Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1998 Jan;69(1):5–16. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.69-5

Patch choice as a function of procurement cost and encounter rate.

G Collier 1, D F Johnson 1, J Berman 1
PMCID: PMC1284644  PMID: 9465410

Abstract

The effects of patch encounter rate on patch choice and meal patterns were studied in rats foraging in a laboratory environment offering two patch types that were encountered sequentially and randomly. The cost of procuring access to one patch was greater than the other. Patches were either encountered equally often or the high-cost patch was encountered more frequently. As expected, rats exploited the low-cost patch on almost 100% of encounters and exploited the high-cost patch on a percentage of encounters that was inversely proportional to its cost. Meal size was the same at both patches. Surprisingly, when low-cost patches were rare, the rats did not increase their use of high-cost patches. This resulted in spending more time and energy searching for patches and a higher average cost per meal. The rats responded to this increased cost by reducing the frequency and increasing the size of meals at both patches and thereby limited total daily foraging cost and conserved total intake.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (166.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Charnov E. L. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Apr;9(2):129–136. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Collier G. H. Determinants of choice. Nebr Symp Motiv. 1982;29:69–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collier G., Johnson D. F., Borin G., Mathis C. E. Drinking in a patchy environment: the effect of the price of water. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Sep;62(2):169–184. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Collier G., Johnson D. F. The time window of feeding. Physiol Behav. 1990 Dec;48(6):771–777. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90225-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herrnstein R. J., Loveland D. H. Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):107–116. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson D. F., Collier G. H. Caloric regulation and patterns of food choice in a patchy environment: the value and cost of alternative foods. Physiol Behav. 1987;39(3):351–359. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90234-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson D. F., Collier G. The relationship between feeding rate and patch choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):79–95. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mazur J. E., Vaughan W., Jr Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Sep;48(2):251–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schoener T. W. The compression hypothesis and temporal resource partitioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Oct;71(10):4169–4172. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.10.4169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES