Skip to main content
Vaccines logoLink to Vaccines
. 2026 Jan 15;14(1):88. doi: 10.3390/vaccines14010088

Extending ImmunoSpot® Assays’ Sensitivity for Detecting Rare Antigen-Specific B Cells to One in a Million—And Possibly Lower

Greg A Kirchenbaum 1,*, Noémi Becza 1, Lingling Yao 1, Alexey Y Karulin 1, Paul V Lehmann 1,*
Editors: Alexander Batista-Duharte1, Gabriel Cabrera1
PMCID: PMC12846458  PMID: 41601005

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Despite clonal expansion during a primary immune response, or after subsequent antigen encounters, the frequency of memory B cells (Bmem) specific for an antigen remains low, making their detection difficult. However, unlike serum antibodies, which have a short half-life in vivo and thus require continuous replenishment to maintain stable titers, circulating Bmem are long-lived; they preserve immunological preparedness through their ability to rapidly engage in recall responses and differentiate into antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) upon antigen encounter. To this end, development of assays suited for the reliable detection of rare antigen-specific Bmem is critical and can provide insights into an individual’s antigen exposure history and immune status beyond that offered by traditional serum antibody measurements alone. Methods: ImmunoSpot® has emerged as a suitable technique for the detection of individual antigen-specific B cells through visualizing their antibody-derived secretory footprints. Here, we report the theoretical and practical foundations for detecting rare antigen-specific Bmem in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Leveraging the unique availability of verifiably naïve vs. antigen-experienced human samples, we used SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S-) and Nucleocapsid (NCAP) antigens to interrogate the presence of Bmem with these respective specificities. Results: While 100% diagnostic accuracy was achieved for both antigens, detection of NCAP-specific Bmem required reducing the lower detection limit of the standard assay. Specifically, this was achieved by testing a total of 2 million PBMC across multiple replicate assay wells and assessing the cumulative number of secretory footprints detected. Conclusion: The protocols described here should facilitate the reliable detection of ASCs present at varying precursor frequencies and serve as guidance for routine immune monitoring of rare Bmem with specificity for any antigen.

Keywords: ELISPOT, FluoroSpot, immunological memory, cross-reactivity, Ig class, diagnostics, assay validation, vaccine

1. Introduction

Techniques for detection of antibodies in bodily fluids are well-established, and because these are very robust molecules after removal from the body they can easily be stored or shipped as serum samples. Their detection and characterization have thus become the “gold standard” for immune monitoring [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The presence of antibodies is the common criterion currently used for diagnosing previous antigen exposures or infections, and for predicting the magnitude (antibody titer) and quality (antibody class and subclass) of the immunity that exists in a given human for the antigen of interest. Recent observations, however, call the validity of such a solely antibody-based immune diagnostic approach into question. For example, serum antibody titers specific for SARS-CoV-2 antigens can rapidly wane after infection or vaccination [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19], and false negative sero-diagnostic results can occur shortly after verified infections [20,21,22,23,24,25] even in the continued presence of detectable antigen-specific Bmem [21,26,27].

There are at least three important reasons why Bmem promise to become more reliable indicators of past antigen exposures than serum antibody reactivity. First, in vivo, antibody molecules are relatively short lived: IgG, for example, has a half-life of three weeks [28,29]. Therefore, the continued presence of serum antibodies requires their ongoing replenishment by plasma cells (PC). Second, while PC can potentially be long-lived, their survival depends on competition for residential niches in the bone marrow [30,31] whereas Bmem are long-lived and their survival does not have such limitations [32,33,34]. Third, during the immune response, the differentiation of proliferating B cells into PC and Bmem relies on different instructive signals [35,36]. As a result, Bmem and PC are not necessarily generated at similar ratios and Bmem can outnumber PC. Consequently, it is not uncommon to identify individuals with low or negative antibody titers (reflecting PC status) while simultaneously possessing elevated frequencies of antigen-specific Bmem [21,26,37].

As well as providing improved accuracy regarding antigen exposure histories, there are several additional reasons why immune monitoring of Bmem is of critical importance for immune diagnostics [38]. As stated above, antibodies provide only a fading image of past exposures. In contrast, Bmem constitute the cellular basis of future immune responsiveness. Not only do their frequencies predict the magnitude of future B cell responses, their Ig class/subclass expression also permits insights into the quality thereof. Furthermore, the distribution of BCR affinities in the antigen-specific Bmem repertoire [39] and the cross-reactivity of individual Bmem clones with future antigenic variants [40] also provides additional prognostic information. It is therefore of crucial importance to overcome the technical challenges posed by the scarcity of antigen-specific Bmem and the fragility of the viable cellular material required for their detection.

The use of fluorescently labeled antigen probe(s) to stain antigen-specific B cells for subsequent flow cytometry (FC) analysis is one emerging approach for Bmem detection, and ELISPOT/FluoroSpot (collectively called ImmunoSpot) is another [41,42]. The latter technique not only allows detection at the single cell level, but also assesses functionality by measuring antibody-derived secretory footprints originating from individual antigen-specific B cells (see Supplementary Figure S1). A recent side-by-side comparison of FC vs. ImmunoSpot documented that both techniques are equally well-suited for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S-antigen)-specific Bmem and offered equivalent (100%) diagnostic accuracy—provided that the frequency of antigen-specific Bmem was in the high to intermediate range [43]. However, owing to the inherent background noise associated with the antigen probe-based FC approach [41,44], and the substantially greater amounts of PBMC required relative to ImmunoSpot, we hypothesized that the ImmunoSpot methodology should be best suited for measurements of low to very low Bmem frequencies. Here we report our successful extension of the lower detection limit of ImmunoSpot assays from the >1 in 105 to the <106 frequency range.

Even endemic virus-specific Bmem frequencies are commonly present only in very low numbers in PBMC, including those for HCMV, EBV and seasonal influenza [45]. While it can safely be assumed that essentially all individuals have been previously exposed to such viruses, when such past infections occurred typically cannot be ascertained. This is in stark contrast to exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Before the emergence of this virus in 2019 [46,47], all humans were verifiably immunologically naïve—hence their PBMC serve as perfect negative controls for detecting Bmem specific for the SARS-CoV-2 S-antigen and Nucleocapsid (NCAP) proteins. Conversely, PBMC obtained from individuals that had recently (within weeks to a few months) recovered from PCR-verified SARS-CoV-2 infection serve as ideal positive controls. Notably, elevated frequencies of S-antigen-specific Bmem were readily detected in nearly all convalescent donors ~30 days after symptom onset using fluorescently labeled S-antigen detection probes and remained elevated in longitudinally tracked donors [37]. However, frequencies of NCAP-specific Bmem were considerably lower in the same cohort, and a greater number of individuals’ PBMC samples yielded results below the assay’s limit of detection when tested under standard FC assay conditions. Reliably detecting NCAP specific Bmem is critical for understanding the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection nowadays because the diagnostic utility of detecting S-antigen-specific serum IgG or Bmem for evidencing past SARS-CoV-2 infection has been lost due to widespread COVID-19 mRNA S-antigen vaccination [48].

To this end, and in line with our ongoing efforts to extend the detection limit for rare antigen-specific Bmem, here we focus on NCAP-specific Bmem. To achieve our ambitious goal of reliably detecting Bmem that are present in the ultra-low frequency range, we specifically needed to establish the scientific basis and best practices for quantifying very rare antigen-specific Bmem using the ImmunoSpot methodology. Importantly, the lessons learned within the unique highly controlled SARS-CoV-2 model are also directly applicable to the detection of Bmem with specificity for other antigens, especially in instances where the individual’s prior exposure history cannot be verified.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Human Subjects

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) tested in this study originate from the ePBMC® library (Cellular Technology Limited (CTL), Shaker Heights, OH, USA). These samples were collected at FDA-registered centers and were obtained from IRB-consented healthy human donors by leukapheresis and were then sold to CTL, identifying donors only by code and concealing the subjects’ identities. PBMC were isolated and cryopreserved according to previously described protocols [49]. All PBMC samples were stored in liquid nitrogen until testing. Details of all human donors included in this manuscript are provided in Supplementary Table S1.

2.2. Murine B Cell Hybridoma

A murine B cell hybridoma line (M-F10-D8) secreting an IgG1, κ monoclonal antibody (mAb) with reactivity against the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (S-antigen) expressed by the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain was generously provided by Dr. Giuseppe Sautto (Cleveland Clinic, Port St. Lucie, FL, USA). In brief, the M-F10-D8 B cell hybridoma line was generated from a DBA/2J mouse (Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) immunized intraperitoneally with heat-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus antigen [50] (~100 µL of virus antigen) adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide on day 0, day 21, and day 42. To further focus the B cell response towards the S-antigen, the mouse was boosted intraperitoneally with 15 μg of SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S-antigen) protein [51] on day 63. Following an intraperitoneal booster immunization with 15 µg of S-antigen in PBS on day 77, fusion of the splenocytes with SP2/0 myeloma cells was performed four days later, following similar methods as described previously [52]. The M-F10-D8 B cell hybridoma was single-cell cloned by FACS prior to its shipment, and was passaged in complete medium consisting of RPMI 1640 (Alkali Scientific, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gemini Bioproducts, West Sacramento, CA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 U/mL streptomycin, 2 mM L-Glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 8 mM HEPES (all from Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), and 50 µM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at CTL until achieving a viability of >90% before use in assays.

2.3. Recombinant Proteins

Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S-antigen) protein representing the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 strain [51] was acquired from the Center for Vaccines and Immunology (CVI) (University of Georgia (UGA), Athens, GA, USA). Recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) proteins encoding A/California/04/2009 (CA/09, H1N1), A/Texas/50/2012 (TX/12, H3N2) and B/Phuket/3073/2013 (Phuket/13, B/Yam) were also obtained from the CVI. Recombinant Epstein–Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) protein was purchased from Serion (Würzburg, Germany). The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) gH pentamer complex, consisting of gH, gL, UL128, IL130 and UL131A proteins, was purchased from The Native Antigen Company (Kidlington, UK). Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (NCAP) protein was purchased from the Wuhu Interferon Biological Products Industry Research Institute (Wuhu, China). Importantly, all recombinant proteins used in this study possessed a genetically encoded (His) affinity tag.

2.4. B Cell ImmunoSpot® Assays

For detection of antigen-specific ASCs using the affinity capture coating method [53], PVDF membrane bottomed 96 well ImmunoSpot® assay plates (CTL) were first pre-conditioned with 70% (v/v) EtOH (15 μL/well) followed by two washes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (150 μL/well) prior to coating with purified anti-His antibody at 10 µg/mL in Diluent A (provided in CTL’s affinity coating kits) overnight at 4 °C. The following day, assay plates were washed once with 150 μL/well of PBS and then coated overnight at 4 °C with His-tag labeled recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S-antigen or NCAP at 10 µg/mL in Diluent A. Prior to use, assay plates were washed once with 150 μL/well of PBS and then blocked with 150 μL/well of complete medium for 1 h at room temperature. Immediately prior to plating cells, assay plates were decanted, and 100 μL/well of pre-warmed complete medium was added to each well.

PBMC were harvested after 5 days of polyclonal stimulation [40,49] and washed twice with PBS prior to counting using CTL’s Live/Dead Cell Counting Suite on an S6 Flex M2 Analyzer (CTL). After centrifugation, cell pellets were resuspended at 5 × 106 live cells/mL in complete medium, or were diluted to 2 × 106 live cells/mL, prior to plating into assays unless otherwise indicated. For S-antigen assays, donor PBMC were tested using a two-fold serial dilution approach starting at 2 × 105 live cells per well unless otherwise indicated. To avoid damage to the assay membrane, PBMC were serially diluted in round-bottom 96-well tissue culture plates (Corning, Sigma-Aldrich) and then subsequently transferred into assay plates as previously described [49]. For NCAP assays, donor PBMC were tested in four replicate wells input with either 2 × 105 or 5 × 105 live cells per well unless otherwise indicated. Following plating of PBMC, assay plates were incubated for 4–6 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. In previous studies we established that this incubation time is both needed and optimal for revealing the secretory footprints of the individual ASC using the ELISPOT methodology; before diffusion of the released antibodies into the supernatant causes an elevation of background membrane staining via an “ELISA effect” [54]. Plate-bound spot-forming units (SFUs), each representing the secretory footprint of a single ASC, were visualized using IgG-specific detection reagents included in the human IgG Single-Color Enzymatic ImmunoSpot® kit (from CTL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Likewise, Human or murine pan IgG ELISPOT assays were performed using reagents included in Single-Color Enzymatic ImmunoSpot® kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions. It is worth noting that IgG-secreting ASCs (representing recently differentiated plasmablasts that are in transit from lymphoid tissues to the bone marrow) may be present in PBMC acutely after an antigen encounter and such ASCs can be detected by plating PBMC directly into the assay, without prior polyclonal stimulation [55,56,57,58,59]. All human data reported here were obtained following polyclonal stimulation of PBMC as required for the conversion of resting Bmem into ASCs [54]. Lastly, the anti-IgG detection reagent provided in the human IgG Single-Color Enzymatic ImmunoSpot® kit does not exhibit detectable reactivity with either the anti-His or anti-Igκ/λ capture antibody reagents.

2.5. Image Acquisition and SFU Counting

Plates were air-dried prior to scanning on an S6 Ultimate Analyzer (CTL). SFUs were then enumerated using ImmunoSpot® Single-color Studio software (Version 1.7.35.1) and the B cell ELISPOT-specific IntelliCount™ algorithm for SFU detection [60]. Assay-specific minimal size and intensity thresholds were then applied for more precise enumeration of pan, S-antigen, or NCAP-specific SFUs. Notably, to reduce counting of artifacts that were more prevalent in NCAP-coated wells input with 5 × 105 PBMC, the counting parameters deployed for enumeration of NCAP-specific SFUs were established for optimal performance in wells input with 2 × 105 PBMC (discussed in greater detail in Section 3.4 and Section 3.5). Only SFU counts within the linear range of pan or S-antigen-specific assays, or SFU counts from the highest cell input tested, were considered for frequency calculations and were used to extrapolate SFU counts to a defined fixed input (denoted in the corresponding figure or tables) using the B cell export template. Alternatively, the mean ± SD or cumulative sum of replicate wells tested with a fixed cell input were used to approximate the frequency of NCAP-reactive IgG+ ASC. Since ImmunoSpot® B cell kits, analyzers, and software proprietary to CTL were used in this study, we refer to the collective methodology as ImmunoSpot®.

2.6. Statistical Methods

Correlation of determination values, denoted as R2, for frequency measurements based on three or more cell inputs from the cell dilution series were calculated using the ImmunoSpot® Single-color Studio software (Version 1.7.35.1). The precision of measurements between replicate wells, or coefficient of variation (CV), was calculated by dividing the standard deviation ( σ) by the mean (x¯) and is reported as a percentage (% CV=100×(σ/x¯)). Significant differences in the frequency of pan IgG+ ASC in the donor cohorts detailed in Table 1 was assessed using an unpaired Student’s t-test (GraphPad Prism 10 Version 10.4.0, San Diego, CA, USA).

To assess whether the observed spot counts in replicate wells conformed to a Poisson distribution at low cell inputs, two independent approaches were applied: (i) quantile–quantile (Q–Q) plot analysis comparing observed count quantiles with theoretical Poisson quantiles, and (ii) a chi-squared goodness of fit test for the Poisson model. Both analyses were conducted using SpotStat™ software (CTL, Version 1.7.0.0). The absence of overdispersion in the spot-count data at low cell inputs provided additional evidence supporting Poisson distribution.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Rationale

In our efforts to reduce the lower detection limit for rare antigen-specific Bmem in PBMC we relied on the ImmunoSpot® technology in which the IgG-derived secretory footprints originating from individual B cells are visualized. Based on this assay’s basic principle (illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1), there should be no inherent lower limit of detection provided that the assay has been previously optimized for measuring antibody secretion by individual antigen-specific B cells among all cells seeded into the assay. To establish the test conditions where this requirement applies was one primary aim of the work presented in this article. We elected to focus on IgG-secreting antigen-specific B cells for the tracking of PBMC-derived Bmem because IgG is exclusively secreted by B cells that have previously undergone in vivo antigen-driven T helper cell-dependent Ig class switching (reviewed in [36,61]) and, by this most stringent of criteria, qualify as Bmem. Thus, antigen-specific IgG secretion in PBMC enables the identification of B cells previously generated during the course of an immune response in vivo. Importantly, since resting Bmem do not spontaneously secrete antibodies, to become detectable in ImmunoSpot assays they must first be polyclonally stimulated in vitro to drive their terminal differentiation into antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) [62,63].

In order to accurately detect Bmem at single cell resolution among PBMC in ImmunoSpot assays, we first needed to verify that IgG secretion by polyclonally stimulated primary B cells is fully autonomous, i.e., it follows the rules of a first-order reaction measuring cellular functions that are independent of other assay variables, such as the density and activity of other ASCs or third-party cells present in the culture. As this information, to the best of our knowledge, is not available in the literature for B cell ImmunoSpot assays, but is critical for detecting rare Bmem at single cell resolution, in the first part of this work we sought to establish conditions under which this is the case. We argue that if IgG production by polyclonally stimulated primary B cell blasts is truly autonomous during the assay’s duration, one would expect that (a) the number of secretory footprints produced by such ASCs would be linearly related to the number of cells seeded into the assay well, (b) the amount of antibody secreted by individual cells would be independent of the cell numbers seeded per well, and (c) that the detection of low frequency ASCs would follow the Poisson distribution for rare events, i.e., the inter-well variability for replicates (the sampling error) would increase profoundly as the frequency of ASCs plated per well declines. Lastly, (d) the formal proof needed to be established that the empirically measured distribution of secretory footprints matches the mathematical prediction for a Poisson distribution. If IgG+ ASC measurements follow such rules, their frequency can be precisely determined within PBMC, and it should be possible to reliably detect antigen-specific Bmem in the low and very low frequency range.

3.2. Studies of IgG+ B Cell Hybridomas in ImmunoSpot Assays

When studying primary antigen-specific IgG+ Bmem in PBMC, the true frequency of these cells is unknown and many inherent assay variables could potentially impact the results (e.g., in addition to possible antibody feedback regulation, the influence of the third-party cells that are present at different densities could affect the B cell’s productivity or the detection of individual ASCs). Therefore, we started out with the systematic analysis of a defined, biologically simple test system—autonomously IgG-secreting B cell hybridoma clones. Of several murine B cell hybridoma lines tested, results generated by an S-antigen-specific hybridoma (M-F10-D8) are presented in the following. Notably, these data are fully representative of results obtained using several other murine B cell hybridoma clones as well.

Figure 1 shows images of wells obtained after plating B cell hybridomas in a two-fold serial dilution starting with an input of ~500 hybridoma cells per well. In Figure 1A, the secretory footprints (spot-forming units, SFUs) generated by the IgG1-secreting hybridoma cells were captured on the assay membrane pre-coated with antibodies specific for the kappa light chain (Igκ); subsequently, the plate-bound hybridoma-secreted IgG secretory footprints were visualized using IgG1-specific detection reagents, as illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1A. In parallel with this pan (total) IgG-detecting ImmunoSpot® assay, an S-antigen-specific test was also performed in which the assay membrane was coated with the S-antigen itself, and thus the antibodies secreted by the hybridoma cells were retained on the membrane owing to their specificity for the S-antigen (Figure 1B). Following machine-assisted automated counting of the individual SFUs in the respective wells, the resulting data are also depicted in Figure 2A–D. As seen in Figure 2B, for both pan IgG detection (blue symbols) and S-antigen-specific measurements (red symbols), the number of SFUs and the number of hybridoma cells seeded was close to perfectly linear up to ~50 SFU/well. Moreover, the ASC frequencies calculated from the respective assays also matched nearly perfectly, confirming that this S-antigen-specific B cell hybridoma line was indeed clonal and that >90% of the cells secreted the monoclonal antibody (mAb). However, at higher SFU counts the relationship between hybridoma cells plated and measured SFUs began to flatten (Figure 2A). The undercounting at higher SFUs was in part due to an elevated assay background that results from the re-capture of excess hybridoma-derived antibody present in the culture supernatant distally (“ELISA effect”) as well as the crowding of SFUs (in Figure 1 clearly visible at the 500-, and to a lesser extent also the 250-cell input). The slight discrepancy between SFU counts in the pan (total) vs. the S-antigen-specific assays at higher cell inputs can be attributed to superiority of the anti-Igκ capture antibody reagent compared to the reduced—albeit still high—affinity of the secreted mAb for the S-antigen itself that resulted in more efficient capture/retention of the secreted analyte in the pan (total) IgG1 assay. Subsequently, the ELISA effect was lower for the pan IgG1 assay, and the counting of individual SFUs somewhat more reliable over the reduced background. In general, in all similar experiments performed so far, we found that the linear function between cell input and SFU counts is tight only up to 70 (conservative for most antigens and pan Ig capture antibodies) and 150 (for select assays only) SFU/well. These are the maximal SFU counts from which accurate frequencies of ASCs within all cells plated can be calculated. The lower limit of detection will be defined by the rules of Poisson distributions, if they indeed apply to B cell ImmunoSpot results.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Serial dilution of B cell hybridoma cells corresponds to a reduction in detectable secretory footprints. (A) S-antigen-specific mAb (IgG1, κ)-producing B cell hybridoma cells (M-F10-D8) were seeded at 500 cells/well and serially diluted two-fold as indicated. IgG1-derived secretory footprints were measured in a pan (total) IgG1 assay as illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1A. The number of secretory footprints (spot-forming units, SFUs) detected was established by machine-assisted counting using ImmunoSpot® software (refer to Section 2.5), with the SFU counts specified in the top left corner of the corresponding well images. Counts in which the number of SFUs detected and hybridoma cells plated per well followed a linear function are denoted with red asterisks. Note the slight increase in background membrane staining and crowding of SFUs that occurred at 250 cells/well, and to a greater extent at the 500 cells/well input resulting in undercounting relative to the expected linear outcome. (B) S-antigen-specific assay. The above description of the pan IgG1 assay applies, except the membrane was directly coated with S-antigen. One of four replicate wells is shown for each condition. The graphical evaluation of these results is shown in Figure 2A,B.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Rules for the basic evaluation of ImmunoSpot data. (AD) Results are shown for a B cell hybridoma (M-F10-D8) line: (A,B) Graphing of spot-forming units (SFUs) described in Figure 1 with the pan IgG results denoted with blue symbols and the S-antigen-specific assay results with red symbols. Mean ± SD of four replicate wells tested for each condition are shown. Note in panel (B) the linearity of SFU counts and the number of hybridoma cells plated per well up to 60 SFU/well, and the flattening of the curve at higher SFU counts seen in panel A resulting from the ELISA effect and SFU crowding observable in Figure 1. The extrapolated frequency (panel (B)) of pan or S-antigen-specific ASC per 103 cells plated, along with the coefficient of determination (R2) of the respective frequency calculations, are denoted in the inset (refer to Section 2.6). (C) Increasing coefficient of variation (% CV) among replicate wells at SFU counts < 10/well. M-F10-D8 hybridoma cells were plated at decreasing numbers in 48 replicate wells from which the specified % CV was calculated. Note the profound increase in % CV at low SFU counts that is consistent with a Poisson distribution for low frequency events. (D) Q–Q plot establishing that a Poisson distribution applies to the observed inter-well variation in M-F10-D8-derived secretory footprints with a mean = 3 SFU/well and SD = 1.7 SFU/well. Chi-square goodness of fit test for a continuous probability distribution yielded a p-value = 0.55 and further supports that the observed data fit a Poisson distribution model (refer to Section 2.6). (EH) Results obtained testing for S-antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC following polyclonal stimulation of PBMC isolated from a convalescent donor (LP561) with PCR-verified SARS-CoV-2 infection (refer to Supplementary Table S1). The PBMC were serially diluted and input into the S-antigen-specific assay. The SFU counts vs. number of PBMC plated are shown (panel (E)) with the deviation from linearity clearly visible starting at >75 SFU/well; panel F focuses in on the linear range. Frequency of S-antigen-specific IgG+ ASC per 105 PBMC plated, along with the R2 value, is denoted in the inset of panel (F). (G) Increasing % CV between SFU counts detected in 48 replicate S-antigen-coated wells at decreasing inputs of PBMC from LP561 is shown. (H) Q-Q plot establishing that a Poisson distribution applies to the observed inter-well variation in S-antigen-specific IgG+ secretory footprints with a mean = 1.6 SFU/well and SD = 1.3 SFU/well. Chi-square goodness of fit test for a continuous probability distribution yielded a p-value = 0.24 and further supports that the observed data fit a Poisson distribution model. (IL) Results obtained testing for pan IgG+ ASC following polyclonal stimulation of PBMC isolated from a donor (LP667) collected in the post-COVID era (refer to Supplementary Table S1). The PBMC were serially diluted and plated in a pan IgG-detecting assay with four replicates per cell input tested. The SFU counts vs. number of PBMC plated are shown in panel (I) and the linear section is shown in panel (J). Frequency of pan IgG+ ASC per 105 PBMC plated, together with the R2 value, is denoted in the inset of panel (J). (K) Increasing % CV between SFU counts detected in 48 replicate wells at decreasing inputs of PBMC from LP667 is shown. (L) Q-Q plot of pan IgG+ SFU fitting a Poisson distribution in wells with a mean = 3.8 SFU/well and SD = 2.2 SFU/well. Chi-square goodness of fit test for a continuous probability distribution yielded a p-value = 0.76. Collectively, these data establish that all of these Ig-detecting ImmunoSpot results have a Goldilocks range between 10 and up to ~100 SFU/well in which SFU counts are linearly related to the number of ASC present in the test sample, and from which frequencies of ASC can be calculated within all cells plated. At <10 SFU/well, however, stochastic variability inherent with Poisson distributions increasingly introduces uncertainty into the detection of rare events.

As hybridomas produce antibody autonomously, in the absence of bystander cells that could interfere with the assay, one would expect SFU counts to follow the predictions of Poisson for the detection of rare events. One of Poisson’s predictions is that the standard deviation (SD) among replicate wells (denoted as % CV—refer to Section 2.6) will profoundly increase when fewer and fewer cells are seeded per well. Figure 2C shows that this was indeed the case for the hybridoma cells. To further test whether the rules of a Poisson distribution apply, we also studied whether the empirically detected intra-well variability of SFU counts followed those mathematically predicted for a Poisson distribution. As seen in the Q-Q plot in Figure 2D, a close to perfect match was found.

Thus, using a biologically simple hybridoma model, in which the cells plated are tumor cells that autonomously secrete IgG, we have established that secretory footprints are generated by individual ASCs under an upper limit of quantification above which SFU crowding and ELISA effects interfere with their detection. Serial dilution of the sample is readily suited to extend this upper limit of quantification—using the serial dilution strategy the test system has no inherent upper limit of quantification. As far as the lower limit of detection is concerned, with hybridomas (in the absence of other cells that might interfere) the stochastic nature of Poisson distribution limits the precision of such single-well measurements, which was increasingly more evident with cell inputs yielding <10 SFU/well. Therefore, the hybridoma data suggest that for ASC frequency calculations SFU counts between 10 and 70 (assay and donor dependent up to 150 SFU/well) provide the “Goldilocks range” on which accurate measurements can be based. After we established the above rules for autonomously IgG-secreting hybridoma cells, we next sought to test whether they also apply to polyclonally stimulated primary IgG-secreting (Bmem-derived) ASCs that represent only a minor fraction of cells within the PBMC plated.

3.3. Studies of Bmem-Derived IgG+ ASCs in PBMC

S-antigen-specific IgG+ Bmem are known to occur in a wide frequency range in PBMC of healthy people [45,64]. We therefore tested PBMC from random donors collected between May 2022 and May 2025 (refer to Supplementary Table S1), by which time most individuals can be expected to have either been previously infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and/or received one or more COVID-19 vaccine inoculations. Figure 3 shows the results of a typical S-antigen-specific IgG+ ImmunoSpot® test with each individual’s PBMC two-fold serially diluted starting at 2 × 105 PBMC/well. The resulting SFU counts, which were automatically established by machine-assisted counting, are shown in the upper left corner of each well. The software also identifies the test wells yielding SFU counts within the user-defined Goldilocks range, and denotes them with green shading. Importantly, when three or more SFU counts from a serial dilution of a subject’s PBMC fall within the Goldilocks range, these SFU counts exhibited a linear relationship with cell numbers plated. From the resulting trend line, the frequency of ASCs among all PBMC plated was extrapolated (as was performed in Supplementary Figure S2 for selected donors shown in Figure 3). Therefore, for measurements of antigen-specific IgG+ Bmem present at high frequencies in PBMC, the autonomous IgG secretion-based rules established above using B cell hybridomas also applied. However, for donors with lower frequencies of S-antigen-specific IgG+ Bmem, for whom only the highest cell input (2 × 105 PBMC) provided SFU counts above, or close to, the Goldilocks threshold (15 SFU/well for this assay plate), replicate wells and/or optimized assay conditions would be needed to more precisely establish accurate frequencies. This would apply to donors LP707, LP728, and LP741, 3 of the 12 donors shown in Figure 3. Related to this, we asked to what extent Poisson noise affected the detection of such low frequency antigen-specific IgG+ Bmem in ImmunoSpot® tests.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

S-antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC occur at relatively high frequencies among PBMC isolated from post-COVID era donors. A representative ELISPOT plate overview depicting testing of 12 donors collected in the post-COVID era (refer to Supplementary Table S1) for S-antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC using a singlet serial dilution approach. The assay principle is illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1B. For each donor, the two-fold (1 + 1) serial dilution was initiated at 2 × 105 PBMC/well, as specified. The raw images and machine-assisted automated SFU counts are shown in the top left corner for each well. The ImmunoSpot® Studio.SC software (refer to Section 2.5) automatically denotes wells yielding SFU counts within a defined upper and lower bound with green shading; for this assay plate 15 to 100 SFU/well. Using contiguous datapoints within the so-called “Goldilocks range” the software automatically calculates the frequency of ASC within all PBMC tested; the autogenerated frequency calculations for donors yielding three or more datapoints within the defined upper and lower SFU range are shown in Supplementary Figure S2. The data highlight that frequencies of S-antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC span a wide range in healthy individuals, requiring the serial dilution strategy for accurate calculations for most donors; however, in 3 of the 12 donors the number of SFUs detected was too low for frequency calculations using this strategy.

As was previously seen using hybridoma cells (Figure 2A–C), testing a polyclonally stimulated PBMC sample obtained from a convalescent donor (LP561) following PCR-verified SARS-CoV-2 infection using a serial dilution approach, it was apparent that only S-antigen-specific IgG+ SFU counts in wells yielding between 10 and 70 SFU/well displayed a linear relationship with the number of PBMC plated (Figure 2E,F). Furthermore, S-antigen-specific SFU counts also displayed increasing well-to-well variation (denoted as % CV) when fewer and fewer PBMC were plated and, consequently, the number of S-antigen-specific IgG+ ASC was <10 SFU/well (Figure 2G). Lastly, we verified that the empirically measured SFU counts at low PBMC inputs also conformed to a Poisson distribution (Figure 2H).

Similar results were also obtained when measuring pan (total) IgG+ ASC following polyclonal stimulation of PBMC (the example shown in Figure 2I–L is from testing the PBMC of donor LP667). Supplementary Figure S3 shows the raw data supporting what was already shown for S-antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC in Figure 3. Namely, the frequency of pan IgG+ ASC following polyclonal stimulation of donor PBMC also showed considerable inter-donor variability and necessitated a serial dilution approach. In other words, there is no single cell input at which SFU counts within the Goldilocks range can be reliably assumed for all individuals’ samples. Owing to ELISA effects and crowding, SFU counts were also underestimated in the pan IgG assay when they exceeded 150 SFU/well; but, between 10 and 150 SFU/well, the SFU counts and PBMC input were linearly related and permitted frequency calculations (Figure S4 and Figure 2J). However, when SFU counts were <10 SFU/well, increasingly the influence of noise resulting from Poisson distributions prevailed in pan IgG+ ASC measurements as well (Figure 2K,L). Having thus established the basic rules for ImmunoSpot-based assessment of IgG+ ASC that are relatively abundant in PBMC, we next sought to achieve reliable detection of Bmem existing in the low frequency range among PBMC. The Poisson rule permits us to define the number of replicate wells needed to establish precise frequencies for very rare Bmem (see Supplementary Figure S5).

3.4. Improving the Detection Limit of Rare Antigen-Specific IgG+ Bmem in ImmunoSpot Assays

The data in Figure 3 established that testing for S-antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC starting at 2 × 105 PBMC per well using a serial dilution in singlet wells provided the expected positive results for all individuals whose PBMC were isolated after May 2022, although 3 of these 12 exhibited lower S-antigen-specific frequencies. When these same individuals were tested for Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC reactivity for the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (NCAP) protein using an equivalent input of 2 × 105 PBMC/well, notably only one-third of them (4 of 12) yielded SFU counts that were >10 SFU/well (Figure 4). The remaining eight either yielded no detectable SFUs or generated < 10 SFU/well at the 2 × 105 PBMC input. Consequently, these data did not enable a clear distinction between whether these individuals had only been previously COVID-19 vaccinated (that would reconcile their positivity for S-antigen and negative NCAP test result) or whether such donors, in addition to potentially being COVID-19 vaccinated, had previously been SARS-CoV-2 infected but did not develop elevated frequencies of NCAP-specific IgG+ Bmem. Likewise, even for endemic viruses, such as seasonal influenza, EBV and HCMV, to which prior exposure and hence the formation of immune memory can be assumed to have occurred in most individuals, the frequency of Bmem specific for the respective antigens showed high inter-individual variability (Supplementary Table S2). Importantly, in many instances antigen-specific IgG+ Bmem occur in the very low frequency range and cannot be reliably assessed using existing testing practices. For this reason, we set out to extend the detection range of antigen-specific Bmem using ImmunoSpot. We focused here on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 NCAP-specific IgG+ Bmem because PBMC from truly naïve individuals are only available as negative controls for exposure to this virus owing to their cryopreservation prior to the emergence and circulation of SARS-CoV-2, constituting a pre-COVID era cohort.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (NCAP)-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC occur at low frequencies in PBMC isolated from post-COVID era donors. Representative well images depicting test results obtained using the same post-COVID era donors shown in Figure 3 when plating 2 × 105 PBMC in NCAP-coated wells. The assay principle is illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1B; refer to Section 2.5 for additional details. Note that at this PBMC plating density NCAP-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ SFU counts could occur in the Goldilocks range (between 10 and 100 SFU/well, 4 donors) or were rare (<10 SFU/well, 8 donors) and therefore susceptible to variations associated with a Poisson distribution.

Increasing the number of PBMC to be tested is the obvious solution to the detection of very rare cells. This can be accomplished in the case of ImmunoSpot assays by plating more cells per well, and/or testing many replicate wells. To test whether increasing the PBMC numbers seeded per well would improve the NCAP assay’s lower limit of detection, we selected donors whose NCAP-specific IgG+ SFU counts were <10 SFU when tested at 2 × 105 PBMC/well. Strikingly, a higher PBMC input (5 × 105) per well did not uniformly result in a proportional increase in SFU counts (Supplementary Table S3); on the contrary, in many instances the spot morphology deteriorated to a point where the secretory footprints became barely discernible (Figure 5). Moreover, the incidence of notably fainter secretory footprints and those displaying irregular morphologies also increased. Of note, to achieve objective image analysis of the corresponding well images, the counting parameters deployed were optimized for detection of secretory footprints generated in wells input with 2 × 105 PBMC, which entailed applying more stringent minimal size and density criteria. We also demonstrated that this, seemingly counterintuitive, outcome is a result of third-party PBMC physically inhibiting access of ASC-secreted antibody to the membrane. The deterioration of the spot morphology was also seen when a fixed number of S-antigen-specific ASCs were tested in the presence of increasing numbers of unstimulated autologous PBMC (that, without polyclonal pre-stimulation do not secrete antibody and merely serve as third-party filler cells) (Supplementary Figure S6).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Secretory footprint morphologies generated by NCAP-specific IgG+ ASC deteriorate if more than 2 × 105 PBMC are plated. The depicted ImmunoSpot well images were generated using PBMC from post-COVID era donors that displayed low frequencies of NCAP-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC in a previous test. Raw data are shown for 3 subjects out of 12 tested (see Supplementary Table S3 for summarized results) to illustrate the outcome.

In our next attempt to extend the lower limit of detection of rare Bmem, we increased the number of replicate wells tested. For this, a total of 2 million PBMC from select post-COVID era donors were tested across 10 replicate wells at 2 × 105 PBMC/well and the cumulative number of NCAP-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ SFUs was determined (Table 1). In each of the 10 post-COVID era donors tested so far, whose PBMC were isolated after May 2022, the cumulative number of SARS-CoV-2 NCAP-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ SFUs was >20 SFU/2 × 106 PBMC whereas the cumulative SFU count in 10 pre-COVID era donors was between 0 and 9 possible “SFUs”.

Table 1.

Testing 2 × 106 PBMC at single cell resolution permits detection of SARS-CoV-2 NCAP-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC with 100% diagnostic specificity in post-COVID era donors. Cryopreserved PBMC samples from ten donors collected in the pre-COVID era, and 10 in the post-COVID era (after May 2022), were polyclonally stimulated and then tested in a SARS-CoV-2 NCAP-specific ImmunoSpot assay by plating 2 × 105 PBMC/well in 10 replicate wells for each donor. The cumulative number of SFUs detected in all 10 wells, i.e., a total of 2 × 106 PBMC, is shown for each donor. Note, while SARS-CoV-2 NCAP “specific” SFU were seen in low numbers in select pre-COVID samples, these secretory footprints were faint and exhibited a diffuse morphology (suggesting a low-affinity/cross-reactivity) that was fundamentally different compared to the tight and dense morphologies seen when testing PCR-verified convalescent donors or post-COVID era donors. Refer to Figure 6 showing raw well images. Donor PBMC were also plated in an identical manner into 6xHis peptide- or BSA-coated wells; which served as specificity controls for comparison when testing 2 × 106 PBMC. Likewise, pre-COVID era donors were also interrogated for IgG+ ASC reactivity for the SARS-CoV-2 S-antigen, with the cumulative SFU counts shown for each. Alternatively, frequencies of S-antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC in the post-COVID era cohort, and pan IgG+ ASC activity in both cohorts, were established using a serial dilution strategy (as described in Section 2.5). SFU values were then extrapolated to 2 × 106 PBMC and those determined using three or more cell inputs are denoted with an asterisk. Note, the abundance of pan IgG+ ASC following polyclonal stimulation did not differ between the pre-COVID era and post-COVID era donors, proving that these cells were equally functional; i.e., the lack of NCAP or S-antigen reactivity seen in the pre-COVID era donors cannot be attributed to storage-related impairment. Moreover, pre-COVID era PBMC samples yielded pristine IgG+ secretory footprints when plated in wells coated with hemagglutinin proteins representing seasonal influenza vaccine strains (refer to Figure 8, Figures S8 and S9).

S-antigen a NCAP a 6xHis a BSA a Pan IgG b
Pre-COVID LP366 0 0 1 0 39,800 * Pan IgG (µ ± σ)
133,480 ± 103,032
      LP377 3 6 3 0 157,800 *
      LP381 0 0 0 0 19,933 *
      LP391 0 9 0 0 57,733 *
      LP413 3 4 0 0 299,600 *
      LP424 1 2 0 0 49,467 *
      LP426 0 1 2 0 257,200 *
      LP432 2 4 1 1 70,200 *
      LP434 0 1 3 1 133,067 *
      LP475 0 5 4 1 250,000 *
        S-antigen b NCAP a 6xHis a BSA a Pan IgG b  
Post-COVID LP695 967 * 35 3 1 156,400 * Pan IgG (µ ± σ) 115,723 ± 62,567
      LP696 5067 * 49 1 0 60,900 *
      LP728 210 35 2 0 202,133 *
      LP741 170 21 0 0 229,867 *
      LP757 5200 * 31 1 0 114,133 *
      LP815 1880 * 24 0 0 63,900 *
      LP820 900 * 44 0 0 66,100 *
      LP827 730 * 31 0 0 124,600 *
      LP828 4960 * 21 0 0 52,400 *
      LP836 1680 * 25 0 0 86,800 *

a Spot-forming units (SFUs) were aggregated from 10 replicate wells seeded with 2 × 105 PBMC; b SFU values were extrapolated to 2 × 106 PBMC; * SFU value determined through serial dilution of donor PBMC.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Fundamentally different SARS-CoV-2 NCAP-reactive IgG+ SFU morphologies are seen in pre-COVID era subjects compared to a verified SARS-CoV-2 infected donor. Raw data are shown from an NCAP-specific ImmunoSpot assay in which PBMC samples were plated into 10 replicate wells at 2 × 105 cells/well. LP565 is a convalescent donor with a PCR-verified SARS-CoV-2 infection (refer to Supplementary Table S1) and served as an assay-specific positive control.

3.5. SFU Morphology Distinguishes Between Cognate and Cross-Reactive Bmem

The few SARS-CoV-2 NCAP-reactive “SFUs” that were observed when testing pre-COVID era PBMC samples exhibited a fundamentally distinct spot morphology compared to secretory footprints detected when testing a PBMC sample obtained from PCR-verified convalescent donors (in Figure 6 and Figure S7 LP565 is shown as a representative example of the latter). SARS-CoV-2 S-antigen-reactive “SFUs” were almost entirely absent in the pre-COVID cohort, and if present, these secretory footprints were also much fainter and more diffuse in their morphology compared to those generated in parallel using the positive control PBMC sample (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Near complete absence of S-antigen-reactive IgG+ SFU in pre-COVID era subjects compared to a verified SARS-CoV-2 infected donor. Raw data are shown from an S-antigen-specific ImmunoSpot assay in which pre-COVID era PBMC samples were plated into 10 replicate wells at 2 × 105 cells/well. LP565 served as an assay-specific positive control and owing to their elevated frequency of S-antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC PBMC were instead plated at 5 × 104 cells/well (denoted by an asterisk).

In direct antigen-specific ImmunoSpot assays, the detection of faint and diffuse SFUs is indicative of low affinity antibodies that are poorly retained on the antigen-coated membrane [54]. Therefore, the SARS-CoV-2 NCAP- (and to a much lesser extent also S antigen-) reactive secretory footprints detected when testing pre-COVID PBMC, where present, may originate from low-affinity, cross-reactive Bmem that were primed by prior exposure to one or more circulating common cold-causing coronaviruses (CCC), and possibly other antigens (reviewed in [65]). As the NCAP protein is more conserved than the S-antigen between SARS-CoV-2 and circulating CCC, the detection of more low-affinity SARS-CoV-2 NCAP Bmem in pre-COVID is, to some degree, an expected outcome. Importantly, however, the differential spot morphologies permits a clear distinction between cognate-SARS-CoV-2-antigen-primed Bmem and low-affinity, cross-reactive Bmem (refer to Supplementary Figure S7). After extending the lower limit of detection for SARS-CoV-2 NCAP-reactive Bmem by sampling 2 × 106 PBMC per donor and also taking spot morphology into account, it was therefore possible to identify exposure to SARS-CoV-2 with 100% diagnostic specificity. Because low-affinity, cross-reactive Bmem can serve as precursor B cells for a cognate B cell response to SARS-CoV-2 [65,66], their presence should also have additional valuable immune diagnostic significance [38].

