Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1996 Winter;29(4):495–505. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-495

An experimental comparison of three different schedules of reinforcement of drug abstinence using cigarette smoking as an exemplar.

J M Roll 1, S T Higgins 1, G J Badger 1
PMCID: PMC1284006  PMID: 8995832

Abstract

The efficacy of three different schedules of reinforcement for promoting and sustaining drug abstinence was compared in this study. Cigarette smoking was studied as an exemplar of stimulant drug self-administration. Sixty cigarette smokers were assigned to one of three groups (progressive rate of reinforcement, fixed rate of reinforcement, and yoked control). Participants in all three groups were asked to refrain from smoking for 1 week. Participants in the progressive and fixed groups achieved greater mean levels of abstinence than those in the control group. Participants in the progressive group were significantly less likely to resume smoking when they became abstinent than participants in the other groups.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (165.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bickel W. K., DeGrandpre R. J., Hughes J. R., Higgins S. T. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. II. A unit-price analysis of cigarette smoking. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):145–154. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carroll M. E., Lac S. T., Nygaard S. L. A concurrently available nondrug reinforcer prevents the acquisition or decreases the maintenance of cocaine-reinforced behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1989;97(1):23–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00443407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chornock W. M., Stitzer M. L., Gross J., Leischow S. Experimental model of smoking re-exposure: effects on relapse. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1992;108(4):495–500. doi: 10.1007/BF02247427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crowley T. J., MacDonald M. J., Zerbe G. O., Petty T. L. Reinforcing breath carbon monoxide reductions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1991 Dec;29(1):47–62. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(91)90021-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cummings K. M., Jaén C. R., Giovino G. Circumstances surrounding relapse in a group of recent exsmokers. Prev Med. 1985 Mar;14(2):195–202. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fagerstrom K. O., Schneider N. G. Measuring nicotine dependence: a review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. J Behav Med. 1989 Apr;12(2):159–182. doi: 10.1007/BF00846549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fung Y. K., Schmid M. J., Anderson T. M., Lau Y. S. Effects of nicotine withdrawal on central dopaminergic systems. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996 Mar;53(3):635–640. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)02063-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Higgins S. T., Bickel W. K., Hughes J. R. Influence of an alternative reinforcer on human cocaine self-administration. Life Sci. 1994;55(3):179–187. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(94)00878-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Higgins S. T., Budney A. J., Bickel W. K., Foerg F. E., Donham R., Badger G. J. Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;51(7):568–576. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950070060011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Higgins S. T., Budney A. J., Bickel W. K., Hughes J. R., Foerg F., Badger G. Achieving cocaine abstinence with a behavioral approach. Am J Psychiatry. 1993 May;150(5):763–769. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.5.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Higgins S. T., Stitzer M. L., Bigelow G. E., Liebson I. A. Contingent methadone delivery: effects on illicit-opiate use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1986 Jul;17(4):311–322. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(86)90080-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hughes J. R., Gulliver S. B., Fenwick J. W., Valliere W. A., Cruser K., Pepper S., Shea P., Solomon L. J., Flynn B. S. Smoking cessation among self-quitters. Health Psychol. 1992;11(5):331–334. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.11.5.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marcus B. A., Vollmer T. R. Effects of differential negative reinforcement on disruption and compliance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):229–230. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nader M. A., Woolverton W. L. Effects of increasing the magnitude of an alternative reinforcer on drug choice in a discrete-trials choice procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1991;105(2):169–174. doi: 10.1007/BF02244304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rand C. S., Stitzer M. L., Bigelow G. E., Mead A. M. The effects of contingent payment and frequent workplace monitoring on smoking abstinence. Addict Behav. 1989;14(2):121–128. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(89)90041-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Repp A. C., Felce D., Barton L. E. The effects of initial interval size on the efficacy of DRO schedules of reinforcement. Except Child. 1991 Mar-Apr;57(5):417–425. doi: 10.1177/001440299105700505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shoptaw S., Jarvik M. E., Ling W., Rawson R. A. Contingency management for tobacco smoking in methadone-maintained opiate addicts. Addict Behav. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):409–412. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(95)00066-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Silverman K., Higgins S. T., Brooner R. K., Montoya I. D., Cone E. J., Schuster C. R., Preston K. L. Sustained cocaine abstinence in methadone maintenance patients through voucher-based reinforcement therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 May;53(5):409–415. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830050045007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stitzer M. L., Bigelow G. E. Contingent reinforcement for carbon monoxide reduction: within-subject effects of pay amount. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Winter;17(4):477–483. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stitzer M. L., Bigelow G. E. Contingent reinforcement for reduced carbon monoxide levels in cigarette smokers. Addict Behav. 1982;7(4):403–412. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stitzer M. L., Bigelow G. E., Liebson I. Reducing benzodiazepine self-administration with contingent reinforcement. Addict Behav. 1979;4(3):245–252. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(79)90034-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stitzer M. L., Rand C. S., Bigelow G. E., Mead A. M. Contingent payment procedures for smoking reduction and cessation. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Summer;19(2):197–202. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES