Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2001 Fall;34(3):269–287. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-269

Identifying possible contingencies during descriptive analyses of severe behavior disorders.

T R Vollmer 1, J C Borrero 1, C S Wright 1, C Van Camp 1, J S Lalli 1
PMCID: PMC1284322  PMID: 11678524

Abstract

Contingencies of reinforcement involve, in part, relations between behavior and subsequent environmental events. In this study we observed 11 individuals with developmental disabilities and severe behavior problems while they interacted with their primary care providers in simulated environments (hospital therapy rooms). We compared the probability of obtaining attention, escape from instructional demands, or access to materials following instances of problem behavior with the background probability of those events. However, the focus of our analysis was the evaluation of comparative probabilities ("contingency values") in the context of relevant establishing operations such as diverted attention, instructional demands, and restricted access to materials. Results showed that the method was useful in identifying relations between behavior and subsequent environmental events. Implications for linking descriptive and functional analyses are discussed, and difficulties in identifying naturally occurring contingencies are considered.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (184.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bijou S. W., Peterson R. F., Ault M. H. A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Summer;1(2):175–191. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carr E. G., Durand V. M. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):111–126. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carr E. G. The motivation of self-injurious behavior: a review of some hypotheses. Psychol Bull. 1977 Jul;84(4):800–816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Galbicka G., Platt J. R. Response-reinforcer contingency and spatially defined operants: testing an invariance property of phi. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Jan;51(1):145–162. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hammond L. J. The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):297–304. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Iwata B. A., Pace G. M., Cowdery G. E., Miltenberger R. G. What makes extinction work: an analysis of procedural form and function. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Spring;27(1):131–144. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson S. M., Bolstad O. D. Reactivity to home observation: a comparison of audio recorded behavior with observers present or absent. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Summer;8(2):181–185. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lerman D. C., Iwata B. A. Descriptive and experimental analyses of variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Fall;26(3):293–319. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mace F. C., Lalli J. S. Linking descriptive and experimental analyses in the treatment of bizarre speech. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Fall;24(3):553–562. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mace F. C. The significance and future of functional analysis methodologies. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):385–392. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moerk E. L. Three-term contingency patterns in mother-child verbal interactions during first-language acquisition. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):293–305. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shirley M. J., Iwata B. A., Kahng S. False-positive maintenance of self-injurious behavior by access to tangible reinforcers. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Summer;32(2):201–204. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vollmer T. R., Borrero J. C., Lalli J. S., Daniel D. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):451–466. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vollmer T. R., Iwata B. A. Differential reinforcement as treatment for behavior disorders: procedural and functional variations. Res Dev Disabil. 1992;13(4):393–417. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(92)90013-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES