Skip to main content
BMC Public Health logoLink to BMC Public Health
. 2025 Nov 28;26:314. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-25430-0

Data science and artificial intelligence for maternal, newborn and child health: scoping review and thematic analysis

Joseph Akuze 1,2,#, Grieven P Otieno 3,#, Samson Yohannes Amare 4, Bancy Ngatia 1, Phillip Wanduru 2,5, Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou 6,7, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura 2,8, Agbessi Amouzou 7, Abiy Seifu Estifanos 9,10, Eric O Ohuma 1,
PMCID: PMC12838465  PMID: 41316063

Abstract

Introduction

In 2020, an estimated 287,000 women died in pregnancy or childbirth-related causes (70% in Africa), while 2.3 million newborns died in the first 28 days of life in 2022 (46% in Africa). The utility of data science and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in health has potential to contribute and accelerate innovation, improve data use for evidence-based decision making, and better planning for policy decision making.

Aim

To map the current landscape of data science and artificial intelligence applications in maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) across Africa and identify gaps, challenges, and opportunities for future implementation.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted following the Arksey and O’Malley framework across five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Ovid) and grey literature published before December 2023. Thematic analysis was conducted using previously published seven-domain framework to identify patterns in data science applications, challenges and opportunities. Additionally, projects within the maternal newborn and child health focus on the WHO’s Digital Health Initiatives Atlas were reviewed.

Results

Of 11,320 articles screened, 52 articles from 31 African countries met inclusion criteria. Most studies (n = 34, 65.4%) were from Eastern Africa. Most studies were research projects (n = 28, 53.8%) and demographic health surveys (n = 22, 43.1%) rather than operational implementation government programmes. Key themes identified included infrastructure challenges, data quality issues, limited workforce capacity, and heavy reliance on external funding. The WHO’s Digital Health Atlas revealed 659 data science initiatives across Africa with the earliest recorded in 2002. 316 (48%) projects were focussed on MNCH and were implemented in 44 African countries.

Conclusion

The limited application of data science and artificial intelligence in MNCH at the national level highlights a significant gap in Africa. Our review found that 28 studies (53.8%) were research projects compared to operational implementations integrated into routine systems to inform policy. Main barriers include inadequate infrastructure, limited data stewardship capacity, and insufficient government commitment. Opportunities exist through Africa’s youthful demographics, expanding mobile technology, and latecomer advantage in digital innovation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-025-25430-0.

Keywords: Data science, Artificial intelligence, Maternal health, Newborn health, Child health, Africa, Scoping review

Introduction

Data science is defined as “an interdisciplinary field of inquiry that merges scientific methodologies, algorithms, and systems to analyse both structured and unstructured data” [1]. Data science uses quantitative and analytical approaches, processes and systems to extract knowledge and insights from large and complex datasets and encompasses several topics, notably: big data, analytics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, digital technologies, informatics, modelling, mobile technologies and visualisation [2, 3].

In the maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) context, data science has the potential to transform our understanding and utilisation of health data for example in diagnosing and classifying newborn conditions, gestational age estimation, predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes and pattern recognition, ultimately leading to improved health outcomes [4]. As an extension of data science, artificial intelligence has increasingly gained recognition globally for its applicability to various disciplines including maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) [5, 6]. Reliable health information systems are essential for tracking MNCH indicators related to global initiatives such as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [7, 8], Every Woman Every Newborn Everywhere (EWENE) initiative (previously known as Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP)) [9], and the Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality (EPMM) initiative [10].

Despite several sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries demonstrating improvements in vaccine coverage, nutrition, healthcare access, family planning and skilled birth attendance since the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) between 1990-to-2015 [11, 12], SSA bears the highest burden for stillbirths (47% of the global 1.9 million stillbirths) and neonatal deaths (46% of the 2.3 million preventable neonatal deaths) [13, 14]. Since the MDGs era, slow progress has been observed in the rate reduction for stillbirth (2.3% per year), neonatal death rates (2.9% per year), under-five child deaths (4.3% per year) and maternal mortality (4.2% per year) [13, 15, 16], due to poor quality of care during pregnancy and during/at birth; limited preventive interventions and health workforce; inadequate social recognition of stillbirths’ impact on families [17]; measurement and data gaps challenges [18].

National data from African countries are often missing, incomplete, or of poor quality, thereby limiting the ability to monitor key health indicators [19, 20]. SSA countries rely on periodic household surveys like Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) to assess progress made towards international goals such as SDGs [21, 22]. The key barriers to robust data collection and utilisation include inadequate infrastructure, funding, inefficient management and operation of the health systems, inadequate and inequitable distribution of health workforce, poor planning and budgeting [23, 24]. In addition, most SSA countries do not have nationally implemented electronic health records. These shortcomings lead to non-evidence-based decision-making, hinder access to quality MNCH care and adverse outcomes [25].

To improve MNCH outcomes in Africa, it is essential to incorporate data science and Artificial Intelligence in health to help accelerate innovation and improve data use for evidence-based decision making, identification of where gaps lie for prioritisation of interventions, and better planning for policy [5, 12, 26]. Achieving this goal will require multifaceted collaborative efforts aimed at building and strengthening capacity, improving data infrastructure and data quality, increasing demand for data use across all levels of the health system, and developing robust information systems along with sound data governance and policies.

There is a significant opportunity to capitalise on Africa’s advancing digital infrastructure and internet connectivity, which have enabled the overwhelming success of financial technology entities such as mobile money services [27]. The rapid growth of mobile health technology (m-health) in Africa has resulted in the collection of vast amounts of data that will require advanced data science and artificial intelligence approaches to process and analyse. Evidence suggests that mobile health interventions can significantly enhance health service utilisation among women in the perinatal period [6, 28]. Therefore, highlighting the potential role that technology, data science, and artificial intelligence can play in accelerating progress towards MNCH targets and improving health outcomes is key.

Despite the increasing relevance and application of data science to health data in Africa, the specific impact on MNCH remains largely unexplored in SSA [19, 29]. This paper seeks to illuminate the extent to which data science and artificial intelligence has been utilised to solve key MNCH issues in Africa, explore any potential challenges and gaps hindering the wide application of data science for MNCH priorities, and explore the untapped potential that could be a contributor in accelerating data science applications for health in Africa. To achieve this, we follow a three-pronged approach. First, a scoping review to comprehensively map the existing landscape of data science applications in MNCH across Africa. Second, we analyse data on projects registered on the WHO Digital Health Initiatives Atlas and any relevant data science examples from Africa as case studies focusing on those utilising data science for MNCH in Africa [4]. We evaluate this systematically based on our previously published framework [4] encompassing seven domains: (i) Infrastructure and Systemic Challenges, (ii) Data Quality, (iii) Data Governance, Regulatory Dynamics and Policy, (iv) Technological Innovations and Digital Health, (v) Capacity Development, Human Capital and Opportunity (vi) Collaborative and Strategic Frameworks, and (vii) Recommendations for Implementation and Scaling (Supplementary Fig. 1). Finally, we synthesise the findings from the scoping review, WHO Digital Health Initiatives Atlas review, and case studies from Africa to highlight key issues and emerging themes, challenges and opportunities, offering insights into the future trajectory of data science in MNCH and provide recommendations for its effective implementation and scale-up.

Methods

Our scoping review protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) [4] and is published in BMJ Open [4]. To investigate and synthesise the transformative potential of data science in MNCH in Africa, we employed a two-pronged methodological approach: a summary and thematic analysis of scoping review process (Section 1a and 1b respectively), an overview and thematic analysis of data from the Digital Health Atlas (Section 2a and 2b respectively) and a discussion of results from the case studies and the overall landscape of data science in Africa. Each section was reviewed separately by a different reviewer. This approach allowed us to identify the existing gaps, challenges, opportunities and to offer recommendations for enhancing and integrating data science in MNCH initiatives.

Section 1a: scoping review summary

We conducted a scoping review based on the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley [30] to explore the utilisation of data science in addressing MNCH priority questions in Africa. This framework was chosen due to the evolving nature of data science in Africa and its limited documentation, details of which are presented in our scoping review protocol [4].

Operationalisation of Arskey and O’malley framework for scoping reviews

Following the five stages of the Arksey and O’Malley framework [30], we (1) identified research questions focussed on data science applications in MNCH across Africa; (2) identified relevant studies through systematic database and website searches; (3) selected studies based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and (4) collated and summarised results through thematic analyses using our seven-domain framework that was published in our protocol paper [4].

As outlined in our published protocol, our scoping review focus is maternal, newborn, child health populations in African countries (Population), data science and artificial intelligence applications notably, machine learning, big data analytics, and digital health technologies (Concept) and African healthcare settings including clinical, community and national health system levels across all 54 African countries (Context), therefore using a population concept and context framework.

Data sources and search strategy

A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Ovid. We also searched the reference lists, reports, and grey literature sources including WHO and African Union reports, government publications and organisational websites (Data Science for Health Discovery and Innovation in Africa (DS-I Africa), WHO’s Digital health atlas and Data Science Africa). The search terms focussed on the intersection of data science and MNCH components (maternal health, neonatal health, child health and perinatal) within the African context (All 54 African countries were eligible for inclusion). Key search terms included combinations of: ‘data science,’ ‘artificial intelligence,’ ‘machine learning,’ ‘maternal health,’ ‘newborn,’ ‘child health,’ and African country names. The search covered publications from inception to December 2023. Boolean operators “OR” and “AND” were used. Our complete search strategy is provided in Supplementary Table S1 for detailed search terms.

Study screening and selection

The screening and selection process involved several steps: (a) removal of duplicates, (b) review of the titles, (c) review of the executive summaries or abstract, and (d) review of full texts. Three reviewers were involved in the study screening process. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved through discussion, with a third reviewer (EOO) consulted when consensus could not be reached.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Inclusion

We included articles that employed data science methods (machine learning, AI, big data analytics) to address MNCH indicators in Africa (including from African populations) and described their analytical approaches and performance. Peer reviewed articles and grey literature were included.

Exclusion

Articles in languages other than English, as well as systematic reviews, scoping reviews, books, book chapters, studies without clear data science methodology and those not focussed on MNCH outcomes were excluded.

Data extraction and analysis

Data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) (Supplementary Table 2) [31]. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers using standardised forms developed priori. One reviewer extracted data from the peer-reviewed articles and using Rayyan software [32] for data management. The second reviewer focussed on extracting and analysing data from the grey literature. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion. The data we extracted included characteristics such as author, year, organisation, population, country, donor, study aims and objectives, study design or methods and approaches used, context, intervention (type, duration, recipients), key concepts and comparisons made and main findings. The extracted data were collated in Microsoft Excel [33].

Section 1b: thematic analysis of scoping review: case studies and landscape overview

To provide a nuanced understanding of the practical application and impacts of data science in MNCH in Africa, we conducted an in-depth review of illustrative case studies. Additionally, we conducted a landscape overview to place these case studies within the broader context of data science in Africa using our published seven domains outlined in our conceptual framework (Figure S1) [4], which encompasses infrastructure and systemic challenges, data quality, governance and policy, technological innovations, capacity development, collaborations, and recommendations for implementation and scaling. The case study analysis aimed to highlight successful applications, identify common challenges and barriers, and showcase innovative approaches to leveraging data science for MNCH improvement in Africa.

Sections 2a-2b: overview and thematic analysis of who’s digital health initiatives atlas

The third reviewer assessed projects registered on WHO’s Digital Health Initiatives Atlas [34] from 1970-to-2024 that focussed on MNCH in Africa. The projects were identified using keywords such as “pregnancy”, “breastfeeding”, “childbirth”, “birth registration”, “antenatal care”, “child health”, “family planning” and “maternal health”. Projects with MNCH components were classified as an MNCH Data Science initiative. We analysed data to identify countries leading in Data Science utilisation for healthcare generally and MNCH. The analysis focussed on the project’s overall background, involvement of donors, financial support from the government, use of software programmes, and challenges in carrying out the project. Descriptive statistics were conducted for analysis. We reviewed and synthesised the data using our MNCH data science framework with seven domains. All data analyses were conducted using Stata version 18.0 [35], Microsoft Excel 365 [33] and Quantum GIS version 3.36.2 [36].

Results

This scoping review addressed six research questions as outlined in our published protocol and Fig. 1: (1) Where have data science projects and initiatives in MNCH been implemented in Africa? (2) What are the experiences and practices of data science in MNCH within Africa to improve MNCH outcomes? (3) What are the existing gaps and opportunities in using data science in MNCH in Africa? (4) How can we leverage identified gaps and opportunities to advance data science in MNCH in Africa? (5) What is the future trajectory of data science in MNCH in Africa? (6) What are the opportunities and challenges for effective use and scale-up of data science to optimise decision-making and improve MNCH outcomes in Africa?

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overview of the study selection process and research questions. PRISMA flow diagram showing the scoping review research questions and methodology for identifying and selecting studies on data science applications in maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) in Africa. The process began with 11,320 records (11,314 records identified through database searching and six grey literature). Fifty two articles were included for full review after systematic screening and exclusion criteria were applied. The six research questions addressed by the review are shown on the right, covering implementation patterns, experiences and practices, gaps and opportunities, leveraging identified opportunities, future trajectories, and scale-up challenges for data science in MNCH across Africa

Section 1a: overview of results from the scoping review

Selection of sources and evidence

We conducted a comprehensive literature search across five major databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science, and grey literature resulting in 11,320 hits. After removing 1,878 (16.6%) duplicates, 9,442 articles remained for screening by title and abstract. Of these, 9,352 (99%) articles were excluded for failing to meet the inclusion criteria, primarily due to lack of focus on MNCH or did not have a data science focus. The remaining 90 articles (< 1%) underwent full text review. Of these, 38 articles were excluded–for being out of scope (n = 34) and four for being the wrong publication type (e.g., opinion pieces)–resulting in 52 articles included in the final scoping review (Fig. 1).

Characteristics of included studies

The 52 studies reviewed were published between 2016 and 2024 and increased each year from 2016 to 2024 (Supplementary Figures S2a and S2b). Most MNCH data science related studies conducted in Africa were not led by African authors, notably 13 studies (25.5%) had first author from the USA, followed by Ethiopia with 12 studies (23.5%). Other countries included Tanzania with 4 studies (7.8%), the UK with 3 studies (5.9%), and Ghana, India, Kenya, Uganda, and Zambia, each contributing 2 studies (3.9%). An additional 9 studies (17.6%) were contributed by authors from a range of other non-African countries, collectively grouped as “Others” (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary characteristics of included studies (n=52)

Study characteristics Number of studies n (%) Study References
First Author's Country  n=52
 USA 13 (25.0%) [3749]
 Ethiopia 12 (23.1%) [5061]
 Tanzania 4 (7.7%) [6265]
 Uganda 3 (5.8%) [6668]
 Ghana 3 (5.8%) [6971]
 India 2 (3.8%) [72, 73]
 Kenya 2 (3.8%) [74, 75]
 UK 2 (3.8%) [76, 77]
 Zambia 2 (3.8%) [78, 79]
 Others* 9 (17.3%) [8088]
Regions of countries where studies were conducted  n=52
 Eastern: Zanzibar, Ethiopia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, Rwanda, Tanzania, Kenya, Zambia, Malawi 34 (65.4%) [37, 4044, 5068, 72, 75, 77, 79, 82, 84, 8688]
 Multiple countries and regions: Tanzania, Zambia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Ghana, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Cote d'Ivoire, Guinea, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Zimbabwe, Chad, South Africa, Sierra Leone, Mauritania, Liberia, Gambia, USA 11 (21.2%) [39, 4548, 73, 74, 76, 83, 85]
 Southern: South Africa 2 (3.8%) [49, 78]
 Western: Ghana 3 (5.8%) [6971]
 Northern: Morocco 1 (1.9%) [80]
Funding  n=52
 Funded 27 (51.9%) [3739, 41, 42, 44, 47, 48, 51, 52, 55, 6267, 7274, 76, 78, 80, 82, 83, 87, 88]
 Not Funded 15 (28.8%) [40, 43, 53, 54, 56, 58, 60, 61, 6971, 75, 79, 81, 85, 86]
 Not Indicated 10 (19.2%) [45, 46, 49, 50, 57, 59, 68, 77, 84]
Data Source  n=52
 Study 28 (53.8%) [37, 38, 41, 42, 4447, 49, 50, 62, 64, 65, 6770, 72, 73, 7578, 8082, 88]
 Demographic Health Survey (DHS) 22 (42.3%) [39, 40, 43, 48, 5161, 66, 74, 79, 8385, 87]
 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 1 (1.9%) [63]
 Short Term Government Programme 1 (1.9%) [86]
MNCH Thematic Area  n=52
 Child Health and Morbidity 8 (15.4%) [37, 38, 50, 66, 67, 76, 80, 81]
 Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality 6 (11.5%) [5153, 62, 74, 82]
 Maternal and Child Mortality 5 (9.6%) [39, 40, 69, 83, 84]
 Estimation of gestational age 5 (9.6%) [41, 42, 72, 73, 77]
 Maternal and Child Nutrition 5 (9.6%) [43, 54, 55, 70, 85]
 Maternal Health and Morbidity 5 (9.6%) [44, 45, 5658]
 Child birth and delivery 5 (9.6%) [46, 59, 63, 64, 86]
 Preterm birth and birthweight 3 (5.8%) [47, 60, 78]
 Universal health coverage and service delivery 3 (5.8%) [61, 71, 75]
 Stunting 2 (3.8%) [79, 87]
 Vaccination 2 (3.8%) [48, 68]
 Others (RMNCHN, Pregnancy outcomes and Ultrasound image classification 3 (5.8%) [49, 65, 88]

The reviewed studies were conducted in 31 African countries, across several African regions (defined by the United Nations geoscheme for regional classification). The Eastern Africa region had the largest representation (34 studies (65.4%, 9 countries). Studies involving multiple countries and regions constituted 11 studies (21.5%) from 29 countries (26 were African, two were Asian and one North American countries) (Table 1). Twenty-seven (52%) studies were funded, whereas fifteen (29%) reported no external funding and ten studies (19%) did not indicate any funding information (Table 1 and supplementary Table S3). The majority of the reviewed articles were either studies (53.8%, n = 28) or national demographic health surveys (DHS) (42.3%, n = 22) rather than operational implementation in routine health systems (Table 1).

Focus on MNCH thematic area and outcomes

Most articles included in our review assessed various MNCH outcomes, notably child health and morbidity (15.4%, n = 8) [37, 38, 50, 66, 67, 76, 80, 81], neonatal and perinatal mortality (11.5%, n = 6) [5153, 62, 74, 82], maternal and child mortality (9.6%, n = 5) [39, 40, 69, 83, 84], estimation of gestational age (9.6%, n = 5) [41, 42, 72, 73, 77], maternal and child nutrition (9.6%, n = 5) [43, 54, 55, 70, 85], maternal health and morbidity (9.6%, n = 5) [44, 45, 5658], childbirth and delivery (9.6%, n = 5) [46, 59, 63, 64, 86], preterm birth and birthweight (5.8%, n = 3) [47, 60, 78], universal health coverage and service delivery (5.8%, n = 3) [61, 71, 75], stunting (3.8%, n = 2) [79, 87], vaccination (3.8%, n = 2) (i.e., DPT for Mali and Nigerian study and not specified for Ugandan Study) [48, 68], pregnancy outcomes (1.9%, n = 1) [49], reproductive, maternal, newborn, child health and nutrition (RMNCHN) (1.9%, n = 1) [65] and Ultrasound image processing (1.9%, n = 1) [88] (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 2.

Main characteristics of included studies on use of data science in MNCH (n=52)

First Author Year Journal First Author’s country Article type Outcome MNCH thematic areas Study Aim Analytical methods used** Data source Funding Source Study references
Nasejje & Mwambi 2022 BMJ South Africa Journal Article u5MR Maternal and child Mortality predict U5MR Random Forest, Neural Network DHS sub-Saharan Africa Consortium for Advanced Biostatistics training (SSACAB) grant as part of the DELTAS Africa Initiative  [83]
Mboya 2020 BMJ Tanzania Journal Article perinatal death Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality determine key predictors of perinatal death Random Forest, Neural Network, Naïve Bayes, Bagged Trees Study GSK Africa Non-Communicable Disease Open Lab through the DELTAS Africa Sub-Saharan African Consortium for Advanced Biostatistics (SSACAB) [62]
Robi & Sitote 2023 Hindawi Ethiopia Journal Article neonatal infections Child Health and morbidity To apply a classification stacking model for the following four main neonatal diseases: sepsis, birth asphyxia, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and respiratory distress syndrome Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine Study Not indicated [50]
Ndagijimana 2023 JPMPH Rwanda Journal Article Stunting Stunting To develop a prediction model for stunting Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes DHS World Bank funding (ID: ESC 91) through African Centre of Excellence in Data Science, University of Rwanda [87]
Dejene 2022 BMC Ethiopia Journal Article Maternal Anaemia Maternal Health and Morbidity Predict level of anaemia among pregnant women Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision Trees, Cat Boost DHS None [56]
Aung 2019 GHRP Tanzania Journal Article RMNCHN RMNCHN characterize data visualization interpretation capacity Data visualisation study Not indicated [65]
Fredriksson 2022 Frontiers in Digital Health Zanzibar Journal Article location of delivery Delivery Build a prediction model Random Forest, Neural Network, LASSO Regression Uzazi Salama government programme None [86]
Chilyabanyama 2022 MDPI Zambia Journal Article Stunting Stunting Predict stunting among children Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine DHS None [79]
Awadh 2021 Kenya Thesis UHC Universal health coverage and service delivery Role of health information systems in obtaining universal health coverage Data visualisation Study None [75]
Tarimo 2021 BMJ Open Tanzania Journal Article Labour induction Delivery To Identify predictors of labour induction Random Forest, Neural Network, Naïve Bayes Hospital Registry Research on CDC-Hospital-Community Trinity Coordinated Prevention and Control System for Major Infectious Diseases, Zhengzhou University  [63]
Hazlett 2023 Nature USA Journal Article Infant mortality Maternal and child Mortality To estimate risk for infant mortality Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Kernel Cross validation, Elastic-Net DHS Not indicated [39]
Fenta 2021 BMC Ethiopia Journal Article Under 5 undernutrition Maternal and child nutrition Predict under-five undernutrition Random Forest, Neural Network, LASSO Regression, Ridge Regression DHS None [54]
Espinosa 2023 Science Advances USA Journal Article Preterm birth Preterm birth and birthweight To identify signatures for maternal covariates affecting preterm birth Extreme Gradient Boosting Study Not indicated [47]
Kebede 2023 BMC Ethiopia Journal Article Contraceptive discontinuation Maternal Health and Morbidity To predict and determine the predictors for contraceptive discontinuation in Ethiopia Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbours, AdaBoost DHS Not indicated [57]
Khan & Yunus 2023 Nutrition Malaysia Journal article under 5 malnutrition Maternal and child nutrition To develop a majority voting-based hybrid ensemble learning model to accelerate prediction accuracy of malnutrition data of under-five children Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision Trees, k-Nearest Neighbours DHS None [85]
Tsai 2023 Heliyon USA Journal Article algorithm vulnerability Child Health and morbidity To evaluate algorithm's vulnerability to adversarial attacks Random Forest, Neural Network, LASSO Regression Study Harvard Data Science Initiative  [37]
Kananura 2022 PLOS Uganda Journal Article Acute respiratory infections; diarrhoea Child Health and morbidity To identify predictors of pneumonia and diarrhoea Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, LASSO Regression, Bagged Trees DHS Not indicated [66]
Syed 2019 JAMA USA Journal Article Disease classification Child Health and morbidity To develop a convolution neural network to enhance detection of pathologic morphological features comparing diseased to healthy duodenal tissue Neural Network, LASSO Regression Study Not indicated [38]
Ganguli and Wagner 2024 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology USA Abstract risk for caesarean delivery Delivery To develop an objective, individualized risk prediction model for caesarean delivery using machine learning (ML) models trained on routine prenatal data. Extreme Gradient Boosting study Not indicated [46]
Lee 2023 JAMA USA Journal Article Gestational age Estimation of Gestational age To develop artificial intelligence (AI) models to estimate GA Neural Network study Google LLC; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [77]

The Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) Gestational

Age Study Group and Aftab

2021 BMJ Global Health India Journal Article Gestational age Estimation of Gestational age To develop and validate programmatically feasible and accurate approaches to estimate newborn gestational age (GA) in low resource settings Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine Study Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [73]
Anku & Duah 2024 PLoS ONE Ghana Journal Article under 5 malnutrition Maternal and child nutrition To use machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict undernutrition and identify its associated factors Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, LASSO Regression, Ridge Regression study None [70]
Bekele 2022 BMC Medical informatics and Decision Making Ethiopia Journal Article low birth weight Preterm birth and birthweight To predict LBW in Ethiopia Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Decision Trees, Naïve Bayes, k-Nearest Neighbours DHS None [60]
Biswas 2023 BMJ Global Health USA Journal Article zero dose vaccination Vaccination To examine how well predictive algorithms can characterise an individual child’s risk of being ZD Decision Trees, k-Nearest Neighbours, Ridge Regression DHS GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance [48]
Bitew 2020 Journal of Population Sciences USA Journal Article under 5 mortality Maternal and child Mortality To predict important under-five mortality risks in Ethiopia Random Forest, k-Nearest Neighbours DHS None [40]
Bitew 2022 Public Health Nutrition USA Journal Article Under 5 undernutrition Maternal and child nutrition To estimate predictive algorithms for the determinants of childhood stunting Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Neural Network, k-Nearest Neighbours DHS None [43]
Bogale 2022 BMC Medical informatics and Decision Making Ethiopia Journal Article maternal health Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality To predict perinatal mortality based on maternal health status and health insurance service using homogeneous ensemble machine learning methods Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Cat Boost DHS University of Gondar research and community service vice president's office. [51]
Demsash 2023 PLOS ONE Ethiopia Journal Article childhood vaccination Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality To predict perinatal mortality based on maternal health status and health insurance service using homogeneous ensemble machine learning methods Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, AdaBoost, J48 classifier algorithm DHS None [53]
Dereje 2021 IEEE Xplore Ethiopia conference paper neonatal mortality Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality To investigate risk factors and predict neonatal and infant mortality based on maternal data Bagged Trees, AdaBoost DHS Not stated [52]
Gebeye 2024 Nutrition methodology Ethiopia Journal Article childhood nutrition Maternal and child nutrition To identify important predictors of MN deficiency among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia using machine learning algorithms. Random Forest, Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes DHS Wollo University research and community service vice president’s office. [55]
Gough 2021 eBioNedicine USA Journal Article gestational age, birth weight, neonatal growth Estimation of Gestational age To predict gestational age, birth weight and neonatal growth in rural Zimbabwe Extreme Gradient Boosting study Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Department for International Development, Wellcome Trust, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, US National Institutes of Health, and UNICEF [42]
Jeddi 2021 Healthcare (Basel) Morocco Journal Article childhood asthma Child Health and morbidity to predict the occurrence of childhood asthma using data from a prospective study of 202 children with and without asthma Support Vector Machine, Decision Trees study Belgium Ministry of cooperation through the VLIR UOS programme [80]
Kovacs 2021 BMC pediatrics Scotland Journal Article neonatal mortality Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality to provide a tool that provides clinically relevant cut-offs for predicting mortality that is easily used by clinicians in a low-resource setting Decision Trees study Antimicrobial Resistance Cross-Council Initiative through a grant from the Medical Research Council; National Institute for Health Research [48]
Kwizera 2019 Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Uganda Journal Article childhood mortality Child Health and morbidity To deploy machine learning tools (random forests) to develop a model that reliably predicts hospital mortality in children with acute infections Random Forest study Not indicated [67]
Lee 2023 NPJ Digital medicine UK journal Article fetal gestational age Estimation of Gestational age to estimate gestational age using only image analysis of standard ultrasound planes, without any measurement information.  Neural Network study Not indicated [41]
Li 2023 European Journal of Medical Research China journal Article childhood cerebral malaria Child Health and morbidity to study the molecular biological functions, signalling pathway changes and biological targets in the process of CM infection Support Vector Machine, LASSO Regression study None [81]
Mamo 2024 BMC Women's Health Ethiopia Journal Article unintended pregnancy Maternal Health and Morbidity to assess the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms in predicting unintended pregnancy in Ethiopia and to identify the key predictors Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision Trees, Extra Tree classification DHS None [58]
Mbunge 2023 IEEE Xplore Zimbabwe Conference paper child mortality Maternal and child Mortality To use machine learning techniques to predict child mortality Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Decision Trees DHS Not indicated [84]
Mulugeta 2023 IEEE Xplore Ethiopia conference paper delivery date Delivery Determine key predictors of perinatal death Random Forest, Neural Network DHS Not indicated [59]
Murnane 2021 Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndrome USA journal Article viremia Maternal Health and Morbidity To predict viremia to facilitate targeted adherence support in sub-Saharan Africa LASSO Regression study Not indicated [45]
Nareeba 2020 International Journal of Infectious Diseases Uganda journal Article childhood immunization Vaccination To understand the determinants of childhood immunization in a rural Uganda using a machine learning method of Classification and Regression Tree Decision Trees study Not indicated [68]
Naydenova 2016 Journal of the royal society interface UK journal Article childhood pneumonia Child Health and morbidity To develop a suite of data mining tools that facilitate automated diagnosis through quantifiable features Random Forest, Support Vector Machine study EPSRC and the RCUK Digital Economy Programme, Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship at the University of Oxford, Wellcome Trust [76]
Nti & Owusu-Boadu 2022 Smart Health Ghana journal Article maternal mortality Maternal and child Mortality To establish an intelligent machine learning-based system for effectively monitoring and predicting pregnant women's risk levels Extreme Gradient Boosting Study None [69]
Ogallo 2021 AMIA Annu Symp Proc Kenya journal Article neonatal mortality Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality identifying the factors associated with neonatal mortality Decision Trees DHS Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [74]
Petersen 2023 Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology USA journal Article adverse pregnancy outcomes Pregnancy ouctomes to investigate associations between co-occurring placental features and adverse pregnancy outcomes in a prospective cohort of singletons k-Nearest Neighbours Study Not indicated [49]
Rittenhouse 2019 PLOS ONE Zambia journal Article identification of preterm newborn identification Preterm birth and birthweight to leverage machine learning algorithms incorporating maternal factors associated with SGA to improve accuracy of preterm newborn identification in LMIC settings Data visualisation study Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant to the Global Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth [78]
Sazawal 2022 Journal of global health India journal Article Gestational age Estimation of Gestational age Data visualisation study Bill & Melinda gates foundation [72]
Sendra-Balcells 2023 Nature scientific reports Spain journal Article fetal ultrasound Ultrasound image processing  investigating the transferability of AI models trained in high-income settings and their applicability to process images acquired in low-income settings Neural Network study European Union's 2020 research and innovation programme [88]
Shah 2023 Frontiers in Digital Health USA Journal Article postpartum hemorrhage Maternal Health and Morbidity to predict the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage using machine learning models based on antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal visit data  Random Forest, Decision Trees, Naïve Bayes study Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [44]
Tarimo 2021 Risk Management Healthcare policy Tanzania Journal Article Apgar score Delivery to establish the most efficient boosting method in predicting neonatal low Apgar scores following labour induction intervention Extreme Gradient Boosting study Research on CDC-Hospital-Community Trinity Coordinated Prevention and Control System for Major Infectious Diseases, Zhengzhou University  [64]
Tesfaye 2019 BMC Medical informatics and Decision Making Ethiopia journal Article skilled delivery service use Universal health coverage and service delivery to identify determinants and develop a predictive model for skilled delivery service use in Ethiopia by applying logistic regression and machine-learning techniques Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes DHS None [61]
Boadu 2021 BioMed Research International Ghana Journal Article healthcare delivery Universal health coverage and service delivery To assess healthcare providers attitude towards LHIMS system for service provision Data visualisation study None [71]

**Random Forest (n=28, 53.8%), Extreme Gradient Boosting (n=20, 38.5%), Neural Network (n=15, 28.8%), Support Vector Machine (n=12, 23.1%), Decision Trees (n=11, 21.2%), Naïve Bayes (n=9, 17.3%), LASSO Regression (n=8, 15.4%), k-Nearest Neighbors (n=7, 13.5%), Bagged Trees (n=3, 5.8%), AdaBoost (n=3, 5.8%), Ridge Regression (n=3, 5.8%), Other: Cat Boost, Kernel Cross validation, J48 classifier algorithm, Extra Tree classification, Elastic-Net and Data visualisation (n=11, 21.2%)

Data management, modelling and analytical approaches

The studies employed a broad array of machine learning approaches to support MNCH research. The most frequently used techniques included Random Forest (n = 28, 53.8%), Extreme Gradient Boosting (n = 20, 38.5%), Neural Networks (n = 15, 28.8%), Support Vector Machines (n = 12, 23.1%), Decision Trees (n = 11, 21.2%), Naïve Bayes (n = 9, 17.3%), the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression (n = 8, 15.4%), k-Nearest Neighbors (n = 7, 13.5%), Bagged Trees (n = 3, 5.8%), AdaBoost (n = 3, 5.8%), Ridge Regression (n = 3, 5.8%), Other: Cat Boost, Kernel Cross validation, J48 classifier algorithm, Extra Tree classification, Elastic-Net and Data visualisation (n = 11, 21.2%) (Table 2).

Section 1b: thematic analysis of results from the scoping review

In Africa, application of data science within MNCH reflects varied advancements and persistent challenges. We examined case studies according to seven domains previously defined in our published scoping review [4].

Domain I: infrastructure and systemic challenges

Most African countries have DHIS2, however, Mozambique [89, 90] and Kenya [91] have pioneered the deployment of the DHIS2 platform for national and subnational data aggregation, focusing on health indicators like preterm birth and low birth weight [8991]. Most African countries utilise the DHIS2 platform to mostly capture aggregated data, although individual-level data collection is being explored [91]. Besides DHIS2, efforts in Nigeria [92, 93] and Ghana [94] have shown progress through development and utilisation of individual-level electronic health record systems, however, barriers such as fragmented digital ecosystems that work in silos with no unified plans for full national integration.

Domain II: data quality

While Mozambique and Kenya utilise DHIS2 primarily for aggregate data [8991], Nigeria has experimented with patient-level data collection in tertiary hospitals, though this has not scaled nationwide [92, 93]. In Ghana, the Lightwave Hospital Information Management System (LHIMS) was introduced in 2017 to improve patient records management, however, challenges with consistent implementation due to electricity load shedding, poor internet connectivity, and inadequate logistics leads to a partial return to paper-based systems which affects data completeness [71], underscoring the need for enhanced digital infrastructure and policies supporting reliable data capture [94, 95].

Domain III: data governance, regulatory dynamics, and policy

Governance and policy frameworks differ significantly across the continent, influencing the governance of MNCH data science projects. Ghana’s e-Health strategy, introduced in 2010, aimed at strengthening data governance through a centralised LHIMS in all teaching hospitals in the country to improve patient records has encountered user acceptance issues that have limited its impact [71, 94, 95]. Similarly, Nigeria’s integration of patient-level data within tertiary hospitals demonstrates potential for data governance but requires broader policy support to reach nationwide implementation [92].

Domain IV: technological innovations and digital health

Several African countries are implementing unique digital tools to bridge healthcare gaps. For example, different digital tools were implemented in Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania, Kenya and Ghana (i.e., Enketo, ODK, RapidSMS, RapidPro, SMS, Native Android, Medic Mobile, CouchDB, iHRIS, Web, REDcap, LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), SmartHIS, Postgres, and Python) (Table 3). The Western Cape in South Africa has created a digital health ecosystem, although the lack of a unified approach in other provinces in South Africa illustrates challenges in establishing a unified national electronic health record system [9699].

Table 3.

Summary of country case studies from the WHO’s digital health atlas

Attributes Ethiopia Nigeria Kenya Uganda Tanzania Malawi Zambia Ghana
Digital health attributes
Number of projects 90 37 64 51 39 58 16 12
Number of MNCH focussed projects 11 (12%) 19 (51%) 34 (53%) 27 (53%) 29 (74%) 28 (48%) 11 (69%) 5 (42%)
Examples of project safe delivery app to guide skilled health workers on Basic Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care, vital events registration, data collection childhood vaccinations, pregnancy, birth and postpartum care, registration of births and health promotion, data collection. eHealth and MNCH advice, digital payments, vaccinations, pregnancy registration and tracking ANC visits, and data collection mHealth and MNCH trainings and advice, dashboards and visualisation, clinical decision making, communication and reminders, digital payments and MNCH data collection mHealth and MNCH advice, vaccination, appointments, data collection community-based decision support, pregnancy registration, communication, care-follow-up and referrals MNCH registration and data collection, vaccinations, programme decision making, and communications diagnostics, communication, vaccinations
Data science domains
Domain I: Infrastructure & Systemic Challenges Strong National coverage and international support (Izumi Foundation, Gates) National-level coverage limited, individual-state projects Strong county/national/multi-country coverage Village to national implementation, strong telecom networks Smallest units to national-level, multi-country projects Government and donor-funded, multi-tiered implementation Substantial donor support, government involvement Government involved, some advancements in eHealth infrastructure
Domain II: Data Quality Poor data quality, insufficient data utilization Communication barriers, inadequate health worker motivation Limited data utilization, high operational costs Poor data quality, inadequate patient engagement Poor guideline adherence, logistical issues Delayed event reporting, poor health worker motivation Poor data quality, health worker competence challenges Poor data quality, insufficient worker competence
Domain III: Data Governance, Regulatory Dynamics, Policy Strong government involvement in 10 (91%) of initiatives Government supports 52% of projects 62% of projects funded by government 74% of projects funded by government Government funds 62% of projects 64% government involvement 100% government-funded MNCH projects 80% government involvement
Domain IV: Technological Innovations & Digital Health Use of IVR, DHIS 2, and OppiaMobile AWS, Commcare, DHIS 2 DHIS 2, Community Health Toolkit, mobile/web apps Commcare, Enketo, mobile platforms Commcare, OpenSRP, SMS MVTK, DHIS 2, mobile technologies DHIS 2, OpenSRP, iHRIS, custom-built software Blood Safety Info System, Carely Digital Health Platform
Domain V: Capacity Development, Human Capital, Opportunity Substantial training of health workers Training gaps, competence issues Expanding capacity but hindered by high costs Training and supervision gaps Insufficient supervision of health workers Delayed event reporting Insufficient health worker competence Limited health worker competence and engagement
Domain VI: Collaborative and Strategic Frameworks International collaboration (WEEMA, Gates, etc.) Collaboration with USAID, Gates Collaboration with Grand Challenges Canada, CDC Collaboration with Gates Foundation, CDC, Gavi Collaboration with Gates, USAID, Gavi Collaboration with Save the Children, World Bank, Skoll Collaboration with UNICEF, DFID, Gates Collaboration with CDC, Gates, DFID
Domain VII: Recommendations for Implementation & Scaling Expand data utilization, improve service continuity Improve health worker competence, better communication Address operational costs, reach underserved areas Address patient engagement, improve data quality Improve supervision, address logistical issues Improve event reporting, better health worker motivation Address data quality, service delivery gaps Improve health worker competence, expand eHealth solutions
Challenges Poor data quality, service continuity issues Health worker competence, communication barriers, motivation Limited data use, operational costs Poor patient engagement, data quality issues Logistical challenges, inadequate supervision, motivation Delayed reporting, low worker motivation Poor data quality, health worker competence issues Poor data quality, worker competence gaps

Domain V: capacity development, human capital, and opportunity

Kenya’s capacity development is advancing through initiatives such as the AMPATH programme, which supports workforce training across 300 + public health facilities [100, 101]. However, countries like Nigeria and Tanzania continue to face challenges related to training gaps and workforce motivation, constraining the effective application of data science in MNCH projects (Table 3).

Domain VI: collaborative and strategic frameworks

Collaborations underscore the role of external support in building robust data systems, for example, in Mozambique, DHIS2-SISMA was implemented through partnerships with international NGOs [8991], while Ghana’s LHIMS and e-Health strategy benefited from collaborations with nursing and midwifery schools, WHO and other global health entities.

Domain VII: recommendations for implementation and scaling

Scaling and implementation of data science initiatives and innovations for MNCH requires strong resource allocation, governmental support, and adaptable technologies. Kenya and Uganda showcase scalable multi-level implementations of data science initiatives and DHIS2 systems to include all health facilities (public and private) and communities, but further scalability across the continent requires improved infrastructure, workforce development, and sustained funding to ensure broader impact in MNCH interventions.

Section 2a: overview of results from the WHO’s digital health initiatives atlas database

We identified 659 data science projects implemented across 54 African nations, with 316 (48%) of these initiatives focussed on MNCH. These MNCH-focussed projects were implemented in 44 (82%) African countries Table 3, Supplementary Table S3 and Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Distribution of data science initiatives in Africa. Geographic distribution of research projects across Africa, comparing all identified projects (left map) with MNCH-specific projects (right map)

The first recorded data science initiatives, both MNCH and Non-MNCH in Africa were launched in 2002, whereas similar initiatives outside Africa have been documented as far back as the 1970’s (Supplementary Table 3) The WHO Digital Health Atlas database had data on several aspects of MNCH including antenatal and postnatal care, childbirth and skilled birth attendance, maternal mortality and family planning services. For newborns, it included data on essential neonatal care practices, effective breastfeeding promotion, newborn mortality and stillbirths, and interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Child health initiatives included immunisation coverage, managing common childhood illnesses, child and infant mortality and supporting nutrition and developmental milestones. Additionally, health systems strengthening themes included data collection, training health workers, and ensuring access to essential medicine.

Section 2b: thematic analysis of results from the who’s digital health initiatives atlas database

Using our published conceptual framework [4], we summarise countries with at least 10 projects in the WHO Digital Health Initiatives Atlas i.e., Ethiopia, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia, and Ghana. While Ghana, implemented fewer projects overall, it has also made notable strides in digital health for MNCH, therefore was included in our assessment (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3). The integration of data science into MNCH initiatives in the eight country case studies highlights advancements and persistent challenges within healthcare delivery (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3).

Domain I: infrastructure and systemic challenges

All countries leverage a mix of donor support and existing digital health infrastructure to implement MNCH data science initiatives. Technologies like DHIS2 are widely used across Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and Zambia, allowing for structured data collection and management. However, systemic challenges, such as funding gaps and limited scalability of platforms persist. For example, Ethiopia benefits from strong international support and substantial national coverage, including backing from organisations like the Gates Foundation, while Nigeria struggles with national-level coverage, as most projects operate at state or regional levels. Similarly, Kenya benefits from a robust infrastructure with national and multi-country initiatives, but faces challenges in operational costs, which limit scalability. Uganda, Tanzania, Malawi, and Zambia have implemented initiatives at multiple administrative levels, from village to national and multi-country levels, but continue to grapple with logistical challenges in scaling these efforts. Ghana is progressing in eHealth infrastructure but still faces scalability issues due to existing systemic constraints (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3).

Domain II: data quality

Data quality is a common issue across all countries. Poor data quality limits the potential of MNCH initiatives to yield actionable insights. Ethiopia, Nigeria, Uganda, and Ghana particularly struggle with insufficient data utilisation and quality concerns. Kenya faces high operational costs and limited data use, while Tanzania and Malawi contend with poor guideline adherence and delayed reporting. Zambia and Ghana both face issues with poor data quality and worker competence (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3).

Domain III: data governance, regulatory dynamics, and policy

Government support is crucial in the governance of MNCH projects, with all countries receiving varying degrees of government backing. Zambia shows strong governmental commitment, with full funding support for its initiatives. Ethiopia and Uganda also demonstrate significant national support, while Kenya and Tanzania benefit from moderate government backing. Nigeria and Ghana are progressing toward stronger regulatory frameworks, but still require increased policy integration (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3).

Domain IV: technological innovations and digital health

Technologies such as District Health Information Software version 2 (DHIS2), Commcare, and mobile health platforms are widely used across all countries to facilitate data collection, management and healthcare delivery, therefore, bridging the technological gap in healthcare access. All countries operate other digital technologies unique to them such as IVR and OppiaMobile in Ethiopia, AWS in Nigeria, REDCap, OpenSRP and SMS-based platforms in Uganda, Tanzania and Kenya. Ghana applies similar technologies in addition to advanced tools like the Blood Safety Information System (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3).

Domain V: capacity development, human capital, and opportunity

Capacity building remains a significant challenge in many countries. Nigeria and Tanzania struggle with training gaps and health worker motivation, while Kenya faces high operational costs. Uganda and Malawi suffer from inadequate supervision and delayed reporting, respectively. Zambia and Ghana need to improve health worker competence to advance MNCH initiatives (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3). These workforce-related barriers hinder the effective implementation and scaling of MNCH initiatives.

Domain VI: collaborative and strategic frameworks

Collaboration with international donors and organisations are central to MNCH initiatives’ success. All countries receive significant support from organisations (like the Gates Foundation, Gavi, DFID, World Bank Group and UNICEF) and research universities, fostering strategic partnerships to drive improved MNCH healthcare delivery. Many of the data science projects implemented are as a result of external funding (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3).

Domain VII: recommendations for implementation and scaling

Implementation scope varies across countries, from local to national and multi-country levels. Scaling MNCH initiatives is dependent on effective resource allocation, government involvement, and the adoption of suitable technologies. Kenya and Uganda have implemented initiatives at multiple levels, allowing for broader coverage and adaptability (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3).

Discussion

Key findings

In our scoping review, we mapped and provided an overview of data science use cases with applications to MNCH in Africa. We comprehensively reviewed and analysed case studies to provide insights into the current landscape and identified gaps and potential opportunities for improving MNCH in Africa with data science. The scoping review included 52 studies and found that no article used nationwide routinely collected data. These results highlight a critical gap in utilisation of routinely collected MNCH data in data science and machine learning. The fact that no reviewed article used nationwide routinely collected MNCH data could be indicative of limited electronic health records in SSA, although there were a number of electronic health records databases that are used regionally or nationally in some African countries.

A review of the WHO’s Digital Health Atlas found limited use of individual-level data in national health systems and instead, the DHIS2 platform was widely adopted for data aggregation of MNCH indicators. Data quality and completeness were common and reported as persistent challenges faced across MNCH data systems in Africa. In addition, there was a lack of significant government commitment and especially in regulatory support for adopting and scaling MNCH data science initiatives. Instead, there was still a heavy reliance on external partnerships and funding.

Some of the notable persistent challenges we identified to hinder progress of data science applications within MNCH include: poor data quality, insufficient workforce competence, and logistical challenges. These issues need to be addressed to maximise the potential of data science in MNCH initiatives in Africa. Addressing these challenges through targeted interventions in capacity building, improved data governance, and enhanced collaboration will be crucial for sustaining progress and scaling successful initiatives.

This review has several key strengths. First, we leveraged data from WHO’s Digital Health Initiatives Atlas, a globally recognised platform that provides comprehensive information on data science initiatives, covering many years of project implementation across 80% of African countries. Second, our analysis employed robust methods and tools, ensuring a thorough examination of MNCH data science projects across the continent.

Like any other study, ours is not without limitations, First, our reliance on specific keywords to identify MNCH data science initiatives may have excluded relevant projects, such as those focussed on COVID-19 or Civil Registration and Vital Statistics, which could indirectly impact MNCH. This specificity may have led to underreporting. Second, there are potential data gaps due to variations in reporting efforts across countries and the broad timeframe (2002–2024). Older projects, which might have been less documented, could have skewed our dataset toward more recent initiatives. Furthermore, limitations in our dataset regarding data cleaning, accuracy, and completeness mean our findings depend on the reporting standards and consistency of the WHO’s Digital Health Initiatives Atlas, therefore, our reliance on the WHO Digital Health Atlas may exclude smaller, locally funded initiatives that were not formally registered. Third, our study is primarily descriptive, limiting our ability to draw causal inferences or assess the effectiveness of MNCH data science projects in Africa. This approach provides a broad snapshot rather than an in-depth analysis of factors influencing project success or challenges. Fourth, our inclusion of only English language studies may have introduced publication bias, potentially underrepresenting other research within Africa that is published in French, Portuguese and Arabic. Finally, because our findings rely on projects registered within the WHO Digital Health Initiatives Atlas, they may not fully represent smaller or locally funded projects that were not registered, affecting the generalisability of our conclusions.

Challenges for data science initiatives for MNCH in Africa

Data stewardship: data science skill set and capacity

In Africa, limited data literacy among its population poses a significant barrier on efforts to harness the power of data science in MNCH [102, 103]. Often, healthcare providers (e.g., nurses, doctors) who are responsible for recording data at health facilities lack formal training in data management and analysis [65]. Additionally, routine healthcare data across the continent are rarely subjected to quality assessments by trained data management professionals, which compromises the reliability and usability of the collected data [104]. This shortcoming is indicative of limited data stewardship, therefore, underscores the need for targeted capacity-building initiatives [105]. To address this, universities could incorporate continuous updates to existing curricula and introduce new programmes focussed on data science and management, thereby cultivating a skilled workforce capable of upholding high standards in data stewardship across healthcare sectors in Africa [105].

Data use, access, and ownership

Access to MNCH data within Health Information Systems (HIS) in Africa should be extended beyond healthcare providers, academia and policymakers, reaching the general public as well. Evidence from developed countries suggests that enabling citizens to access their health data through existing HIS platforms can generate public health benefits, empowering individuals to engage more actively in their health management [106]. For Africa to strengthen data ownership, it must not only innovate and build new technologies but also adapt and localise global initiatives to fit its unique contexts [107]. Fostering a culture of data use is essential and must be accompanied by efforts to build robust capacities for data curation. Developing a national data infrastructure that supports an integrated, high-quality ecosystem is critical. Such infrastructure should accommodate initiatives of all scales, ensuring comprehensive coverage across the continuum of care and facilitating better health outcomes continent-wide [108].

Government regulation and policies

Africa’s adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has been gradual, with only a few countries, including Benin, Egypt, Ghana, Mauritius, Rwanda, Senegal, and Tunisia, developing a national AI strategy [109111]. In contrast, 77.8% (n = 42) of African countries have established national eHealth strategy reflecting broader engagement with digital health initiatives. Regulatory approaches to Artificial Intelligence (AI) often centre on data protection acts or regulatory institutions rather than comprehensive AI-specific policies. This results in limited effective policy frameworks and funding dedicated to AI research across countries [111, 112]. While the need for regulation in AI is widely acknowledged, some argue that minimal regulatory intervention could benefit early-stage innovations, allowing for more rapid development. The success of mobile money platforms, such as Kenya’s M-Pesa [113] and Uganda’s mobile money, illustrate this concept, where limited initial regulation enabled accelerated growth as a financial technology innovation [114]. For African countries aiming to implement AI, particularly within sensitive areas such as MNCH data, tailored strategies that balance regulation with innovation support could prove advantageous. This approach would allow African nations to harness AI’s potential while safeguarding the ethical and privacy considerations critical to healthcare data [115].

Opportunities for data science initiatives for MNCH within Africa

Based on our findings, the review highlights the strong potential for data science to improve MNCH across Africa, although challenges still exist in light of the opportunities that are available. Data science offers valuable tools to strengthen health systems, empower healthcare workers, and enhance patient outcomes. Africa’s distinct demographic profile, growing adoption of new technologies, adaptable regulatory environment, and it’s “latecomer advantage” in digital innovation present unique opportunities. If strategically developed, these factors could create a strong foundation for data science initiatives to address MNCH challenges and lead to meaningful improvements in health outcomes across the continent.

Demographic opportunity

Africa represents 14.4% of the World population, with a significantly youthful demographic–70% of the population in SSA are under 30 years old compared to an aging global population that is observed in high-income countries [116118]. This demographic trend offers a unique opportunity for the continent to harness its demographic dividend [119]. Therefore, Africa’s younger population can potentially champion the adoption and application of data science in MNCH. In addition, the innovative potential and fresh perspectives of African youths can provide the continent with an advantage to overcome barriers facing development of health research on the continent [120].

Data infrastructure and health information systems

The District Health Information Software version 2 (DHIS2) has been adopted by majority of African countries and other low-middle income countries as a national health information system. Although we found majority of the countries use the DHIS2 platform for only aggregated data. Experiences and lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic show that it can also be used to support individual level data. This is an opportunity for integrating individual-level MNCH data within the existing infrastructure across many SSA countries [121]. Another opportunity is that beyond Oslo University (the developers of DHIS2), within the African continent expertise to further develop and customise DHIS2 for MNCH data within Africa is available through the Health Information Systems Programmes (HISP) network [122, 123]. For example, HISP network partners are present in Kenya [124], Uganda [125], Rwanda [126], Mozambique [127], South Africa [128], Tanzania [129], and Zimbabwe [125]. The HISP networks in Africa are comprised of an East and Southern Africa network and a West African network. The two regional blocks have signed a Memorandum of Understanding in a recent meeting to merge and form a Pan-African network of HISP networks. These HISP partners are available to support DHIS2 customisation for other countries that have limited capacity [125].

Data standardisation and quality

Data standardisation is essential for maximising the potential of pooled datasets in healthcare. Frameworks such as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) have significantly advanced the standardisation of clinical diagnoses, enabling a unified classification system that supports data pooling across multiple sources, countries, and regions. This standardised approach opens opportunities for data science applications, especially when applied to individual-level data [130]. In some countries, such as Ethiopia, customised solutions like the National Classification of Disease (NCOD) have been developed. This adaptation addresses the challenge of non-existent or uncommon diseases in the global standards, ensuring that local health data are accurately captured and coded [131]. Application of data science approaches such as large language models suffers from lack of standardised metadata that are essential for their utilisation.

To address this, ongoing initiatives in Africa aim to establish Common Data Models (CDMs). For example, the Implementation Network for Sharing Population Information from Research Entities (INSPIRE) data hub employs the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership (OMOP) CDM to harmonise data from longitudinal population studies across Africa [132]. Also the INDEPTH Network’s maternal newborn health working group spearheaded the standardisation of definitions of key MNCH indicators and data within the INDEPTH Network [133, 134]. Other opportunities aligned with data science and AI applications with internationally accepted guidelines are the Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles [135]. Adhering to FAIR principles in Africa’s health information systems could ensure that data is AI-ready and available for use at the point of care, enhancing the quality and applicability of health data across the continent.

Leveraging mobile technology surge in Africa

The rise of mobile technology across Africa has facilitated the development of software solutions ranging from disease-specific platforms like DHIS2 to broader management systems like OpenMRS and custom mobile apps for data collection and patient management. Despite these advancements, challenges such as limited data quality, healthcare workforce shortages, and logistical barriers continue to hinder implementation. Integrating data science into healthcare has the potential to transform maternal and child health outcomes yet realising these benefits will require addressing gaps in funding, staff training, and infrastructure. Sustained support from international donors, along with government backing, will be key to overcoming these obstacles. Africa’s expanding digital backbone and internet connectivity also provide substantial opportunities, as seen in the success of mobile financial platforms like M-Pesa. Mobile health interventions have already improved maternal and neonatal healthcare utilisation in low- and middle-income countries for example in Uganda and Senegal, where digital payments for MNCH services have been used to improve coverage and remuneration of health workers during immunisation and other health campaigns for polio [27, 136]. Rwanda through Zipline’s drone initiative has improved delivery of medicines to patients in hard to reach areas [137]. By enhancing mobile technologies with AI capabilities and applying insights from existing implementations, Africa could leverage mobile health to drive further improvements in healthcare delivery and access.

High disease burden that calls for interventions that use data science

Despite significant progress towards achieving SDG 3 and ENAP across SSA, huge health disparities and disease burdens remain, especially in underserved communities [138]. Emerging technologies present an opportunity to utilise the growing volume of data generated at points of care, supporting data-driven decision-making that can enhance healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. The rising demand for data-informed strategies aligns well with Africa’s youthful population, which holds tremendous potential for data science applications. By investing in skills development and robust data infrastructure, African countries can harness this demographic advantage to drive impactful MNCH interventions and address existing health inequities.

Greenfield advantage and latecomer advantage

Africa’s health systems, particularly in MNCH, largely operate through traditional, paper-based methods. This “greenfield” or latecomer advantage means that, unlike more digitised systems, there is minimal need for extensive research, training, retraining or the “unlearning” of outdated technology, allowing Africa to adopt and implement the latest and most effective technologies from the outset. This opportunity positions African health systems to leapfrog directly into using advanced data science tools and techniques. For instance, new systems could incorporate Generative AI powered by large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Bard, which have made data science concepts more accessible to a broader audience. The potential of Generative AI is particularly promising for addressing MNCH and broader healthcare challenges, although it should be noted that current LLMs, such as ChatGPT, are not specifically designed for medical applications and therefore bring performance and safety considerations that require careful adaptation and oversight in healthcare [139].

Future trajectory of data science within MNCH in Africa

Data stewardship programmes

Currently, Africa has limited capacity-building initiatives in data science to fully harness the potential of data in maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH). Developing long-term and sustainable data stewardship programmes—ensuring responsible management and use of research data—is essential for advancing Open Science and clinical research on the continent. Effective data stewardship involves structured planning for data handling, addressing challenges in data management, accessibility, and reliability [140]. By investing in data stewardship programmes, African countries can create a foundation for enhanced use of data science tools and techniques, overcoming barriers in MNCH data quality and paving the way for impactful healthcare solutions.

Multidisciplinary approach

Addressing the knowledge gaps and establishing priorities in MNCH data science requires a multidisciplinary approach that involves active engagement across multiple sectors. Stakeholder involvement at the policy level, particularly in areas such as data use and protection, is essential for ensuring ethical and effective data application. Civil society organisations, private-sector partners, and public entities should be integral to these efforts, promoting private-public partnerships that transform research findings into actionable products and services. Observations from the current review suggest that research findings are often published without being translated into testable, real-world applications. By fostering collaboration among policymakers, implementation researchers, private-sector actors, and other stakeholders, there can be a stronger uptake and integration of data science solutions. Additionally, adopting citizen-centred design will help ensure that data science and AI tools are responsive to public health needs and well-suited to the African context.

Programmatic implementation at scale

To harness the full potential of data science in MNCH, strengthening Africa’s data systems is essential. The current reliance on aggregate data limits actionable insights, underscoring the need for more granular data systems capable of driving meaningful change. Our review reveals that most studies in Africa focus on foundational research in data science and AI for MNCH, rather than programmatic implementation. For greater impact, research efforts must be closely linked to implementation partners, start-ups, and the development of minimum viable products with scalability potential. Achieving this requires balancing ethical considerations, regulatory frameworks, and operational flexibility, while promoting grassroots data use and minimising data migration challenges.

Next steps and recommendations

Our scoping review found various limitations which constrain the development and application of data science tools in MNCH. Effective use of data science in healthcare requires substantial investments in data creation, curation, and skilled personnel. However, many governments hesitate to invest without clear evidence of the benefits—creating a cycle in which data science applications lack the initial support needed to demonstrate their value in healthcare. Mobilising both local and international funding will be critical to building data stewardship capacity and supporting scalable health solutions. Africa’s latecomer advantage allows MNCH initiatives to leapfrog directly into advanced data science applications, leveraging the continent’s unique demographic landscape for broader impact. The rapid growth of mobile technology and the vast amounts of data it generates offer an unprecedented opportunity to build analytics capacity, addressing the region’s health challenges and improving MNCH outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa.

We make five key recommendations that could potentially help break this cycle, enabling African governments, institutions, and international partners to support data science for MNCH in Africa. By addressing these areas, Africa can build a robust data science ecosystem that advances MNCH and improves healthcare outcomes across the continent [141].

  1. Investment in Infrastructure: Building data repositories and computational resources across Africa will create the foundation for advanced data science applications, facilitating more impactful MNCH initiatives.

  2. Training, Capacity Building, and Capacity Strengthening: Expanding data science training programmes will upskill Africa’s young workforce, making data science initiatives more scalable and sustainable.

  3. Collaborations: Partnerships within Africa, as well as with global and high-income country partners, can foster knowledge sharing, best practices, and technology transfer to accelerate data science advancements.

  4. Funding: Increased investment from both African governments and philanthropy and international donors, including grants and loans, will drive the development of data science tools and evidence-based interventions to address MNCH needs on the continent.

  5. Governance and Ethics: Clear frameworks for ethical data use are essential. Governments, researchers, and policymakers should prioritise ethical guidelines to ensure responsible implementation of data science in healthcare.

Conclusion

This scoping review mapped the current landscape of data science applications in MNCH across Africa, revealing both opportunities and challenges. While 52 studies demonstrated various applications of machine learning and AI techniques, most remained research-focussed rather than operationally integrated. The WHO Digital Health Atlas showed 316 MNCH-focussed initiatives across 44 African countries, indicating growing interest but persistent challenges in data quality, infrastructure, and capacity. Africa’s demographic advantage, expanding digital infrastructure, and latecomer advantage in technology adoption present significant opportunities for advancing data science applications in MNCH.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Material 2 (85.6KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 3 (608.6KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is a part of a broader writing project on the State of Data Science for Health in Africa (https://bit.ly/StateDataSciAfrica). The project is led by three Scientific Co-Chairs, Catherine Kyobutungi of the African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC, Kenya), Emile R. Chimusa of the Northumbria University Newcastle (United Kingdom), and A. Kofi Amegah of the University of Cape Coast (Ghana). The project is coordinated and supported by the Center for Global Health Studies at the Fogarty International Center, U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), the African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), Wellcome Trust through Grant No. 228261/Z/23/Z, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through Grant No. INV-058418, in collaboration with other partner organizations. We also thank Hesborn Wao for earlier comments on the manuscript.

Abbreviations

AI

Artificial Intelligence

AMPATH

Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare

CDM

Common Data Models

DHA

Digital Health Atlas

DHS

Demographic and Health Survey

DHIS2

District Health Information Software version 2

DPT

Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus

DS-I Africa

Data Science for Health Discovery and Innovation in Africa

ENAP

Every Newborn Action Plan

EPMM

Ending Preventable Maternal Mortality

EWENE

Every Woman Every Newborn Everywhere

FAIR

Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable

HIS

Health Information Systems

HISP

Health Information Systems Programmes

ICD 11

International Classification of Diseases 11

INSPIRE

Implementation Network for Sharing Population Information from Research Entities

LASSO

Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator

LHIMS

Lightwave Hospital Information Management System

LLMs

Large Language Models

m-health

Mobile health technology

MDGs

Millennium Development Goals

MICS

Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys

MNCH

Maternal, Newborn and Child Health

NCOD

National Classification of Disease

OMOP

Observational Medical Outcome Partnership

OSF

Open Science Framework

PRISMA-ScR

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping reviews

RMNCHN

Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child Health and Nutrition

SDGs

Sustainable Development Goals

SSA

Sub-Saharan African

Authors’ contributions

AJ and EOO conceptualised the idea and drafted the manuscript. AJ, EOO, and BN developed the research questions and study methods and contributed meaningfully to the drafting and editing; AJ, SYA and GPO conducted the scoping reviews. SYA, GPO, PW, RMK, FKS, AA, ASE and EOO reviewed and contributed to the manuscript developed. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the article for publication. AJ is responsible for the overall content of the manuscript as guarantor.

Funding

This work was made possible with funding from Center for Global Health Studies at the Fogarty International Center, U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Grant No. INV-058418 and Wellcome Trust, Grant No. 228261/Z/23/Z.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this scoping review are publicly available or included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The 52 articles that we have included in the scoping review are listed in Table 1 and the detailed supplementary materials. Data from the **WHO Digital Health Initiatives Atlas** are also publicly available and accessible through its original URL [https://digitalhealthatlas.org/en/-/](https:/digitalhealthatlas.org/en/-) or via “**Implementome**” it’s new host [https://gdhub.unige.ch/implementome/projects](https:/gdhub.unige.ch/implementome/projects). Any additional materials used in this study are available from the corresponding authors Professor Eric O. Ohuma ([Eric.Ohuma@lshtm.ac.uk](mailto:Eric.Ohuma@lshtm.ac.uk)) and Dr Akuze Joseph Waiswa ([joseph.waiswa@lshtm.ac.uk](mailto:joseph.waiswa@lshtm.ac.uk)) both at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable - As this study involved analysis of published literature and data from publicly available databases, ethical approval was not required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Eric O. Ohuma contributed as a senior author.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Joseph Akuze and Grieven P. Otieno are joint co-first authors.

References

  • 1.Ley C, Bordas SPA. What makes data science different? A discussion involving Statistics2.0 and computational sciences. Int J Data Sci Anal. 2018;6:167–75. 10.1007/s41060-017-0090-x. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.National Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Strategic Plan For Data Science. 2018. 2018.
  • 3.Wright CY, Jaca A, Kapwata T, Naidoo N, Awokola B, Bainomugisha E, et al. Identifying globally relevant learnings from africa’s challenges and solutions to climate change and air pollution-related health impacts: a data science scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e076941. 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Akuze J, Ngatia B, Amare SY, Wanduru P, Otieno GP, Kananura RM, et al. Unlocking the transformative potential of data science in improving maternal, newborn and child health in africa: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2024;14:e091883. 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Perez LG, Peet ED, Vegetabile B, Shih RA. Big data needs and challenges to advance research on Racial and ethnic inequities in maternal and child health. Womens Health Issues. 2022;32:90–4. 10.1016/j.whi.2021.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coleman J, Black V, Thorson AE, Eriksen J. Evaluating the effect of maternal mHealth text messages on uptake of maternal and child health care services in South africa: a multicentre cohort intervention study. Reprod Health. 2020;17:160. 10.1186/s12978-020-01017-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.UN Women. SDG 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. UN Women – Headquarters. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/women-and-the-sdgs/sdg-3-good-health-well-being. Accessed 6 Feb 2024.
  • 8.Siddiqi S, Aftab W, Siddiqui FJ, Huicho L, Mogilevskii R, Friberg P, et al. Global strategies and local implementation of health and health-related sdgs: lessons from consultation in countries across five regions. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e002859. 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.WHO. Every Newborn Action Plan. 2014. https://www.who.int/initiatives/every-newborn-action-plan. Accessed 2 Sept 2024.
  • 10.WHO. Ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM). 2015. https://www.who.int/initiatives/ending-preventable-maternal-mortality. Accessed 2 Sept 2024.
  • 11.Esamai F, Mwangi A, Nangami M, Tabu J, Ayuku D, Were E. Improving maternal and child health outcomes through a community involvement strategy in Kabula location, Bungoma County, Kenya. Dialogues Health. 2022;1:100026. 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bennett TD, Callahan TJ, Feinstein JA, Ghosh D, Lakhani SA, Spaeder MC, et al. Data science for child health. J Pediatr. 2019;208:12–22. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.12.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lawn JE, Kinney MV, Black RE, Pitt C, Cousens S, Kerber K, et al. Newborn survival: a multi-country analysis of a decade of change. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(Suppl 3):iii6–28. 10.1093/heapol/czs053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nabyonga-Orem J. Monitoring sustainable development goal 3: how ready are the health information systems in low-income and middle-income countries? BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2:e000433. 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ohuma EO, Moller A-B, Bradley E, Chakwera S, Hussain-Alkhateeb L, Lewin A, et al. National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2023;402:1261–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00878-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waiswa P, et al. Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014;384:189–205. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kiguli J, Namusoko S, Kerber K, Peterson S, Waiswa P. Weeping in silence: community experiences of stillbirths in rural Eastern Uganda. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:24011. 10.3402/gha.v8.24011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.UNICEF. A neglected tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths 2020. 2020. https://www.unicef.org/reports/neglected-tragedy-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020. Accessed 13 Jan 2025.
  • 19.World Health Organization. Monitoring maternal, newborn and child health: understanding key progress indicators – Countdown 2030.
  • 20.Bagherian H, Sattari M. Health information system in developing countries: A review on the challenges and causes of success and failure. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022;36:111. 10.47176/mjiri.36.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Akuze J, Cousens S, Lawn JE, Waiswa P, Gordeev VS, Arnold F, et al. Four decades of measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in demographic and health surveys: historical review. Popul Health Metr. 2021;19(Suppl 1):8. 10.1186/s12963-020-00225-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hanson C, Annerstedt KS, Alsina MDR, Abeid M, Kidanto HL, Alvesson HM, et al. Stillbirth mortality by Robson ten-group classification system: A cross-sectional registry of 80 663 births from 16 hospital in sub-Saharan Africa. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024;131:1465–74. 10.1111/1471-0528.17833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.World Health Organization. Everybody’s business -- strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes. 2007.
  • 24.Countdown Working Group on Health Policy and Health Systems. Assessment of the health system and policy environment as a critical complement to tracking intervention coverage for maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet. 2008;371:1284–93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60563-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bennett S, Ssengooba F. Closing the gaps: from science to action in Maternal, Newborn, and child health in Africa. PLOS Med. 2010;7:e1000298. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shilo S, Rossman H, Segal E. Axes of a revolution: challenges and promises of big data in healthcare. Nat Med. 2020;26:29–38. 10.1038/s41591-019-0727-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.De P, Pradhan MR. Effectiveness of mobile technology and utilization of maternal and neonatal healthcare in low and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23:664. 10.1186/s12905-023-02825-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bossman E, Johansen MA, Zanaboni P. mHealth interventions to reduce maternal and child mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern asia: A systematic literature review. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022;3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.UNICEF. UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). UNICEF DATA. 2023. https://data.unicef.org/resources/un-inter-agency-group-for-child-mortality-estimation-unigme/. Accessed 26 Apr 2024.
  • 30.Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73. 10.7326/M18-0850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rayyan – Intelligent Systematic Review - Rayyan. 2021. https://www.rayyan.ai/. Accessed 3 Sept 2024.
  • 33.Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel.
  • 34.World Health Organization. World Health Organization Digital Health Atlas (DHA). https://digitalhealthatlas.org/en/-/. Accessed 16 Apr 2024.
  • 35.StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software. 2023.
  • 36.QGIS Development Team. Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. 2023.
  • 37.Tsai Y-T, Fulcher IR, Li T, Sukums F, Hedt-Gauthier B. Predicting facility-based delivery in zanzibar: the vulnerability of machine learning algorithms to adversarial attacks. Heliyon. 2023;9:e16244. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Syed S, Al-Boni M, Khan MN, Sadiq K, Iqbal NT, Moskaluk CA, et al. Assessment of machine learning detection of environmental enteropathy and Celiac disease in children. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e195822. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hazlett C, Ramos AP, Smith S. Better individual-level risk models can improve the targeting and life-saving potential of early-mortality interventions. Sci Rep. 2023;13:21706. 10.1038/s41598-023-48888-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bitew FH, Nyarko SH, Potter L, Sparks CS. Machine learning approach for predicting under-five mortality determinants in ethiopia: evidence from the 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey. Genus. 2020;76:37. 10.1186/s41118-020-00106-2. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lee C, Willis A, Chen C, Sieniek M, Watters A, Stetson B, et al. Development of a machine learning model for sonographic assessment of gestational age. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6:e2248685. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gough EK, Edens TJ, Geum HM, Baharmand I, Gill SK, Robertson RC, et al. Maternal fecal Microbiome predicts gestational age, birth weight and neonatal growth in rural Zimbabwe. eBioMedicine. 2021;68. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Bitew FH, Sparks CS, Nyarko SH. Machine learning algorithms for predicting undernutrition among under-five children in Ethiopia. Public Health Nutr. 2022;25:269–80. 10.1017/S1368980021004262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shah SY, Saxena S, Rani SP, Nelaturi N, Gill S, Tippett Barr B, et al. Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) using machine learning algorithms in a Kenyan population. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023;4. 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1161157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Murnane PM, Ayieko J, Vittinghoff E, Gandhi M, Katumbi C, Milala B, et al. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021;88:439. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002800. Machine Learning Algorithms Using Routinely Collected Data Do Not Adequately Predict Viremia to Inform Targeted Services in Postpartum Women Living With HIV. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Ganguli R, Wagner SM. 444 National and international validation of a prenatal machine learning algorithm to forecast Cesarean section risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230:S244–5. 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.470. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Espinosa CA, Khan W, Khanam R, Das S, Khalid J, Pervin J, et al. Multiomic signals associated with maternal epidemiological factors contributing to preterm birth in low- and middle-income countries. Sci Adv. 2023;9:eade7692. 10.1126/sciadv.ade7692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Biswas A, Tucker J, Bauhoff S. Performance of predictive algorithms in estimating the risk of being a zero-dose child in India, Mali and Nigeria. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8:e012836. 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Petersen JM, Parker SE, Dukes KA, Hutcheon JA, Ahrens KA, Werler MM. Machine learning-based placental clusters and their associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2023;37:350–61. 10.1111/ppe.12938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Robi YG, Sitote TM. Neonatal disease prediction using machine learning techniques. J Healthc Eng. 2023;2023:e3567194. 10.1155/2023/3567194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bogale DS, Abuhay TM, Dejene BE. Predicting perinatal mortality based on maternal health status and health insurance service using homogeneous ensemble machine learning methods. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2022;22:341. 10.1186/s12911-022-02084-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dereje T, Abuhay TM, Letta A, Alelign M. Investigate Risk Factors and Predict Neonatal and Infant Mortality Based on Maternal Determinants using Homogenous Ensemble Methods. In: 2021 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Development for Africa (ICT4DA). 2021:18–23. 10.1109/ICT4DA53266.2021.9671271
  • 53.Demsash AW, Chereka AA, Walle AD, Kassie SY, Bekele F, Bekana T. Machine learning algorithms’ application to predict childhood vaccination among children aged 12–23 months in ethiopia: evidence 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey dataset. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0288867. 10.1371/journal.pone.0288867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fenta HM, Zewotir T, Muluneh EK. A machine learning classifier approach for identifying the determinants of under-five child undernutrition in Ethiopian administrative zones. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2021;21:291. 10.1186/s12911-021-01652-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gebeye LG, Dessie EY, Yimam JA. Predictors of micronutrient deficiency among children aged 6–23 months in ethiopia: a machine learning approach. Front Nutr. 2024;10. 10.3389/fnut.2023.1277048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Dejene BE, Abuhay TM, Bogale DS. Predicting the level of anemia among Ethiopian pregnant women using homogeneous ensemble machine learning algorithm. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2022;22:247. 10.1186/s12911-022-01992-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kebede SD, Sebastian Y, Yeneneh A, Chanie AF, Melaku MS, Walle AD. Prediction of contraceptive discontinuation among reproductive-age women in Ethiopia using Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2016 dataset: A machine learning approach. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2023;23:9. 10.1186/s12911-023-02102-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mamo DN, Gebremariam YH, Adem JB, Kebede SD, Walle AD. Machine learning to predict unintended pregnancy among reproductive-age women in ethiopia: evidence from EDHS 2016. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24:57. 10.1186/s12905-024-02893-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mulugeta T, Melese M, Assefa Y, Gedif B. Machine Learning Based Delivery Date Prediction For Child Birth. In: 2023 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Development for Africa (ICT4DA). 2023: 25–30. 10.1109/ICT4DA59526.2023.10302249
  • 60.Bekele WT. Machine learning algorithms for predicting low birth weight in Ethiopia. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2022;22:232. 10.1186/s12911-022-01981-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tesfaye B, Atique S, Azim T, Kebede MM. Predicting skilled delivery service use in ethiopia: dual application of logistic regression and machine learning algorithms. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2019;19:209. 10.1186/s12911-019-0942-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mboya IB, Mahande MJ, Mohammed M, Obure J, Mwambi HG. Prediction of perinatal death using machine learning models: a birth registry-based cohort study in Northern Tanzania. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e040132. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tarimo CS, Bhuyan SS, Li Q, Mahande MJJ, Wu J, Fu X. Validating machine learning models for the prediction of labour induction intervention using routine data: a registry-based retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Northern Tanzania. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e051925. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tarimo CS, Bhuyan SS, Li Q, Ren W, Mahande MJ, Wu J. Combining resampling strategies and ensemble machine learning methods to enhance prediction of neonates with a low Apgar score after induction of labor in Northern Tanzania. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:3711–20. 10.2147/RMHP.S331077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Aung T, Niyeha D, Shagihilu S, Mpembeni R, Kaganda J, Sheffel A, et al. Optimizing data visualization for reproductive, maternal, newborn, child health, and nutrition (RMNCH&N) policymaking: data visualization preferences and interpretation capacity among decision-makers in Tanzania. Glob Health Res Policy. 2019;4:4. 10.1186/s41256-019-0095-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kananura RM. Machine learning predictive modelling for identification of predictors of acute respiratory infection and diarrhoea in uganda’s rural and urban settings. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2:e0000430. 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kwizera A, Kissoon N, Musa N, Urayeneza O, Mujyarugamba P, Patterson AJ, et al. A machine Learning-Based triage tool for children with acute infection in a low resource Setting*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20:e524. 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nareeba T, Wosu A, Kajungu D. Machine learning algorithm for identifying the predictors of childhood immunization in rural Uganda. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;101:483. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.1262. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nti IK, Owusu-Boadu B. A hybrid boosting ensemble model for predicting maternal mortality and sustaining reproductive. Smart Health. 2022;26:100325. 10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100325. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Anku EK, Duah HO. Predicting and identifying factors associated with undernutrition among children under five years in Ghana using machine learning algorithms. PLoS ONE. 2024;19:e0296625. 10.1371/journal.pone.0296625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Boadu RO, Lamptey MA, Boadu KAO, Adzakpah G, Mensah NK. Healthcare providers’ intention to use technology to attend to clients in cape Coast teaching Hospital, Ghana. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:5547544. 10.1155/2021/5547544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sazawal S, Das S, Ryckman KK, Khanam R, Nisar I, Deb S et al. Machine learning prediction of gestational age from metabolic screening markers resistant to ambient temperature transportation: facilitating use of this technology in low resource settings of South Asia and East Africa. J Glob Health 12:04021. 10.7189/jogh.12.04021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 73.The Alliance for Maternal and Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) Gestational Age Study Group. Simplified models to assess newborn gestational age in low-middle income countries: findings from a multicountry, prospective cohort study. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005688. 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ogallo W, Speakman S, Akinwande V, Varshney KR, Walcott-Bryant A, Wayua C, et al. Identifying factors associated with neonatal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa using machine learning. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021;2020:963–72. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Awadh Mbarak Z, Njoroge K, Kawila C. The Role Of Health Information System Towards The Achievement Of Uhcin Maternal Care: A Case Of Coast General Teaching & Referral Hospital. PhD Thesis. Kenya Methodist University; 2021.
  • 76.Naydenova E, Tsanas A, Howie S, Casals-Pascual C, De Vos M. The power of data mining in diagnosis of childhood pneumonia. J R Soc Interface. 2016;13:20160266. 10.1098/rsif.2016.0266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lee LH, Bradburn E, Craik R, Yaqub M, Norris SA, Ismail LC, et al. Machine learning for accurate Estimation of fetal gestational age based on ultrasound images. Npj Digit Med. 2023;6:1–11. 10.1038/s41746-023-00774-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rittenhouse KJ, Vwalika B, Keil A, Winston J, Stoner M, Price JT, et al. Improving preterm newborn identification in low-resource settings with machine learning. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0198919. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chilyabanyama ON, Chilengi R, Simuyandi M, Chisenga CC, Chirwa M, Hamusonde K, et al. Performance of machine learning classifiers in classifying stunting among Under-Five children in Zambia. Children. 2022;9:1082. 10.3390/children9071082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Jeddi Z, Gryech I, Ghogho M, Hammoumi EL, Mahraoui M. Machine learning for predicting the risk for childhood asthma using Prenatal, Perinatal, postnatal and environmental factors. Healthcare. 2021;9:1464. 10.3390/healthcare9111464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Li J-X, Liao W-Z, Huang Z-M, Yin X, Ouyang S, Gu B, et al. Identifying effective diagnostic biomarkers for childhood cerebral malaria in Africa integrating coexpression analysis with machine learning algorithm. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28:76. 10.1186/s40001-022-00980-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kovacs D, Msanga DR, Mshana SE, Bilal M, Oravcova K, Matthews L. Developing practical clinical tools for predicting neonatal mortality at a neonatal intensive care unit in Tanzania. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:537. 10.1186/s12887-021-03012-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Nasejje JB, Mbuvha R, Mwambi H. Use of a deep learning and random forest approach to track changes in the predictive nature of socioeconomic drivers of under-5 mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e049786. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mbunge E, Fashoto SG, Muchemwa B, Millham RC, Chemhaka G, Sibiya MN et al. Application of machine learning techniques for predicting child mortality and identifying associated risk factors. In: 2023 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS). 2023:1–5. 10.1109/ICTAS56421.2023.10082734
  • 85.Khan MNA, Yunus RM. A hybrid ensemble approach to accelerate the classification accuracy for predicting malnutrition among under-five children in sub-Saharan African countries. Nutrition. 2023;108:111947. 10.1016/j.nut.2022.111947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fredriksson A, Fulcher IR, Russell AL, Li T, Tsai Y-T, Seif SS et al. Machine learning for maternal health: predicting delivery location in a community health worker program in Zanzibar. Front Digit Health. 2022;4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 87.Ndagijimana S, Kabano IH, Masabo E, Ntaganda JM. Prediction of stunting among Under-5 children in Rwanda using machine learning techniques. J Prev Med Pub Health. 2023;56:41–9. 10.3961/jpmph.22.388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sendra-Balcells C, Campello VM, Torrents-Barrena J, Ahmed YA, Elattar M, Ohene-Botwe B, et al. Generalisability of fetal ultrasound deep learning models to low-resource imaging settings in five African countries. Sci Rep. 2023;13:2728. 10.1038/s41598-023-29490-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Collinson N, Saugene Z, Braa J, Sahay S, Mosse E, Reflections. Learnings and Proposed Interventions on Data Validation and Data Use for Action in Health: A Case of Mozambique. 2021.
  • 90.WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA. Born too soon: Decade of action on preterm birth. 2023.
  • 91.MEASURE Evaluation. Using DHIS 2 to Strengthen Health Systems. Publication. 2017.
  • 92.Tukur J, Lavin T, Adanikin A, Abdussalam M, Bankole K, Ekott MI, et al. Quality and outcomes of maternal and perinatal care for 76,563 pregnancies reported in a nationwide network of Nigerian referral-level hospitals. eClinicalMedicine. 2022;47. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 93.Shuaib F, Garba AB, Meribole E, Obasi S, Sule A, Nnadi C, et al. Implementing the routine immunisation data module and dashboard of DHIS2 in Nigeria, 2014–2019. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5:e002203. 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ampomah S, National. E-Health Project with Bio-surveillance (Early Warning) System. Ministry Of Health. 2022. https://www.moh.gov.gh/national-e-health-project-with-bio-surveillance-early-warning-system/. Accessed 29 Apr 2024.
  • 95.Achampong EK. Electronic Health Record System: A Survey in Ghanaian Hospitals. 2012.
  • 96.Msomi M, Kalusopa T, Luthuli LP. Change management in the implementation of electronic health records (EHR) systems at Inkosi Albert luthuli central Hospital, South Africa. South Afr J Libr Inf Sci. 2021;87:1–10. 10.7553/87-2-1835. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Katurura M, Cilliers L. Electronic health record system in the public health care sector of South africa: A systematic literature review. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2018;10. 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 98.Zharima C, Griffiths F, Goudge J. Exploring the barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records in a middle-income country: a qualitative study from South Africa. Front Digit Health. 2023;5:1207602. 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1207602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Modise T, Jantjies M, Mavetera N. Electronic health record (ehr) adoption in South African healthcare centres: a case of NW province. 2019.
  • 100.Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare. Where We Work. AMPATH Kenya. https://www.ampathkenya.org/where-we-work. Accessed 17 Apr 2024.
  • 101.Tierney WM, Achieng M, Baker E, Bell A, Biondich P, Braitstein P, et al. Experience implementing electronic health records in three East African countries. MEDINFO 2010. IOS; 2010: 371–5. 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-371. [PubMed]
  • 102.United Nations. Widening Digital Gap between Developed, Developing States Threatening to Exclude World’s Poorest from Next Industrial Revolution, Speakers Tell Second Committee | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. https://press.un.org/en/2023/gaef3587.doc.htm. Accessed 29 Apr 2024.
  • 103.Omar N. Towards an African alliance for meaningful data access. Research ICT Africa. 2023. https://researchictafrica.net/2023/12/14/towards-an-african-alliance-for-meaningful-access-to-intermediaries-data-holdings/. Accessed 29 Apr 2024.
  • 104.Mbondji PE, Kebede D, Soumbey-Alley EW, Zielinski C, Kouvividila W, Lusamba-Dikassa P-S. Health information systems in africa: descriptive analysis of data sources, information products and health statistics. J R Soc Med. 2014;107(1 Suppl):34–45. 10.1177/0141076814531750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.World Bank. Demand for Digital Skills in Sub-Saharan Africa: Key Findings from a Five-Country Study - Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, and Rwanda. World Bank. 2021. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099614312152318607/pdf/IDU0b36e9e030767f0417e0afb806e2ffdf1e8bf.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2025.
  • 106.Nøhr C, Parv L, Kink P, Cummings E, Almond H, Nørgaard JR, et al. Nationwide citizen access to their health data: analysing and comparing experiences in Denmark, Estonia and Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:534. 10.1186/s12913-017-2482-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Mamuye AL, Yilma TM, Abdulwahab A, Broomhead S, Zondo P, Kyeng M, et al. Health information exchange policy and standards for digital health systems in africa: A systematic review. PLOS Digit Health. 2022;1:e0000118. 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Victor AA, Frank LJ, Makubalo LE, Kalu AA, Impouma B. Digital health in the African region should be integral to the health system’s strengthening. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023;1:425–34. 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.The Future Society. National AI Strategies for Inclusive & Sustainable Development. The Future Society. 2022. https://thefuturesociety.org/policies-ai-sustainable-development/. Accessed 4 Nov 2024.
  • 110.Musoni M. Envisioning Africa’s AI governance landscape in 2024. 2024.
  • 111.Diplo. National AI policies in Africa - Diplo Resource. 2023. https://www.diplomacy.edu/resource/report-stronger-digital-voices-from-africa/ai-africa-national-policies/. Accessed 4 Nov 2024.
  • 112.Anicet Kiemde SM, Dooguy Kora A. The challenges facing the development of AI in Africa. 2020 IEEE int Conf advent trends multidiscip res Innov ICATMRI. 2020;:1–6. 10.1109/ICATMRI51801.2020.9398454
  • 113.Ndung’u N. Chapter 3 - The M-Pesa Technological Revolution for Financial Services in Kenya: A Platform for Financial Inclusion. In: Lee Kuo Chuen D, Deng R, editors. Handbook of Blockchain, Digital Finance, and Inclusion, Volume 1. Academic Press; 2018:37–56. 10.1016/B978-0-12-810441-5.00003-8
  • 114.Kanobe F, Alexander PM, Bwalya KJ, Policies. Regulations and procedures and their effects on mobile money systems in Uganda. Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries. 2017;83:1–15. 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00615.x. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.African Union. Continental Artificial Intelligence Strategy. 2021. https://au.int/en/documents/20240809/continental-artificial-intelligence-strategy. Accessed 16 Sept 2025.
  • 116.United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. The Demographic profile of African countries. 2016.
  • 117.WHO, iAHO. Africa Region. https://aho.afro.who.int/atlas-context/af. Accessed 29 Apr 2024.
  • 118.United Nations. Young People’s Potential, the Key to Africa’s Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ohrlls/news/young-people%E2%80%99s-potential-key-africa%E2%80%99s-sustainable-development. Accessed 29 Apr 2024.
  • 119.United Nations. World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. 2024.
  • 120.Adebisi YA, Jimoh ND, Bassey AE, Alaka HO, Marah M, Ngoma C, et al. Harnessing the potential of African youth for transforming health research in Africa. Glob Health. 2024;20:35. 10.1186/s12992-024-01039-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Open Health News. District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2). 2025. https://openhealth.news/resources/district-health-information-system-2-dhis2. Accessed 13 Jan 2025.
  • 122.Nielsen P. Advancing Health Information Systems: Experiences from Implementing DHIS 2 in Africa. 2012.
  • 123.Network HISP. DHIS2. https://dhis2.org/hisp-network/. Accessed 26 Oct 2024.
  • 124.HISPKE – Supporting Health Informatics in Kenya. https://hisp.or.ke/. Accessed 26 Oct 2024.
  • 125.HISP Uganda. https://www.hispuganda.org/. Accessed 26 Oct 2024.
  • 126.HISP RWANDA – hisprwanda.org. https://hisprwanda.org/. Accessed 26 Oct 2024.
  • 127.Saudigitus – Digital Innovation Services. https://saudigitus.org/. Accessed 26 Oct 2024.
  • 128.Home -, HISP-SA. https://www.hisp.org/. Accessed 26 Oct 2024.
  • 129.HISP Tanzania –. Advancing digital development solutions. https://hisp.tz/. Accessed 26 Oct 2024.
  • 130.Kiwuwa-Muyingo S, Todd J, Bhattacharjee T, Taylor A, Greenfield J. Enabling data sharing and utilization for African population health data using OHDSI tools with an OMOP-common data model. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1116682. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1116682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Biruk E, Habtamu T, Taye G, Ayele W, Tassew B, Nega A et al. Improving the quality of clinical coding through mapping of National classification of diseases (NCoD) and international classification of disease (ICD-10). Ethiop J Health Dev. 2021;35.
  • 132.Bhattacharjee T, Kiwuwa-Muyingo S, Kanjala C, Maoyi ML, Amadi D, Ochola M, et al. INSPIRE datahub: a pan-African integrated suite of services for harmonising longitudinal population health data using OHDSI tools. Front Digit Health. 2024;6. 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1329630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 133.Waiswa P, Akuze J, Moyer C, Kwesiga D, Arthur S, Sankoh O, Welaga P, et al. Status of birth and pregnancy outcome capture in health demographic surveillance sites in 13 countries. Int J Public Health. 2019;64:909–20. 10.1007/s00038-019-01241-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.INDEPTH Network. Every Newborn Action Plan. https://www.indepth-network.org/projects/enap. Accessed 4 Nov 2024.
  • 135.Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3:160018. 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.MakSPH. Background of DHPI-R | Digital Health Payment Initiative & Research in Africa. 2021.
  • 137.ITU News. How medical delivery drones are improving lives in Rwanda. ITU. 2020. https://www.itu.int/hub/2020/04/how-medical-delivery-drones-are-improving-lives-in-rwanda/. Accessed 17 Feb 2025.
  • 138.Owili PO, Muga MA, Chou Y-J, Hsu Y-HE, Huang N, Chien L-Y. Associations in the continuum of care for maternal, newborn and child health: a population-based study of 12 sub-Saharan Africa countries. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:414. 10.1186/s12889-016-3075-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Peng C, Yang X, Chen A, Smith KE, PourNejatian N, Costa AB, et al. A study of generative large Language model for medical research and healthcare. Npj Digit Med. 2023;6:1–10. 10.1038/s41746-023-00958-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Jansen P, van den Berg L, van Overveld P, Boiten J-W. Research data stewardship for healthcare professionals. In: Kubben P, Dumontier M, Dekker A, editors. Fundamentals of clinical data science. Cham (CH): Springer; 2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Adebamowo CA, Callier S, Akintola S, Maduka O, Jegede A, Arima C, et al. The promise of data science for health research in Africa. Nat Commun. 2023;14:6084. 10.1038/s41467-023-41809-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 2 (85.6KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 3 (608.6KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this scoping review are publicly available or included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The 52 articles that we have included in the scoping review are listed in Table 1 and the detailed supplementary materials. Data from the **WHO Digital Health Initiatives Atlas** are also publicly available and accessible through its original URL [https://digitalhealthatlas.org/en/-/](https:/digitalhealthatlas.org/en/-) or via “**Implementome**” it’s new host [https://gdhub.unige.ch/implementome/projects](https:/gdhub.unige.ch/implementome/projects). Any additional materials used in this study are available from the corresponding authors Professor Eric O. Ohuma ([Eric.Ohuma@lshtm.ac.uk](mailto:Eric.Ohuma@lshtm.ac.uk)) and Dr Akuze Joseph Waiswa ([joseph.waiswa@lshtm.ac.uk](mailto:joseph.waiswa@lshtm.ac.uk)) both at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, upon reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Public Health are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES