Abstract
Individuals who do not possess the verbal skills to express meaningful choice in the absence of its consequences may have difficulty indicating their preference for protracted activities that are unavailable until some time in the future (e.g., taking a walk, riding a bike). When we examined the preferences of 4 individuals with developmental disabilities by showing them pictorial representations of various activities, their initial choices showed no clear preferences. In a subsequent condition, selecting a photograph resulted in brief access to the depicted activity. When selections produced differential consequences (i.e., access to the activity), clear preferences emerged. In addition, 3 individuals' preferences were later shifted to an initially less preferred but more socially desirable option by superimposing additional reinforcement contingencies for engaging in the less preferred activity. Results are discussed in terms of the conditions under which choice functions as an indicator of preference and how those conditions may be altered to improve the quality of choice making without limiting access to preferred options.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bannerman D. J., Sheldon J. B., Sherman J. A., Harchik A. E. Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: the rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;23(1):79–89. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeLeon I. G., Iwata B. A. Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519–533. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunlap G., dePerczel M., Clarke S., Wilson D., Wright S., White R., Gomez A. Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;27(3):505–518. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faw G. D., Davis P. K., Peck C. Increasing self-determination: teaching people with mental retardation to evaluate residential options. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):173–188. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Hagopian L. P., Owens J. C., Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491–498. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanley G. P., Piazza C. C., Fisher W. W., Contrucci S. A., Maglieri K. A. Evaluation of client preference for function-based treatment packages. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):459–473. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higbee T. S., Carr J. E., Harrison C. D. The effects of pictorial versus tangible stimuli in stimulus-preference assessments. Res Dev Disabil. 1999 Jan-Feb;20(1):63–72. doi: 10.1016/s0891-4222(98)00032-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamarre J., Holland J. G. The functional independence of mands and tacts. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jan;43(1):5–19. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Newton J. S., Ard W. R., Jr, Horner R. H. Validating predicted activity preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):239–245. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Northup J., George T., Jones K., Broussard C., Vollmer T. R. A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):201–212. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pace G. M., Ivancic M. T., Edwards G. L., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reid D. H., Hurlbut B. Teaching nonvocal communication skills to multihandicapped retarded adults. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Winter;10(4):591–603. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]