Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 2004 Fall;37(3):339–349. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-339

An analysis of initial acquisition and maintenance of sight words following picture matching and copy cover, and compare teaching methods.

Colleen M Conley 1, K Mark Derby 1, Michelle Roberts-Gwinn 1, Kimberly P Weber 1, T E McLaughlin 1
PMCID: PMC1284508  PMID: 15529890

Abstract

This study compared the copy, cover, and compare method to a picture-word matching method for teaching sight word recognition. Participants were 5 kindergarten students with less than preprimer sight word vocabularies who were enrolled in a public school in the Pacific Northwest. A multielement design was used to evaluate the effects of the two interventions. Outcomes suggested that sight words taught using the copy, cover, and compare method resulted in better maintenance of word recognition when compared to the picture-matching intervention. Benefits to students and the practicality of employing the word-level teaching methods are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (120.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Connell James E., Witt Joseph C. Applications of computer-based instruction: using specialized software to aid letter-name and letter-sound recognition. J Appl Behav Anal. 2004 Spring;37(1):67–71. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2004.37-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cooper L. J., Wacker D. P., Sasso G. M., Reimers T. M., Donn L. K. Using parents as therapists to evaluate appropriate behavior of their children: application to a tertiary diagnostic clinic. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Fall;23(3):285–296. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Didden R., Prinsen H., Sigafoos J. The blocking effect of pictorial prompts on sight-word reading. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):317–320. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pany D., McCoy K. M. Effects of corrective feedback on word accuracy and reading comprehension of readers with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil. 1988 Nov;21(9):546–550. doi: 10.1177/002221948802100905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Samuels S. J. Attentional process in reading: the effect of pictures on the acquisition of reading responses. J Educ Psychol. 1967 Dec;58(6):337–342. doi: 10.1037/h0020045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Saunders R. J., Solman R. T. The effect of pictures on the acquisition of a small vocabulary of similar sight-words. Br J Educ Psychol. 1984 Nov;54(Pt 3):265–275. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb02590.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Singh N. N., Solman R. T. A stimulus control analysis of the picture-word problem in children who are mentally retarded: the blocking effect. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Winter;23(4):525–532. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES