In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. The figure, as published, did not include the appropriate statistical information. We have revised the figure accordingly, and the corrected version of “Figure 1” is presented below. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Figure 1.
Adhesion and invasion (%) of S. lugdunensis to HaCaT cells after treatment with S. gummiferum-MeOH (0.5 MIC-MBC) compared to the untreated control (100%). Students t-test was used (GraphPad Prism 9.0.0.); the asterisks represent statistical significance *, p ≤ 0.05.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Reference
- 1.Zengin G., Stojković D., Mahomoodally M.F., Jugreet B.S., Paksoy M.Y., Ivanov M., Gašić U., Gallo M., Montesano D. Comprehensive Biological and Chemical Evaluation of Two Seseli Species (S. gummiferum and S. transcaucasicum) Antioxidants. 2021;10:1510. doi: 10.3390/antiox10101510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]