In support of the notion that these rare and predominantly faint/diffuse SARS-CoV-2 antigen-reactive IgG+ SFUs detected in pre-COVID samples signify the presence of low-affinity, cross-reactive Bmem, the same PBMC samples yielded variable numbers of influenza hemagglutinin (HA)-specific secretory footprints that, based on their morphology, likely originated from high-affinity Bmem, i.e., the SFU were tight and dense. Raw data are shown in Figure 8 for the ImmunoSpot tests performed using a hemagglutinin (HA) representing a seasonal H3N2 vaccine strain (A/Texas/2012) for antigen coating, and in Supplementary Figures S8 and S9 using HA proteins representing an H1N1 vaccine strain (A/California/09) or an influenza B vaccine strain (B/Phuket/2013), respectively. Although for most of the donors the testing of replicate wells at 2 × 105 PBMC/well was required to reliably enumerate low frequency influenza HA-specific Bmem, the individual spot morphologies themselves were pristine and readily detected using even the most stringent machine-assisted counting parameters. Furthermore, well-to-well variation in SFU counts was also apparent when the frequency of HA-specific IgG+ ASC was low for a particular donor/antigen combination. As previously discussed, these observations serve as further evidence that SFU counts follow stochastic (Poisson) distributions when the frequency of antigen-specific IgG+ ASC is <10 SFU/well and that the testing of replicate wells is required for accurate frequency measurements.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Detection of pristine influenza (H3)-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ SFU in pre-COVID era donors. Raw data are shown from an ImmunoSpot assay in which pre-COVID era donors were seeded at 2 × 105 PBMC/well into wells coated with recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) protein representing a seasonal H3N2 vaccine strain (A/Texas/2012). Assay specifics were otherwise identical to those in Figure 6. Notably, while frequencies of influenza H3-specific IgG+ SFU were variable among the pre-COVID era donors shown, they were detectable in all subjects and were crisp and dense, i.e., reflective of high-affinity antibody binding. Moreover, these data highlight that increasing the number of replicate wells, and cumulatively the number of PBMC interrogated, in a B cell ImmunoSpot test is a universal strategy for improving the limit of detection for rare antigen-specific Bmem—even in the absence of available negative controls.

4. Conclusions

Our data show that Bmem specific for antigens of viruses to which the human population are nowadays commonly exposed (SARS-CoV-2 included) can occur at variable frequencies in different individuals, ranging from high to very low. Hence, a single testing approach for measuring antigen-specific Bmem populations using the ImmunoSpot methodology, either performing a serial dilution or plating a fixed input of PBMC in many replicate wells, will rarely, if ever, be optimal for all samples. Instead, based on preliminary observations, the ImmunoSpot testing approach used for Bmem detection should be customized to provide the depth of resolution required. As viral infections are among the strongest immune stimuli, one can expect Bmem involved in less immunogenic reactions, such as self-antigen recognition during auto- or anti-tumor immunity to occur at even lower numbers. We establish here how the lower detection limit of ImmunoSpot assays can be extended to reliably detect such very rare B cells. There is, however, an upper limit of how many PBMC can be tested per well (conservatively 2 × 105, or with some antigens 5 × 105 PBMC/well in a standard 96 well test plate) beyond which cell crowding can impair access of the ASC-derived antibody to the membrane-absorbed antigen. When the PBMC are seeded at a maximal cell density whereby the resolution of individual ASC is still maintained, only the total number of PBMC available for testing (along with the availability of other potentially limiting reagents like the antigens themselves) defines how many replicate wells can be evaluated per donor and hence the lower limit of Bmem detection. This implies that ImmunoSpot assays do not have an inherent lower limit of detection.

When extending the limit of detection for rare Bmem using ImmunoSpot, in addition to the cumulative SFU counts revealing the number of antigen-reactive ASC within all PBMC interrogated, we further suggest that the SFU morphology should also be taken into account (Supplementary Figure S7). Namely, faint/diffuse SFUs are likely to signify the presence of low-affinity Bmem generated through prior exposure(s) to cross-reactive antigens. While the functional significance of low-affinity, cross-reactive IgG+ Bmem and their protective capacity in vivo is presently unclear, such class-switched Bmem may still constitute an appreciably increased antigen-specific precursor frequency compared to that of a truly naïve B cell repertoire [31,65]. To this end, such Bmem, albeit not necessarily possessing an exquisitely high affinity, may still critically contribute to host immunity through their ability to rapidly differentiate into ASCs upon antigen encounter [67]. Hence, being able to monitor quantitatively (numbers) and qualitatively (affinities) the Bmem precursor cell repertoire (that constitutes the cellular basis for the second wall of humoral immunity) in large donor cohorts promises to open a new window for immune diagnostics that so far has largely been confined to studies of serum antibodies in retrospect. It is beyond question that the frequencies of antigen-specific Bmem defines the magnitude of the available precursor cell repertoire and thus the potential to mount a renewed antibody response. Therefore, identifying Bmem even in very low numbers signifies elevated responsiveness compared to the naïve state. How the frequencies of Bmem (i.e., the response potential of the host) change with repeat antigen encounters and is affected by antigen persistence is presently unknown, and gaining insights into it will largely benefit from improvements of cellular immune monitoring techniques, including high-resolution ImmunoSpot analysis. The resulting changes in Bmem frequencies can be expected to define host defense vs. adverse reactions and being able to measure them should add great value to monitoring an individual’s immune status vs. an antigen.

Acknowledgments

We thank Graham Pawelec for valuable discussions and proofreading of the manuscript. Additionally, we thank Giuseppe Sautto for generously providing murine B cell hybridoma lines.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vaccines14010088/s1, Figure S1: Illustration of pan (total) and antigen-specific B cell ImmunoSpot® test principles; Figure S2: Frequency calculations of S-antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASCs in post-COVID era donors; Figure S3: Serial dilution of donor PBMC permits measurements of pan (total) IgG+ ASCs; Figure S4: Frequency calculations of pan IgG+ ASCs in post-COVID era donors; Figure S5: Power analysis enables prediction of replicate wells required to measure low frequencies of antigen-specific ASCs with defined level of precision; Figure S6: Crowding of third-party PBMC interferes with detection of secretory footprints in ImmunoSpot assays; Figure S7: Images depicting low-affinity vs. high-affinity NCAP-reactive IgG+ secretory footprints at higher magnification; Figure S8: High resolution ImmunoSpot testing for influenza H1-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASCs; Figure S9: High resolution ImmunoSpot testing for influenza B HA-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASCs; Table S1: Donor demographics; Table S2: Viral antigen-specific Bmem-derived IgG+ ASC frequencies vary considerably between individual donors; Table S3: Increasing the number of PBMC plated per well does not result in a proportional increase in NCAP-specific IgG+ SFU.

Author Contributions

All authors fulfilled the ICMJE recommended criteria for authorship, with their major contribution being as follows: Conceptualization: G.A.K. and P.V.L.; Methodology: G.A.K., A.Y.K., and P.V.L.; Formal Analysis: G.A.K., N.B., and A.Y.K.; Investigation: G.A.K., N.B., and L.Y.; Data Curation: G.A.K.; Original Draft Preparation: P.V.L.; Writing—Review and Editing G.A.K., A.Y.K., and P.V.L.; Supervision: G.A.K.; Project Administration: G.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Mouse immunizations were conducted in accordance with an IACUC-approved protocol (A2020 02-024-Y2-A5, approved 1 April 2020) at the University of Georgia (Athens, GA, USA).

Informed Consent Statement

PBMC samples from pre- and post-COVID-19-era donors were collected at FDA-registered collection centers from IRB-consented healthy human donors and were sold to CTL identifying donors only by code while concealing the subjects’ identities. PBMC from convalescent COVID-19 donors were obtained either from the American Red Cross (Atlanta, GA, USA) with IRB approval and were then sold to CTL identifying donors by code while concealing the subjects’ identities.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in this study will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.

Conflicts of Interest

P.V.L. is Founder, President, and CEO of Cellular Technology Limited (CTL), a company that specializes in immune monitoring by ImmunoSpot®. G.A.K., A.Y.K, N.B. and L.Y. are employees of CTL. This study was funded by CTL, and the funder directed the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of this article, and made the decision to submit it for publication.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the R&D budget of Cellular Technology Limited (CTL).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Walter J., Eludin Z., Drabovich A.P. Redefining serological diagnostics with immunoaffinity proteomics. Clin. Proteom. 2023;20:42. doi: 10.1186/s12014-023-09431-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bewley K.R., Coombes N.S., Gagnon L., McInroy L., Baker N., Shaik I., St-Jean J.R., St-Amant N., Buttigieg K.R., Humphries H.E., et al. Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody by wild-type plaque reduction neutralization, microneutralization and pseudotyped virus neutralization assays. Nat. Protoc. 2021;16:3114–3140. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00536-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Odio C.D., Daag J.V., Crisostomo M.V., Voirin C.J., Escoto A.C., Adams C., Hein L.D., Aogo R.A., Mpingabo P.I., Rodriguez G.R., et al. Dengue virus IgG and neutralizing antibody titers measured with standard and mature viruses are protective. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:191. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53916-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Waldock J., Zheng L., Remarque E.J., Civet A., Hu B., Jalloh S.L., Cox R.J., Ho S., Hoschler K., Ollinger T., et al. Assay Harmonization and Use of Biological Standards To Improve the Reproducibility of the Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay: A FLUCOP Collaborative Study. mSphere. 2021;6:e0056721. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00567-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ansotegui I.J., Melioli G., Canonica G.W., Caraballo L., Villa E., Ebisawa M., Passalacqua G., Savi E., Ebo D., Gómez R.M., et al. IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper. World Allergy Organ. J. 2020;13:100080. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100080. Erratum in 2021, 14, 100557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Flor N., García M.I., Molineri A., Bottasso O., Diez C., Veaute C. Antibodies to SARS-CoV2 induced by vaccination and infection correlate with protection against the infection. Vaccine. 2023;41:7206–7211. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Atti A., Insalata F., Carr E.J., Otter A.D., Castillo-Olivares J., Wu M., Harvey R., Howell M., Chan A., Lyall J., et al. Antibody correlates of protection from SARS-CoV-2 reinfection prior to vaccination: A nested case-control within the SIREN study. J. Infect. 2022;85:545–556. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khoury D.S., Schlub T.E., Cromer D., Steain M., Fong Y., Gilbert P.B., Subbarao K., Triccas J.A., Kent S.J., Davenport M.P. Correlates of Protection, Thresholds of Protection, and Immunobridging among Persons with SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2023;29:381–388. doi: 10.3201/eid2902.221422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Follmann D., O’bRien M.P., Fintzi J., Fay M.P., Montefiori D., Mateja A., Herman G.A., Hooper A.T., Turner K.C., Chan K.C., et al. Examining protective effects of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after vaccination or monoclonal antibody administration. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:3605. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39292-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Choudhary H.R., Parai D., Dash G.C., Peter A., Sahoo S.K., Pattnaik M., Rout U.K., Nanda R.R., Pati S., Bhattacharya D. IgG antibody response against nucleocapsid and spike protein post-SARS-CoV-2 infection. Infection. 2021;49:1045–1048. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01651-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Levin E.G., Lustig Y., Cohen C., Fluss R., Indenbaum V., Amit S., Doolman R., Asraf K., Mendelson E., Ziv A., et al. Waning Immune Humoral Response to BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine over 6 Months. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;385:E84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seow J., Graham C., Merrick B., Acors S., Pickering S., Steel K.J.A., Hemmings O., O’byrne A., Kouphou N., Galao R.P., et al. Longitudinal observation and decline of neutralizing antibody responses in the three months following SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:1598–1607. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00813-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Forgacs D., Silva-Moraes V., Sautto G.A., Hanley H.B., Gattiker J.L., Jefferson A.M., Kolhe R., Ross T.M. The Effect of Waning on Antibody Levels and Memory B Cell Recall following SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Vaccination. Vaccines. 2022;10:696. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bayart J.-L., Douxfils J., Gillot C., David C., Mullier F., Elsen M., Eucher C., Van Eeckhoudt S., Roy T., Gerin V., et al. Waning of IgG, Total and Neutralizing Antibodies 6 Months Post-Vaccination with BNT162b2 in Healthcare Workers. Vaccines. 2021;9:1092. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yousefi Z., Taheri N., Dargahi M., Chaman R., Binesh E., Emamian M.H., Jafari R. Long-Term Persistence of Anti-SARS-COV-2 IgG Antibodies. Curr. Microbiol. 2022;79:96. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-02800-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Christensen I.E., Jyssum I., Tveter A.T., Sexton J., Tran T.T., Mjaaland S., Kro G.B., Kvien T.K., Warren D.J., Jahnsen J., et al. The persistence of anti-Spike antibodies following two SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses in patients on immunosuppressive therapy compared to healthy controls—A prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 2022;20:378. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02587-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meyer J., Hoerauf A., Dubiel A.E., Kovačević P., Trudić A., Primorac D., Hübner M.P., Adjobimey T., Parcina M. Pe Temporal dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and IgG subclasses following multiple doses and diverse COVID-19 vaccine combinations. Front. Immunol. 2026;16:1727049. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1727049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pradenas E., Urrea V., Marfil S., Pidkova T., Aguilar-Gurrieri C., Abancó F., Mateu L., Chamorro A., Grau E., Trigueros M., et al. Recurrent waning of anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies despite multiple antigen encounters. J. Transl. Med. 2025;23:783. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06837-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Choe P.G., Kang C.K., Suh H.J., Jung J., Song K.-H., Bang J.H., Kim E.S., Bin Kim H., Park S.W., Kim N.J., et al. Waning Antibody Responses in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021;27:327–329. doi: 10.3201/eid2701.203515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Achiron A., Gurevich M., Falb R., Dreyer-Alster S., Sonis P., Mandel M. SARS-CoV-2 antibody dynamics and B-cell memory response over time in COVID-19 convalescent subjects. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021;27:1349.e1–1349.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Winklmeier S., Eisenhut K., Taskin D., Rubsamen H., Gerhards R., Schneider C., Wratil P.R., Stern M., Eichhorn P., Keppler O.T., et al. Persistence of functional memory B cells recognizing SARS-CoV-2 variants despite loss of specific IgG. iScience. 2021;25:103659. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Van Elslande J., Oyaert M., Lorent N., Weygaerde Y.V., Van Pottelbergh G., Godderis L., Van Ranst M., André E., Padalko E., Lagrou K., et al. Lower persistence of anti-nucleocapsid compared to anti-spike antibodies up to one year after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2022;103:115659. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Self W.H., Tenforde M.W., Stubblefield W.B., Feldstein L.R., Steingrub J.S., Shapiro N.I., Ginde A.A., Prekker M.E., Brown S.M., Peltan I.D., et al. Decline in SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies After Mild Infection Among Frontline Health Care Personnel in a Multistate Hospital Network—12 States, April–August 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020;69:1762–1766. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6947a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Petersen L.R., Sami S., Vuong N., Pathela P., Weiss D., Morgenthau B.M., AHenseler R., Daskalakis D.C., Atas J., Patel A., et al. Lack of Antibodies to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a Large Cohort of Previously Infected Persons. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;73:e3066–e3073. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ali A., Ali K., Fatah M., Tawfeeq H., Rostam H. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in patients negative for immunoglobulin G following recovery from COVID-19. New Microbes New Infect. 2021;43:100926. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wolf C., Köppert S., Becza N., Kuerten S., Kirchenbaum G.A., Lehmann P.V. Antibody Levels Poorly Reflect on the Frequency of Memory B Cells Generated following SARS-CoV-2, Seasonal Influenza, or EBV Infection. Cells. 2022;11:3662. doi: 10.3390/cells11223662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vallejo A., Vizcarra P., Martín-Hondarza A., Gómez-Maldonado S., Haemmerle J., Velasco H., Casado J.L. Impact of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells on the immune response after mRNA-based Comirnaty vaccine in seronegative health care workers. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:1002748. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1002748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Morell A., Terry W.D., Waldmann T.A. Metabolic properties of IgG subclasses in man. J. Clin. Investig. 1970;49:673–680. doi: 10.1172/JCI106279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mankarious S., Lee M., Fischer S., Pyun K.H., Ochs H.D., Oxelius V.A., Wedgwood R.J. The half-lives of IgG subclasses and specific antibodies in patients with primary immunodeficiency who are receiving intravenously administered immunoglobulin. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1988;112:634–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lightman S.M., Utley A., Lee K.P. Survival of Long-Lived Plasma Cells (LLPC): Piecing Together the Puzzle. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:965. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Palm A.-K.E., Henry C. Remembrance of Things Past: Long-Term B Cell Memory After Infection and Vaccination. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1787. