Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1998 Nov;70(3):235–251. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-235

Control by sample location in pigeons' matching to sample.

K M Lionello 1, P J Urcuioli 1
PMCID: PMC1284682  PMID: 9821678

Abstract

Three experiments assessed the impact of sample location in pigeons' matching to sample. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that after line or hue identity matching was acquired to high levels of accuracy with center-key samples, varying sample location across the three keys disrupted performances. The drop in accuracy occurred following both zero-delay and simultaneous training and was mostly confined to trials in which the sample appeared on a side key. Experiment 3 attempted to diminish control by location by training birds to match samples that could appear in any location prior to center-key sample training and moving-sample testing with another set of stimuli. In testing, all birds performed accurately on center-sample trials and on side-key sample trials in which the matching choice appeared on the center key. Accuracy was below chance, however, on side-key sample trials in which the matching choice appeared on the other side key. One implication of the persistent control by sample location in the three-key paradigm is that it precludes the possibility of symmetry because symmetry tests require a change in the locations at which samples and comparisons appear.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (271.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carter D. E., Werner T. J. Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):565–601. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. D'Amato M. R., Salmon D. P., Loukas E., Tomie A. Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):35–47. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Iversen I. H., Sidman M., Carrigan P. Stimulus definition in conditional discriminations. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):297–304. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Iversen I. Matching-to-sample Performance In Rats: A Case Of Mistaken Identity? J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):27–45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kamil A. C., Sacks R. A. Three-configuration matching-to-sample in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 May;17(3):483–488. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lipkens R., Kop P. F., Matthijs W. A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 May;49(3):395–409. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Oden D. L., Thompson R. K., Premack D. Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1988 Apr;14(2):140–145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sidman M., Rauzin R., Lazar R., Cunningham S., Tailby W., Carrigan P. A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):23–44. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES