Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2000 Fall;33(3):347–351. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-347

Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.

A S Geckeler 1, M E Libby 1, R B Graff 1, W H Ahearn 1
PMCID: PMC1284261  PMID: 11051580

Abstract

The effects of choice and no choice of reinforcer on the response rates of 3 children with autism were compared across single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures. No consistent differences in responding between choice and no-choice components emerged during single-operant phases. During the concurrent-schedule phases, however, all participants had substantially higher rates of responding to the button that led to a choice among reinforcers than to the button that did not lead to choice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (89.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fisher W. W., Thompson R. H., Piazza C. C., Crosland K., Gotjen D. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423–438. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fisher W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Hagopian L. P., Owens J. C., Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491–498. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Graff R. B., Libby M. E. A comparison of presession and within-session reinforcement choice. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Summer;32(2):161–173. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lerman D. C., Iwata B. A., Rainville B., Adelinis J. D., Crosland K., Kogan J. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):411–422. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pace G. M., Ivancic M. T., Edwards G. L., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES