Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2000 Spring;33(1):13–27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-13

An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.

C C Piazza 1, J D Adelinis 1, G P Hanley 1, H L Goh 1, M D Delia 1
PMCID: PMC1284219  PMID: 10738949

Abstract

The purpose of the current investigation was to extend the literature on matched stimuli to three dissimilar forms of aberrant behavior (dangerous climbing and jumping, saliva manipulation, and hand mouthing). The results of functional analyses suggested that each behavior was automatically reinforced. Preference assessments were used to identify two classes of stimuli: items that matched the hypothesized sensory consequences of aberrant behavior (matched stimuli) and items that produced sensory consequences that were not similar to those produced by the aberrant behavior (unmatched stimuli). The effects of providing continuous and noncontingent access to either the most highly preferred matched or the most highly preferred unmatched stimuli were assessed relative to a condition in which no stimuli were available. Overall results suggested that providing access to items that matched the hypothesized sensory consequences of aberrant behavior may be more effective than simply selecting stimuli either arbitrarily or based on the results of preference assessments alone.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (202.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fisher W. W., Lindauer S. E., Alterson C. J., Thompson R. H. Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):513–527. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fisher W. W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Amari A. Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. Am J Ment Retard. 1996 Jul;101(1):15–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goh H. L., Iwata B. A., Shore B. A., DeLeon I. G., Lerman D. C., Ulrich S. M., Smith R. G. An analysis of the reinforcing properties of hand mouthing. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):269–283. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Horner R. D. The effects of an environmental "enrichment" program on the behavior of institutionalized profoundly retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;13(3):473–491. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iwata B. A., Pace G. M., Dorsey M. F., Zarcone J. R., Vollmer T. R., Smith R. G., Rodgers T. A., Lerman D. C., Shore B. A., Mazalesk J. L. The functions of self-injurious behavior: an experimental-epidemiological analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):215–240. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Michael J. Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):149–155. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Piazza C. C., Fisher W. W., Hanley G. P., Hilker K., Derby K. M. A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):137–152. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Piazza C. C., Fisher W. W., Hanley G. P., LeBlanc L. A., Worsdell A. S., Lindauer S. E., Keeney K. M. Treatment of pica through multiple analyses of its reinforcing functions. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Summer;31(2):165–189. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rincover A., Cook R., Peoples A., Packard D. Sensory extinction and sensory reinforcement principles for programming multiple adaptive behavior change. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):221–233. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vollmer T. R., Marcus B. A., LeBlanc L. Treatment of self-injury and hand mouthing following inconclusive functional analyses. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):331–344. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vollmer T. R. The concept of automatic reinforcement: implications for behavioral research in developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 1994 May-Jun;15(3):187–207. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(94)90011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES