Abstract
Most concepts of development explain certain behavior changes as products or markers of the invariable succession of emerging periods, stages, refinements, or achievements that define and order much of an individual's life. A different but comparable concept can be derived from the most basic mechanisms of behavior analysis, which are its environmental contingencies, and from its most basic strategy, which is to study behavior as its subject matter. From a behavior-analytic perspective, the most fundamental developmental questions are (a) whether these contingencies vary in any systematic way across the life span, and thus make behavior change in a correspondingly systematic way; (b) whether some of these contingencies and their changes have more far-reaching consequences than others, in terms of the importance to the organism and others, of the behavior classes they change. Certain behavior changes open the door to especially broad or especially important further behavior change, leading to the concept of the behavioral cusp. A behavioral cusp, then, is any behavior change that brings the organism's behavior into contact with new contingencies that have even more far-reaching consequences. Of all the environmental contingencies that change or maintain behavior, those that accomplish cusps are developmental. Behavior change remains the fundamental phenomenon of development for a behavior-analytic view; a cusp is a special instance of behavior change, a change crucial to what can come next.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (181.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ALLEN K. E., HART B., BUELL J. S., HARRIS F. R., WOLF M. M. EFFECTS OF SOCIAL REINFORCEMENT ON ISOLATE BEHAVIOR OF A NURSERY SCHOOL CHILD. Child Dev. 1964 Jun;35:511–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1964.tb05188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baer D. M., Peterson R. F., Sherman J. A. The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):405–416. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Rose J., De Souza D. G., Hanna E. S. Teaching reading and spelling: exclusion and stimulus equivalence. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):451–469. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon L. S. The nature of control by spoken words over visual stimulus selection. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 May;27(3):433–442. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FERGUSON G. A. On learning and human ability. Can J Psychol. 1954 Jun;8(2):95–112. doi: 10.1037/h0083598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FERGUSON G. A. On transfer and the abilities of man. Can J Psychol. 1956 Sep;10(3):121–131. doi: 10.1037/h0083676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koegel R. I., Frea W. D. Treatment of social behavior in autism through the modification of pivotal social skills. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Fall;26(3):369–377. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIlvane W. J., Stoddard T. Acquisition of matching - to - sample performances in severe retardation: learning by exclusion. J Ment Defic Res. 1981 Mar;25(Pt 1):33–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1981.tb00091.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reese H. W. Contextualism and developmental psychology. Adv Child Dev Behav. 1991;23:187–230. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stokes T. F., Baer D. M. An implicit technology of generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):349–367. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]