Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1997 Spring;30(1):21–41. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-21

An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses.

B A Shore 1, B A Iwata 1, I G DeLeon 1, S Kahng 1, R G Smith 1
PMCID: PMC1284023  PMID: 9103985

Abstract

The concept of reinforcer substitutability proposes a continuum of interactions among reinforcers in a given situation. At one end of this continuum, reinforcers are substitutable, with one reinforcer being readily traded for another. We conducted an analysis of reinforcers that were substitutable with those produced by self-injurious behavior (SIB). Three individuals with profound developmental disabilities, whose SIB appeared to be maintained by automatic reinforcement, participated. Results of three experiments showed that (a) object manipulation and SIB were inversely related when leisure materials and SIB were concurrently available, with participants showing almost complete preference for object manipulation; (b) attempts to reduce SIB using the preferred objects as reinforcers in differential reinforcement contingencies were unsuccessful for all 3 participants; and (c) participants' preferences for SIB or object manipulation systematically changed when reinforcer cost (the amount of effort required to obtain the object) was varied. Results of the three experiments illustrate the importance of examining interactions among concurrently available reinforcers when conducting reinforcer assessments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (328.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow D. H., Hayes S. C. Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):199–210. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett R. P., McGonigle J. J., Ackles P. K., Burkhart J. E. Behavioral treatment of chronic aerophagia. Am J Ment Defic. 1987 May;91(6):620–625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baum W. M. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):269–281. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cowdery G. E., Iwata B. A., Pace G. M. Effects and side effects of DRO as treatment for self-injurious behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Winter;23(4):497–506. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DAVENPORT R. K., Jr, BERKSON G. Stereotyped movements of mental defectives. II. Effects of novel objects. Am J Ment Defic. 1963 May;67:879–882. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Danford D. E., Huber A. M. Pica among mentally retarded adults. Am J Ment Defic. 1982 Sep;87(2):141–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Day R. M., Rea J. A., Schussler N. G., Larsen S. E., Johnson W. L. A functionally based approach to the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Behav Modif. 1988 Oct;12(4):565–589. doi: 10.1177/01454455880124005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goh H. L., Iwata B. A., Shore B. A., DeLeon I. G., Lerman D. C., Ulrich S. M., Smith R. G. An analysis of the reinforcing properties of hand mouthing. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):269–283. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Green Leonard, Freed Debra E. The substitutability of reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):141–158. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HERRNSTEIN R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Horner R. D. The effects of an environmental "enrichment" program on the behavior of institutionalized profoundly retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;13(3):473–491. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hursh S. R., Raslear T. G., Shurtleff D., Bauman R., Simmons L. A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):419–440. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Iwata B. A., Pace G. M., Dorsey M. F., Zarcone J. R., Vollmer T. R., Smith R. G., Rodgers T. A., Lerman D. C., Shore B. A., Mazalesk J. L. The functions of self-injurious behavior: an experimental-epidemiological analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):215–240. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Iwata B. A., Pace G. M., Kalsher M. J., Cowdery G. E., Cataldo M. F. Experimental analysis and extinction of self-injurious escape behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;23(1):11–27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kerwin M. E., Ahearn W. H., Eicher P. S., Burd D. M. The costs of eating: a behavioral economic analysis of food refusal. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):245–260. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lockwood K., Bourland G. Reduction of self-injurious behaviors by reinforcement and toy use. Ment Retard. 1982 Aug;20(4):169–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mazaleski J. L., Iwata B. A., Rodgers T. A., Vollmer T. R., Zarcone J. R. Protective equipment as treatment for stereotypic hand mouthing: sensory extinction or punishment effects? J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):345–355. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Neef N. A., Shade D., Miller M. S. Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):575–583. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pace G. M., Ivancic M. T., Edwards G. L., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Repp A. C., Deitz S. M., Deitz D. E. Reducing inappropriate behaviors in classrooms and in individual sessions through DRO schedules of reinforcement. Ment Retard. 1976 Feb;14(1):11–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rincover A. Sensory extinction: a procedure form eliminating self-stimulatory behavior in developmentally disabled children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1978 Sep;6(3):299–310. doi: 10.1007/BF00924733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Steege M. W., Wacker D. P., Berg W. K., Cigrand K. K., Cooper L. J. The use of behavioral assessment to prescribe and evaluate treatments for severely handicapped children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1989 Spring;22(1):23–33. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tustin R. D. Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):597–606. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Houten R. The use of wrist weights to reduce self-injury maintained by sensory reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):197–203. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vollmer T. R., Iwata B. A. Differential reinforcement as treatment for behavior disorders: procedural and functional variations. Res Dev Disabil. 1992;13(4):393–417. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(92)90013-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vollmer T. R. The concept of automatic reinforcement: implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 1994 May-Jun;15(3):187–207. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(94)90011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES