Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2001 Winter;34(4):505–509. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-505

The reductive effects of noncontingent reinforcement fixed-time versus variable-time schedules.

J E Carr 1, K K Kellum 1, I M Chong 1
PMCID: PMC1284346  PMID: 11800191

Abstract

The effects of fixed-time (FT) and variable-time (VT) schedules on responding were evaluated with 2 adults with mental retardation. Multielement and reversal designs were used to compare the effects of FT and VT schedules in reducing responses previously maintained on variable-ratio reinforcement schedules. The schedules were equally effective in reducing the target behavior.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (94.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carr J. E., Nicolson A. C., Higbee T. S. Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):353–357. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Van Camp C. M., Lerman D. C., Kelley M. E., Contrucci S. A., Vorndran C. M. Variable-time reinforcement schedules in the treatment of socially maintained problem behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):545–557. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Vollmer T. R., Iwata B. A., Zarcone J. R., Smith R. G., Mazaleski J. L. The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):9–21. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES