Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2000 Winter;33(4):515–531. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-515

Recombinative generalization of within-syllable units in prereading children.

M M Mueller 1, D J Olmi 1, K J Saunders 1
PMCID: PMC1284276  PMID: 11214028

Abstract

This study demonstrates recombinative generalization of within-syllable units in prereading children. Three kindergarten children learned to select printed consonant-vowel-consonant words upon hearing the corresponding spoken words. The words were taught in sets; there were six sets, presented consecutively. Within sets, the four words that were taught had overlapping letters, for example, sat, mat, sop, and sug. Tests for recombinative generalization determined whether the children selected novel words with the same components as the trained words (e.g., mop and mug). Two children demonstrated recombinative generalization after one training set, and the 3rd demonstrated it after two training sets. In contrast, 2 other children, who received tests but no training, showed low accuracy across six sets. The 3 experimental children then demonstrated highly accurate printed-word-to-picture matching, and named the majority of the printed words. These findings are a promising step in the development of a computerized instructional technology for reading.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (296.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. De Rose J., De Souza D. G., Hanna E. S. Teaching reading and spelling: exclusion and stimulus equivalence. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):451–469. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldstein H. Effects of modeling and corrected practice on generative language learning of preschool children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1984 Nov;49(4):389–398. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4904.389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldstein H., Mousetis L. Generalized language learning by children with severe mental retardation: effects of peers' expressive modeling. J Appl Behav Anal. 1989 Fall;22(3):245–259. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goswami U. Phonological priming and orthographic analogies in reading. J Exp Child Psychol. 1990 Apr;49(2):323–340. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90062-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Romski M. A., Ruder K. F. Effects of speech and speech and sign instruction on oral language learning and generalization of action + object combinations by Down's syndrome children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1984 Aug;49(3):293–302. doi: 10.1044/jshd.4903.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Saunders K. J., Spradlin J. E. Conditional discrimination in mentally retarded subjects: programming acquisition and learning set. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):571–585. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sidman M., Cresson O., Jr Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. Am J Ment Defic. 1973 Mar;77(5):515–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sidman M., Cresson O., Jr, Willson-Morris M. Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):261–273. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sidman M. Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5–13. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1401.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Striefel S., Wetherby B., Karlan G. R. Establishing generalized verb-noun instruction-following skills in retarded children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1976 Oct;22(2):247–260. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(76)90005-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Treiman R., Zukowski A. Children's sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes, and phonemes. J Exp Child Psychol. 1996 Apr;61(3):193–215. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wise B. W., Olson R. K., Treiman R. Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction: onset-rime vs. postvowel segmentation. J Exp Child Psychol. 1990 Feb;49(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90046-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES