Abstract
This study examined the use of a progressive-delay schedule of reinforcement to increase self-control and decrease disruptive behavior in children with autism. When initially given the choice between an immediate smaller reinforcer and a larger delayed reinforcer, all participants chose the smaller reinforcer. When access to the larger reinforcer required either no activity or engaging in a concurrent task during the delay, all participants demonstrated both self-control and preference for a response requirement. Disruptive behavior decreased during delays that required a concurrent task compared to sessions without an activity requirement.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (114.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dixon M. R., Hayes L. J., Binder L. M., Manthey S., Sigman C., Zdanowski D. M. Using a self-control training procedure to increase appropriate behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Summer;31(2):203–210. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon M. R., Holcomb S. Teaching self-control to small groups of dually diagnosed adults. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):611–614. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mischel W., Ebbesen E. B., Zeiss A. R. Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972 Feb;21(2):204–218. doi: 10.1037/h0032198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schweitzer J. B., Sulzer-Azaroff B. Self-control: teaching tolerance for delay in impulsive children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Sep;50(2):173–186. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]