Abstract
Behavior-reduction interventions typically employ dense schedules of alternative reinforcement in conjunction with operant extinction for problem behavior. After problem behavior is reduced in the initial treatment stages, schedule thinning is routinely conducted to make the intervention more practical in natural environments. In the current investigation, two methods for thinning alternative reinforcement schedules were compared for 3 clients who exhibited severe problem behavior. In the dense-to-lean (DTL) condition, reinforcement was delivered on relatively dense schedules (using noncontingent reinforcement for 1 participant and functional communication training for 2 participants), followed by systematic schedule thinning to progressively leaner schedules. During the fixed lean (FL) condition, reinforcement was delivered on lean schedules (equivalent to the terminal schedule of the DTL condition). The FL condition produced a quicker attainment of individual treatment goals for 2 of the 3 participants. The results are discussed in terms of the potential utility of using relatively lean schedules at treatment outset.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (157.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Fisher W. W., Adelinis J. D., Thompson R. H., Worsdell A. S., Zarcone J. R. Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by termination of "don't" (and symmetrical "do") requests. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Fall;31(3):339–356. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher W. W., Thompson R. H., Hagopian L. P., Bowman L. G., Krug A. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training. Behav Modif. 2000 Jan;24(1):3–29. doi: 10.1177/0145445500241001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher W., Piazza C., Cataldo M., Harrell R., Jefferson G., Conner R. Functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):23–36. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hagopian L. P., Fisher W. W., Legacy S. M. Schedule effects of noncontingent reinforcement on attention-maintained destructive behavior in identical quadruplets. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):317–325. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hagopian L. P., Fisher W. W., Sullivan M. T., Acquisto J., LeBlanc L. A. Effectiveness of functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment: a summary of 21 inpatient cases. J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Summer;31(2):211–235. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanley G. P., Iwata B. A., Thompson R. H. Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):17–38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwata B. A., Duncan B. A., Zarcone J. R., Lerman D. C., Shore B. A. A sequential, test-control methodology for conducting functional analyses of self-injurious behavior. Behav Modif. 1994 Jul;18(3):289–306. doi: 10.1177/01454455940183003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kahng S. W., Iwata B. A., DeLeon I. G., Wallace M. D. A comparison of procedures for programming noncontingent reinforcement schedules. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Summer;33(2):223–231. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lalli J. S., Casey S. D., Kates K. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring;30(1):127–137. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lalli J. S., Casey S., Kates K. Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):261–268. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leitenberg H., Rawson R. A., Bath K. Reinforcement of competing behavior during extinction. Science. 1970 Jul 17;169(3942):301–303. doi: 10.1126/science.169.3942.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ringdahl J. E., Vollmer T. R., Borrero J. C., Connell J. E. Fixed-time schedule effects as a function of baseline reinforcement rate. J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Spring;34(1):1–15. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vollmer T. R., Iwata B. A., Zarcone J. R., Smith R. G., Mazaleski J. L. The role of attention in the treatment of attention-maintained self-injurious behavior: noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement of other behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):9–21. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vollmer T. R., Marcus B. A., Ringdahl J. E. Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):15–26. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vollmer T. R., Ringdahl J. E., Roane H. S., Marcus B. A. Negative side effects of noncontingent reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring;30(1):161–164. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]