Abstract
Five experiments addressed the issue of how pigeons learn to discriminate the relative frequency of stimuli. During a sampling period, three different stimuli (keylights) were presented serially, in mixed order, and with different frequencies. During a choice period, the stimuli were presented simultaneously, and reinforcement was arranged for choosing the stimulus that was presented the least number of times during the sample. The results showed that (a) the overall proportion of correct choices was always above chance levels; (b) the likelihood of a correct choice decreased with the serial position of the correct stimulus, a negative recency effect; (c) when the last three stimuli of the sample were constrained to be one of each kind, the negative recency effect decreased but errors became more likely when the correct stimulus occurred early in the sample, a negative primacy effect; (d) accurate performance generalized to new and larger samples; and (e) under some conditions the probability of a correct choice was independent of the serial position of the correct stimulus. The serial position curves suggest that in a least frequent discrimination task, two processes determine how the least frequent stimulus controls behavior: a passive decay process (the stimulus loses its effectiveness with time since its last occurrence), and a residual salience process (when the stimulus occurs in the first position it may decay to a higher asymptote than when it occurs in later positions.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (387.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flexser A. J., Bower G. H. How frequency affects recency judgments: a model for recency discrimination. J Exp Psychol. 1974 Oct;103(4):706–716. doi: 10.1037/h0037194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HERRNSTEIN R. J., LOVELAND D. H. COMPLEX VISUAL CONCEPT IN THE PIGEON. Science. 1964 Oct 23;146(3643):549–551. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3643.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hasher L., Zacks R. T. Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. Am Psychol. 1984 Dec;39(12):1372–1388. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.39.12.1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MECHNER F., GUEVREKIAN L. Effects of deprivation upon counting and timing in rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:463–466. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Machado A. Behavioral variability and frequency-dependent selection. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Sep;58(2):241–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Machado A. Operant conditioning of behavioral variability using a percentile reinforcement schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Sep;52(2):155–166. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meck W. H., Church R. M. A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Jul;9(3):320–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rilling M. Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Feb;63(1):60–65. doi: 10.1037/h0024164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santiago H. C., Wright A. A. Pigeon memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Oct;10(4):498–512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimp C. P. Short-term memory in the pigeon: relative recency. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Jan;25(1):55–61. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simon H. A. A note on Jost's Law and exponential forgetting. Psychometrika. 1966 Dec;31(4):505–506. doi: 10.1007/BF02289520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wright A. A., Santiago H. C., Sands S. F., Kendrick D. F., Cook R. G. Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people. Science. 1985 Jul 19;229(4710):287–289. doi: 10.1126/science.9304205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]