Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1996 Nov;66(3):349–367. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-349

Effects of D-amphetamine on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement.

M G LeSage 1, T Byrne 1, A Poling 1
PMCID: PMC1284574  PMID: 8921614

Abstract

The present study examined in 8-hour sessions the effects of d-amphetamine (1.0, 5.6, and 10 mg/kg) on the acquisition of lever-press responding in rats that were exposed to procedures in which water delivery was delayed by 0, 8, or 16 seconds relative to the response that produced it. Both nonresetting- and resetting-delay conditions were studied. Although neither shaping nor autoshaping occurred, substantial levels of operative-lever responding developed under all conditions in which responses produced water. The lowest dose (1.0 mg/kg) of d-amphetamine either had no effect on or increased operative-lever pressing, whereas higher doses typically produced an initial reduction in lever pressing. Nonetheless, overall rates of operative-lever pressing at these doses were as high as, or higher than, those observed with vehicle. Thus, response acquisition was observed under all reinforcement procedures at all drug doses. In the absence of the drug, most responding occurred on the operative lever when reinforcement was immediate. Such differential responding also developed under both nonresetting- and resetting-delay procedures when the delay was 8 seconds, but not when it was 16 seconds. d-Amphetamine did not affect the development of differential responding under any procedure. Thus, consistent with d-amphetamine's effects under repeated acquisition procedures, the drug had no detrimental effect on learning until doses that produced general behavioral disruption were administered.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (337.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Branch M. N. On the role of "memory" in the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Sep;28(2):171–179. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Critchfield T. S., Lattal K. A. Acquisition of a spatially defined operant with delayed reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):373–387. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans A. Color-vision deficiency--what does it mean? J Sch Nurs. 1992 Dec;8(4):6–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Evans E. B., Wenger G. R. Effects of drugs of abuse on acquisition of behavioral chains in squirrel monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1992;107(1):55–60. doi: 10.1007/BF02244965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans E. B., Wenger G. R. The acute effects of caffeine, cocaine and d-amphetamine on the repeated acquisition responding of pigeons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1990 Mar;35(3):631–636. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90300-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harting J., Mcmillian D. E. Effects of pentobarbital and d-amphetamine on the repeated acquisition of response sequences by pigeons. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1976 Sep 29;49(3):245–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00426823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lattal K. A., Gleeson S. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Jan;16(1):27–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lattal K. A., Metzger B. Response acquisition by Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens) with delayed visual reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):35–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Paule M. G., McMillan D. E. Incremental repeated acquisition in the rat: acute effects of drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Sep;21(3):431–439. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(84)80106-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Seiden L. S., Sabol K. E., Ricaurte G. A. Amphetamine: effects on catecholamine systems and behavior. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1993;33:639–677. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.33.040193.003231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stolerman I. P. A method for studying the influences of drugs on learning for food rewards in rats. Psychopharmacologia. 1971;19(4):398–406. doi: 10.1007/BF00404384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stolerman I. P. Analysis of the acquisition and extinction of food-reinforced behaviour in rats after the administration of chlorpromazine. Psychopharmacologia. 1971;20(3):266–279. doi: 10.1007/BF00402102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thompson D. M. Repeated acquisition of response sequences: effects of d-amphetamine and chlorpromazine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1974 Nov-Dec;2(6):741–746. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(74)90104-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilkenfield J., Nickel M., Blakely E., Poling A. Acquisition of lever-press responding in rats with delayed reinforcement: A comparison of three procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):431–443. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van Haaren F. Response acquisition with fixed and variable resetting delays of reinforcement in male and female Wistar rats. Physiol Behav. 1992 Oct;52(4):767–772. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90412-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES