Skip to main content
Diseases logoLink to Diseases
. 2026 Jan 8;14(1):25. doi: 10.3390/diseases14010025

Increasing Numbers of Persons with Sleeping Problems in Sweden

Mona Nilsson 1,*, Lennart Hardell 2
Editor: Amal Mitra
PMCID: PMC12839934  PMID: 41590240

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated sleeping problems in the Swedish population based on the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare’s national patient register on numbers of patients in specialized outpatient care diagnosed with codes for sleeping problems. Methods: Numbers of patients per year and per 100,000 inhabitants in various age groups: 0–4, 5–19, 20–39, 40–59, and 60+ years diagnosed each year between 2001 and 2024 with the ICD codes G47 (sleep disorders) or F51 (non-organic sleep disorders) as main diagnosis were assessed. Results: The highest increase for sleep disorders was seen among children, adolescents, and young adults. All results are given per 100,000 persons. In the age group 0–4 years, the numbers of sleep disorders (G47) increased from 41.5 in 2001 to 215.8 in 2024. The corresponding results in the age group 5–19 years were 13.8 and 235.6, respectively. In the age group 20–39 years, 40.4 were diagnosed in 2001 and 220.9 in 2024. For subjects aged 40–59 years, 169.5 were diagnosed in 2001 and 362.8 in 2024, and for persons aged 60+ years, 116.4 were diagnosed in 2001 and 322.9 in 2024. No major changes in the numbers of persons with F51, non-organic sleep disorders, were observed. Conclusions: Sleeping problems can be caused by several factors; however, the rapid increase in recent years has temporally coincided with an increase in the public’s exposure to microwave radiofrequency (RF) radiation and increasing use of screens. RF radiation and use of screens may negatively impact sleep.

Keywords: microwaves, radiofrequency radiation, sleeping problems, Sweden

1. Introduction

In recent decades, public exposure to microwave radiofrequency (RF) radiation has increased sharply, largely due to the widespread and increasing use of mobile phones (smartphones), along with the expansion of 3G, 4G, and, most recently, 5G network infrastructures. The proliferation of Wi-Fi routers and various other wireless devices that rely on pulse-modulated microwave signals has also contributed to this trend (see Table 3 in [1]).

Since the introduction of 5G around 2019/2020, we have published eight case reports [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] documenting a substantial increase in radiation levels following the rollout of 5G that exceed those previously associated with adverse health effects in people residing near mobile phone base stations [10].

1.1. Limits for Microwave RF Radiation

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the USA [11] and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) in Germany [12] have adopted or recommended exposure limits for RF radiation that are based on thermal effects (tissue heating) only. It is claimed that these limits, although only based on thermal acute effects, protect the public and workers from the negative health impacts of chronic exposure to RF radiation [13]. In 2020, the ICNIRP recommended limits that were slightly relaxed in spite of growing evidence of harmful effects below the thermal limits [12,14]. Thermal-based limits have been adopted by the majority of the countries in the world, including Sweden, although there is a group of countries that have somewhat lower limits, e.g., China, Bulgaria, Poland, Russia, and Switzerland [15].

The ICNIRP limits are important for the telecommunications and military industry sector, which is exemplified by one leading 5G infrastructure provider, as outlined in a presentation. In that presentation, it was concluded that it would be difficult or even impossible to rollout 5G with 100 times lower limits than those proposed by the ICNIRP [16].

The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), on the contrary, concluded that the thermal-based ICNIRP and FCC limits are “invalid and continue to present a public health harm”. The commission noted that new limits are “urgently needed”. They should be based on scientific results instead of “erroneous assumptions, especially given the increasing worldwide exposures of people and the environment to RFR” [17].

1.2. Evidence of Impact on Sleep

Evidence of adverse biological effects from pulsed or modulated microwave RF radiation began to appear in the scientific literature during the 1960s and 1970s. Researchers at that time reported that the central and peripheral nervous systems, including the brain, appeared to be particularly susceptible to such exposure [18,19].

Studies of occupationally exposed groups demonstrated that non-thermal levels of microwave or RF radiation were associated with a range of neurological symptoms, including sleep disturbances, fatigue, dizziness, headaches, anxiety, and difficulties with attention and memory [20,21].

Studies investigating health effects among people living close to base stations or mobile phone masts have reported increased prevalence of several of the same symptoms, including sleep problems, as those described above. There are also studies that have found no effects. Balmori [10] analyzed all studies investigating health effects among people living near mobile phone base stations between 2002 and 2021. The majority of the studies, 17 out of 23, showed increased prevalence of various symptoms described above that are due to effects on the central nervous system.

A study published in 2025 found increased prevalence of the microwave syndrome or radiofrequency sickness symptoms associated with increased measured microwave RF radiation in the investigated persons’ homes [22]. Although the levels in the highest exposure group (5000–8000 μW/m2) were well below the ICNIRP and the FCC limits, 91.2% of the participants in that group reported sleeping problems. Other symptoms reported by over 90% of the participants were fatigue, memory problems, headache, increased irritability, and anxiety.

In another study, the prevalence of neuropsychiatric complaints such as headache, memory changes, dizziness, tremors, depressive symptoms, and sleep disturbance was significantly higher among exposed inhabitants than controls. Memory problems and sleep disturbance were among the symptoms with the highest prevalence [23].

Statistically significant increased prevalence of headaches, dizziness, fewer hours of sleep, and tiredness were found in a study involving people living near mobile phone antennas in Vallecas, Madrid, Spain [24].

The rollout of 5G technology began around 2019/2020, accompanied by a rapid increase in the number of base stations and antennas emitting microwave RF radiation.

To date, eight individual case studies, along with a summary review covering seven of them, have been published describing health effects in persons exposed to emissions from 5G base stations [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,25]. The most frequent and severe symptoms were sleep disturbances followed by fatigue, headaches, and increased irritability among the 16 individuals included in these case studies [25].

In a study involving 1072 participants, those with the highest measured RF radiation levels had shorter sleep duration and longer sleep latency than those living in zones with lower measured levels [26].

A large cohort of mobile phone use and sleep disturbances with 21,049 Swedish and 3120 Finnish participants reported in 2020 a higher risk, odds ratio (OR) = 1.24, and 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03–1.51 of insomnia among the most intensive users (>258 min/week). The study, funded to a significant extent by telecommunication companies, found most other sleep outcomes not to be associated with mobile phone use [27].

A study involving 1925 students aged 17–23 years in Saudi Arabia found that average mobile screen use per 24 h was 8.57 ± 4.59 h in 2018/2019 and that mobile screen use of ≥8 h per day and night was related to sleep disturbances and decreased sleep time [28].

Controlled laboratory studies show strong evidence that microwave RF radiation impacts the brain’s electrical activity, measured by electroencephalogram, EEG [29]. When normal brain activity is disrupted, sleep disturbances may follow. A study involving 12 participants found that exposure to the Wi-Fi frequency 2.45 GHz for seven nights significantly reduced sleep quality [30].

A review and meta-analysis of 20 studies involving, in total, 125,198 children aged 6–19 years on use of mobile phone and portable screen-based media (tablets for instance) reported “a strong and consistent association between bedtime media device use and inadequate sleep quantity (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.42–3.32), poor sleep quality (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.14–1.88), and excessive daytime sleepiness (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.32–5.61)” [31].

A review based on 25 studies on smart phone use and sleep quality reported that excessive smartphone use negatively impacted sleep quality and that younger populations and females were more susceptible [32].

On the other hand, a review commissioned by the WHO published in 2024 reported that microwave RF exposure below the ICNIRP limits “does not cause symptoms, but the evidence is very uncertain. The very low certainty evidence is due the low number of studies, possible risk of bias in some studies, inconsistencies, indirectness, and imprecision”. The review was based on five studies on sleep impact [33]. The first author, Martin Röösli, is a member of the ICNIRP, which might be a conflict of interest [34,35].

In a previous article, we described increasing numbers of memory problems among children age 5–19 years in Sweden and Norway [1]. Sleep deprivation may be related to memory problems as it has been reported to have a detrimental impact on memory [36,37].

1.3. Aim of This Study

The general public’s exposure to microwave RF radiation and use of mobile phones have increased substantially since the beginning of this millennium. Therefore, it is interesting to explore if sleeping problems have increased during the same time period. The aim of this study was to investigate if diagnosis of sleeping problems has increased in Sweden among various age groups, to describe trends, and to propose hypotheses.

2. Method

Statistics on sleeping problems were obtained from The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare’s national patient register on numbers of patients in specialized outpatient care diagnosed with codes for sleeping problems. We obtained numbers of patients per year and per 100,000 inhabitants in various age groups: 0–4, 5–19, 20–39, 40–59, and 60+ years diagnosed each year between 2001 and 2024 with the ICD-10 codes G47 (sleep disorders) or F51 (non-organic sleep disorders) as the main diagnosis. Since this was a register-based study without any individual data, ethics approval was not needed. AI tool Chat GPT version 5.2 was used for the making of the line charts (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).

3. Results

All results are presented as the number of diagnosed patients per 100,000 inhabitants per year. In the age group 0–4 years, the number of children with sleep disorders G47 as the main diagnosis increased from 41.5 in 2001 to 215.8 in 2024 (Table 1). The increase was more rapid since 2010 and reached a peak during 2020 with 240.6 patients (Figure 1). For children and adolescents aged 5–19 years, the corresponding results were 13.8 in 2001 and 235.6 in 2024 (Table 2, Figure 2). In the age group 20–39 years, 40.4 were diagnosed in 2001 and 220.9 in 2024 (Table 3, Figure 3). The results in the age group 40–59 years were 169.5 in 2001 and 362.8 in 2024, respectively (Table 4, Figure 4). Slightly lower numbers were seen in the age group 60+ years, with 116.4 in 2001 and 322.9 in 2024 (Table 5, Figure 5).

Table 1.

Number of patients aged 0–4 per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders G47 as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

Year Number of Patients per 100,000
2001 41.5
2002 62.1
2003 71.7
2004 68.6
2005 61.2
2006 53.8
2007 71.8
2008 78.0
2009 79.5
2010 109.1
2011 110.3
2012 144.7
2013 153.5
2014 167.4
2015 164.3
2016 167.5
2017 172.7
2018 203.0
2019 232.2
2020 240.6
2021 234.0
2022 224.3
2023 234.0
2024 215.8

Table 2.

Number of patients aged 5–19 per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders G47 as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

Year Number of Patients per 100,000
2001 13.8
2002 17.9
2003 19.6
2004 19.8
2005 23.1
2006 22.4
2007 25.2
2008 31.9
2009 36.1
2010 52.2
2011 65.7
2012 83.7
2013 92.6
2014 99.3
2015 104.3
2016 114.8
2017 130.1
2018 148.8
2019 175.7
2020 203.4
2021 220.2
2022 204.8
2023 223.0
2024 235.6

Table 3.

Number of patients aged 20–39 per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders G47 as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

Year Number of Patients per 100,000
2001 40.4
2002 52.4
2003 56.4
2004 63.8
2005 67.7
2006 70.2
2007 85.0
2008 84.2
2009 95.4
2010 123.5
2011 131.9
2012 134.0
2013 151.7
2014 156.8
2015 138.6
2016 141.0
2017 149.8
2018 150.9
2019 166.4
2020 169.0
2021 215.0
2022 191.4
2023 202.4
2024 220.9

Table 4.

Number of patients aged 40–59 per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders G47 as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

Year Number of Patients per 100,000
2001 169.5
2002 210.6
2003 222.5
2004 229.5
2005 233.9
2006 251.3
2007 316.4
2008 267.4
2009 300.3
2010 357.4
2011 377.5
2012 351.3
2013 353.1
2014 364.7
2015 282.3
2016 301.3
2017 300.6
2018 286.1
2019 289.3
2020 296.5
2021 447.2
2022 349.2
2023 334.0
2024 362.8

Table 5.

Number of patients aged 60 + per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders G47 as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

Year Number of Patients per 100,000
2001 116.4
2002 144.1
2003 161.9
2004 169.3
2005 177.7
2006 216.0
2007 277.1
2008 238.3
2009 284.2
2010 321.2
2011 369.0
2012 338.4
2013 347.4
2014 354.2
2015 268.5
2016 272.2
2017 272.6
2018 259.5
2019 262.2
2020 253.7
2021 394.1
2022 322.1
2023 301.2
2024 322.9

The most pronounced increase in sleep disorders (G47) was observed in the 5–19 years age group, where the incidence per 100,000 inhabitants increased approximately 17 times between 2001 and 2024. The most rapid increase occurred after 2009, when the incidence of diagnosed sleep disorders in this age group increased from 36.1 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2009 to 235.6 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2024.

For the diagnosis F51, non-organic sleep disorders, only a small change in number of patients was observed during the same time period, and for some age groups, there was no change. The numbers were also much lower compared to G47 (data not in table).

No substantial differences were observed between males and females in the number of patients diagnosed with sleep disorders within the 5–19 years age group. There were constantly more boys than girls aged 0–4 years diagnosed with sleep disorders over the time period. In that age group, 241.5 boys and 188.8 girls per 100 000 inhabitants were diagnosed in 2024 (Figure 1). For the age groups 20 years and older, more men than women were diagnosed with sleep disturbances over the whole studied time period (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Number of patients aged 0–4 per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders (G47) as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Number of patients aged 5–19 per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders (G47) as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Number of patients aged 20–39 per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders (G47) as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Number of patients aged 40–59 per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders (G47) as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Number of patients aged 60 + per 100,000 inhabitants diagnosed with sleep disorders (G47) as main diagnosis, each year from 2001 to 2024, in Sweden.

4. Discussion

This register-based study showed increasing numbers of sleep disturbances ICD code G47 among all age groups in Sweden since 2001. The most rapid increase occurred among children, adolescents, and young adults. These age groups have historically not experienced this level of sleep disturbances, illustrated by the lower numbers during the first years of the studied period.

Many well-established factors influence sleep problems, including mental health trends, stress, socioeconomic shifts, and school stress. Pandemic effects might be a contributing factor. However, since the pandemic began in Sweden in 2020, it is unlikely to be a major factor. Since this was a register-based study without any individual data, major factors driving the increasing trend of sleep disturbances were nor possible to analyze. Diagnostic awareness and trends might be a confounding factor, but assessing them was not possible in this type of study. Another limitation is that no systematic measurements of RF radiation on a population level during the studied time period, or other potential contributing lifestyle or environmental factors with potential to influence sleep, were able to be assessed.

The data are based on the Swedish National Board of Health’s national patient register. The register was launched in 2001, and there may be some underreporting of the number of cases during the registry’s first years according to the source (see https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/statistikdatabasen/, accessed on 20 December 2025). However the most rapid increase in sleeping disorders among children 0–4 and 5–19 years was observed after 2009, which contradicts that initial underreporting would be a major cause of the steep rise.

Clearly, the results differed between G47 (sleep disorders) and F51 (non-organic sleep disorders), with increasing numbers for sleep disorders with the code G47. Non-organic sleep disorders, F51, have no clear medical cause and are primarily related to psychological or behavioral factors. G47 is used for patients who have difficulty falling asleep and who have a short night’s sleep. For further discussion, see [38].

The results are similar to a Swedish study involving 335,625 adults aged 18–74 years. Sleeping problems increased markedly between 2000 and 2016 across all age groups, although perceived work stress decreased [39].

The increasing trend of sleeping problems among children and adolescents is also mirrored in data from the Swedish National Board of Health on number of patients prescribed sleeping pills by physicians each year. In the age group 0–19 years, the number increased from 16,102 in 2011 to 112,000 in 2024, e.g., a sevenfold increase [40,41].

Increasing sleep disturbances among children and adults have also been reported from other countries. A clear increase, from 34% to 49%, in self-reported sleep problems was reported among 15–45-year-old Danes between 2010 and 2021 [42]. In Finland, an increasing trend of insomnia among children aged 11–18 was found between the mid-1990s and the end of the first decade of the 2000s [43]. A “striking increase” in the number of sleep problems among adults in the USA was reported between 2002 and 2012 [44,45].

Insufficient sleep has been described as a global health problem with serious health implications. Chronic insufficient sleep and sleep disorders may lead to a range of physical and mental health problems [46].

We have previously documented increasing memory problems and mild cognitive decline (including memory problems) among children and adolescents aged 5–19 in Norway and in Sweden [1]. The increase in memory problems in this age group in Sweden began after 2010, around the same time period as the more pronounced increase in sleeping problems began among children aged 0–4 and 5–19 years in Sweden based on official statistics.

The increase in sleeping problems and memory problems has coincided in time with a huge increase in the publics’ exposure to microwave RF radiation from mobile telecommunication technologies. As documented in our article on memory problems, see Table 3 in [1], children have been increasingly exposed to microwave RF radiation during the last 15 years through the introduction and marketing of smartphones, Wi-Fi in schools and homes, and the rollout of 4G and later 5G. In 2009, one of the largest telecom operators in Sweden directed a marketing campaign to parents of children aged 7 years. Prepaid mobile phone cards were offered to schoolchildren starting in the first grade [47]. By 2022, more than 70% of Swedish children aged 15 years and 40% of children aged 12 years used a mobile phone for more than 3 h per day [48].

Given the register-based design, this study is only hypothesis-generating and does not allow for causal inference. While the hypothesis of RF contributing to rising sleep disorder rates is biologically and socially plausible, further rigorous investigations are needed to explore possible driving factors behind the increasing sleep disturbances [46,49].

In our case studies involving a total of 16 studied persons exposed to 5G base stations near their apartment or house, the most common and severe symptom was sleeping problems, followed by fatigue [25].

Blue light from the increasing use of smartphones, tablets, and laptops may also contribute to increasing sleeping problems as the light disrupts circadian rhythm and melatonin production [50].

Sleeping problems may be caused by several factors. However, the rapid increase in recent years is clearly coinciding with a parallel increase in the public’s exposure to microwave RF radiation and increasing use of smart phones and screens. In future investigations, sleep disorders, RF radiation exposure, and biological parameters would be desirable to study.

5. Conclusions

This Swedish register-based study showed increasing sleeping problems in the population since about 2009, especially in the age groups up to 39 years. The increase cannot only be caused by higher prevalence of reporting patients to the national patient register. Rather, the pattern suggests the involvement of a widespread environmental- or lifestyle-related exposure. Notably, the period under study coincides with a substantial rise in population exposure to microwave RF radiation following the deployment of 4G and 5G infrastructure and the growing use of mobile phones and other RF radiation-emitting technologies. Such exposures may represent an important contributing factor to the observed trends.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript the author used Chat GPT version 5.2 for the purposes of making the line charts (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take fully responsible for the content of this publication.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.N. and L.H.; methodology, M.N. and L.H.; software, M.N.; validation, M.N. and L.H.; formal analysis, M.N. and L.H.; investigation, M.N. and L.H.; resources, M.N. and L.H.; data curation, M.N. and L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N. and L.H.; writing—review and editing, M.N. and L.H.; visualization, M.N. and L.H.; supervision, M.N. and L.H.; project administration, M.N. and L.H.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The information generated and analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Nilsson M., Hardell L. Increasing numbers of children aged 5–19 years with memory problems in Sweden and Norway. Arch. Clin. Biomed. Res. 2025;9:431–439. doi: 10.26502/acbr.50170487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hardell L., Nilsson M. Case Report: The microwave syndrome after installation of 5G emphasizes the need for protection from radiofrequency radiation. Ann. Case Rep. 2023;8:1112. doi: 10.29011/2574-7754.101112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nilsson M., Hardell L. Development of the microwave syndrome in two men shortly after installation of 5G on the roof above their office. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)];Ann. Clin. Case Rep. 2023 8:2378. Available online: https://www.anncaserep.com/open-access/development-of-the-microwave-syndrome-in-two-men-shortly-after-9589.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hardell L., Nilsson M. Case Report: A 52-year healthy woman developed severe microwave syndrome shortly after installation of a 5G base station close to her apartment. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)];Ann. Clin. Med. Case Rep. 2023 10:1–10. Available online: https://acmcasereports.org/pdf/ACMCR-v10-1926.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nilsson M., Hardell L. 5G Radiofrequency radiation caused the microwave syndrome in a family living close to the base stations. J. Cancer Sci. Clin. Ther. 2023;7:127–134. doi: 10.26502/jcsct.5079203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nilsson M., Hardell L. A 49-year-old man developed severe microwave syndrome after activation of 5G base station 20 meters from his apartment. J. Community Med. Public Health. 2023;7:382. doi: 10.29011/2577-2228.100382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nilsson M., Hardell L. Case Report: Both parents and their three children developed symptoms of the microwave syndrome while on holiday near a 5G tower. Ann. Clin. Med. Case Rep. 2023;12:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hardell L., Nilsson M. A woman aged 82 years with electromagnetic hypersensitivity since almost four decades developed the microwave syndrome after installation of 5G base stations in her living vicinity—Ethical principles in medicine are violated. J. Environ. Sci. Public Health. 2024;8:1–8. doi: 10.26502/jesph.96120200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hardell L., Nilsson M. An eight year old boy developed severe headache in a school close to a mast with 5G base stations. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)];Ann. Clin. Case Stud. 2024 6:1093. Available online: https://www.medtextpublications.com/open-access/an-eight-year-old-boy-developed-severe-headache-in-a-1582.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Balmori A. Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer. Environ. Res. 2022;214:113851. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)];OET Bull. 1997 65:1–53. Available online: https://www.lbagroup.com/images/PDFs/oet65c.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz) Health Phys. 2020;118:483–524. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000001210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.GSMA International EMF Exposure Guidelines Explaining the 2020 RF-EMF Exposure Guidelines Published by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) October 2021. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)]. Available online: https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/public-policy/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GSMA_International_EMF_Exposure_Guideline_Oct21.pdf.
  • 14.Hardell L., Nilsson M., Koppel T., Carlberg M. Aspects on the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) 2020 guidelines on radiofrequency radiation. J. Cancer Sci. Clin. Ther. 2021;5:250–283. doi: 10.26502/jcsct.5079117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ramirez-Vazquez R., Escobar I., Vandenbosch G.A.E., Arribas E. Personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A comparative analysis of international, national, and regional guidelines. Environ. Res. 2024;246:118124. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Törnevik C. Impact of EMF limits on 5G network roll-out; Proceedings of the ITU Workshop on 5G, EMF & Health; Warsaw, Poland. 5 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: Implications for 5G. Environ. Health. 2022;21:92. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carpenter D.O. The microwave syndrome or electro-hypersensitivity: Historical background. Rev. Environ. Health. 2015;30:217–222. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2015-0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pollack H. The microwave syndrome. Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med. 1979;55:1240–1243. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Marha K., Musil J., Tuha H. Electromagnetic Fields and the Life Environment. San Francisco Press; Berkeley, CA, USA: 1971. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)]. Biological effects of electromagnetic waves and their mechanism; pp. 29–38. Available online: https://www.stralskyddsstiftelsen.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/1971book_marha.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dodge C. Clinical and Hygienic Aspects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields: A Review. U.S. Naval Observatory; Washington, DC, USA: 1969. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)]. Available online: https://www.magdahavas.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Dodge_1969.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sailo L., Laldinpuii, Zosangzuali M., Weller S., Varte C.L., Tochhawng L., McCredden J.E., Zothansiamaa Greater prevalence of symptoms associated with higher exposures to mobile phone base stations in a hilly, densely populated city in Mizoram, India. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2025;44:385–404. doi: 10.1080/15368378.2025.2513900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abdel-Rassoul G., El-Fateh O.A., Salem M.A., Michael A., Farahat F., El-Batanouny M., Salem E. Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. Neurotoxicology. 2007;28:434–440. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.López I., Félix N., Rivera M., Alonso A., Maestú C. What is the radiation before 5G? A correlation study between measurements in situ and in real time and epidemiological indicators in Vallecas, Madrid. Environ. Res. 2021;194:110734. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hardell L., Nilsson M. Summary of seven Swedish case reports on the microwave syndrome associated with 5G radiofrequency radiation. Rev. Environ. Health. 2025;40:147–157. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2024-0017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chandel P., Singh M.M., Pati A.K., Parganiha A. Exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation shortens sleep duration and lengthens sleep latency and sleep inertia in humans living in proximity to the base transceiver stations. South Asian J. Exp. Biol. 2021;11:466–481. doi: 10.38150/sajeb.11(4).p466-481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tettamanti G., Auvinen A., Åkerstedt T., Kojo K., Ahlbom A., Heinävaara S., Elliott P., Schüz J., Deltour I., Kromhout H., et al. Long-term effect of mobile phone use on sleep quality: Results from the cohort study of mobile phone use and health (COSMOS) Environ. Int. 2020;140:105687. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rafique N., Al-Asoom L.I., Alsunni A.A., Saudagar F.N., Almulhim L., Alkaltham G. Effects of Mobile Use on Subjective Sleep Quality. Nat. Sci. Sleep. 2020;12:357–364. doi: 10.2147/nss.s253375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Loughran S.P., Verrender A., Dalecki A., Burdon C.A., Tagami K., Park J., Taylor N.A.S., Croft R.J. Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure and the Resting EEG: Exploring the Thermal Mechanism Hypothesis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:1505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bijlsma N., Conduit R., Kennedy G., Cohen M. Does radiofrequency radiation impact sleep? A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study. Front. Public Health. 2024;12:1481537. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1481537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carter B., Rees P., Hale L., Bhattacharjee D., Paradkar M.S. Association Between Portable Screen-Based Media Device Access or Use and Sleep Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:1202–1208. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kumar M., Katoch O.R., Kumar N., Sehgal S. Exploring the link between smartphone use and sleep quality: A systematic review. Sleep Res. 2025;2:42–56. doi: 10.1002/slp2.70002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Röösli M., Dongus S., Jalilian H., Eyers J., Esu E., Oringanje C.M., Meremikwu M., Bosch-Capblanch X. The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on tinnitus, migraine and non-specific symptoms in the general and working population: A systematic review and meta-analysis on human observational studies. Environ. Int. 2024;183:108338. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hardell L. World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health–a hard nut to crack. Int. J. Oncol. 2017;51:405–413. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nyberg R., McCredden J., Hardell L. The European Union assessments of radiofrequency radiation health risks—Another hard nut to crack. Rev. Environ. Health. 2023;39:709–719. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2023-0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Carley D.W., Farabi S.S. Physiology of Sleep. Diabetes Spectr. 2016;29:5–9. doi: 10.2337/diaspect.29.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Newbury C.R., Crowley R., Rastle K., Tamminen J. Sleep deprivation and memory: Meta-analytic reviews of studies on sleep deprivation before and after learning. Psychol. Bull. 2021;147:1215–1240. doi: 10.1037/bul0000348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Riemann D., Espie C.A., Altena E., Arnardottir E.S., Baglioni C., Bassetti C.L.A., Bastien C., Berzina N., Bjorvatn B., Dikeos D., et al. The European Insomnia Guideline: An update on the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia 2023. J. Sleep Res. 2023;32:e14035. doi: 10.1111/jsr.14035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Blom V., Kallings L.V., Ekblom B., Wallin P., Andersson G., Hemmingsson E., Ekblom Ö., Söderling J., Ekblom Bak E. Self-reported general health, overall and work-related stress, loneliness, and sleeping problems in 335,625 Swedish adults from 2000 to 2016. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:511. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dagens Medicin Fler Barn får Sömnmedel–Femdubblad Förskrivning på tio år. 2022. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)]. Available online: https://www.dagensmedicin.se/alla-nyheter/lakemedel/fler-barn-far-somnmedel-femdubblad-forskrivning-pa-tio-ar/
  • 41.SVT Nyheter Halland Stor Ökning av Unga som tar Sömnmedel–det här är Orsaken. 2025. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)]. Available online: https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/halland/stor-okning-av-unga-som-tar-somnmedel-det-har-ar-orsaken.
  • 42.Zucco A.G., Drews H.J., Uleman J.F., Bhatt S., Rod N.H. Exploring nationwide patterns of sleep problems from late adolescence to adulthood using machine learning. Sci. Adv. 2025;11:eadw1227. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kronholm E., Puusniekka R., Jokela J., Villberg J., Urrila A.S., Paunio T., Välimaa R., Tynjälä J. Trends in self-reported sleep problems, tiredness and related school performance among Finnish adolescents from 1984 to 2011. J. Sleep Res. 2015;24:3–10. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ford E.S., Wheaton A.G., Cunningham T.J., Giles W.H., Chapman D.P., Croft J.B. Trends in outpatient visits for insomnia, sleep apnea, and prescriptions for sleep medications among US adults: Findings from the National Ambulatory Medical Care survey 1999–2010. Sleep. 2014;37:1283–1293. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ford E.S., Cunningham T.J., Giles W.H., Croft J.B. Trends in insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness among U.S. adults from 2002 to 2012. Sleep Med. 2015;16:372–378. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chattu V.K., Manzar M.D., Kumary S., Burman D., Spence D.W., Pandi-Perumal S.R. The global problem of insufficient sleep and its serious public health implications. Healthcare. 2018;7:1. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Expressen Tele2 Skickar Kontantkort till Sjuåringar. 2009. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)]. Available online: https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/tele2-skickar-kontantkort-till-sjuaringar/
  • 48.Statens medieråd Ungar & Medier 2023, En Statistisk Undersökning av Ungas Medievanor och Attityder till Medieanvändning. 2023. [(accessed on 20 December 2025)]. Available online: https://mediemyndigheten.se/globalassets/rapporter-och-analyser/ungar-och-medier/ungar--medier-2023_anpassad.pdf.
  • 49.Bodewein L., Dechent D., Graefrath D., Kraus T., Krause T., Driessen S. Systematic review of the physiological and health-related effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure from wireless communication devices on children and adolescents in experimental and epidemiological human studies. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0268641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chang A.M., Aeschbach D., Duffy J.F., Czeisler C.A. Evening use of light-emitting eReaders negatively affects sleep, circadian timing, and next-morning alertness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:1232–1237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418490112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The information generated and analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Diseases are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES