Abstract
Stimulus control was evaluated in 3 individuals with moderate to severe mental retardation by delayed identity matching-to-sample procedures that presented either one or two discrete forms as sample stimuli on each trial. On pretests, accuracy scores on one-sample trials were uniformly high. On two-sample trials, the correct stimulus (i.e., the one that subsequently appeared in the comparison array) varied unpredictably, and accuracy scores were substantially lower, suggesting that both sample stimuli did not exert stimulus control on every trial. Subjects were then given training sessions with the one-sample task and with a new set of four stimuli. For two of the stimuli, correct matching responses were followed by reinforcers on a variable-ratio schedule that led to a high reinforcer rate. For the other two stimuli, correct responses were followed by reinforcers on a variable-ratio schedule that led to a substantially lower reinforcer rate. Results on two-sample tests that followed showed that (a) on trials in which comparison arrays consisted of one high reinforcer-rate and one low reinforcer-rate stimulus, subjects most often selected the high-rate stimulus; and (b) on trials in which the comparison arrays were either two high reinforcer-rate stimuli or two low reinforcer-rate stimuli and the samples were one high reinforcer- and one low reinforcer-rate stimulus, accuracy was higher on trials with the high-rate comparisons. These results indicate that the frequency of stimulus control by high reinforcer-rate samples was greater than that by low reinforcer-rate samples. Following more training with the one-sample task and reversed reinforcement schedules for all stimuli, the differences in stimulus control frequencies on two-sample tests also reversed. These results demonstrate experimental control by reinforcement contingencies of which of two sample stimuli controlled selections in the two-sample task. The procedures and results may prove to be relevant for understanding restricted stimulus control and stimulus overselectivity.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allen K. D., Fuqua R. W. Eliminating selective stimulus control: a comparison of two procedures for teaching mentally retarded children to respond to compound stimuli. J Exp Child Psychol. 1985 Feb;39(1):55–71. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(85)90029-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baum W. M., Rachlin H. C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baum W. M. Time allocation in human vigilance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jan;23(1):45–53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bickel W. K., Stella M. E., Etzel B. C. A reevaluation of stimulus overselectivity: restricted stimulus control or stimulus control hierarchies. J Autism Dev Disord. 1984 Jun;14(2):136–157. doi: 10.1007/BF02409657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davison M. C., Tustin R. D. The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):331–336. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartl J., Fantino E. Choice As A Function Of Reinforcement Ratios In Delayed Matching-to-sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jul;66(1):11–27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joyce J. H., Chase P. N. Effects of response variability on the sensitivity of rule-governed behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):251–262. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koegel R. L., Wilhelm H. Selective responding to the components of multiple visual cues by autistic children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1973 Jun;15(3):442–453. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(73)90094-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kovattana P. M., Kraemer H. C. Response to multiple visual cues of color, size, and form by autistic children. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1974 Sep;4(3):251–261. doi: 10.1007/BF02115231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Litrownik A. J., McInnis E. T., Wetzel-Pritchard A. M., Filipelli D. L. Restricted stimulus control and inferred attentional deficits in autistic and retarded children. J Abnorm Psychol. 1978 Oct;87(5):554–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lovaas O. I., Koegel R. L., Schreibman L. Stimulus overselectivity in autism: a review of research. Psychol Bull. 1979 Nov;86(6):1236–1254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mace F. C., Neef N. A. Limited matching on concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):585–596. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Markham M. R., Dougher M. J. Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):529–542. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mulvaney D. E., Hughes L. H., Jwaideh A. R., Dinsmoor J. A. Differential production of positive and negative discriminative stimuli by normal and retarded children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1981 Dec;32(3):389–400. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(81)90104-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nevin J. A. An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):301–316. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nevin J. A., Mandell C., Atak J. R. The analysis of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):49–59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- REYNOLDS G. S. Attention in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:203–208. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schreibman L., Charlop M. H., Koegel R. L. Teaching autistic children to use extra-stimulus prompts. J Exp Child Psychol. 1982 Jun;33(3):475–491. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(82)90060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schroeder S. R., Holland J. G. Reinforcement of eye movement with concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):897–903. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. A note on the measurement of conditional discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Mar;33(2):285–289. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M. Adventitious control by the location of comparison stimuli in conditional discriminations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):173–182. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stromer R., McIlvane W. J., Dube W. V., Mackay H. A. Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):83–102. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Touchette P. E. Tilted lines as complex stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):211–214. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilhelm H., Lovaas O. I. Stimulus overselectivity: a common feature in autism and mental retardation. Am J Ment Defic. 1976 Jul;81(1):26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wixted J. T. Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):409–426. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]