Abstract
Seed coat color in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a critical agronomic trait that affects both nutritional quality and market appeal. In this study, we identified two bHLH transcription factor genes, AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b, homologues of Arabidopsis TRANSPARENT TESTA 8, as indispensable gatekeepers of basal flavonoid pigmentation. QTL-seq analysis of a recombinant inbred line population derived from a black-testa parent (S3) and a white-testa parent (S2) revealed that recessive loss-of-function mutations in both AhWSC1a/1b abolish proanthocyanidin biosynthesis, resulting in a white testa. Integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling confirmed the absence of proanthocyanidins and a strong repression of late anthocyanin-pathway genes (DFR, LDOX) in the mutants. Molecular assays further demonstrated that AhWSC1 physically interacts with the R2R3-MYB regulator AhTc1 to form a functional MBW complex that activates AhDFR and AhLDOX transcription. In this research, we also found that the black testa phenotype may arise from elevated AhTc1 expression associated with a structural variant (SV); however, in the SV background, the introduction of ahwsc1a/1b mutant leads to a significant suppression of AhTc1 expression. Notably, because AhWSC1 is transcriptionally silent in hairy-root systems, overexpression of AhTc1 alone failed to induce these late-stage anthocyanin biosynthesis genes, highlighting AhWSC1 as an indispensable, rate-limiting hub of anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway regulation. Collectively, our findings establish AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b as master regulators of peanut testa pigmentation, elucidate the molecular basis of classical white testa inheritance, and provide genetic targets for precision-breeding of nutritionally enhanced cultivars.
Keywords: peanut, seed coat color, anthocyanin, bHLH, AhWSC1
1. Introduction
Seed coat color of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is more than a visual trait—it influences seed antioxidant capacity, consumer acceptance, and market price. It is increasingly targeted in breeding programs aimed at developing functional-food cultivars rich in anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins. Flavonoid pigments are strong natural antioxidants [1]. They give peanut seed coats colors that range from pink to purple or black. The accumulation of these flavonoid pigments not only elevates the antioxidant capacity and overall nutritional quality of peanut kernels but also enhances resistance to insect pests, pathogenic microorganisms, and abiotic stresses. However, in peanut, the genetic loci and regulatory networks underlying testa pigmentation remain insufficiently characterized, limiting the development and application of molecular breeding strategies to improve this trait of both nutritional and economic significance.
Significant progress has been made in elucidating the regulatory mechanisms governing anthocyanin biosynthesis in a variety of plant species. Central to this pathway is a conserved transcriptional regulatory module known as the MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) complex [2,3], which orchestrates the expression of key structural genes involved in the late stages of anthocyanin biosynthesis. In Arabidopsis thaliana, this complex consists of R2R3-MYB transcription factors (such as PAP1/PAP2), bHLH TFs (e.g., TT8, GL3, EGL3) [4], and the WD40 repeat protein TTG1 [5]. Together, these components form a ternary complex that activates genes encoding enzymes such as DFR (dihydroflavonol 4-reductase), ANS (anthocyanidin synthase), and UFGT (UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase), which are crucial for anthocyanin accumulation. In rice (Oryza sativa), as well as in other economically important crops, substantial progress has been made in deciphering the regulatory mechanisms underlying anthocyanin biosynthesis. Although most cultivated rice varieties produce non-pigmented grains, pigmented types such as black and red rice accumulate high levels of anthocyanins or proanthocyanidins in the pericarp. Key transcriptional regulators include OsC1 [6], an R2R3-MYB transcription factor homologous to maize C1, and bHLH partners such as OsB1, OsB2, and OsRb, which together form a functional MBW complex. Another essential regulator, Rc, encodes a bHLH protein controlling proanthocyanidin biosynthesis [7]. Mutations in Rc are associated with the white pericarp phenotype in many cultivated rice varieties [8]. These findings demonstrate that MBW-like modules in rice regulate flavonoid pathway genes similarly to those in model systems, though with lineage-specific features.
To date, multiple genes involved in regulating seed coat color have been identified in peanut, shedding light on the molecular basis of testa pigmentation. Among them, a dominant R2R3-MYB transcription factor, AhTc1, has been shown to upregulate anthocyanin biosynthetic genes, contributing to the deep purple seed coat phenotype [9]. In red testa varieties, a series of loci collectively referred to as the “red-testa” series includes AhRt1 on ChrA03 (encoding a bHLH transcription factor), AhRt2 on ChrB02 (encoding anthocyanidin reductase, ANR), and the more recently identified AhRt3, a second ANR homolog [10,11,12]. These loci modulate either the expression levels or enzymatic activity of ANR, thereby redirecting metabolic flux toward or away from cyanidin-derived pigments and resulting in distinct shades of red. In purplish-red peanut lines, the bHLH transcription factor AhPSC1 forms a regulatory complex with AhMYB7 to repress ANR expression, further enhancing anthocyanin accumulation [13]. It has been proposed that UFGTs and ANRs compete for the common substrate cyanidin, and that the relative enzymatic activities of these two pathways play a critical role in determining the peanut testa color [14].
Despite recent advances in deciphering the genetic determinants of black and red seed coats, the most prevalent testa color in both wild and cultivated peanuts is pink (also described as light brown), with white variants occurring in rare germplasm [15]. The molecular mechanisms that drive the formation of these common and rare testa colors, however, remain poorly characterized, and the underlying regulatory networks have yet to be systematically unraveled. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the key genetic regulators and to elucidate the regulatory and metabolic mechanisms underlying peanut testa colour variation, with a particular focus on the transition between the predominant pink testa and the rare white testa. In this research, we used a multi-omics approach in combination with a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross between black and white testa to dissect the genetic basis of testa pigmentation. Our analysis identified a pair of paralogous bHLH type transcription factor genes as key regulators responsible for the development of the pink testa phenotype. Notably, recessive homozygous mutations in both of these twin genes result in the complete loss of pigmentation, giving rise to the white testa phenotype. Building on this finding, we further integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic data to systematically dissect the molecular mechanisms underlying testa colour variation in peanut.
2. Results
2.1. Proanthocyanidin Biosynthesis Is Disrupted in the Seed Coat of Peanuts with White Testa
Seed-coat colors in cultivated peanut include pink, red, black (also termed deep purple), white, and other less common hues. To determine the differences in anthocyanin content among these different colors, we conducted targeted metabolomic analysis on peanuts with pink (HY917, Tifrunner), black (S3), red (YH1), and white (S2) seed coats (Figure 1a). The results revealed marked differences in flavonoid-related metabolites, including anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins, among peanuts with varying seed coat colors (Figure 1b). Compared to pink seed coats, black seed coats exhibited significantly higher levels of various glycosylated forms of anthocyanins than other colored peanuts (Figure 1b, Table S1). Cyanidin-3-(6-O-p-caffeoyl)-glucoside, Cyanidin-3-O-sambubioside, Quercetin-3-O-glucoside and rutin were identified as the predominant form of cyanidin (Figure 1b, Table S1). In contrast, procyanidins were nearly undetectable in white seed coats (Figure 1c, Table S1). Red seed coats showed a significant reduction in procyanidin content compared to pink seed coats, while Quercetin-3-O-glucoside, rutin, and glycosylated forms of petunidin increased significantly (Figure 1b,c, Table S1).
Figure 1.
Metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis of peanut varieties with different testa colors. (a) Testa color variation among peanut varieties: pink (TIF, HY917); red (YH1); black (S3); white (S2). (b) Heatmap of anthocyanin contents in seed coats of different colors (normalized values). (c) Heatmap of proanthocyanidin contents in seed coat of different colors; numbers indicate concentrations (ng/mg). (d) Leaf color differences between S3 and S2. (e) Heatmap of expression levels (FPKM values) for anthocyanin pathway enzyme genes in leaves of S2 and S3.
Color difference was also observed in newly emerged young leaves between black (S3) and white (S2) seed coat peanuts (Figure 1d). Petioles and leaves of the white-seeded S2 line accumulated minimal anthocyanins, whereas those of the S3 line displayed markedly deeper pigmentation. Transcriptome analysis of newly emerged leaves from S2 and S3 lines demonstrated that the expression of key metabolic enzymes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway was significantly reduced in the white-seeded S2 peanuts. Enzymes such as dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR) and leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX) were barely detectable in S2 leaves (Figure 1e).
2.2. Population Development and Genetic Analysis of Seed Coat Color
To investigate the mechanism underlying peanut seed coat color formation and anthocyanin metabolism, the white-seeded peanut line S2 and the black-seeded line S3 were used to construct a genetic mapping population. Observation of seed coats in the F2:3 generation revealed that the segregating progeny exhibited black (BL), pink (PN), and white (WH) seed coats, along with a small number of white seeds with purple stripes (PW) (Figure 2a). Metabolomic analysis showed that both PW and WH seeds lacked detectable levels of procyanidins, as well as their precursors catechin and epicatechin (Figure 2b, Table S2).
Figure 2.
The construction and genetic analysis of the RIL population. (a) Segregation of testa colors in F2:3 generation from S3 × S2 cross: black (BL), pink (PN), purple-white (PW), white (WH). (b) Analysis of major pigment contents in seed coat of pink (PN), purple-white (PW), white (WH). (c) Schematic diagram of RIL population development. The arrows indicate selfing to establish independent lines.
Analysis of seed coat color in the F3:4 and F4:5 generations demonstrated that the black trait is dominant over pink, pink is dominant over white, and purple-striped white is also dominant over plain white (Figure 2c). Chi-square tests confirmed a 3:1 segregation ratio for black versus pink, and a 15:1 segregation ratio for pink versus white (Table 1). This indicates that, relative to pink peanuts, the black trait is controlled by a single dominant gene, while the white seed coat phenotype is controlled by two recessive genes. Due to the low frequency of white-seeded individuals in the F2 generation, we focused on selecting white-seeded progeny from the F3 and F4 generations within each line for genetic analysis to clone the gene(s) regulating the white seed coat (Figure 2c).
Table 1.
Chi-square test for the number of genes controlling different seed coat colors.
| Phenotype | Number of Gene | Ratio | Expect | χ2 | χ20.05 (1) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BL:NB | 1 | 23:52 | 1:3 | 1.28 | 3.84 | 0.2571 |
| BL:NB | 2 | 23:52 | 1:15 | 76.290 | 3.84 | 2.5 × 10−18 |
| WH:NW | 1 | 1:74 | 1:3 | 22.40 | 3.84 | 2.22 × 10−6 |
| WH:NW | 2 | 1:74 | 1:15 | 3.09 | 3.84 | 0.0786 |
| WH:NW | 3 | 1:74 | 1:63 | 0.0256 | 3.84 | 0.8728 |
| WH:NW | 4 | 1:74 | 1:255 | 1.7127 | 3.84 | 0.1907 |
| WH:PN | 1 | 1:21 | 1:3 | 4.909 | 3.84 | 0.026 |
| WH:PN | 2 | 1:21 | 1:15 | 0.109 | 3.84 | 0.741 |
| WH:PN | 3 | 1:21 | 1:63 | 1.312 | 3.84 | 0.252 |
| WH:PN | 4 | 1:21 | 1:255 | 9.761 | 3.84 | 0.0018 |
BL, Black; PN, Pink; NB, Non-black; NW, Non-white; WH, White.
From the F5 generation, twenty phenotypically stable lines were selected from each of the black and pink seed coat categories and pooled separately for BSA based on pooled sequencing. Analysis of the pink and black bulks identified a key quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome Chr10, within the 100–120 Mb interval, that regulates the production of the black seed coat in peanut (Figure 3a–c). Sequence analysis of this interval revealed the presence of AhTc1 (Arachis hypogaea Testa color 1), a gene previously reported as a key regulator of black seed coat formation in peanut. Transcriptomes of black and pink seed coats at the harvest maturity stage (R8) [14] were analyzed (Table S3). Consistent with previous studies, our transcriptome data revealed that AhTc1 is significantly upregulated in black testa compared to other color classes. However, the underlying mechanism responsible for this elevated expression has remained unclear. In this study, We identified an inversion extending from the upstream region of AhCD1PG8 to the downstream region of AhJ3K16K (AhTc1) (Figure 3d and Figure S1). Notably, both AhCD1PG8 and AhTc1 are candidate genes for black testa formation in peanuts [9,16]. RNA-seq data indicated elevated AhTc1 expression specifically in black testae (Table S3). New markers were developed to detect this inversion (Figure 3d). How this inversion directly contributes to the upregulation of AhTc1 expression need further investigation. In transcriptome analysis, genes involved in flavonoid and anthocyanin metabolism were found to be significantly upregulated in black seed coats (Figure 3e). KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the upregulated genes showed that the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway (map00941) was among the top ten enriched metabolic pathways (Figure 3f). Heatmap analysis based on the expression levels of major flavonoid biosynthetic enzyme genes further confirmed that these genes were markedly upregulated in developing black seed coats (Figure 3e).
Figure 3.
Bulk Segregant Analysis (BSA) mapping of black-testa-related QTL, molecular marker development, and transcriptomic analysis. (a) Circos plot of black vs. pink BSA across all chromosomes, generated with multiple algorithms. (b) Delta-SNP index plot for Chr10, where the red line shows the smoothed SNP index curve, and the gray and blue lines indicate the 99% and 95% confidence thresholds, respectively. (c) QTL mapping on Chr10 based on the ED4 algorithm, with the red line representing the smoothed ED4 curve and the horizontal blue line indicating the 99% confidence threshold. (d) Schematic diagram of structural variations associated with the black seed coat in peanut S3 and corresponding PCR validation markers. P1, P2, P3, and P4 are PCR primers flanking the inversion region, showing differences in amplification fragments between black and pink seed coats. (e) Heatmap of anthocyanin pathway gene expression in pink (PN), and black (BL) testa. Data were normalized to a 0–1 scale. (f) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs between black and pink seed coats: circle size indicates the number of DEGs per pathway; the color gradient represents the enrichment fold change; X-axis denotes the p-value (−log10 scaled). The arrows indicate the direction of the metabolic reactions.
2.3. Genetic Mapping and Analysis of the White Seed Coat Loci
The genetic mechanisms underlying white seed coat formation in peanut remain poorly understood. In our genetic mapping population, the white seed coat phenotype was found to be a polygenic recessive trait relative to pink. To investigate the genetic basis of this trait, BSA-seq was performed by comparing pools of white and pink seed coat lines. After applying ΔSNP index, G prime (G′), and Euclidean Distance (ED) algorithms, we detected two highly significant quantitative trait loci (QTLs) on Chr02 and Chr12 (Figure 4a and Figure S2). By comparing SNP profiles and BAM alignment data between the S2 line and the white seed coat bulk, two candidate genomic intervals were identified: Chr02: 97,068,567–99,232,985 and Chr12: 113,267,287–114,173,564. Within these regions, the SNP polymorphism patterns in the white seed coat bulk were found to be completely identical to those of the white parent S2, suggesting a strong genetic correlation. Functional annotation revealed that these QTL intervals are located within collinear regions of the peanut A and B subgenomes (Tables S4 and S5). The candidate intervals encompass 110 and 56 protein-coding genes on Chr02 and Chr12, respectively (Tables S4 and S5). Notably, Ah.MP3D3D on Chr02 and Ah.26781N on Chr12 were the only genes with nonsense mutations in their coding regions (Figure 4b), and importantly, no other gene pair within the intervals exhibited such homologous mutations across the A and B sub-genomes (Tables S4 and S5). Both Ah.MP3D3D and Ah.26781N encode homologs of Arabidopsis thaliana TRANSPARENT TESTA 8 (AtTT8), a key regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis. Accordingly, they were designated White Seed Coat 1a (AhWSC1a on Chr02) and White Seed Coat 1b (AhWSC1b Chr12), and were prioritized as strong candidate genes responsible for the white seed coat phenotype. We hypothesize that the white seed coat phenotype may result from concurrent mutations in homologous genes across both subgenomes.
Figure 4.
Mapping of the white seed coat gene AhWSC1. (a) QTLs for white testa on Chr02 and Chr12 identified with ΔSNP-index, ED4, and G′ algorithms: scatter points indicate the raw ΔSNP-index, ED4, or G′ values at each locus; the red curve depicts the smoothed ΔSNP-index or ED4 profile, while the blue curve depicts the smoothed G′ profile. (b) Nonsense mutation sites in AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b; uppercase letters denote exon sequences, lowercase letters denote intron sequences, whereas * represents a stop codon. (c) Geographic distribution of the AhWSC1b genotype variant across domestic and international cultivars.
2.4. Natural Population Analysis and Transgenic Validation
When aligning to the Tifrunner reference genome, we found that in S2, a potential structural variation may be located near the nonsense mutation site of AhWSC1a, and similarly, a structural variation (SV) might also exist near the nonsense mutation of AhWSC1b in S3. However, analysis based on the Shitouqi reference genome revealed that this structural variation is present in both AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b in S2 (Figure S3). Sequence analysis shows that, in the Tifrunner assembly, AhWSC1b carries an intronic insertion that makes this region 67 bp longer than in AhWSC1a (Figure S4a). By contrast, in the Shitouqi genome, AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b differ in this region only at the SNP level. A PCR marker was developed to detect the SV (Figure S4b), and Sanger sequencing revealed that the amplicon derived from the S2 line is 67 bp longer than that from the S3 line and SNP analysis indicated that this marker can simultaneously detect the structural variation in both the A and B subgenomes (Figures S4b and S5). In this study, we refer to the short structural-variant insertion in the AhWSC1b allele as SVb, and the analogous insertion in AhWSC1a as SVa. Moreover, all white and purple-white testa lines were homozygous for the SVa and SVb allele (Figure S4b). Resequencing data of 390 cultivated peanut accessions was analyzed [17]. It revealed that the SVb in AhWSC1b is prevalent, occurring in 191 accessions. Among these accessions, 62 accessions also carry the nonsense mutation, whereas no nonsense mutations were detected in accessions lacking the SVb (Table S4). This distribution pattern supports a hypothesis that the nonsense mutation is a derived allele that arose subsequent to the SV event. In contrast, the SVa linked to the AhWSC1a nonsense mutation site was found exclusively in the S2 line and some white peanuts we collected Such as Baiyu, Chi-Bai. SVa and nonsense mutation were absent from all 390 cultivated peanut accessions included in the resequencing panel (Table S4). Moreover, the frequency of the ahwsc1b mutation is significantly higher in domestic cultivars than in foreign ones, implying that the genetic base of Chinese breeding lines may be relatively narrow (Figure 4c and Figure S6).
In Arabidopsis thaliana, the tt8 mutant exhibits reduced pigmentation in the seed coat, primarily due to impaired anthocyanin biosynthesis [4]. In this study, we observed that seedlings from white-seeded peanut lines isolated from the RIL population displayed visibly lighter epicotyls and petioles compared to those from pink and black lines (Figure 5a–c). These phenotypic similarities suggest that the function of TT8 may be conserved between peanut and Arabidopsis. AhWSC1 was overexpressed in the Arabidopsis tt8 mutant under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter. The results showed that the pale yellow seed coat color of the mutant was restored in the transgenic lines (Figure 5d–f). In addition, purple pigmentation was observed in the petioles of rosette leaves and at the epicotyl base of transgenic Arabidopsis, indicating functional complementation of AhWSC1 in the attt8 background (Figure 5g–i).
Figure 5.
Complementation of Arabidopsis tt8 mutant by AhWSC1. (a–c) Pigmentation differences in the epicotyls and petioles of newly germinated peanut seedlings: pink (a), white (b), and black (c). (d–i) Comparison of testa color, epicotyl pigmentation, and rosette-leaf vein pigmentation in wild-type plants (d,g), the tt8 mutant (e,h), and tt8 plants expressing AhWSC1a (f,i). The black scale bar represents 1 cm. The arrows indicate the main stem and leaf veins.
2.5. Mechanistic Insights into AhWSC1-Mediated Regulation of Anthocyanin Metabolism
RNA-seq comparison of white, purple-white, and pink seed coat revealed broadly high expression of anthocyanin-biosynthetic genes in the pink seed coat (Figure 6a). KEGG enrichment of the down-regulated set again highlighted flavonoid biosynthesis (map00941) as the most over-represented pathway (Figure 6b). Targeted metabolomics showed that proanthocyanidins were present only at trace levels in the white testa and remained extremely low in the purple-white seed coat (Figure 2b). Integrated clustering of metabolomic and transcriptomic data revealed that white and purple-white seeds share a highly similar expression profile for anthocyanin-pathway genes (Figure 6c).
Figure 6.
Transcriptomic analysis of anthocyanin pathway genes in RIL testae (pink, white, purple-white). (a) Volcano plot of DEGs between pink and white seed coat, with anthocyanin-pathway genes highlighted in yellow. (b) Bubble plot of KEGG enrichment for DEGs upregulated in pink seed coats: bubble size reflects the number of DEGs per pathway, color gradient indicates the enrichment fold change, and the X-axis displays −log10 (p-value). (c) Heatmap of anthocyanin pathway gene expression in pink (PN), white (WH), and purple-white (PW) seed coat. Data were normalized to a 0–1 scale. The arrows indicate the direction of the metabolic reactions.
In particular, transcripts for dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR) and leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase (LDOX) were almost undetectable in both white and purple-white seeds (Figure 7a), consistent with reports that DFR and LDOX are direct downstream targets of TT8 in other species [2]. A dual-luciferase reporter assay in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves confirmed that AhWSC1 strongly trans-activates the promoters of DFR and LDOX (Figure 7b). Correspondingly, RNA-seq data showed that DFR and LDOX expression in black testa is substantially higher than in pink (Figure 3f). Co-expression of AhWSC1 and AhTc1 in the dual-luciferase system greatly enhanced promoter activity (Figure 7b), and yeast two-hybrid assays revealed a direct physical interaction between the two proteins (Figure 7c).
Figure 7.
AhWSC1 is indispensable for testa pigmentation. (a) Expression levels (FPKM) of AhWSC1a, AhWSC1b, AhTc1, AhDFR1, AhLDOX1, and AhLDOX2 in RILs segregating for seed coat color: black (BL), white (WH), purple-white (PW), and pink (PN). ** indicates a significant difference (p < 0.01); *** indicates a highly significant difference (p < 0.001). (b) Predicted AhWSC1 binding sites (E-box) and AhTc1 binding sites (MBS, MRE, AC-box) in promoters of AhDFR1 and AhLDOX2, with dual-luciferase assays showing transcriptional activation. LUC, firefly luciferase; REN, Renilla luciferase. (c) Yeast two-hybrid assay validating the protein–protein interactions between AhWSC1a and homologues of MBW-complex components. (d) Heatmap displaying hierarchically clustered expression levels of DFR, LDOX, and representative early biosynthetic genes. Sample groups are defined as follows: OE-1, OE-2, and similar lines are hairy roots overexpressing AhTc1; Ctr-1, Ctr-2, and Ctr-3 lines are non-transformed control roots; PN-1, PN-2, and PN-3 samples correspond to pink testa tissue. The numbers in the heatmap indicate raw FPKM expression values for each gene across different tissues. (e) A working model of seed coat colour formation in peanut: Pink represents the basal colour. Homozygous loss-of-function mutations in the twin bHLH TF AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b block anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis, yielding a white testa. A dominant high-expression mutation in AhTc1 boosts anthocyanin accumulation, producing a black testa. When this AhTc1 mutation occurs in the AhWSC1a/1b double-mutant background, anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin remain blocked, but flavonols and other bypass-pathway metabolites accumulate, giving rise to an irregular purple-white testa.
Although dual-luciferase assays in leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana demonstrated that AhTc1 can activate the expression of DFR and LDOX, the transcript levels of these genes remain very low in white and purple-white peanut testa (Figure 7a). Molecular marker analysis confirmed the presence of the AhTc1-associated structural variant in PW and mutations in both AhWSC1 homologs. In PW, AhTc1 expression itself is not significantly elevated and remains suppressed. Thus, in peanut testa, both the expression of AhTc1 and its activation of downstream targets depend on intact AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b function. To investigate whether the transcriptional activation of DFR and LDOX by AhTc1 depends on AhWSC1, we performed transcriptome analysis using a hairy root transformation system. The results showed that AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b remained undetectable in the hairy roots overexpressing AhTc1 (Figure 7d). Despite the high expression of AhTc1 in these roots (FPKM > 100, approximately half the level observed in black testa), DFR and LDOX transcripts were still nearly undetectable (Figure 7d). In contrast, several upstream genes in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway, such as cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), Flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H), and chalcone synthase (CHS), were significantly upregulated (Figure 7c, Table S7).
3. Discussion
3.1. Structural Variation Associated with High Expression of AhTc1, Resulting in Black Seed Coats
In the recombinant inbred line (RIL) population crossed with black- and white-testa parents, segregation yielded pink testa, indicating that the black phenotype is dominant over pink. Bulked-segregant analysis pinpointed the known dominant locus AhTc1 as a major contributor to black testa formation [9]. Consistent with previous studies, our transcriptome data show that AhTc1 is significantly upregulated in black testa compared with other color classes. The mechanism driving this elevated expression had remained elusive, however. In this study, we identified a structural variation near the promoter region of AhTc1 in black-testa lines (Figure 3d and Figure S1), which may have caused an inversion. Whether this inversion affects AhTc1 expression still requires further investigation. Consistent with previous studies, our transcriptome data show that AhTc1 is significantly upregulated in black testa compared with other color classes. The mechanism driving this elevated expression had remained elusive, however. In this study, we identified a structural variation near the promoter region of AhTc1 in black-testa lines (Figure 3d and Figure S1), which may have caused an inversion. We hypothesize that the inversion could be associated with elevated AhTc1 expression through more than one regulatory scenario, although direct evidence for the underly ing mechanism is not yet available. One possibility is that, during the inversion, AhTc1 and its distal regulatory elements (e.g., enhancers) could be brought into a new juxtaposition, such that previously inefficient expression becomes driven by a strong promoter in the new spatial context, leading to elevated transcription [18]. A second possibility is that the inversion alters chromatin folding and 3D genome architecture, repositioning AhTc1 into an active chromatin domain, thereby increasing its expression [19]. These two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and may occur simultaneously. These proposed models remain speculative and will require chromatin conformation assays and/or targeted genome editing to be rigorously tested.
3.2. AhWSC1 Defines the Foundational Pigmentation Program of Peanut Testa
Peanut displays a striking array of testa colors: black, red, wine (maroon), purple, pink and white. The genetic basis of peanut seed-coat coloration has perplexed researchers for more than 100 years [15]. Classical segregation studies established that testa pigmentation is a complex, polygenic trait, and that pink, occasionally manifesting as a light tan, represents the basal hue [15]. Red testa can originate via two distinct genetic routes: a dominant allele R1 or recessive mutations at two loci, r2 and r3 [20,21]. Purple coloration is conferred by the dominant gene P [22]. Recent advances suggest two distinct genetic routes to red testa pigmentation. In recessive red testa lines, loss-of-function mutations in the anthocyanidin reductase (ANR) genes AhRt2 and AhRt3 appear to drive the accumulation of red pigments [11,12]. In contrast, dominant red testa is linked to AhPSC1, which encodes a bHLH transcription factor carrying an EAR motif [13]. Acting as a transcriptional repressor, AhPSC1 likely attenuates ANR expression, thereby limiting proanthocyanidin biosynthesis and shifting the metabolic flux toward red pigmentation.
We note that SV detection at the AhWSC1a/AhWSC1b locus is dependent on the reference assembly because the Tifrunner and Shitouqi genomes differ in local haplotype structure in this region. In the Tifrunner reference, the insertion is already present in AhWSC1b; therefore, when mapping to Tifrunner, this feature is absorbed by the reference and only the difference in AhWSC1a is called as an SV in white-testa materials. In contrast, when using Shitouqi as the reference, the corresponding segment does not contain the same insertion configuration, enabling SV signals to be detected in both AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b. Importantly, our origin analysis indicates that the AhWSC1b SV predates the emergence of the nonsense mutation, and we currently have no evidence that the SV is mechanistically required for generating the nonsense allele. Thus, we interpret the SV primarily as a linked structural feature/marker within the local haplotype background, whereas the nonsense mutations remain the most parsimonious causal lesions for the white testa phenotype.
In addition, Sanger sequencing of S2 showed that AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b carry the same insertion-type SV and the same nonsense mutation in S2. However, resequencing of the broader natural population indicated that the corresponding SV insertion is not observed at AhWSC1a in other accessions, suggesting that the S2 AhWSC1a configuration is unusual and likely derived. Notably, Sanger sequencing further revealed that homeolog-specific SNPs flanking the SV/nonsense sites are still present between the two subgenomes, arguing against a large-scale homogenization event. Together, these observations are consistent with the possibility that, in the white-testa line S2, the AhWSC1a nonsense mutation and the associated SV may have arisen via a small tract inter-subgenomic recombination/gene-conversion-like event between the two homeologs [23], although the exact mechanism will require additional haplotype-resolved long-read evidence to be confirmed.
Pink (or light tan) is conditioned by two pairs of completely dominant duplicate genes, F1/F2 and D1/D2 [24]. When a dominant allele is present at each pair, the seed coat expresses its basic color [24], Homozygosity for recessive alleles at one or both duplicate pairs, f1f1 f2f2 D1D1 D2D2, F1F1 F2F2 d1d1 d2d2 or f1f1 f2f2 d1d1 d2d2, produces white seed coat [24,25,26]. Yet the molecular basis of the basal pigmentation pathway has remained unresolved. In this research, bulked-segregant analysis reveals that concurrent loss-of-function mutations in two homeologous bHLH genes, AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b, eliminate anthocyanin accumulation, yielding a white testa. This dual-gene model dovetails with earlier genetic predictions (duplicate recessive control) and positions AhWSC1 as a pivotal regulator of the baseline testa colour in peanut.
3.3. AhWSC1 Acts as a Key Regulatory Controlling Proanthocyanidins Biosynthesis
Targeted metabolomic profiling of anthocyanin-related compounds across seed-coat color classes showed a clear pattern: pink testa contained markedly higher levels of proanthocyanidins than any other colour, whereas both red and black testa exhibited reduced proanthocyanidin content (Figure 1). Because anthocyanidins serve as common precursors for the biosynthesis of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins. Anthocyanidin reductase (ANR) catalyzes the conversion of anthocyanidins into proanthocyanidins, the decrease observed in red testa is plausibly attributable to lower ANR expression. In black testa, proanthocyanidin depletion is more likely driven by metabolic diversion of anthocyanidins toward glycosylated anthocyanins, thereby reducing the substrate pool for proanthocyanidin synthesis. UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) plays a key role in anthocyanin biosynthesis, as it catalyzes the glycosylation of unstable anthocyanidins, thereby converting them into stable anthocyanins [27]. By contrast, proanthocyanidin production is almost completely abrogated in white testa (Figure 1b and Figure 2b). Given that blocking ANR alone produces a red testa, the metabolic lesion responsible for the white phenotype must reside further upstream in the pathway. Transcriptome data support this notion: most genes in the anthocyanin pathway are down-regulated, and transcripts of DFR and LDOX are virtually undetectable in white testa. Dual-luciferase assays confirmed that the bHLH factor AhWSC1 can activate the promoters of both DFR and LDOX in tabaco, underscoring its pivotal role as an upstream regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis.
3.4. The Function of AhTc1 Depends on AhWSC1
In addition to the commonly observed white, pink, and black seed coat colors, a small number of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) exhibited a purple-white seed coat phenotype. Metabolomic analysis revealed that the biosynthesis of proanthocyanidins remained blocked in these purple-white peanuts. Genotypic analysis showed that these lines carried double mutations in AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b, along with the structural variant of AhTc1. However, the expression level of AhTc1 in the purple-white seed coat was only slightly higher than that in white and pink seed coats (Figure 7a). We speculate that AhTc1 may be highly expressed in only a limited subset of integument cell lineages, leading to the upregulation of some upstream anthocyanin biosynthetic genes in a portion of the cells. The purple-white coloration might result from the blockage of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis, which causes metabolic flux to be redirected toward other flavonoid-derived pigments, such as flavonols and flavones.
In dicotyledonous plants like Arabidopsis, anthocyanin biosynthetic genes are divided into early biosynthetic genes (EBGs) and late biosynthetic genes (LBGs) [28]. EBGs, such as CHS, CHI, F3H, F3′H, and FLS, are activated by R2R3-MYB transcription factors and contribute to the production of flavonols and other flavonoids [29]. LBGs, including DFR, ANS/LDOX, and UFGT, act downstream and are regulated by the MBW complex to complete anthocyanin synthesis [29]. A similar regulatory mechanism appears to operate in peanut. In Arabidopsis, AtTT8 interacts with AtPAP1, AtPAP2, AtMYB113, and TT2 [30]. In this study, yeast two-hybrid assays also demonstrated an interaction between AhTc1 and AhWSC1a. We further found that in white peanut seed coats, the transcription of DFR and LDOX was blocked compared to pink seed coats, while the expression of early biosynthetic genes (EBGs) such as CHS, CHI, F3H, F3′H, and FLS remained largely unaffected. In AhTc1-overexpressing hairy roots, EBGs were significantly upregulated, but DFR and LDOX transcription was not induced (Figure 7d).
4. Material and Methods
4.1. Population Development and Phenotypic Assessment
The black-testa cultivar, S3, was crossed with a white-testa cultivar, S2, in 2018 at the experimental station of Shandong Peanut Research Institute, Laixi, Shandong, China to generate the S2 × S3 RIL population (SS population). F1 seeds were sown in the same field the following season, and self-pollinated progeny were advanced to the F5 generation. All generations (F1–F5) were grown under identical agronomic management: 70 cm row spacing, 20 cm plant spacing. Because peanut testa color is maternally determined, the testa of F3 seeds reflects the genotype of the F2 plant. Consequently, seed harvested from each F2 to F5 individual was visually inspected under daylight and classified into four discrete colour classes—black, white, pink, or purple-white. Segregation ratios were tested by χ2 goodness-of-fit, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
4.2. Genomic Resequencing and BSA
Genomic DNA was isolated from young leaflets of F5 plants whose testa color was stable across two seasons. Three bulks were assembled: black, white, and pink. For each bulk, equimolar DNA from each line was pooled to 5 µg total for next generation resequencing. Raw reads were quality-trimmed with fastp v0.23.2, then aligned to the Tifrunner reference genome (v2.0) using Hisat2 with parameter “--no-spliced-alignment”. After duplicate removal and base-quality recalibration, SNPs and indels were called jointly across bulks with GATK HaplotypeCaller in GVCF mode [26,31]. SNP positions with total depth < 10× in any bulk were discarded. Three complementary metrics were applied to the resequencing data: (i) the ΔSNP-index, defined as the difference between the SNP-index of the high-trait bulk and that of the low (or parental mean) bulk [32,33]; (ii) G′ (Gprime), the smoothed G statistic obtained by tricube-kernel weighting [33,34]; and (iii) the fourth-power Euclidean distance (ED4), which was modified to increase the signal to noise ratio by raising normal ED to the fourth power [35,36]. For each statistic, values were smoothed in a 1 Mb sliding window with 100 kb steps, and empirical 95% significance thresholds were generated from 100,000 Monte-Carlo permutations of bulk labels [37]. All calculations were implemented in Python v3.10 scripts we developed, which are available on Github (https://github.com/sdpeanut/BSAtool, accessed on 18 June 2025).
4.3. Geographic Distribution Analysis of Varieties
We reanalyzed 390 resequencing datasets [17], aligning reads to the Tifrunner reference genome with HISAT2 and inspecting AhWSC1 mutation types one by one using the IGV v2.17.4 tools [38,39]. Using the associated geographic coordinates, we developed a Python tool, GeoMapDraw v1.0 (https://github.com/sdpeanut/GeoMapDraw, accessed on 18 June 2025), to visualize the geographic distribution of the different mutation types.
4.4. De Novo Assembly of S3 and PCR Marker Development
Cleaned reads of S3 were re-assembled de novo using MEGAHIT v1.2.9 on a 96-thread Ubuntu 22.04 server (512 GB RAM) with multi-k-mer mode (--k-min 31 --k-max 141 --k-step 10), 85% memory usage, and a minimum contig length of 1 kb [40]. Known sequences flanking the AhTc1-associated SV in S3 were used as BLAST+ v2.12.0 queries to identify the corresponding contigs in the assembly, and primers were designed on the basis of the alignment results.
4.5. Targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Anthocyanins
Mature dry seeds were deshelled, and testa were peeled, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and lyophilised for 48 h. Powdered samples (50 mg) were extracted in 1 mL 70% methanol containing 0.1% formic acid, vortex-mixed 30 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged (12,000× g, 10 min). Supernatants were filtered (0.22 µm PTFE) before analysis. Three biological replicates per color class were prepared. Chromatographic separation utilized an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 µm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) on a Waters UPLC-I Class system. Mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid in water; phase B: acetonitrile. Detection used a Sciex QTRAP 6500+ LC–MS/MS system (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA), operated as triple-quadrupole in MRM mode, positive ionization, source temperature 550 °C, ion spray voltage 5500 V. A 52-compound anthocyanin standard library were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) enabled absolute quantification; data were processed with MultiQuant v3.0.3 (https://sciex.com/products/software/multiquant-software, accessed on 20 July 2025).
4.6. Transcriptome Sequencing and Analysis
Total RNA was extracted from the first fully expanded leaves of S2 and S3 and from testa at the R9 stage [14] resenting four classes (white, black, pink, purple-white) in the RIL population. RNA libraries were sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform by Biomarker Technologies (Beijing, China). FastQC v0.12.1 was used for quality control. Reads were trimmed with fastp and aligned to the Tifrunner reference transcriptome using HISAT2 v2.2.1 [41,42]. Gene counts were obtained with featureCounts v2.0.3 and normalized to TPM. Differential expression was determined with DESeq2 (https://github.com/thelovelab/DESeq2, accessed on 19 April 2025). KEGG pathway mapping used KOBAS v2.0 [43] and KEGG enrichment employed ClusterProfiler, v2.13 [44].
4.7. Arabidopsis Genetic Complementation and Hairy Root Transformation of Peanut
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0) and the tt8-6 mutant (GABI_241D05) were grown in 7 cm pots filled with peat/vermiculite (3:1) under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod, 22 °C, 60% relative humidity, and ~150 µmol m−2 s−1 light strength. The full-length AhWSC1a coding sequence was amplified from S3 cDNA and cloned into pCAMBIA1300 under the CaMV 35S promoter, yielding p35S:AhWSC1a. The construct was introduced into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 and transformed into tt8-3 plants using the floral-dip method [45]. T0 seeds were surface-sterilized and selected on MS medium containing 25 mg L−1 hygromycin. Integration of the transgene was confirmed by PCR. T1 plants were examined for seed-coat pigmentation. Complementation was inferred when the pale yellow testa of tt8-6 converted to brown. The AhTc1 coding sequence (CDS) was cloned into the pCAMBIA1300 vector under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter to generate an AhTc1 overexpression construct (OE). An empty vector lacking AhTc1 was used as the control (Ctr). Peanut leaves were transformed using Agrobacterium rhizogenes. The resulting hairy roots were harvested for RNA-seq, and transcriptome data from pink-peanut seed coats at the R9 stage (PN) were also included for integrated analysis to identify downstream genes. Rhizobium rhizogenes strain K599 was used in transformation of peanut leaf to generate hairy root [46,47].
4.8. Y2H and Transcriptional Activation Analysis
The coding sequences (CDSs) of AhWSC1a, AhTT2, AhTTG1, and AhTc1 were individually cloned into pGADT7 and pGBKT7 and co-transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain Y2HGold [48]. To suppress auto-activation, 2 mM 3-AT was added to the selective medium. To assess whether AhWSC1 activates the promoters of AhDFR and AhLDOX1, a dual-luciferase reporter assay was conducted in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. The AhWSC1a and AhTc1 coding sequence was cloned into the pCambia1300 effector vector, and ~2 kb promoter regions of AhDFR1 and AhLDOX1 were inserted upstream of the firefly luciferase (LUC) gene in the pGreenII 0800-LUC reporter vector [49]. The Renilla luciferase (REN) gene under the CaMV 35S promoter served as an internal control. Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 strains carrying the effector and reporter constructs were co-infiltrated into N. benthamiana leaves, and proteins were extracted for luciferase activities three days later [50,51]. Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Cat# DL101-01, Vazyme, Nanjing, China) were used to perform the assay. The relative promoter activity was expressed as the LUC/REN ratio, with 6 biological replicates for each assay at least.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we demonstrated that two bHLH transcription factor genes AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b are indispensable regulators of peanut testa pigmentation. Recessive loss-of-function mutations in both loci abolish proanthocyanidin biosynthesis and repress late anthocyanin-pathway genes, resulting in the classical white testa phenotype. In addition, structural variation tightly linked to AhTc1 contributes to the black testa phenotype, yet its effect depends on the presence of functional AhWSC1. We further showed that AhWSC1 physically interacts with the MYB regulator AhTc1 to form a functional MBW complex that activates key downstream genes, establishing AhWSC1a/1b as the central transcriptional hub of the anthocyanin pathway. Collectively, these findings elucidate the molecular basis of white testa inheritance in peanut and highlight AhWSC1a/1b as critical genetic targets for precision-breeding of nutritionally improved peanut varieties.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| DFR | Dihydroflavonol 4-reductase |
| LDOX | Leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase |
| ANS | Anthocyanidin synthase |
| LUC | Firefly luciferase |
| REN | Renilla luciferase |
| ED | Euclidean distance |
| ED4/ED4 | Euclidean distance to the 4th power |
| bHLH | basic helix–loop–helix |
| BSA | Bulked Segregant Analysis |
| QTL | Quantitative Trait Locus |
| CDS | Coding Sequence |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants15020304/s1, Figure S1: Structural variation associated with seed-coat color in black peanut; Figure S2: Circos plot displaying genome-wide QTL scans from the ED4, ΔSNP-index, and G′ algorithms; Figure S3: Reference-genome choice affects the detection of structural variation adjacent to the point-mutation site of AhWSC1; Figure S4: Comparative alignment of subgenome sequences flanking the point-mutation sites in AhWSC1a and AhWSC1b and development of molecular markers; Figure S5: Sanger sequencing chromatogram of the marker amplicon in single white peanut individual, confirming that the fragment derives from both the A and B subgenomes; Figure S6: Number of domestic and international germplasm accessions carrying either the SVb structural variant or the ahwsc1b loss-of-function genotype; Figure S7: Number of domestic and international germplasm accessions carrying either the SVb structural variant or the ahwsc1b loss-of-function genotype; Table S1: Content of anthocyanins (ng/mg) in varieties with different seed coat colors; Table S2: Metabolomic profiling of flavanoids and anthocyanins in seed coats from color-segregated Individuals of RIL opulations; Table S3: Transcriptomic analysis of seed coats at R8 stage: black (BL), pink (PN), white (WH), and purple-white (PW); Table S4: Protein-coding genes within the Chr02 QTL interval; Table S5: Protein-coding genes within the Chr02 QTL interval; Table S6: Analysis of different mutation types in natural populations; Table S7: RNA sequencing analysis of flavonoid pathway genes across multiple tissue types; Table S8: Marker primer list.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.C. and M.Y.; methodology, Y.R., L.L. and P.X.; software, G.C.; formal analysis, Y.T. and J.T.; investigation, S.L.; resources, P.X. and L.W.; data curation, H.W. (Hui Wang) and H.W. (Heng Wang); writing—original draft preparation, G.C.; writing—review and editing, Z.W., J.Z. and M.Y.; visualization, T.Y.; project administration, Z.W. and J.Z.; funding acquisition, M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
All the original resequencing data can be available at the web site of the National Genomics Data Center of China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB) (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/, accessed on 15 January 2025) with the project ID PRJCA021788.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province, China (2025LZGC020), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2024MC038), Natural Science Foundation of China (32072107).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Falcone Ferreyra M.L., Rius S.P., Casati P. Flavonoids: Biosynthesis, biological functions, and biotechnological applications. Front. Plant Sci. 2012;3:222. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baudry A., Heim M.A., Dubreucq B., Caboche M., Weisshaar B., Lepiniec L. TT2, TT8, and TTG1 synergistically specify the expression of BANYULS and proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2004;39:366–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02138.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ramsay N.A., Glover B.J. MYB-bHLH-WD40 protein complex and the evolution of cellular diversity. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nesi N., Debeaujon I., Jond C., Pelletier G., Caboche M., Lepiniec L. The TT8 gene encodes a basic helix-loop-helix domain protein required for expression of DFR and BAN genes in Arabidopsis siliques. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1863–1878. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.10.1863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Walker A.R., Davison P.A., Bolognesi-Winfield A.C., James C.M., Srinivasan N., Blundell T.L., Esch J.J., Marks M.D., Gray J.C. The TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 Locus, which regulates trichome differentiation and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, encodes a WD40 Repeat Protein. Plant Cell. 1999;11:1337–1349. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.7.1337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Saitoh K., Onishi K., Mikami I., Thidar K., Sano Y. Allelic diversification at the C (OsC1) locus of wild and cultivated rice: Nucleotide changes associated with phenotypes. Genetics. 2004;168:997–1007. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.018390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Furukawa T., Maekawa M., Oki T., Suda I., Iida S., Shimada H., Takamure I., Kadowaki K. The Rc and Rd genes are involved in proanthocyanidin synthesis in rice pericarp. Plant J. 2007;49:91–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02958.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Oikawa T., Maeda H., Oguchi T., Yamaguchi T., Tanabe N., Ebana K., Yano M., Ebitani T., Izawa T. The birth of a black rice gene and its local spread by introgression. Plant Cell. 2015;27:2401–2414. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhao Y., Ma J., Li M., Deng L., Li G., Xia H., Zhao S., Hou L., Li P., Ma C., et al. Whole-genome resequencing-based QTL-seq identified AhTc1 gene encoding a R2R3-MYB transcription factor controlling peanut purple testa colour. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020;18:96–105. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen H., Chen X., Xu R., Liu W., Liu N., Huang L., Luo H., Huai D., Lan X., Zhang Y., et al. Fine-mapping and gene candidate analysis for AhRt1, a major dominant locus responsible for testa color in cultivated peanut. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2021;134:3721–3730. doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03924-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang K., Yuan M., Xia H., He L., Ma J., Wang M., Zhao H., Hou L., Zhao S., Li P., et al. BSA-seq and genetic mapping reveals AhRt2 as a candidate gene responsible for red testa of peanut. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2022;135:1529–1540. doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04051-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tang Y., Zhou X., Li X., Zhou C., Wang W., Zhou M., Hu Z., Li X., Zhang K., Wang S., et al. Genetic analysis and fine mapping reveal that AhRt3, which encodes an anthocyanin reductase, is responsible for red testa in cultivated peanuts. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2025;138:117. doi: 10.1007/s00122-025-04903-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhao K., Zhang J., Fan Y., Du X., Zhu S., Li Z., Qiu D., Cao Z., Ma Q., Li Y., et al. PSC1, a basic/helix-loop-helix transcription factor controlling the purplish-red testa trait in peanut. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2025;67:1364–1378. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang X., Liu Y., Ouyang L., Yao R., He D., Han Z., Li W., Ding Y., Wang Z., Kang Y., et al. Metabolomics combined with transcriptomics analyses of mechanism regulating testa pigmentation in peanut. Front. Plant Sci. 2022;13:1065049. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1065049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Branch W.D. First 100 years—inheritance of testa color in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Crop Sci. 2011;51:1–4. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2010.06.0349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huang L., Liu X., Pandey M.K., Ren X., Chen H., Xue X., Liu N., Huai D., Chen Y., Zhou X., et al. Genome-wide expression quantitative trait locus analysis in a recombinant inbred line population for trait dissection in peanut. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020;18:779–790. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lu Q., Huang L., Liu H., Garg V., Gangurde S.S., Li H., Chitikineni A., Guo D., Pandey M.K., Li S., et al. A genomic variation map provides insights into peanut diversity in China and associations with 28 agronomic traits. Nat. Genet. 2024;56:530–540. doi: 10.1038/s41588-024-01660-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Galupa R., Picard C., Servant N., Nora E.P., Zhan Y., van Bemmel J.G., El Marjou F., Johanneau C., Borensztein M., Ancelin K., et al. Inversion of a topological domain leads to restricted changes in its gene expression and affects interdomain communication. Development. 2022;149:dev200568. doi: 10.1242/dev.200568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tourdot E., Grob S. Three-dimensional chromatin architecture in plants—General features and novelties. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2023;102:151344. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2023.151344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ashri A. A second locus controlling red testa in peanuts, Arachis hypogaea. Crop Sci. 1969;9:515–517. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900040041x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Branch W., Holbrook C. Genic relationship between R1, R2, and R3 for red peanut testa color. Peanut Sci. 1988;15:13–14. doi: 10.3146/i0095-3679-15-1-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Branch W.D. Genetic relationship between purple and wine testa color in peanut. Peanut Sci. 2001;28:19–20. doi: 10.3146/i0095-3679-28-1-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Deb S.K., Edger P.P., Pires J.C., McKain M.R. Patterns, mechanisms, and consequences of homoeologous exchange in allopolyploid angiosperms: A genomic and epigenomic perspective. New Phytol. 2023;238:2284–2304. doi: 10.1111/nph.18927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hammons R.O. White testa inheritance in the peanut. J. Hered. 1963;54:139–142. doi: 10.1093/jhered/54.4.139. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Branch W.D. Genetic studies involving wine testa color in peanut. Peanut Sci. 1997;24:60–62. doi: 10.3146/i0095-3679-24-1-13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McKenna A., Hanna M., Banks E., Sivachenko A.Y., Cibulskis K., Kernytsky A., Garimella K.V., Altshuler D.D., Gabriel S., Daly M.J., et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Muhammad N., Luo Z., Yang M., Li X., Liu Z., Liu M. The joint role of the late anthocyanin biosynthetic UFGT-encoding genes in the flowers and fruits coloration of horticultural plants. Sci. Hortic. 2022;301:111110. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Petroni K., Tonelli C. Recent advances on the regulation of anthocyanin synthesis in reproductive organs. Plant Sci. 2011;181:219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lepiniec L., Debeaujon I., Routaboul J.M., Baudry A., Pourcel L., Nesi N., Caboche M. Genetics and biochemistry of seed flavonoids. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006;57:405–430. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zimmermann I.M., Heim M.A., Weisshaar B., Uhrig J.F. Comprehensive identification of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB transcription factors interacting with R/B-like BHLH proteins. Plant J. 2004;40:22–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yuan Y., Gao M., Zhang M., Zheng H., Zhou X., Guo Y., Zhao Y., Kong F., Li S. QTL mapping for phosphorus efficiency and morphological traits at seedling and maturity stages in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:614. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Takagi H., Abe A., Yoshida K., Kosugi S., Natsume S., Mitsuoka C., Uemura A., Utsushi H., Tamiru M., Takuno S., et al. QTL-seq: Rapid mapping of quantitative trait loci in rice by whole genome resequencing of DNA from two bulked populations. Plant J. 2013;74:174–183. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen G., Sheng L., Wu L., Yin L., Li S., Wang H., Jiang X., Wang H., Shi Y., Zhan F., et al. Identification of novel QTLs for resistance to late leaf spot in peanut by SNP array and QTL-seq analyses. J. Integr. Agric. 2025;24:3772–3788. doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Magwene P.M., Willis J.H., Kelly J.K. The statistics of bulk segregant analysis using next generation sequencing. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011;7:e1002255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hill J.T., Demarest B.L., Bisgrove B.W., Gorsi B., Su Y.C., Yost H.J. MMAPPR: Mutation mapping analysis pipeline for pooled RNA-seq. Genome Res. 2013;23:687–697. doi: 10.1101/gr.146936.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Goettelmann F., Chen Y., Knorst V., Yates S., Copetti D., Studer B., Kolliker R. High-resolution bulked segregant analysis enables candidate gene identification for bacterial wilt resistance in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) Plant J. 2024;118:1516–1527. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li P., Li G., Zhang Y.-W., Zuo J.-F., Liu J.-Y., Zhang Y.-M. A combinatorial strategy to identify various types of QTLs for quantitative traits using extreme phenotype individuals in an F2 population. Plant Commun. 2022;3:100319. doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Robinson J.T., Thorvaldsdottir H., Winckler W., Guttman M., Lander E.S., Getz G., Mesirov J.P. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–26. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Robinson J.T., Thorvaldsdottir H., Wenger A.M., Zehir A., Mesirov J.P. Variant review with the integrative genomics viewer. Cancer Res. 2017;77:e31–e34. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li D., Liu C.M., Luo R., Sadakane K., Lam T.W. MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kim D., Paggi J.M., Park C., Bennett C., Salzberg S.L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Xie C., Mao X., Huang J., Ding Y., Wu J., Dong S., Kong L., Gao G., Li C.Y., Wei L. KOBAS 2.0: A web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W316–W322. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xu S., Hu E., Cai Y., Xie Z., Luo X., Zhan L., Tang W., Wang Q., Liu B., Wang R., et al. Using clusterProfiler to characterize multiomics data. Nat. Protoc. 2024;19:3292–3320. doi: 10.1038/s41596-024-01020-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Clough S.J., Bent A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Liu L., Qu J., Wang C., Liu M., Zhang C., Zhang X., Guo C., Wu C., Yang G., Huang J., et al. An efficient genetic transformation system mediated by Rhizobium rhizogenes in fruit trees based on the transgenic hairy root to shoot conversion. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2024;22:2093–2103. doi: 10.1111/pbi.14328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cui Y., Zhang Q., Meng Q., Liu X., Liu X. The peanut Ubiquitin4 promoter drives stable gene overexpression and efficient multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in peanut. aBIOTECH. 2025;6:685–692. doi: 10.1007/s42994-025-00230-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.An J.P., Zhang X.W., Xu R.R., You C.X., Wang X.F., Hao Y.J. Apple MdERF4 negatively regulates salt tolerance by inhibiting MdERF3 transcription. Plant Sci. 2018;276:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hellens R.P., Allan A.C., Friel E.N., Bolitho K., Grafton K., Templeton M.D., Karunairetnam S., Gleave A.P., Laing W.A. Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants. Plant Methods. 2005;1:13. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-1-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xu R., Wang P., Pang Y., Liu H., Zhang T., Li Y., Zhang S. Involvement of the miR156/SPLs/NLP7 modules in plant lateral root development and nitrogen uptake. Planta. 2025;261:127. doi: 10.1007/s00425-025-04688-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen G.-H., Sun J.-Y., Liu M., Liu J., Yang W.-C. SPOROCYTELESS Is a Novel Embryophyte-Specific Transcription Repressor that Interacts with TPL and TCP Proteins in Arabidopsis. J. Genet. Genom. 2014;41:617–625. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2014.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All the original resequencing data can be available at the web site of the National Genomics Data Center of China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB) (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/, accessed on 15 January 2025) with the project ID PRJCA021788.