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fooksman D.R., Jing Z., Park R. New insights into the ontogeny, diversity, maturation and survival of long-lived plasma cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2024;24:461–470. doi: 10.1038/s41577-024-00991-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Crotty S., Felgner P., Davies H., Glidewell J., Villarreal L., Ahmed R. Cutting Edge: Long-Term B Cell Memory in Humans after Smallpox Vaccination. J. Immunol. 2003;171:4969–4973. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.10.4969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weisel F., Shlomchik M. Memory B Cells of Mice and Humans. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017;35:255–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-041015-055531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Akkaya M., Kwak K., Pierce S.K. B cell memory: Building two walls of protection against pathogens. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;20:229–238. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0244-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Syeda M.Z., Hong T., Huang C., Huang W., Mu Q. B cell memory: From generation to reactivation: A multipronged defense wall against pathogens. Cell Death Discov. 2024;10:117. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-01889-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dan J.M., Mateus J., Kato Y., Hastie K.M., Yu E.D., Faliti C.E., Grifoni A., Ramirez S.I., Haupt S., Frazier A., et al. Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection. Science. 2021;371:eabf4063. doi: 10.1126/science.abf4063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kirchenbaum G.A., Pawelec G., Lehmann P.V. The Importance of Monitoring Antigen-Specific Memory B Cells, and How ImmunoSpot Assays Are Suitable for This Task. Cells. 2025;14:223. doi: 10.3390/cells14030223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Becza N., Liu Z., Chepke J., Gao X.H., Lehmann P.V., Kirchenbaum G.A. Assessing the Affinity Spectrum of the Antigen-Specific B Cell Repertoire via ImmunoSpot®. Methods Mol. Biol. 2024;2768:211–239. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3690-9_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yao L., Becza N., Stylianou G., Tary-Lehmann M., Todryk S.M., Kirchenbaum G.A., Lehmann P.V. SARS-CoV-2 Infection or COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Elicits Partially Different Spike-Reactive Memory B Cell Responses in Naïve Individuals. Vaccines. 2025;13:944. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13090944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Boonyaratanakornkit J., Taylor J.J. Techniques to Study Antigen-Specific B Cell Responses. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:1694. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bozhkova M., Gardzheva P., Rangelova V., Taskov H., Murdjeva M. Cutting-edge assessment techniques for B cell immune memory: An overview. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2024;38:2345119. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2024.2345119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stylianou G., Cookson S., Nassif J.T., Kirchenbaum G.A., Lehmann P.V., Todryk S.M. A Comparison of Flow Cytometry-based versus ImmunoSpot- or Supernatant-based Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-specific Memory B Cells in Peripheral Blood. Vaccines. 2025;14:20. doi: 10.3390/vaccines14010020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Phelps A., Pazos-Castro D., Urselli F., Grydziuszko E., Mann-Delany O., Fang A., Walker T.D., Guruge R.T., Tome-Amat J., Diaz-Perales A., et al. Production and use of antigen tetramers to study antigen-specific B cells. Nat. Protoc. 2024;19:727–751. doi: 10.1038/s41596-023-00930-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Becza N., Yao L., Lehmann P.V., Kirchenbaum G.A. Optimizing PBMC Cryopreservation and Utilization for ImmunoSpot® Analysis of Antigen-Specific Memory B Cells. Vaccines. 2025;13:765. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13070765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Holmes E.C. The Emergence and Evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2024;11:21–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-093022-013037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li J., Lai S., Gao G.F., Shi W. The emergence, genomic diversity and global spread of SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2021;600:408–418. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04188-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. [(accessed on 10 December 2025)]. Available online: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/vaccines.
  • 49.Yao L., Becza N., Maul-Pavicic A., Chepke J., Kirchenbaum G.A., Lehmann P.V. Four-Color ImmunoSpot® Assays Requiring Only 1–3 mL of Blood Permit Precise Frequency Measurements of Antigen-Specific B Cells-Secreting Immunoglobulins of All Four Classes and Subclasses. Methods Mol. Biol. 2024;2768:251–272. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3690-9_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.The Following Reagent was Deposited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Obtained through BEI Resources, N. NS-RC, Isolate USA-WA1/2020, Heat Inactivated, NR-52286. [(accessed on 1 June 2021)]. Available online: https://www.beiresources.org/Catalog/antigen/NR-52286.aspx.
  • 51.Hsieh C.-L., Goldsmith J.A., Schaub J.M., DiVenere A.M., Kuo H.-C., Javanmardi K., Le K.C., Wrapp D., Lee A.G., Liu Y., et al. Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spikes. Science. 2020;369:1501–1505. doi: 10.1126/science.abd0826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.ASautto G., AKirchenbaum G., Abreu R.B., Ecker J.W., Pierce S.R., Kleanthous H., Ross T.M. A Computationally Optimized Broadly Reactive Antigen Subtype–Specific Influenza Vaccine Strategy Elicits Unique Potent Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies against Hemagglutinin. J. Immunol. 2020;204:375–385. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Köppert S., Wolf C., Becza N., Sautto G.A., Franke F., Kuerten S., Ross T.M., Lehmann P.V., Kirchenbaum G.A. Affinity Tag Coating Enables Reliable Detection of Antigen-Specific B Cells in Immunospot Assays. Cells. 2021;10:1843. doi: 10.3390/cells10081843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lehmann P.V., Karulin A.Y., Becza N., Yao L., Liu Z., Chepke J., Maul-Pavicic A., Wolf C., Köppert S., Valente A.V., et al. Theoretical and practical considerations for validating antigen-specific B cell ImmunoSpot assays. J. Immunol. Methods. 2025;537:113817. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2025.113817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ellebedy A.H., Jackson K.J.L., Kissick H.T., INakaya H., Davis C.W., Roskin K.M., McElroy A.K., Oshansky C.M., Elbein R., Thomas S., et al. Defining antigen-specific plasmablast and memory B cell subsets in human blood after viral infection or vaccination. Nat. Immunol. 2016;17:1226–1234. doi: 10.1038/ni.3533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Varnaitė R., García M., Glans H., Maleki K.T., Sandberg J.T., Tynell J., Christ W., Lagerqvist N., Asgeirsson H., Ljunggren H.-G., et al. Expansion of SARS-CoV-2–Specific Antibody-Secreting Cells and Generation of Neutralizing Antibodies in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. J. Immunol. 2020;205:2437–2446. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wrammert J., Onlamoon N., Akondy R.S., Perng G.C., Polsrila K., Chandele A., Kwissa M., Pulendran B., Wilson P.C., Wittawatmongkol O., et al. Rapid and Massive Virus-Specific Plasmablast Responses during Acute Dengue Virus Infection in Humans. J. Virol. 2012;86:2911–2918. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06075-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wrammert J., Smith K., Miller J., Langley W.A., Kokko K., Larsen C., Zheng N.-Y., Mays I., Garman L., Helms C., et al. Rapid cloning of high-affinity human monoclonal antibodies against influenza virus. Nature. 2008;453:667–671. doi: 10.1038/nature06890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rouers A., Tay M.Z., Ng L.F., Renia L. B-cell ELISpot assay to analyze human memory B cell and plasmablast responses specific to SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain. STAR Protoc. 2023;4:102130. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Karulin A.Y., Katona M., Megyesi Z., Kirchenbaum G.A., Lehmann P.V. Artificial Intelligence-Based Counting Algorithm Enables Accurate and Detailed Analysis of the Broad Spectrum of Spot Morphologies Observed in Antigen-Specific B-Cell ELISPOT and FluoroSpot Assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 2024;2768:59–85. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3690-9_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Inoue T., Kurosaki T. Memory B cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2024;24:5–17. doi: 10.1038/s41577-023-00897-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Franke F., Kirchenbaum G.A., Kuerten S., Lehmann P.V. IL-21 in Conjunction with Anti-CD40 and IL-4 Constitutes a Potent Polyclonal B Cell Stimulator for Monitoring Antigen-Specific Memory B Cells. Cells. 2020;9:433. doi: 10.3390/cells9020433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pinna D., Corti D., Jarrossay D., Sallusto F., Lanzavecchia A. Clonal dissection of the human memory B-cell repertoire following infection and vaccination. Eur. J. Immunol. 2009;39:1260–1270. doi: 10.1002/eji.200839129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Weskamm L.M., Dahlke C., Addo M.M. Flow cytometric protocol to characterize human memory B cells directed against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antigens. STAR Protoc. 2022;3:101902. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Murray S.M., Ansari A.M., Frater J., Klenerman P., Dunachie S., Barnes E., Ogbe A. The impact of pre-existing cross-reactive immunity on SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022;23:304–316. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00809-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Changrob S., Yasuhara A., Park S., Bangaru S., Li L., Troxell C.A., Halfmann P.J., Erickson S.A., Catanzaro N.J., Yuan M., et al. Common cold embecovirus imprinting primes broadly neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 S2. J. Exp. Med. 2025;222:e20251146. doi: 10.1084/jem.20251146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Li Z., Obraztsova A., Shang F., Oludada O.E., Malapit J., Busch K., van Straaten M., Stebbins E., Murugan R., Wardemann H. Affinity-independent memory B cell origin of the early antibody-secreting cell response in naive individuals upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Immunity. 2024;57:2191–2201.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in this study will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher.


Articles from Vaccines are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES