Abstract
Results of functional analysis were ambiguous in suggesting that self-injurious behavior (SIB) was maintained by escape, sensory reinforcement, or both. To help clarify these results, we compared escape extinction, sensory extinction, and the combined treatments. Sensory extinction proved to be a necessary and sufficient treatment, whereas escape extinction failed to decrease SIB. These analyses helped to clarify the function of SIB and to identify an effective and efficient treatment.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (100.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Iwata B. A., Dorsey M. F., Slifer K. J., Bauman K. E., Richman G. S. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197–209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwata B. A., Pace G. M., Cowdery G. E., Miltenberger R. G. What makes extinction work: an analysis of procedural form and function. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Spring;27(1):131–144. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. G., Iwata B. A., Vollmer T. R., Zarcone J. R. Experimental analysis and treatment of multiply controlled self-injury. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):183–196. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]