Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1998 Fall;31(3):323–338. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-323

Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities.

D K Wood 1, A R Frank 1, D P Wacker 1
PMCID: PMC1284126  PMID: 9757578

Abstract

Multiple baseline designs were used to examine the effects of an instructional package on accuracy of performance in solving multiplication facts by 3 students with learning disabilities. The instructional package included the following components: (a) a modified instructional sequence in which multiplication facts were grouped into the zeros, ones, doubles, fives, and nines categories, and those remaining; (b) identification of the category in which each fact belonged; (c) mnemonic strategies associated with solving facts in each category; and (d) steps to be completed for solving facts in each category. Results indicated that the instructional package produced substantial and immediate effects. After receiving instruction, a participant's accuracy was often 100%, and this was maintained throughout the evaluation even as other strategies were introduced. Comparable results occurred across students, demonstrating replication of the effects of the instructional package.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (170.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cawley J. F., Miller J. H. Cross-sectional comparisons of the mathematical performance of children with learning disabilities: are we on the right track toward comprehensive programming? J Learn Disabil. 1989 Apr;22(4):250-4, 259. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Karlan G. R., Rusch F. R. Correspondence between saying and doing: Some thoughts on defining correspondence and future directions for application. J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;15(1):151–162. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. McComas J. J., Wacker D. P., Cooper L. J., Asmus J. M., Richman D., Stoner B. Brief experimental analysis of stimulus prompts for accurate responding on academic tasks in an outpatient clinic. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):397–401. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. O'Leary S. G., Dubey D. R. Applications of self-control procedures by children: a review. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Fall;12(3):449–465. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stokes T. F., Baer D. M. An implicit technology of generalization. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):349–367. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES