Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2001 Summer;34(2):241–253. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-241

Reinforcement contingencies and social reinforcement: some reciprocal relations between basic and applied research.

T R Vollmer 1, T D Hackenberg 1
PMCID: PMC1284320  PMID: 11421320

Abstract

Reinforcement contingencies and social reinforcement are ubiquitous phenomena in applied behavior analysis. This discussion paper is divided into two sections. In the first section, reinforcement contingencies are discussed in terms of the necessary and sufficient conditions for reinforcement effects. Response-stimulus dependencies, conditional probabilities, and contiguity are discussed as possible mechanisms of, and arrangements for, reinforcement effects. In the second section, social reinforcement is discussed in terms of its functional subtypes and reinforcement context effects. Two underlying themes run throughout the discussion: (a) Applied research would benefit from a greater understanding of existing basic research, and (b) basic research could be designed to specifically address some of the issues about reinforcement that are central to effective application.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (125.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baer D. M., Wolf M. M., Risley T. R. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):91–97. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fisher W. W., Mazur J. E. Basic and applied research on choice responding. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):387–410. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisher W. W., Ninness H. A., Piazza C. C., Owen-DeSchryver J. S. On the reinforcing effects of the content of verbal attention. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):235–238. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fisher W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Hagopian L. P., Owens J. C., Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491–498. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Galbicka G., Platt J. R. Response-reinforcer contingency and spatially defined operants: testing an invariance property of phi. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):145–162. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Galizio M. Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jan;31(1):53–70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hackenberg T. D., Joker V. R. Instructional versus schedule control of humans' choices in situations of diminishing returns. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):367–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hammond L. J. The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):297–304. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanley G. P., Iwata B. A., Lindberg J. S. Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):419–435. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayes S. C., Brownstein A. J., Zettle R. D., Rosenfarb I., Korn Z. Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):237–256. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hineline P. N. JEAB, November '92: What's in it for the JABA reader? J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):269–274. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Horne P. J., Lowe C. F. On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185–241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iwata B. A. Applied implications of theory and research on the nature of reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Spring;27(1):183–193. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kazdin A. E., Klock J. The effect of nonverbal teacher approval on student attentive behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Winter;6(4):643–654. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lachter G. D. Some temporal parameters of non-contingent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):207–217. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lalli J. S., Mauro B. C. The paradox of preference for unreliable reinforcement: The role of context and conditioned reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):389–394. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lattal K. A., Bryan A. J. Effects of concurrent response-independent reinforcement on fixed-interval schedule performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):495–504. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lattal K. A. Combinations of response-reinforcer dependence and independence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):357–362. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lattal K. A., Neef N. A. Recent reinforcement-schedule research and applied behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):213–230. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mace F. C., Lalli J. S. Linking descriptive and experimental analyses in the treatment of bizarre speech. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;24(3):553–562. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mace F. C. Technological to a fault or faulty approach to technology development? J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;24(3):433–435. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Neuringer A. J. Superstitious key pecking after three peck-produced reinforcements. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):127–134. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Northup J., Vollmer T. R., Serrett K. Publication trends in 25 years of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Winter;26(4):527–537. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. O'Reilly M. F. Effects of presession attention on the frequency of attention-maintained behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Fall;32(3):371–374. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Contrucci S. A., Delia M. D., Adelinis J. D., Goh H. L. An evaluation of the properties of attention as reinforcement for destructive and appropriate behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):437–449. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ringdahl J. E., Vollmer T. R., Borrero J. C., Connell J. E. Fixed-time schedule effects as a function of baseline reinforcement rate. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):1–15. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Roane H. S., Vollmer T. R., Ringdahl J. E., Marcus B. A. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605–620. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmitt D. Effects of consequences of advice on patterns of rule control and rule choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1998 Jul;70(1):1–21. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Stromer R., McComas J. J., Rehfeldt R. A. Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):359–371. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tustin D. Revealed preference between reinforcers used to examine hypotheses about behavioral consistencies. Behav Modif. 2000 Jul;24(3):411–424. doi: 10.1177/0145445500243007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tustin R. D. Preference for reinforcers under varying schedule arrangements: A behavioral economic analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):597–606. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Houten R., Nau P. A., MacKenzie-Keating S. E., Sameoto D., Colavecchia B. An analysis of some variables influencing the effectiveness of reprimands. J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;15(1):65–83. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vollmer T. R., Iwata B. A. Establishing operations and reinforcement effects. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Summer;24(2):279–291. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vollmer T. R., Iwata B. A., Zarcone J. R., Smith R. G., Mazaleski J. L. The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):9–21. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vollmer T. R., Ringdahl J. E., Roane H. S., Marcus B. A. Negative side effects of noncontingent reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring;30(1):161–164. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES