Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1997 Summer;30(2):299–312. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-299

Identifying instructional tasks that occasion problem behaviors and assessing the effects of student versus teacher choice among these tasks.

B J Vaughn 1, R H Horner 1
PMCID: PMC1284047  PMID: 9210308

Abstract

Levels of problem behavior were assessed when 4 students with severe disabilities received instruction on preferred versus nonpreferred tasks and when tasks of each type were chosen by the teacher rather than by the student. In Phase 1, interview and direct observation assessments were conducted to identify relative preferences for academic tasks. In Phase 2, the effects of these lower preference and higher preference tasks on the rate of problem behavior were evaluated using a multielement design. The results showed that lower preference tasks were associated with higher rates of problem behaviors and that students, when given a choice, consistently selected the tasks that had been identified through interview and direct observation as higher preference. In Phase 3, we assessed whether allowing the students to choose between pairs of lower preference tasks or between pairs of higher preference tasks reduced problem behavior relative to a condition in which the teacher selected the same tasks. For 2 of 4 students, the rates of problem behavior were lower when students (rather than the teacher) selected the lower preference activity. Higher preference tasks for 3 students were associated with relatively low rates of problem behavior regardless of whether the student or the teacher selected the task.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (232.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axelrod S. Functional and structural analyses of behavior: approaches leading to reduced use of punishment procedures? Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(2):165–178. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carr E. G. The motivation of self-injurious behavior: a review of some hypotheses. Psychol Bull. 1977 Jul;84(4):800–816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dunlap G., Kern-Dunlap L., Clarke S., Robbins F. R. Functional assessment, curricular revision, and severe behavior problems. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Summer;24(2):387–397. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dunlap G., dePerczel M., Clarke S., Wilson D., Wright S., White R., Gomez A. Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):505–518. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Durand V. M., Crimmins D. B. Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. J Autism Dev Disord. 1988 Mar;18(1):99–117. doi: 10.1007/BF02211821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher W. W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Amari A. Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. Am J Ment Retard. 1996 Jul;101(1):15–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Green C. W., Reid D. H., White L. K., Halford R. C., Brittain D. P., Gardner S. M. Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):31–43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mace F. C. Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 May;61(3):529–550. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mace F. C., Lalli J. S. Linking descriptive and experimental analyses in the treatment of bizarre speech. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;24(3):553–562. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Newton J. S., Ard W. R., Jr, Horner R. H. Validating predicted activity preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):239–245. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Northup J., Wacker D., Sasso G., Steege M., Cigrand K., Cook J., DeRaad A. A brief functional analysis of aggressive and alternative behavior in an outclinic setting. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;24(3):509–522. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Parsons M. B., Reid D. H. Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):183–195. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Repp A. C., Felce D., Barton L. E. Basing the treatment of stereotypic and self-injurious behaviors on hypotheses of their causes. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Fall;21(3):281–289. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sasso G. M., Reimers T. M., Cooper L. J., Wacker D., Berg W., Steege M., Kelly L., Allaire A. Use of descriptive and experimental analyses to identify the functional properties of aberrant behavior in school settings. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Winter;25(4):809–821. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vollmer T. R., Marcus B. A., Ringdahl J. E., Roane H. S. Progressing from brief assessments to extended experimental analyses in the evaluation of aberrant behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Winter;28(4):561–576. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zarcone J. R., Rodgers T. A., Iwata B. A., Rourke D. A., Dorsey M. F. Reliability analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale: a failure to replicate. Res Dev Disabil. 1991;12(4):349–360. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(91)90031-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES