Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1998 Winter;31(4):513–527. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-513

Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation.

W W Fisher 1, S E Lindauer 1, C J Alterson 1, R H Thompson 1
PMCID: PMC1284145  PMID: 9891391

Abstract

In the current investigation, 2 participants with mental retardation displayed property destruction and stereotypy, and both responses involved the same materials (e.g., breaking and tapping plastic objects). Three experiments were conducted (a) to indirectly assess the functions of these two responses, (b) to determine their relation to one another, and (c) to develop a treatment to reduce the more serious behavior, property destruction. In Experiment 1, previously destroyed materials were either present or absent, and their presence reduced property destruction but not stereotypy. In Experiment 2, matched toys (ones that produced sensory stimulation similar to stereotypy) were either present or absent, or were replaced by unmatched toys (for 1 participant). Matched toys produced large reductions and unmatched toys produced small reductions in property destruction and stereotypy. In Experiment 3, attempts to pick up undestroyed objects were either blocked or not blocked while matched toys were continuously available. Response blocking reduced property destruction (and attempts), prevented stereotypy, and increased manipulation of matched toys. These results suggest that the two aberrant responses formed a chain (e.g., breaking and then tapping the object), which was maintained by the sensory consequences (e.g., auditory stimulation) of the terminal response, and that previously destroyed material or matched toys made the initial response (property destruction) unnecessary.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (169.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aman M. G., Singh N. N., Stewart A. W., Field C. J. The aberrant behavior checklist: a behavior rating scale for the assessment of treatment effects. Am J Ment Defic. 1985 Mar;89(5):485–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowman L. G., Fisher W. W., Thompson R. H., Piazza C. C. On the relation of mands and the function of destructive behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):251–265. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlop M. H., Kurtz P. F., Casey F. G. Using aberrant behaviors as reinforcers for autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):163–181. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Derby K. M., Fisher W. W., Piazza C. C. The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):107–110. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Derby K. M., Wacker D. P., Andelman M., Berg W., Drew J., Asmus J., Prouty A. M., Laffey P. Two measures of preference during forced-choice assessments. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):345–346. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher W. W., Adelinis J. D., Thompson R. H., Worsdell A. S., Zarcone J. R. Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by termination of "don't" (and symmetrical "do") requests. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Fall;31(3):339–356. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher W. W., Grace N. C., Murphy C. Further analysis of the relationship between self-injury and self-restraint. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):103–106. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fisher W. W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Amari A. Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. Am J Ment Retard. 1996 Jul;101(1):15–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fisher W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Hagopian L. P., Owens J. C., Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491–498. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Green Leonard, Freed Debra E. The substitutability of reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):141–158. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Griffin J. C., Williams D. E., Stark M. T., Altmeyer B. K., Mason M. Self-injurious behavior: a state-wide prevalence survey of the extent and circumstances. Appl Res Ment Retard. 1986;7(1):105–116. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(86)90022-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUNDT A. G., PREMACK D. RUNNING AS BOTH A POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE REINFORCER. Science. 1963 Nov 22;142(3595):1087–1088. doi: 10.1126/science.142.3595.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kennedy C. H., Souza G. Functional analysis and treatment of eye poking. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):27–37. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Konarski E. A., Johnson M. R., Crowell C. R., Whitman T. L. Response deprivation and reinforcement in applied settings: A preliminary analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Winter;13(4):595–609. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lalli J. S., Mace F. C. Identification and modification of a response-class hierarchy. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Winter;28(4):551–559. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maurice P., Trudel G. Self-injurious behavior prevalence and relationships to environmental events. Monogr Am Assoc Ment Defic. 1982;(5):81–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  18. PREMACK D. Reversibility of the reinforcement relation. Science. 1962 Apr 20;136(3512):255–257. doi: 10.1126/science.136.3512.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Piazza C. C., Fisher W. W., Hanley G. P., Hilker K., Derby K. M. A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):137–152. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Piazza C. C., Fisher W. W., Hanley G. P., LeBlanc L. A., Worsdell A. S., Lindauer S. E., Keeney K. M. Treatment of pica through multiple analyses of its reinforcing functions. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Summer;31(2):165–189. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Powell S. B., Bodfish J. W., Parker D., Crawford T. W., Lewis M. H. Self-restraint and self-injury: occurrence and motivational significance. Am J Ment Retard. 1996 Jul;101(1):41–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rincover A., Cook R., Peoples A., Packard D. Sensory extinction and sensory reinforcement principles for programming multiple adaptive behavior change. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):221–233. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shore B. A., Iwata B. A., DeLeon I. G., Kahng S., Smith R. G. An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring;30(1):21–41. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sigafoos J., Elkins J., Kerr M., Attwood T. A survey of aggressive behaviour among a population of persons with intellectual disability in Queensland. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1994 Aug;38(Pt 4):369–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1994.tb00417.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Silverman K., Watanabe K., Marshall A. M., Baer D. M. Reducing self-injury and corresponding self-restraint through the strategic use of protective clothing. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Winter;17(4):545–552. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith R. G., Iwata B. A., Vollmer T. R., Pace G. M. On the relationship between self-injurious behavior and self-restraint. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):433–445. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith R. G., Lerman D. C., Iwata B. A. Self-restraint as positive reinforcement for self-injurious behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):99–102. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sugai G., White W. J. Effects of using object self-stimulation as a reinforcer on the prevocational work rates of an autistic child. J Autism Dev Disord. 1986 Dec;16(4):459–471. doi: 10.1007/BF01531711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vollmer T. R., Marcus B. A., LeBlanc L. Treatment of self-injury and hand mouthing following inconclusive functional analyses. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):331–344. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES