Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2002 Winter;35(4):375–389. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-375

Effects of strategic versus tactical instructions on adaptation to changing contingencies in children with adhd.

David E Bicard 1, Nancy A Neef 1
PMCID: PMC1284400  PMID: 12555909

Abstract

This study examined the effects of two types of instructions on the academic responding of 4 children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Tactical instructions specified how to distribute responding between two concurrently available sets of math problems associated with different variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. Strategic instructions provided a strategy to determine the best way to distribute responding. Instruction conditions were counterbalanced in an ABAB/BABA reversal design nested within a multiple baseline across participants design. Experimental sessions consisted of a learning session in which participants were provided with one type of instruction, followed by a test session in which no instruction was provided. The schedules of reinforcement were subsequently reversed during test sessions. When learning and test schedules were identical, the responding of all 4 participants closely matched the reinforcement schedules. When tactical instructions were provided and schedules were subsequently changed, responding often remained under the control of the instructions. When strategic instructions were provided, responding more quickly adapted to the changed contingencies. Analysis of postsession verbal reports indicated correspondence between the participants' verbal descriptions (whether accurate or inaccurate) and their nonverbal patterns of responding.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (153.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrish H. H., Saunders M., Wolf M. M. Good behavior game: effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Summer;2(2):119–124. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catania A. C., Matthews B. A., Shimoff E. Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):233–248. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fisher W. W., Mazur J. E. Basic and applied research on choice responding. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):387–410. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Galizio M. Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jan;31(1):53–70. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hackenberg T. D., Joker V. R. Instructional versus schedule control of humans' choices in situations of diminishing returns. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):367–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayes S. C., Brownstein A. J., Haas J. R., Greenway D. E. Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule-governed from schedule-controlled behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Sep;46(2):137–147. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horne P. J., Lowe C. F. Determinants of human performance on concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):29–60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Joyce J. H., Chase P. N. Effects of response variability on the sensitivity of rule-governed behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):251–262. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lattal K. A. Signal functions in delayed reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Sep;42(2):239–253. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lefrancois J. R., Chase P. N., Joyce J. H. The effects of a variety of instructions on human fixed-interval performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):383–393. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Matthews B. A., Catania A. C., Shimoff E. Effects of uninstructed verbal behavior on nonverbal responding: Contingency descriptions versus performance descriptions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Mar;43(2):155–164. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matthews B. A., Shimoff E., Catania A. C. Saying and doing: A contingency-space analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;20(1):69–74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Michael R. L., Bernstein D. J. Transient effects of acquisition history on generalization in a matching-to-sample task. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):155–166. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Murray L. K., Kollins S. H. Effects of methylphenidate on sensitivity to reinforcement in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an application of the matching law. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):573–591. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Neef N. A., Bicard D. F., Endo S. Assessment of impulsivity and the development of self-control in students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):397–408. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Northup J., Fusilier I., Swanson V., Huete J., Bruce T., Freeland J., Gulley V., Edwards S. Further analysis of the separate and interactive effects of methylphenidate and common classroom contingencies. J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Spring;32(1):35–50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Northup J., Jones K., Broussard C., DiGiovanni G., Herring M., Fusilier I., Hanchey A. A preliminary analysis of interactive effects between common classroom contingencies and methylphenidate. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring;30(1):121–125. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Paniagua F. A. Verbal-nonverbal correspondence training with ADHD children. Behav Modif. 1992 Apr;16(2):226–252. doi: 10.1177/01454455920162005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Poche C., Yoder P., Miltenberger R. Teaching self-protection to children using television techniques. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Fall;21(3):253–261. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rapport M. D., Murphy H. A., Bailey J. S. Ritalin vs. response cost in the control of hyperactive children: a within-subject comparison. J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Summer;15(2):205–216. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shapiro E. S., DuPaul G. J., Bradley-Klug K. L. Self-management as a strategy to improve the classroom behavior of adolescents with ADHD. J Learn Disabil. 1998 Nov-Dec;31(6):545–555. doi: 10.1177/002221949803100604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shimoff E., Matthews B. A., Catania A. C. Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudosensitivity to contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Sep;46(2):149–157. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wulfert E. Correlation between self-reported rigidity and rule-governed insensitivity to operant contingencies. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):659–671. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES