Considering current research trends shaped by critical challenges in food science and the food industry, foodomics can be defined as a scientific discipline that investigates changes in the molecular composition and quality of foods arising from raw materials, processing, and cooking, as well as the effects of food consumption on human health and metabolism [1]. Food matrices are among the most challenging samples to examine because of their varied compositions and complex structural organization [2]. From physical, chemical, and biological perspectives, foods represent multifactorial systems composed of heterogeneous mixtures of macro- and micro-molecules often referred to as small molecules with molecular masses ≤1500 Da embedded within complex physical structures such as crystals, amorphous solids, aqueous solutions, gels, pores, cavities, organelles, and cells. Most foods consist primarily of four components: water and the three macronutrient classes including carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids alongside omnipresent plasticizers. Together, these components typically represent 70–99% of total food mass, despite the vast molecular diversity and heterogeneity within macronutrients [3]. Foodomics primarily focuses on these constituents, involving both qualitative and quantitative data analysis to recognize the specific effects of food on human health and nutrition [4,5,6]. To solve food complexity, advanced analytical chemistry [7,8,9,10], omics sciences [11,12,13,14], and bioinformatics [15,16,17] are jointly employed to address critical challenges in food quality, safety, and traceability [18,19,20], together with the complex relationship between diet and human health. In recent years, the constant evolution of analytical technologies has enabled a transition from traditional targeted approaches toward more comprehensive, sensitive, and high-throughput strategies.
This Special Issue, “Modern Analytical Strategies for Foodomics: From Nutritional Value to Food Security”, brings together five contributions that exemplify how state-of-the-art analytical tools can be effectively applied across different domains of food science, ranging from clinical nutrition to authenticity, allergen detection, dietary supplements, and emerging biosensing methodologies.
The clinical relevance of accurate food analysis is clearly demonstrated in the first study [21], on foods for special medical purposes (FSMPs); a microchip-based gel electrophoresis technique was developed for the rapid and reproducible determination of total nitrogen and protein profiles. The main issues in rapid, reproducible protein/nitrogen analysis involve matrix effects (such as non-protein nitrogen and protein aggregation in dairy), method limitations (Kjeldahl/Dumas time, hazardous reagents, differentiating N types), and the challenges in achieving both speed and accuracy, leading to the need for advanced techniques, for example, microfluidics or spectroscopies such as FT-NIR, to overcome traditional challenges in complex samples [22,23]. The work highlights substantial discrepancies between declared and experimentally measured nitrogen content, especially in liquid FSMPs, raising important concerns for patients with chronic kidney disease whose protein intake must be strictly controlled. This contribution underlines the pivotal role of robust analytical quality control in safeguarding vulnerable populations and ensuring the reliability of nutritional labeling.
The following two contributions [24,25] address food authenticity, employing a multi-analytical technique approach. By combining gas chromatography-based fatty acid profiling with rapid and non-destructive 1H NMR spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis, it was possible to significantly discriminate argan oils based on both region and preparation method [24]. The study represents a clear example of how complementary analytical platforms and chemometrics can be integrated to enable authenticity, purity control, and protection against food fraud. Dietary supplements represent another rapidly expanding sector that requires strict analytical surveillance [26]. In one contribution [25], 1H NMR spectroscopy and HPLC-DAD were used for quality control in supplements containing magnolia bark extract, a popular ingredient with documented anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Although both techniques provided comparable quantitative results for magnolol and honokiol, significant discrepancies between declared and actual compositions were observed. Importantly, this study represents the first demonstration of 1H NMR as a routine quantitative tool for the control of magnolia-based supplements, highlighting the potential of spectroscopic techniques for fast, reliable, and cost-effective quality assessment.
Allergen contamination, one of the most critical aspects of food safety, is investigated in the third paper [27]. In the context of sustainable agriculture and green manuring practices, the potential cross-contamination of wheat with soybean and mustard allergens was investigated using a targeted bottom–up proteomics approach based on RPLC–MRM mass spectrometry [28,29]. The validated method enabled the reliable identification and quantification of specific marker peptides in complex processed matrices such as flour and cookies. This work demonstrates how modern targeted proteomics can effectively support regulatory compliance and consumer protection in the presence of emerging contamination scenarios linked to environmentally friendly farming practices.
Finally, the last contribution [30] provides a comprehensive review of immuno-polymerase chain reaction (IPCR) as an ultra-sensitive analytical platform for food contaminant detection. By merging the selectivity of immunoassays with the amplification capacity of PCR, IPCR has shown remarkable performance in the detection of a wide range of analytes, including pathogens, toxins, mycotoxins, allergens, pesticides, antibiotics, and persistent organic pollutants. The review critically discusses current formats, applications, and limitations while also outlining future perspectives on the implementation of IPCR in next-generation food safety monitoring.
Together, the papers collected in this Special Issue clearly demonstrate how modern analytical strategies, including chromatographic, spectroscopic, mass spectrometric, and bioanalytical methods, are reshaping the field of foodomics. These contributions not only highlight technological advancements but also emphasize their direct implications for nutrition, consumer safety, regulatory compliance, and food security. We believe that this Special Issue will provide valuable insights for researchers, analyst chemists, and stakeholders working at the interface of analytical science and food systems.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their thanks to all contributors to this Special Issue and acknowledge the valuable support of the reviewers through their work in evaluating the articles submitted. We are also grateful to the editorial staff members of International Journal of Molecular Sciences for their kind assistance.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Khakimov B., Aru V., Czaja T.P., Engelsen S.B. Foodomics: A lever to avoid the Darwinian boomerang of malnutrition and compromised nutritional value in the rapidly emerging green food transition. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2025;159:104997. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2025.104997. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shahidi F., Pan Y. Influence of food matrix and food processing on the chemical interaction and bioaccessibility of dietary phytochemicals: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022;62:6421. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1901650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aurand L.W., Woods A.E., Wells M.R. Food Composition and Analysis. 1st ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold; New York, NY, USA: 1987. pp. 1–681. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Capozzi F., Bordoni A. Foodomics: A new comprehensive approach to food and nutrition. Genes Nutr. 2013;8:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s12263-012-0310-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Valdés A., Álvarez-Rivera G., Socas-Rodríguez B., Herrero M., Ibanez E., Cifuentes A. Foodomics: Analytical opportunities and challenges. Anal. Chem. 2021;94:366–381. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zheng C., Chen A. System biological research on food quality for personalised nutrition and health using foodomics techniques: A review. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2014;2:608–616. doi: 10.12691/jfnr-2-9-13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ventura G., Bianco M., Losito I., Cataldi T.R.I., Calvano C.D. MALDI mass spectrometry imaging in plant and food lipidomics: Advances, challenges, and future perspectives. Mol. Omics. 2025;21:566–581. doi: 10.1039/D5MO00116A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gallo M., Ferranti P. The evolution of analytical chemistry methods in foodomics. J. Chromatogr. A. 2016;8:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Calvano C.D., Ventura G., Cataldi T.R.I., Palmisano F. Improvement of chlorophyll identification in foodstuffs by MALDI ToF/ToF mass spectrometry using 1,5-diaminonaphthalene electron transfer secondary reaction matrix. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2015;407:6369–6379. doi: 10.1007/s00216-015-8728-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.De Ceglie C., Calvano C.D., Zambonin C.G. Determination of hidden hazelnut oil proteins in extra virgin olive oil by cold acetone precipitation followed by in-solution tryptic digestion and MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. J. Agri. Food Chem. 2014;62:9401–9409. doi: 10.1021/jf504007d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ibáñez C., Simó C., García-Cañas V., Cifuentes A., Castro-Puyana M. Metabolomics, peptidomics and proteomics applications of capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry in Foodomics: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2013;802:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li S., Tian Y., Jiang P., Lin Y., Liu X., Yang H. Recent advances in the application of metabolomics for food safety control and food quality analyses. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021;61:1448–1469. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1761287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ito K., Yamamoto R., Sekiyama Y. Tracking Metabolite Variations during the Degradation of Vegetables in Rice Bran Bed with Intact-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Metabolites. 2024;14:391. doi: 10.3390/metabo14070391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Su G., Yu C., Liang S., Wang W., Wang H. Multi-omics in food safety and authenticity in terms of food components. Food Chem. 2024;30:137943. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Minkiewicz P., Darewicz M., Iwaniak A., Bucholska J., Starowicz P., Czyrko E. Internet Databases of the Properties, Enzymatic Reactions, and Metabolism of Small Molecules-Search Options and Applications in Food Science. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016;17:2039. doi: 10.3390/ijms17122039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jia W., Georgouli K., Martinez-Del Rincon J., Koidis A. Challenges in the Use of AI-Driven Non-Destructive Spectroscopic Tools for Rapid Food Analysis. Foods. 2024;13:846. doi: 10.3390/foods13060846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yohannis E., Teka T.A., Urugo M.M. Advancements in foodomics: Transformative applications in enhancing food processing, ensuring quality, safety, traceability, and verifying authenticity. Food Chem. Adv. 2025;9:101138. doi: 10.1016/j.focha.2025.101138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bianco M., Calvano C.D., Ventura G., Losito I., Cataldi T.R.I. Determination of hidden milk allergens in meat-based foodstuffs by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization and high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Food Control. 2022;131:108443. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108443. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Martínez A., Abanto M., Días N.B., Olate P., Pérez Nuñez I., Díaz R., Sepúlveda N., Paz E.A., Quiñones J. Recent Trends in Food Quality and Authentication: The Role of Omics Technologies in Dairy and Meat Production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:4405. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang S., Chen J., Gao F., Su W., Li T., Wang Y. Foodomics as a Tool for Evaluating Food Authenticity and Safety from Field to Table: A Review. Foods. 2024;14:15. doi: 10.3390/foods14010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Balogh-Hartmann F., Páger C., Dávidovics A., Nagy S., Marosvölgyi T., Makszin L. A Microfluidic Approach for Profiling Total Nitrogen Content in Age-Specific Nutritional Formulas Using Microchip Gel Electrophoresis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:8233. doi: 10.3390/ijms26178233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moore J.C., DeVries J.W., Lipp M., Griffiths J.C., Abernethy D.R. Total Protein Methods and Their Potential Utility to Reduce the Risk of Food Protein Adulteration. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2010;9:330–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00114.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Felix Urbat F., Müller P., Hildebr A., Wefers D., Bunzel M. Comparison and Optimization of Different Protein Nitrogen Quantitation and Residual Protein Characterization Methods in Dietary Fiber Preparations. Front. Nutr. 2019;6:2019. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Słomczyńska P., Siudem P., Białek A., Kaźmierski S., Paradowska K. The Application of 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), Gas Chromatography (GC) and Ultraviolet–Visible (UV-Vis) Spectroscopy Techniques to the Analysis of the Fatty Acid Profile as Quality of Argan Oil. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:5322. doi: 10.3390/ijms26115322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Siudem P., Wasiak A., Zieli’nska A., Kowalska V., Paradowska K. Using Lignans from Magnolia officinalis Bark in the Assessment of the Quality of Dietary Supplements—The Application of 1H NMR and HPLC-DAD. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:1659. doi: 10.3390/ijms26041659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Durazzo A., Sorkin B.C., Lucarini M., Gusev P.A., Kuszak A.J., Crawford C., Boyd C., Deuster P.A., Saldanha L.G., Gurley B.J., et al. Analytical challenges and metrological approaches to ensuring dietary supplement quality: International perspectives. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;12:714434. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.714434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bianco M., De Palma D., Pagano A., Losito I., Cataldi T.R.I., Calvano C.D. Contamination of Wheat Flour and Processed Foodstuffs with Soybean and Mustard Allergenic Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:3891. doi: 10.3390/ijms26083891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gilbert-López B., Valdés A., Acunha T., García-Cañas V., Simó C., Cifuentes A. Liquid Chromatography. 2nd ed. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2017. Foodomics: LC and LC-MS-based omics strategies in food science and nutrition; pp. 267–299. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bianco M., Ventura V., Calvano C.D., Losito I., Cataldi T.R.I. Food allergen detection by mass spectrometry: From common to novel protein ingredients. Proteomics. 2023;23:e2200427. doi: 10.1002/pmic.202200427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Radomirović M., Gligorijević N., Rajković A. Immuno-PCR in the Analysis of Food Contaminants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025;26:3091. doi: 10.3390/ijms26073091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
