Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1997 Jul;68(1):47–66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-47

Food and amphetamine self-administration by baboons: effects of alternatives.

R W Foltin 1
PMCID: PMC1284615  PMID: 9241862

Abstract

The effects of the availability of an alternative reinforcer on responding maintained by food pellets or fluid solutions were examined in 6 adult male baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis). During daily 23-hr experimental sessions, baboons had concurrent access to both food pellets and fluid, with responding maintained under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement that varied between the two commodities. The fixed-ratio requirement, or cost, for pellets was increased when (a) no fluid, (b) a dilute dextrose vehicle, (c) 0.002 mg/kg d-amphetamine, or (d) 0.004 mg/kg d-amphetamine was available. When given nonrestricted concurrent access to food pellets and amphetamine at minimal cost (FR 2), baboons self-administered sufficient amphetamine to decrease pellet intake. Increasing the response requirement for pellets decreased pellet intake at a similar rate regardless of the available fluid and increased fluid intake in a variable manner among baboons such that there were no statistically significant increases in fluid intake. In contrast, when access to pellets was restricted to 70% of maximal intake under nonrestricted conditions, increasing pellet cost decreased pellet intake and increased fluid intake more rapidly when the high amphetamine dose was available. Thus, amphetamine was more effective as an economic substitute for pellets when access to pellets was restricted. The response cost for vehicle and both amphetamine concentrations was increased when baboons had nonrestricted and restricted access to pellets. Increasing the response requirement for fluid delivery decreased intake of all three fluids similarly under both pellet-access conditions. The results indicate that substitution between commodities with minimal commonalities can be studied under controlled laboratory conditions and is dependent upon reinforcement schedule and commodity restrictions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (346.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bickel W. K., DeGrandpre R. J., Higgins S. T. The behavioral economics of concurrent drug reinforcers: a review and reanalysis of drug self-administration research. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1995 Apr;118(3):250–259. doi: 10.1007/BF02245952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carroll M. E., Lac S. T., Nygaard S. L. A concurrently available nondrug reinforcer prevents the acquisition or decreases the maintenance of cocaine-reinforced behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1989;97(1):23–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00443407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carroll M. E., Meisch R. A. Effects of food deprivation on etonitazene consumption in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1979 Jan;10(1):155–159. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(79)90182-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll M. E. Self-administration of orally-delivered phencyclidine and ethanol under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1987;93(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02439578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroll M. E., Stotz D. C. Increased phencyclidine self-administration due to food deprivation: interaction with concentration and training conditions. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1984;84(3):299–303. doi: 10.1007/BF00555202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carroll M. E., Stotz D. C., Kliner D. J., Meisch R. A. Self-administration of orally-delivered methohexital in rhesus monkeys with phencyclidine or pentobarbital histories: effects of food deprivation and satiation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Jan;20(1):145–151. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(84)90115-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carroll M. E., Stotz D. C. Oral d-amphetamine and ketamine self-administration by rhesus monkeys: effects of food deprivation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1983 Oct;227(1):28–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Comer S. D., Hunt V. R., Carroll M. E. Effects of concurrent saccharin availability and buprenorphine pretreatment on demand for smoked cocaine base in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994 Jun;115(1-2):15–23. doi: 10.1007/BF02244746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Foltin R. W. Does package size matter? A unit-price analysis of "demand" for food in baboons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Sep;62(2):293–306. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Foltin R. W. Economic analysis of the effects of caloric alternatives and reinforcer magnitude on "demand" for food in baboons. Appetite. 1992 Dec;19(3):255–271. doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(92)90166-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foltin R. W., Fischman M. W. Food intake in baboons: effects of d-amphetamine and fenfluramine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988 Nov;31(3):585–592. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90234-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Foltin R. W., Kelly T. H., Fischman M. W. The effects of d-amphetamine on food intake of humans living in a residential laboratory. Appetite. 1990 Aug;15(1):33–45. doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(90)90098-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Foltin R.W. Effects of pharmacological manipulations on "demand" for food by baboons. Behav Pharmacol. 1993 Dec;4(6):586–596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Green Leonard, Freed Debra E. The substitutability of reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jul;60(1):141–158. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoffman S. H., Branch M. N., Sizemore G. M. Cocaine tolerance: acute versus chronic effects as dependent upon fixed-ratio size. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 May;47(3):363–376. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hursh S. R. Behavioral economics. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):435–452. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hursh S. R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):219–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jänicke U. A., Coper H. (+)-Amphetamine oral 'drug taking behavior' in naive and tolerant rats. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1984 Mar;13(2):177–189. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(84)90057-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kanarek R. B., Marks-Kaufman R. Dietary modulation of oral amphetamine intake in rats. Physiol Behav. 1988;44(4-5):501–505. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90312-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kelleher R. T., Morse W. H. Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb Physiol. 1968;60:1–56. doi: 10.1007/BFb0107250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kongyingyoes B., Jänicke B., Coper H. The influence of brain catecholamines on 'drug taking behaviour' relative to oral self-administration of d-amphetamine by rats. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1988 Dec;22(3):223–233. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(88)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McMillan D. E. Effects of d-amphetamine on performance under several parameters of multiple fixed-ratio, fixed-interval schedules. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1969 May;167(1):26–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meisch R. A., Thompson T. Ethanol as a reinforcer: effects of fixed-ratio size and food deprivation. Psychopharmacologia. 1973 Jan 1;28(2):171–183. doi: 10.1007/BF00421402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Samson H. H., Roehrs T. A., Tolliver G. A. Ethanol reinforced responding in the rat: a concurrent analysis using sucrose as the alternate choice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1982 Aug;17(2):333–339. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(82)90088-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Samson H. H., Tolliver G. A., Roehrs T. A. Ethanol reinforced responding in the rat: relation of ethanol introduction to later ethanol responding. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1983 Jun;18(6):895–900. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(83)80012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. de la Garza R., Johanson C. E. The effects of food deprivation on the self-administration of psychoactive drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1987 Jan;19(1):17–27. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(87)90083-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES