Skip to main content
Microorganisms logoLink to Microorganisms
. 2025 Dec 29;14(1):70. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms14010070

Central Line-Related Bloodstream Infection by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Following Probiotic Use in a Patient with Clostridioides difficile Colitis: A Case Report

Yu-Mi Lee 1
Editor: Michael Doulberis1
PMCID: PMC12843839  PMID: 41597590

Abstract

Clinical infections caused by Saccharomyces cerevisiae develop infrequently. We report a case of central line-related bloodstream infection caused by S. cerevisiae in a patient with Clostridioides difficile colitis and central venous catheter placement. The administration of probiotics in C. difficile colitis was associated with fungemia caused by S. cerevisiae. This case suggests the potential for serious infection caused by S. cerevisiae in immunocompromised patients with C. difficile colitis. Removal of the central venous catheter may be important for a better prognosis in fungemia caused by S. cerevisiae.

Keywords: central venous catheter, Clostridioides difficile, fungemia, probiotics, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1. Introduction

Saccharomyces cerevisiae, also called brewer’s yeast, is ubiquitous in plants and in soil [1]. It plays a critical role in numerous food fermentation processes and industrial applications. Saccharomyces boulardii is a subtype of S. cerevisiae, which is utilized as a probiotic [2]. Probiotics are consumed by many healthy individuals to maintain gut health and are also used for therapeutic purposes in cases of diarrhea or intestinal diseases [3]. Many studies have shown that the use of probiotics can be beneficial for treating and preventing the recurrence of diarrhea in patients with Clostridioides difficile, leading to the frequent administration of probiotics with antibiotics [4,5,6].

Probiotics, which are used for their various benefits, can pose risks such as fungemia in certain cases. There have been some reports of bloodstream infection caused by S. cerevisiae [1,7]. However, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) caused by S. cerevisiae have not been emphasized, particularly in patients with C. difficile colitis. We present a case of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) caused by S. cerevisiae following probiotic use in a patient with C. difficile colitis. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (KHUH-2025-06-033) of Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, which waived the need for written informed consent from the patient.

2. Case Presentation

A 74-year-old male patient presenting with voiding difficulty was admitted to the Pulmonology Department of Kyung Hee University Hospital in South Korea in August 2024. The patient had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and benign prostatic hyperplasia. The patient was a hepatitis C carrier. Two years prior, the patient was diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [cT4N1M0, stage IIIA]. The patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with three cycles of nivolumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel, followed by left lower lobectomy. Seven months after surgery, NSCLC recurred with bone and pleural metastasis (cT4N0M1c). The patient had received chemotherapy with pembrolizumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin one month prior to admission, and also underwent palliative radiation therapy at the C7 cervical spine level ten times starting one month before admission.

Ten months prior to admission, the patient was diagnosed with drug-induced immune-mediated colitis, probably caused by nivolumab. Since then, probiotics containing S. boulardii have been administered to the patient for 3 months and then readministered for 25 days prior to admission, continuing up until the time of admission. The patient underwent chemoport insertion in the right anterior chest wall for chemotherapy 37 days prior to admission. The initial vital signs were blood pressure, 107/66 mmHg; pulse rate, 100 beats/min; respiratory rate, 18 breaths/min; temperature, 36.4 °C, pulse oximetry, 98% on room air. Laboratory examination revealed a white blood cell count of 3.51 × 109/L (58% neutrophils) and C-reactive protein (CRP) was 7.77 mg/dL. The results of the kidney and liver function tests were within normal limits. Chest computed tomography showed no interval change in the left pleural thickening or a metastatic mass in the left upper lobe. The probiotics were continuously administered following admission.

On the 2nd day of hospitalization, the patient developed watery diarrhea, occurring approximately ten times a day, with a total volume of approximately 200 g. The patient had no fever. Laboratory examination revealed a white blood cell (WBC) count of 29.83 × 109/L (88% neutrophils) and CRP was 27.1 mg/dL. The C. difficile toxin-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive for Toxin B with a cycle threshold value of 24.6. Toxin A + B of C. difficile were also positive. For molecular detection, we used Xpert C. difficile (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), which targets the tcdB gene and binary toxin genes. The C. difficile toxin antigen detection was performed using VIDAS C. difficile Toxin A & B (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Three sets of blood cultures were performed on the 2nd day of hospitalization. The patient was initially prescribed meropenem (3 g per day) and oral vancomycin (500 mg per day). On the 6th day of hospitalization, one set of aerobic cultures identified Acinetobacter nosocomialis. Watery diarrhea improved, and the inflammatory marker, CRP, also decreased to 1.74 mg/dL. On the 12th day of hospitalization, three sets of blood cultures were performed using BD Bactec Plus Aerobic/F and BD Bactec Plus Anaerobic/F bottles and aBactec FX Instrument (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) because the CRP level had increased again to 4.94 mg/dL.

The three sets of aerobic culture bottles identified S. cerevisiae on the 15th day of hospitalization. S. cerevisiae was identified using a MALDI-TOF MS system (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) following colony pretreatment with the extended direct transfer method. A small amount of a fresh colony was smeared onto a target plate and overlaid with 1 µL of 70% formic acid. After drying, 1 µL of matrix solution (α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, HCCA) was added and allowed to air-dry before analysis. The analysis yielded a score of 2.0, as measured by the IVD MALDI Biotyper software version 4.2 with IVD Library version 10.0. 18S rRNA sequencing analysis revealed that the fungal sequence had a 100% match with S. cerevisiae (GenBank accession number MG101837.1), with the alignment showing identical (1652/1652) base pairs. The patient was initially administered micafungin (100 mg per day) for 4 days. The same organism was grown in subsequent blood cultures from three sets of bottles performed on the 15th and 19th day of hospitalization. The chemoport was removed on the 21st day of hospitalization, and S. cerevisiae was isolated from the chemoport tip culture (>15 colony-forming units). The antibiotic therapy was changed to fluconazole (400 mg per day) for 22 days. The probiotics were discontinued after S. cerevisiae was identified. No organisms grew in the following blood cultures with three sets of bottles performed on the 24th day of hospitalization. No fever was observed during the treatment. At the end of treatment, the WBC count returned to within the reference interval, and the CRP level was 1.9 mg/dL. The patient did not experience a recurrence of C. difficile colitis during the 6-month follow-up period after discharge. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed after the completion of treatment. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antifungal drugs was tested using the Vitek 2 AST-YS08 card, which is designed for yeast susceptibility testing. The MICs of fluconazole, caspofungin, and flucytosine were 32 µg/mL, 0.25 µg/mL, and ≤1 µg/mL, respectively. The susceptibility of voriconazole and amphoterin B were not assessed due to insufficient growth in the positive control well. Antifungal susceptibility testing for S. cerevisiae was not routinely performed in our hospital. The patient was administered fluconazole despite the high MIC because the antifungal susceptibility testing was conducted after the completion of treatment. The clinical course and antifungal treatment of the case patient are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Clinical course and antifungal treatment of a case patient. HD, hospital day, CRP, C-reactive protein, BSI, bloodstream infection.

3. Discussion

S. cerevisiae is a facultative anaerobic fungus that is genetically simple and contains approximately 6000 genes [1,8]. It primarily undergoes fermentation under anaerobic conditions to produce ethanol and carbon dioxide, which are crucial for brewing and baking [9]. This species is essential for both industrial applications and scientific research because of its ease of cultivation and straightforward genetic modifications [10]. The identification of S. cerevisiae is not particularly difficult in laboratories that use microbiological and molecular equipment. S. cerevisiae can be identified by observing round-to-oval budding yeast cells under a microscope [11]. It forms creamy and smooth colonies on culture media. S. cerevisiae typically grows well at 30 °C and cannot grow at higher temperatures [11,12]. Molecular methods such as polymerase chain reaction targeting specific genetic markers and DNA sequencing, and MALDI-TOF MS can also be used to accurately identify S. cerevisiae [13,14]. S. cerevisiae and S. boulardii are taxonomically similar. It is challenging to differentiate them using typical laboratory tests. Molecular analysis is needed to distinguish them [15].

S. cerevisiae has a low potential to cause clinical infections. However, S. cerevisiae can cause invasive infections under certain conditions, particularly in immunocompromised or critically ill patients, such as those with malignancy receiving chemotherapy, human immunodeficiency virus infection, chronic renal failure, antibiotic use, total parenteral nutrition, and undergoing organ transplants [1,7,16,17,18,19]. Admission to the intensive care unit with critical illness and prolonged hospitalization are risk factors for S. cerevisiae bloodstream infection [7]. Munoz et al. reported that of 44 adult patients, all but 3 had underlying conditions, with 25 (57%) being immunocompromised. In this study, 60% were intensive care unit (ICU) patients [1]. Eric et al. revealed that 14 (78%) out of 18 patients were in the ICU [7]. The unique aspect of our report is that it focuses on the occurrence of bloodstream infections due to S. cerevisiae in patients with C. difficile colitis who frequently take probiotics, and highlights that CRBSIs can occur due to this organism in patients with central venous catheters.

Probiotics are typically prescribed to patients with C. difficile colitis for several benefits [5]. Probiotics aid in the early treatment of C. difficile colitis by enhancing intestinal immunity [20]. They also help to prevent the recurrence of C. difficile colitis. S. boulardii in probiotics secretes a protease that degrades the intestinal receptor for C. difficile toxins and breaks down the toxin molecule [21]. This protease suppresses ileal secretion, mannitol permeability, and toxin-induced histological damage. However, fungemia caused by S. cerevisiae can develop when probiotics are administered to patients with C. difficile colitis. C. difficile colitis may be linked to microbial translocation and intestinal injury, which persist even after the clinical resolution of C. difficile colitis [22]. Hasegawa et al. reported the translocation of commensal bacteria across the intestinal epithelial barrier in C. difficile infection, which is suspected to be caused by the weakening of IL-1β medicated neutrophil recruitment [23]. This weakening induces the translocation of bacteria to organs after C. difficile infection. The translocation of S. cerevisiae can cause bloodstream infections due to a weakened intestinal barrier caused by C. difficile colitis, especially in immunocompromised hosts. There have been previous reports of fungemia caused by S. cerevisiae in patients who were administered probiotic preparations containing S. boulardii [1,24,25]. The incidence of bloodstream infections caused by S. cerevisiae associated with the administration of probiotics was low as 1.70 cases per 10,000 patient days and 0.26 cases per 1000 central-line days [7]. There have been a few reports of such cases following C. difficile colitis (Table 1). Santino et al. documented a case of fungemia caused by S. cerevisiae related to probiotic use in a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who developed C. difficile colitis [17]. In this case, the central line culture was negative. Munoz et al. reported that 53.3% of 60 cases of fungemia caused by Sacharomyces occurred after probiotic use at a median interval of 10 days [1]. In our case, the patient had been taking probiotics containing S. boulardii while suffering from C. difficile colitis. S. cerevisiae may have translocated across the impaired intestinal mucosal barrier into the bloodstream. Subsequently, the circulating S. cerevisiae likely adhered to and colonized the indwelling central venous catheter, leading to a CRBSI. This scenario was supported by the isolation of S. cerevisiae from both peripheral blood and the catheter tip, as well as the resolution of fungemia only after the catheter was removed.

Central lines are frequently used to administer medications and monitor in immunocompromised and critically ill patients. CRBSI caused by S. cerevisiae may occur. Fungemia caused by S. cerevisiae can develop regardless of probiotic use [26,27]. In such situations, the central line can serve as a major source of infection [16]. Previous studies have not specifically focused on CRBSI caused by S. cerevisiae. We investigated central line-associated BSI caused by S. cerevisiae, which can be seen in Table 2. There were four cases of CRBSI, and one patient died despite the removal of the central line. One case of fungemia caused by S. cerevisiae, a patient who did not have the central venous catheter removed did not survive despite receiving appropriate antifungal therapy [27]. Among 15 patients whose central venous catheters were removed, 5 died. Our patient experienced resolution of bloodstream infections caused by S. cerevisiae following the removal of the central venous catheter. This case highlights the importance of the early removal of central venous catheters in patients with BSIs caused by S. cerevisiae and central venous catheter placement. Biofilm formation is a key factor in the pathogenesis of CRBSI. S. cerevisiae forms biofilms similar to Candida species, making them difficult to eradicate and potentially leading to antifungal resistance. Li et al. reported that the presence of central venous catheters and stronger biofilm forming strains of Candida species were independent risk factors for persistent candidemia [28]. Boisen et al. reported that only amphotericin B was effective in reducing the viable cell number when treating mature biofilms [29]. They discovered that cells within mature biofilms exhibit slower metabolism and reduced growth, as visualized using FUN-1 staining. Cells with stagnant growth in mature biofilms were resistant to antifungal drugs with the exception of amphotericin B. This study suggested that if S. cerevisiae forms a biofilm on a central venous catheter, it may be difficult to treat with antifungal agents alone without removing the catheter.

S. cerevisiae can persist in hospital environments, leading to cross-contamination and outbreaks of infection. There are cases in which S. cerevisiae fungemia can occur in patients taking probiotics in close proximity within a hospital environment. Olver et al. evaluated the nosocomial transmission of S. cerevisiae infections among bone marrow transplant patients at the hematology unit [30]. Screening test for S. cerevisiae in throat and stool samples revealed colonization in four patients. Genetic testing confirmed that the strains were identical to those of patients who shared the same ward at the same time, indicating cross-infection. Although the exact transmission route was not analyzed in this case, it suggests that S. cerevisiae may be transmitted through contact of airborne routes in hospital settings. Cassone et al. reported an outbreak case of bloodstream infections caused by S. cerevisiae in the ICU, where the central venous catheter was probably contaminated during the probiotic preparation by nurses [26]. Therefore, it is important to recognize the possibility of S. cerevisiae fungemia outbreaks in patients taking probiotics or during their probiotic preparation, and to pay attention to infection control measures, including hand hygiene, to prevent the cross-infection of S. cerevisiae.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia in Clostridioides difficile colitis patients.

Patient Age/
Sex
ICU Stay Underlying Disease and
Medical Condition
Probiotic Use Central Line Previous Antibiotic Use Other Positive Culture Specimen Time to Fungemia (Days) a Co-Pathogen Central Line Removal Treatment Outcome Reference
1 M/86 NR Chronic obstructive bronchitis Yes Yes NR None 10 None Yes Caspofungin Survived [17]
2 F/72 NR Undergone heart surgery Yes NR Yes None 7 None NR No therapy Died [1]
3 F/74 NR Rheumatoid arthritis
Undergone heart surgery
Yes Yes Yes None 7 None Yes Fluconazole Died [1]
4 F/76 NR Undergone heart surgery, myocardial infarction Yes NR Yes None 8 None NR Fluconazole Died
Endocarditis
[1]
5 F/51 NR Polyarteritis nodosa Yes NR Yes None 18 None NR Amphotericin B Survived [31]
6 F/42 NR Undergone kidney-pancreas transplantation Yes NR Yes None 7 None NR Fluconazole Survived [32]
7 M/41 NR HIV, Tuberculous meningitis Yes NR NR None 15 days after discontinuation None NR Amphotericin B Survived [32]

M, male; F, female; ICU, intensive care unit; NR, not reported; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus. a Time from the start of probiotic use to the development of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia.

Table 2.

Characteristics of patients with central line-associated with bloodstream infections caused by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Patient Age/
Sex
ICU Stay Underlying Disease and
Medical Condition
Probiotic Use Central Line Previous Antibiotic Use Other Positive Culture Specimen Central Line Tip Culture Co-Pathogen Central Line Removal Treatment Outcome Reference
1 F/66 NR Metastatic gastric cancer
Undergone chemotherapy
Yes Yes NR None NA None No Fluconazole
Voriconazole
Died [27]
2 M/61 NR Renal failure, hemodialysis, abdominal surgery NR Yes NR Central line Positive None Yes Miconazole
5-flucytosine
Died [33]
3 F/71 NR Aplastic anemia NR Yes Yes None NR Kluyveromyces marxianus NR Amphotericin B
5-flucytosine
Died [34]
4 M/47 NR Esophageal cancer Yes Yes Yes Central line Positive None Yes Fluconazole Survived [35]
5 M/50 Yes Cardiac arrest Yes Yes NR None NR None Yes No Died [36]
6 F/51 Yes Aortic surgery Yes Yes NR None NR None Yes Fluconazole Died [36]
7 M/60 Yes ARDS No Yes NR Central line Positive None Yes Fluconazole Survived [36]
8 M/85 Yes Respiratory failure Yes Yes NR None NR None Yes No Survived [36]
9 F/80 Yes Respiratory failure Yes Yes NR None NR None Yes No Survived [36]
10 M/84 Yes Peritonitis Yes Yes NR None NR None Yes Amphotericin B Died [36]
11 M/55 Yes Stroke Yes Yes NR None NR None Yes No Survived [36]
12 M/34 Yes Head trauma Yes Yes Yes None Not performed None Yes Fluconazole Survived [26]
13 M/48 Yes Cerebral aneurysm Yes Yes Yes None Not performed None Yes Fluconazole Survived [26]
14 F/75 Yes Myocardial infarction Yes Yes Yes Central line Positive None Yes Fluconazole Survived [26]
15 F/35 Yes Multiple trauma Yes Yes Yes None NR None Yes NR Survived [26]
16 M/74 NR Rheumatoid arthritis
Heart surgery
Yes Yes Yes None Negative None Yes Fluconazole Died [1]
17 F/48 NR Chronic leukemia
Allogenic stem cell transplantation
NR Yes NR None NR None Yes Fluconazole Survived [37]

M, male; F, female; ICU, intensive care unit; NR, not reported.

4. Conclusions

We present a case of fungemia caused by S. cerevisiae in an immunocompromised patient with C. difficile colitis. Central line-related bloodstream infections caused by S. cerevisiae have rarely been reported. This case suggests that the use of probiotics should be approached with caution due to the risk of fungemia caused by S. cerevisiae in immunocompromised hosts with C. difficile colitis and central line placement. Early removal of the central line may be important for the elimination of fungemia in CRBSI due to S. cerevisiae, and clinical decisions regarding this should be balanced with the patient’s clinical needs.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kyung Hee University Hospital (protocol code KHUH-2025-06-033, date of approval: 20 June 2025).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to this study was conducted retrospectively.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Muñoz P., Bouza E., Cuenca-Estrella M., Eiros J.M., Pérez M.J., Sánchez-Somolinos M., Rincón C., Hortal J., Peláez T. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia: An emerging infectious disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005;40:1625–1634. doi: 10.1086/429916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Czerucka D., Piche T., Rampal P. Review article: Yeast as probiotics—Saccharomyces boulardii. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007;26:767–778. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03442.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim S.K., Guevarra R.B., Kim Y.T., Kwon J., Kim H., Cho J.H., Kim H.B., Lee J.H. Role of Probiotics in Human Gut Microbiome-Associated Diseases. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019;29:1335–1340. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1906.06064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pillai A., Nelson R. Probiotics for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008;1:Cd004611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004611.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tung J.M., Dolovich L.R., Lee C.H. Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection with Saccharomyces boulardii: A systematic review. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2009;23:817–821. doi: 10.1155/2009/915847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wombwell E. Saccharomyces boulardii prophylaxis for targeted antibiotics and infectious indications to reduce healthcare facility-onset Clostridioides difficile infection. Microbes Infect. 2023;25:105041. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2022.105041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wombwell E., Bransteitter B., Gillen L.R. Incidence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia in hospitalised patients administered Saccharomyces boulardii probiotic. Mycoses. 2021;64:1521–1526. doi: 10.1111/myc.13375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goffeau A., Barrell B.G., Bussey H., Davis R.W., Dujon B., Feldmann H., Galibert F., Hoheisel J.D., Jacq C., Johnston M., et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science. 1996;274:546–567. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parapouli M., Vasileiadis A., Afendra A.S., Hatziloukas E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its industrial applications. AIMS Microbiol. 2020;6:1–31. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nevoigt E. Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008;72:379–412. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00025-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Meredith Blackwell J.W.S. Biodiversity of Fungi. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2004. pp. 7–21. Starter Cultures|Importance of Selected Genera. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Craig E.A., Jacobsen K. Mutations of the heat inducible 70 kilodalton genes of yeast confer temperature sensitive growth. Cell. 1984;38:841–849. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90279-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ryu S.-L., Mikata K., Murooka Y., Kaneko Y. A simple PCR method for distinguishing Saccharomyces cerevisiae from its sibling species by amplification of the RPL2 region. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1998;86:249–252. doi: 10.1016/S0922-338X(98)80001-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moothoo-Padayachie A., Kandappa H.R., Krishna S.B.N., Maier T., Govender P. Biotyping Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2013;236:351–364. doi: 10.1007/s00217-012-1898-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mitterdorfer G., Mayer H.K., Kneifel W., Viernstein H. Clustering of Saccharomyces boulardii strains within the species S. cerevisiae using molecular typing techniques. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002;93:521–530. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01710.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Enache-Angoulvant A., Hennequin C. Invasive Saccharomyces infection: A comprehensive review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005;41:1559–1568. doi: 10.1086/497832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Santino I., Alari A., Bono S., Teti E., Marangi M., Bernardini A., Magrini L., Di Somma S., Teggi A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia, a possible consequence of the treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis with a probioticum. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2014;27:143–146. doi: 10.1177/039463201402700120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thygesen J.B., Glerup H., Tarp B. Saccharomyces boulardii fungemia caused by treatment with a probioticum. BMJ Case Rep. 2012;2012:bcr0620114412. doi: 10.1136/bcr.06.2011.4412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Popiel K.Y., Wong P., Lee M.J., Langelier M., Sheppard D.C., Vinh D.C. Invasive Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a liver transplant patient: Case report and review of infection in transplant recipients. Transplant. Infect. Dis. Off. J. Transplant. Soc. 2015;17:435–441. doi: 10.1111/tid.12384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Qamar A., Aboudola S., Warny M., Michetti P., Pothoulakis C., LaMont J.T., Kelly C.P. Saccharomyces boulardii stimulates intestinal immunoglobulin A immune response to Clostridium difficile toxin A in mice. Infect. Immun. 2001;69:2762–2765. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2762-2765.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Castagliuolo I., LaMont J.T., Nikulasson S.T., Pothoulakis C. Saccharomyces boulardii protease inhibits Clostridium difficile toxin A effects in the rat ileum. Infect. Immun. 1996;64:5225–5232. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.12.5225-5232.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Oliva A., Aversano L., De Angelis M., Mascellino M.T., Miele M.C., Morelli S., Battaglia R., Iera J., Bruno G., Corazziari E.S., et al. Persistent Systemic Microbial Translocation, Inflammation, and Intestinal Damage During Clostridioides difficile Infection. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020;7:ofz507. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hasegawa M., Kamada N., Jiao Y., Liu M.Z., Núñez G., Inohara N. Protective role of commensals against Clostridium difficile infection via an IL-1β-mediated positive-feedback loop. J. Immunol. 2012;189:3085–3091. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martin I.W., Tonner R., Trivedi J., Miller H., Lee R., Liang X., Rotello L., Isenbergh E., Anderson J., Perl T., et al. Saccharomyces boulardii probiotic-associated fungemia: Questioning the safety of this preventive probiotic’s use. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017;87:286–288. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kara I., Yıldırım F., Özgen Ö., Erganiş S., Aydoğdu M., Dizbay M., Gürsel G., Kalkanci A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia after probiotic treatment in an intensive care unit patient. J. Mycol. Medicale. 2018;28:218–221. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2017.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cassone M., Serra P., Mondello F., Girolamo A., Scafetti S., Pistella E., Venditti M. Outbreak of Saccharomyces cerevisiae subtype boulardii fungemia in patients neighboring those treated with a probiotic preparation of the organism. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:5340–5343. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5340-5343.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Graf C., Gavazzi G. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia in an immunocompromised patient not treated with Saccharomyces boulardii preparation. J. Infect. 2007;54:310–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li W.S., Chen Y.C., Kuo S.F., Chen F.J., Lee C.H. The Impact of Biofilm Formation on the Persistence of Candidemia. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1196. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bojsen R., Regenberg B., Folkesson A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae biofilm tolerance towards systemic antifungals depends on growth phase. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:305. doi: 10.1186/s12866-014-0305-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Olver W.J., James S.A., Lennard A., Galloway A., Roberts I.N., Boswell T.C., Russell N.H. Nosocomial transmission of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in bone marrow transplant patients. J. Hosp. Infect. 2002;52:268–272. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bassetti S., Frei R., Zimmerli W. Fungemia with Saccharomyces cerevisiae after treatment with Saccharomyces boulardii. Am. J. Med. 1998;105:71–72. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Riquelme A.J., Calvo M.A., Guzmán A.M., Depix M.S., García P., Pérez C., Arrese M., Labarca J.A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia after Saccharomyces boulardii treatment in immunocompromised patients. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2003;36:41–43. doi: 10.1097/00004836-200301000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cimolai N., Gill M., Church D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia: Case report and review of the literature. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1987;8:113–117. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90158-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nielsen H., Stenderup J., Bruun B. Fungemia with Saccharomycetaceae. Report of four cases and review of the literature. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1990;22:581–584. doi: 10.3109/00365549009027100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hennequin C., Kauffmann-Lacroix C., Jobert A., Viard J.P., Ricour C., Jacquemin J.L., Berche P. Possible role of catheters in Saccharomyces boulardii fungemia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2000;19:16–20. doi: 10.1007/s100960050003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lherm T., Monet C., Nougière B., Soulier M., Larbi D., Le Gall C., Caen D., Malbrunot C. Seven cases of fungemia with Saccharomyces boulardii in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:797–801. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1267-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cairoli R., Marenco P., Perego R., de Cataldo F. Saccharomyces cerevisiae fungemia with granulomas in the bone marrow in a patient undergoing BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:785–786. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Microorganisms are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES