Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2000 Fall;33(3):285–297. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-285

A component analysis of "stereotypy as reinforcement" for alternative behavior.

G P Hanley 1, B A Iwata 1, R H Thompson 1, J S Lindberg 1
PMCID: PMC1284250  PMID: 11051569

Abstract

Results from several studies have suggested that the opportunity to engage in stereotypic behavior may function as reinforcement for alternative, more socially desirable behaviors. However, the procedural components of this intervention include several distinct operations whose effects have not been analyzed separately. While measuring the occurrence of stereotypy and an alternative behavior (manipulation of leisure materials), we exposed 3 participants to three or four components of a "stereotypy as reinforcement" contingency: (a) continuous access to materials, (b) prompts to manipulate materials, (c) restricted access to stereotypy (i.e., response blocking), and (d) access to stereotypy contingent on manipulating the materials. Continuous access to materials and prompting (a and b) produced negligible results. Restriction of stereotypy (c) produced a large increase in the alternative behavior of 2 participants, suggesting that response restriction per se may occasion alternative behavior. However, contingent access to stereotypy (d) was necessary to increase the 3rd participant's object manipulation; this finding provided some support for the use of stereotypy as reinforcement for alternative behavior. Finally, when transfer of the effects of intervention was assessed during periods in which active intervention components were withdrawn, the alternative behavior was maintained for 1 participant.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amari A., Grace N. C., Fisher W. W. Achieving and maintaining compliance with the ketogenic diet. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):341–342. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow D. H., Hayes S. C. Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):199–210. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlop-Christy M. H., Haymes L. K. Using obsessions as reinforcers with and without mild reductive procedures to decrease inappropriate behaviors of children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 1996 Oct;26(5):527–546. doi: 10.1007/BF02172274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlop M. H., Kurtz P. F., Casey F. G. Using aberrant behaviors as reinforcers for autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):163–181. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooper L. J., Wacker D. P., McComas J. J., Brown K., Peck S. M., Richman D., Drew J., Frischmeyer P., Millard T. Use of component analyses to identify active variables in treatment packages for children with feeding disorders. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):139–153. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dyer K. The competition of autistic stereotyped behavior with usual and specially assessed reinforcers. Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(4):607–626. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90056-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher W. W., Lindauer S. E., Alterson C. J., Thompson R. H. Assessment and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by stereotypic object manipulation. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):513–527. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Green G., Striefel S. Response restriction and substitution with autistic children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):21–32. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koegel R. L., Covert A. The relationship of self-stimulation to learning in autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Winter;5(4):381–387. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koegel R. L., Firestone P. B., Kramme K. W., Dunlap G. Increasing spontaneous play by suppressing self-stimulation in autistic children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):521–528. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lindberg J. S., Iwata B. A., Kahng S. W. On the relation between object manipulation and stereotypic self-injurious behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):51–62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McEntee J. E., Saunders R. R. A response-restriction analysis of stereotypy in adolescents with mental retardation: implications for applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):485–506. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitchell W. S., Stoffelmayr B. E. Application of the Premack principle to the behavioral control of extremely inactive schizrophrenics. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Fall;6(3):419–423. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. PREMACK D. Reversibility of the reinforcement relation. Science. 1962 Apr 20;136(3512):255–257. doi: 10.1126/science.136.3512.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. PREMACK D. Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 1959 Jul;66(4):219–233. doi: 10.1037/h0040891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pace G. M., Ivancic M. T., Edwards G. L., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Salzberg B. H., Wheeler A. J., Devar L. T., Hopkins B. L. The effect of intermittent feedback and intermittent contingent access to play on printing of kindergarten children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Fall;4(3):163–171. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Singh N. N., Dawson M. J., Manning P. Effects of spaced responding DRL on the stereotyped behavior of profoundly retarded persons. J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):521–526. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Singh N. N., Millichamp C. J. Independent and social play among profoundly mentally retarded adults: training, maintenance, generalization, and long-term follow-up. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;20(1):23–34. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sugai G., White W. J. Effects of using object self-stimulation as a reinforcer on the prevocational work rates of an autistic child. J Autism Dev Disord. 1986 Dec;16(4):459–471. doi: 10.1007/BF01531711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wells K. C., Forehand R., Hickey K., Green K. D. Effects of a procedure derived from the overcorrection principle on manipulated and nonmanipulated behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Winter;10(4):679–687. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wolery M., Kirk K., Gast D. L. Stereotypic behavior as a reinforcer: effects and side effects. J Autism Dev Disord. 1985 Jun;15(2):149–161. doi: 10.1007/BF01531601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES