Abstract
This study employed a stimulus-class rating procedure to explore whether stimulus equivalence and stimulus generalization can combine to promote the formation of open-ended categories incorporating cross-modal stimuli. A pretest of simple auditory discrimination indicated that subjects (college students) could discriminate among a range of tones used in the main study. Before beginning the main study, 10 subjects learned to use a rating procedure for categorizing sets of stimuli as class consistent or class inconsistent. After completing conditional discrimination training with new stimuli (shapes and tones), the subjects demonstrated the formation of cross-modal equivalence classes. Subsequently, the class-inclusion rating procedure was reinstituted, this time with cross-modal sets of stimuli drawn from the equivalence classes. On some occasions, the tones of the equivalence classes were replaced by novel tones. The probability that these novel sets would be rated as class consistent was generally a function of the auditory distance between the novel tone and the tone that was explicitly included in the equivalence class. These data extend prior work on generalization of equivalence classes, and support the role of operant processes in human category formation.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (163.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dougherty D. H., Wixted J. T. Detecting a nonevent: Delayed presence-versus-absence discrimination in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):81–92. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fields L., Reeve K. F., Adams B. J., Brown J. L., Verhave T. Predicting the extension of equivalence classes from primary generalization gradients: the merger of equivalence classes and perceptual classes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 Jul;68(1):67–91. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fields L., Reeve K. F., Adams B. J., Verhave T. Stimulus generalization and equivalence classes: a model for natural categories. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 May;55(3):305–312. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harnad S. Experimental analysis of naming behavior cannot explain naming capacity. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):262–264. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrnstein R. J. Levels of stimulus control: a functional approach. Cognition. 1990 Nov;37(1-2):133–166. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90021-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lane S. D., Critchfield T. S. Verbal self-reports of emergent relations in a stimulus equivalence procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Mar;65(2):355–374. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders R. R., Green G. Naming is not (necessary for) stimulus equivalence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):312–314. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saunders R. R., Green G. The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Mar;57(2):227–241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Tailby W. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):5–22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stromer R., Mackay H. A. Spelling and emergent picture-printed word relations established with delayed identity matching to complex samples. J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Winter;25(4):893–904. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]