Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1999 Jan;71(1):91–113. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-91

Psychophysics of remembering.

K G White 1, J T Wixted 1
PMCID: PMC1284691  PMID: 10028693

Abstract

We present a new model of remembering in the context of conditional discrimination. For procedures such as delayed matching to sample, the effect of the sample stimuli at the time of remembering is represented by a pair of Thurstonian (normal) distributions of effective stimulus values. The critical assumption of the model is that, based on prior experience, each effective stimulus value is associated with a ratio of reinforcers obtained for previous correct choices of the comparison stimuli. That ratio determines the choice that is made on the basis of the matching law. The standard deviations of the distributions are assumed to increase with increasing retention-interval duration, and the distance between their means is assumed to be a function of other factors that influence overall difficulty of the discrimination. It is a behavioral model in that choice is determined by its reinforcement history. The model predicts that the biasing effects of the reinforcer differential increase with decreasing discriminability and with increasing retention-interval duration. Data from several conditions using a delayed matching-to-sample procedure with pigeons support the predictions.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (257.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alsop B., Davison M. Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):67–80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blough D. S. Context reinforcement degrades discriminative control: a memory approach. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Apr;24(2):185–199. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.24.2.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Creelman C. D., Donaldson W. ROC curves for discrimination of linear extent. J Exp Psychol. 1968 Jul;77(3):514–516. doi: 10.1037/h0025930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davison M. C., Tustin R. D. The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Mar;29(2):331–336. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fetterman J. G. Dimensions of stimulus complexity. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1996 Jan;22(1):3–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones B. M., White K. G. Sample-stimulus discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcement in delayed matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):159–172. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McCarthy D. C., Davison M. The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):51–66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McCarthy D., Voss P. Delayed matching-to-sample performance: Effects of relative reinforcer frequency and of signaled versus unsignaled reinforcer magnitudes. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Jan;63(1):33–51. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McLean A. P., White K. G. Temporal constraint on choice: Sensitivity and bias in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 May;39(3):405–426. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Murdock B. B., Jr Signal-detection theory and short-term memory. J Exp Psychol. 1965 Nov;70(5):443–447. doi: 10.1037/h0022543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nevin J. A., Cate H., Alsop B. Effects of differences between stimuli, responses, and reinforcer rates on conditional discrimination performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Jan;59(1):147–161. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  15. Parks T. E. Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance. Psychol Rev. 1966 Jan;73(1):44–58. doi: 10.1037/h0022662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ratcliff R., McKoon G., Tindall M. Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Jul;20(4):763–785. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.4.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Snodgrass J. G., Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Mar;117(1):34–50. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.117.1.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stevens S. S. To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. Science. 1961 Jan 13;133(3446):80–86. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3446.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. White K. G. Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985 Jul;44(1):15–34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. White K. G. Conjoint control of performance in conditional discriminations by successive and simultaneous stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Mar;45(2):161–174. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wixted J. T. Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings. J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):409–426. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yonelinas A. P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1994 Nov;20(6):1341–1354. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES