Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis logoLink to Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
. 1999 Spring;32(1):63–82. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-63

An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.

J W Harding 1, D P Wacker 1, W K Berg 1, L J Cooper 1, J Asmus 1, K Mlela 1, J Muller 1
PMCID: PMC1284541  PMID: 10201104

Abstract

We examined how positive and negative reinforcement influenced time allocation, occurrence of problem behavior, and completion of parent instructions during a concurrent choice assessment with 2 preschool-aged children who displayed severe problem behavior in their homes. The children were given a series of concurrent choice options that varied availability of parent attention, access to preferred toys, and presentation of parent instructions. The results showed that both children consistently allocated their time to choice areas that included parent attention when no instructions were presented. When parent attention choice areas included the presentation of instructions, the children displayed differential patterns of behavior that appeared to be influenced by the presence or absence of preferred toys. The results extended previous applications of reinforcer assessment procedures by analyzing the relative influence of both positive and negative reinforcement within a concurrent-operants paradigm.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (215.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Browning R. M. A same-subject design for simultaneous comparison of three reinforcement contingencies. Behav Res Ther. 1967 Aug;5(3):237–243. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(67)90038-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Derby K. M., Wacker D. P., Andelman M., Berg W., Drew J., Asmus J., Prouty A. M., Laffey P. Two measures of preference during forced-choice assessments. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):345–346. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisher W. W., Mazur J. E. Basic and applied research on choice responding. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):387–410. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fisher W., Piazza C. C., Bowman L. G., Hagopian L. P., Owens J. C., Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491–498. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher W., Piazza C., Cataldo M., Harrell R., Jefferson G., Conner R. Functional communication training with and without extinction and punishment. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):23–36. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goh H. L., Iwata B. A. Behavioral persistence and variability during extinction of self-injury maintained by escape. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Spring;27(1):173–174. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horner R. H., Day H. M., Sprague J. R., O'Brien M., Heathfield L. T. Interspersed requests: a nonaversive procedure for reducing aggression and self-injury during instruction. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Summer;24(2):265–278. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horner R. H., Day H. M. The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Winter;24(4):719–732. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Iwata B. A. Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis: an emerging technology. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Winter;20(4):361–378. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Iwata B. A., Pace G. M., Kalsher M. J., Cowdery G. E., Cataldo M. F. Experimental analysis and extinction of self-injurious escape behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;23(1):11–27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lerman D. C., Iwata B. A. Developing a technology for the use of operant extinction in clinical settings: an examination of basic and applied research. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):345–385. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mace F. C., Neef N. A. Limited matching on concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):585–596. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neef N. A., Mace F. C., Shade D. Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Spring;26(1):37–52. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Neef N. A., Shade D., Miller M. S. Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):575–583. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Northup J., George T., Jones K., Broussard C., Vollmer T. R. A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):201–212. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pace G. M., Ivancic M. T., Edwards G. L., Iwata B. A., Page T. J. Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Fall;18(3):249–255. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peck S. M., Wacker D. P., Berg W. K., Cooper L. J., Brown K. A., Richman D., McComas J. J., Frischmeyer P., Millard T. Choice-making treatment of young children's severe behavior problems. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Fall;29(3):263–290. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Piazza C. C., Fisher W. W., Hagopian L. P., Bowman L. G., Toole L. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):1–9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Piazza C. C., Fisher W. W., Hanley G. P., Remick M. L., Contrucci S. A., Aitken T. L. The use of positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape-maintained destructive behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Summer;30(2):279–298. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sigafoos J., Dempsey R. Assessing choice making among children with multiple disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Fall;25(3):747–755. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith R. G., Iwata B. A., Shore B. A. Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):61–71. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wacker D. P., Berg W. K., Harding J. W., Derby K. M., Asmus J. M., Healy A. Evaluation and long-term treatment of aberrant behavior displayed by young children with disabilities. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998 Aug;19(4):260–266. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199808000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wacker D. P., Steege M. W., Northup J., Sasso G., Berg W., Reimers T., Cooper L., Cigrand K., Donn L. A component analysis of functional communication training across three topographies of severe behavior problems. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Winter;23(4):417–429. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Windsor J., Piché L. M., Locke P. A. Preference testing: a comparison of two presentation methods. Res Dev Disabil. 1994 Nov-Dec;15(6):439–455. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(94)90028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zarcone J. R., Fisher W. W., Piazza C. C. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):247–250. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES