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 32573262), National Natural Science Foundation of China for Youth (grant number 32302753) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Fang L.H., Jin Y.H., Do S.H., Hong J.S., Kim B.O., Han T.H., Kim Y.Y. Effects of dietary energy and crude protein levels on growth performance, blood profiles, and nutrient digestibility in weaning pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2018;32:556. doi: 10.5713/ajas.18.0294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bertani B., Ruiz N. Function and biogenesis of lipopolysaccharides. Ecosal Plus. 2018;8:e10-1128. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0001-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kayagaki N., Wong M.T., Stowe I.B., Ramani S.R., Gonzalez L.C., Akashi-Takamura S., Miyake K., Zhang J., Lee W.P., Muszyński A., et al. Noncanonical Inflammasome Activation by Intracellular LPS Independent of TLR4. Science. 2013;341:1246–1249. doi: 10.1126/science.1240248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wyns H., Plessers E., De Backer P., Meyer E., Croubels S. In vivo porcine lipopolysaccharide inflammation models to study immunomodulation of drugs. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2015;166:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu Y., Song M., Che T.M., Lee J.J., Bravo D., Maddox C.W., Pettigrew J.E. Dietary plant extracts modulate gene expression profiles in ileal mucosa of weaned pigs after an Escherichia coli infection. J. Anim. Sci. 2014;92:2050–2062. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Torrence M.E. Preharvest Food Safety. John Wiley & Sons; Washington, DC, USA: 2018. Introduction to preharvest food safety; pp. 1–17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh M., Vohra H., Kumar L., Ganguly N.K. Induction of systemic and mucosal immune response in mice immunised with porins of Salmonella typhi. J. Med. Microbiol. 1999;48:79–88. doi: 10.1099/00222615-48-1-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roy M.-F., Riendeau N., Bédard C., Hélie P., Min-Oo G., Turcotte K., Gros P., Canonne-Hergaux F., Malo D. Pyruvate kinase deficiency confers susceptibility to Salmonella typhimurium infection in mice. J. Exp. Med. 2007;204:2949–2961. doi: 10.1084/jem.20062606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hou H.Y., Zhu C.H., Lü J., Dong L.W., Zhu G.Q. In vitro adhesion of Salmonella enterica SEF14 fimbriae to intestinal epithelial cells IPEC-J2 and Caco-2. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2013;45:12–15. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Obianwuna U.E., Kalu N.A., Wang J., Zhang H., Qi G., Qiu K., Wu S. Recent Trends on Mitigative Effect of Probiotics on Oxidative-Stress-Induced Gut Dysfunction in Broilers under Necrotic Enteritis Challenge: A Review. Antioxidants. 2023;12:911. doi: 10.3390/antiox12040911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang H., Liu Y., Shi H., Wang X., Zhu H., Pi D., Leng W., Li S. Aspartate attenuates intestinal injury and inhibits TLR4 and NODs/NF-κB and p38 signaling in weaned pigs after LPS challenge. Eur. J. Nutr. 2016;56:1433–1443. doi: 10.1007/s00394-016-1189-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wen C., Chen D., Zhong R., Peng X. Animal models of inflammatory bowel disease: Category and evaluation indexes. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2023;12:goae021. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goae021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bescucci D.M., Moote P.E., Polo R.O., Uwiera R.R.E., Inglis G.D. Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Temporally Modulates the Enteric Microbiota and Host Responses to Overcome Colonization Resistance in Swine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020;86:e01569-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01569-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tang X., Xiong K., Fang R., Li M. Weaning stress and intestinal health of piglets: A review. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:1042778. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1042778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang L.H., Tian X.S., Guo Y., Zhou F.Z. Effects of CpG ODN on CD4+ and CD8+ T subpopulations in the immune response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome killed virus vaccine. Vaccine. 2006;24:1874–1883. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Takeuchi A., Sprinz H. Electron-microscope studies of experimental salmonella infection in preconditioned guinea pig: 2. Response of intestinal mucosa to invasion by Salmonella typhimurium. Am. J. Pathol. 1967;51:137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chaffey N. Review of Principles and techniques of electron microscopy: Biological applications. 4th ed, by MA. Hayat. [(accessed on 15 August 2021)];Ann. Bot. 2001 87:546–548. Available online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42770954. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Crawley S.W., Shifrin D.A., Grega-Larson N.E., McConnell R.E., Benesh A.E., Mao S., Zheng Y., Zheng Q.Y., Nam K.T., Millis B.A., et al. Intestinal Brush Border Assembly Driven by Protocadherin-Based Intermicrovillar Adhesion. Cell. 2014;157:433–446. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cao G., Yang S., Wang H., Zhang R., Wu Y., Liu J., Qiu K., Dong Y., Yue M. Effects of Bacillus licheniformis on the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, Ileal Morphology, Intestinal Short Chain Fatty Acids, and Colonic Microflora in Piglets Challenged with Lipopolysaccharide. Animals. 2023;13:2172. doi: 10.3390/ani13132172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xue J., Xie L., Liu B., Zhou L., Hu Y., Ajuwon K.M., Fang R. Dietary Supplementation of EGF Ameliorates the Negatively Effects of LPS on Early-Weaning Piglets: From Views of Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Microelement Absorption and Possible Mechanisms. Animals. 2021;11:1598. doi: 10.3390/ani11061598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim S.-J., Kim J.-H., Jun S.-Y., Paik H.R., Han J.-H. Protective effect of bacteriophages against Salmonella Typhimurium infection in weaned piglets. Korean J. Vet. Serv. 2014;37:35–43. doi: 10.7853/kjvs.2014.37.1.35. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gantner B.N., Simmons R.M., Canavera S.J., Akira S., Underhill D.M. Collaborative induction of inflammatory responses by dectin-1 and toll-like receptor 2. J. Exp. Med. 2003;197:1107–1117. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Islam M.A., Pröll M., Hölker M., Tholen E., Tesfaye D., Looft C., Schellander K., Cinar M.U. Alveolar macrophage phagocytic activity is enhanced with LPS priming, and combined stimulation of LPS and lipoteichoic acid synergistically induce pro-inflammatory cytokines in pigs. J. Endotoxin Res. 2013;19:631–643. doi: 10.1177/1753425913477166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mackensen A., Galanos C., Engelhardt R. Modulating activity of interferon-gamma on endotoxin-induced cytokine production in cancer patients. Blood. 1991;78:3254–3258. doi: 10.1182/blood.V78.12.3254.3254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kabanov D.S., Rykov V.A., Prokhorenko S.V., Murashev A.N., Prokhorenko I.R. In vivo Proinflammatory Cytokine Production by CD-1 Mice in Response to Equipotential Doses of Rhodobacter capsulatus PG and Salmonella enterica Lipopolysaccharides. Biochemistry. 2018;83:846–854. doi: 10.1134/S0006297918070088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hyland K.A., Brown D.R., Murtaugh M.P. Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis infection of the porcine jejunal Peyer’s patch rapidly induces IL-1β and IL-8 expression. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2006;109:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen X., Zheng A., Li S., Wang Z., Chen Z., Chen J., Zou Z., Liang H., Liu G. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Regulates the Keap1/Nrf2 Signaling Pathway to Improve the Intestinal (Caco-2 Cells and Chicken Jejunum) Oxidative Stress Response Induced by Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Antioxidants. 2024;13:1550. doi: 10.3390/antiox13121550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nagata T., Suzuki H., Ishigami N., Shinozuka J., Uetsuka K., Nakayama H., Doi K. Development of apoptosis and changes in lymphocyte subsetsin thymus, mesenteric lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches of mice orally inoculated with T-2 toxin. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2001;53:309–315. doi: 10.1078/0940-2993-00196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lis M., Szczypka M., Suszko A., Obmińska-Mrukowicz B. Influence of bestatin, an inhibitor of aminopeptidases, on T and B lymphocyte subsets in mice. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2011;14:393–403. doi: 10.2478/v10181-011-0059-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alfaro D., Muñoz J.J., García-Ceca J., Cejalvo T., Jiménez E., Zapata A. Alterations in the thymocyte phe-notype of EphB-deficient mice largely affect the double negative cell compartment. Immunology. 2008;124:509–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02828.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Casanova-Higes A., Marín-Alcalá C.M., Andrés-Barranco S., Cebollada-Solanas A., Alvarez J., Mainar-Jaime R.C. Weaned piglets: Another factor to be considered for the control of Salmonella infection in breeding pig farms. Vet. Res. 2019;50:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13567-019-0666-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Agredo-Palechor A., Gomez-Rosales S., de Angeles M.L., Perez-Alvarado A., Mariscal-Landin G. PSI-25 Improvements in the jejunal villus morphometry and increases in the number of goblet cells with the addition of humic substances from vermicompost in weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2024;102:692–693. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae234.781. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhu Q., Wang Y., Liu Y., Yu B., He J., Zheng P., Mao X., Huang Z., Luo J., Luo Y., et al. Effects of a Novel Protease on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Intestinal Health in Weaned Piglets. Animals. 2022;12:2803. doi: 10.3390/ani12202803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang Y., Wang Y., Chen D., Yu B., Zheng P., Mao X., Luo Y., Li Y., He J. Dietary chlorogenic acid supplementation affects gut morphology, antioxidant capacity and intestinal selected bacterial populations in weaned piglets. Food Funct. 2018;9:4968–4978. doi: 10.1039/C8FO01126E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kartika R., Purnamasari D., Pradipta S., Larasati R.A., Wibowo H. Impact of Low Interferon-γ and IL-10 Levels on TNF-α and IL-6 Production by PHA-Induced PBMCs in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Inflamm. Res. 2020;13:187–193. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S245064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lapointe J., Fortin E., Bergeron N., Lavergne L., Roy C., Deschêne K., Lessard M. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium induce mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation and oxidative stress conditions in porcine intestinal epithelial cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018;128:S106. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.10.255. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data of the study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.






