Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2004 Summer;37(2):129–144. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-129

Evaluation of a vocal mand assessment and vocal mand training procedures.

Jason Bourret 1, Timothy R Vollmer 1, John T Rapp 1
PMCID: PMC1284489  PMID: 15293633

Abstract

A common deficiency in the verbal repertoires of individuals with autism and related disorders is the absence of socially appropriate vocal mands. The vocal mand repertoires of these individuals may be lacking in several respects: (a) The individual might engage in no mands whatsoever, (b) the mand might be topographically dissimilar to an appropriate response, (c) the mand might be only partially topographically similar to an appropriate response, and (d) the mand might occur only after prompting. Depending on specific deficiencies in an individual's repertoire, different procedures for establishing appropriate mands may be needed. The purpose of Study 1 was to evaluate an assessment prior to teaching vocal mands for 3 individuals with developmental disabilities. The assessment showed that 1 individual displayed partial utterances of mands, 1 displayed vocal mands after mands had been reinforced, and 1 displayed vocal mands when prompted. Thus, in Study 2, a different teaching strategy was tested for each individual. Results showed that the assessment information could be linked directly to mand training for all 3 participants.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bosch S., Fuqua R. W. Behavioral cusps: a model for selecting target behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):123–125. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carr E. G., Durand V. M. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):111–126. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drasgow E., Halle J. W., Ostrosky M. M. Effects of differential reinforcement on the generalization of a replacement mand in three children with severe language delays. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Fall;31(3):357–374. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hanley G. P., Iwata B. A., Thompson R. H. Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):17–38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartmann D. P., Hall R. V. The changing criterion design. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 WINTER;9(4):527–532. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kahng S. W., Hendrickson D. J., Vu C. P. Comparison of single and multiple functional communication training responses for the treatment of problem behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):321–324. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McComas J. J., Wacker D. P., Cooper L. J., Asmus J. M., Richman D., Stoner B. Brief experimental analysis of stimulus prompts for accurate responding on academic tasks in an outpatient clinic. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):397–401. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  9. Richman D. M., Wacker D. P., Winborn L. Response efficiency during functional communication training: effects of effort on response allocation. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):73–76. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Roane H. S., Vollmer T. R., Ringdahl J. E., Marcus B. A. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605–620. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rosales-Ruiz J., Baer D. M. Behavioral cusps: a developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):533–544. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Simic J., Bucher B. Development of spontaneous manding in language deficient children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;13(3):523–528. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tarbox Rachel S. E., Wallace Michele D., Williams Larry. Assessment and treatment of elopement: a replication and extension. J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Summer;36(2):239–244. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Touchette P. E., Howard J. S. Errorless learning: reinforcement contingencies and stimulus control transfer in delayed prompting. J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Summer;17(2):175–188. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Williams G., Donley C. R., Keller J. W. Teaching children with autism to ask questions about hidden objects. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):627–630. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Winborn Lisa, Wacker David P., Richman David M., Asmus Jennifer, Geier Deb. Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages. J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Fall;35(3):295–298. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yamamoto J., Mochizuki A. Acquisition and functional analysis of manding with autistic students. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):57–64. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES